|
Behavioral Medicine SIG Presents: A Discussion Regarding Methodology Utilized in Health Psychology Research: Advantages and Limitations of Within-Subjects and Between-Groups Experimental Designs |
Sunday, May 29, 2016 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Crystal Ballroom B, Hyatt Regency, Green West |
Area: CBM; Domain: Translational |
CE Instructor: Gretchen A. Dittrich, Ph.D. |
Chair: Gretchen A. Dittrich (Simmons College) |
RICHARD K. FLEMING (University of Massachusetts Boston) |
RAYMOND G. MILTENBERGER (University of South Florida) |
MICHAEL PERONE (West Virginia University) |
Abstract: Health promotion research often includes randomized control trials (between-groups design); however, in practice, clinicians may utilize single-subject designs (within-subjects design) to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. Within-subject experimental designs may provide additional information that cannot be gleaned from group designs (i.e., individual trends in responding); however, group designs control for many of the variations that cannot be controlled in a single-subject design (e.g., demographic variations). There are advantages and disadvantages in utilizing each type of experimental design. The purpose of the panel discussion is to review differences in within-subjects and between-groups experimental designs, discuss the strengths and limitations of each design, and make recommendations for conducting research using either methodology. |
Keyword(s): Behavioral Medicine, Between-groups analyses, Experimental methodology, With-subject analyses |
|
|