Association for Behavior Analysis International

The Association for Behavior Analysis International® (ABAI) is a nonprofit membership organization with the mission to contribute to the well-being of society by developing, enhancing, and supporting the growth and vitality of the science of behavior analysis through research, education, and practice.

Search

46th Annual Convention; Online; 2020

Event Details


Previous Page

 

Paper Session #433
Implementing a Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates Schedule to Alter Vocal Stereotypy and Task Engagement in Two Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Monday, May 25, 2020
5:00 PM–5:20 PM
Virtual
Area: AUT
Chair: Theoni Mantzoros (Penn State University)
 

Implementing a Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates Schedule to Alter Vocal Stereotypy and Task Engagement in Two Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Domain: Applied Research
THEONI MANTZOROS (Penn State University), David L. Lee (Penn State)
 
Abstract:

Behaviors maintained through automatic reinforcement make it difficult to treat as the source of the maintaining variable may not be readily available for manipulation. One such behavior is automatically-reinforced vocal stereotypy (VS) which is defined as idiosyncratic, non-functional vocalizations. Vocal stereotypy occurs in various populations however, it is most often observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) where it becomes problematic if it occurs at high rates and interferes with socialization or functioning in structured settings. There are multiple effective interventions available in the literature, however, many procedures require high rates of interventionist time and target complete omission of the behavior which may be problematic in applied settings. One intervention which has not been assessed as an individual intervention in the automatically-reinforced VS literature is differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL). In the present study, a functional analysis was used to determine that the VS of two female adolescents with ASD was maintained by automatic reinforcement. A DRL procedure was implemented which incorporated: (a) a specified interval for reinforcement, (b) the permissible number of VS acceptable within the interval, (c) a behavior checklist, and (d) learner feedback. As the targeted behavior decreased across sessions, the DRL interval was systematically increased in order to thin out the schedule of reinforcement. The intervention reduced VS and increased untargeted task engagement in both participants. Applied and theoretical implications of the study, as well as ethical considerations, social validity, limitations, and future research are discussed.

 
 

BACK TO THE TOP

 

Back to Top
Modifed by Eddie Soh
DONATE