|
Using Organizational Behavior Management Approaches in Human Services Settings |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michael Weinberg, Ph.D. |
MICHAEL WEINBERG (Southbury Training School), JOSEPH D. CAUTILLI (Children Crisis Treatment Center) |
Description: This workshop will provide a theoretical framework for utilizing behavior analysis principles of organizational behavior management, combining it with methods from Quality Management and statistical process control as applied to human services provider organizations (Hantula, 1995; Babcock, Fleming & Oliver, 1999). Organizational management and human resources (HR) applications are a growing area for behavior analysts, who have the unique skills and experience to utilize principles of behavior analysis to improve processes and functions in human services organizations. One particular area of interest for behavioral practitioners will be organizational behavior management (OBM). OBM conceptualizes and empirically solves organizational problems. This workshop will provide participants with the concepts and knowledge to increase their potential for professional behavioral consultation to human services organizations. Operation issues plague most mental health and service industry professions. It is our experience that organizational behavior management has much to offer traditional operations in job design, analysis, and HR management. In addition, OBM readily lends itself to improve the quality of treatment services in human service organizations that provide services to people with mental retardation, developmental disabilities, autism, and emotional/behavioral disorders. This presentation will focuses on applying the basics of OBM to the development of successful service operations, and provide data from a demonstration research project conducted in a residential treatment facility serving these populations. Management involves the acquisition and use of resources. OBM redefines management from control of the person to control of the context/environment in which the person works. It has developed powerful techniques for a range of management areas, and can be used to improve the integrity and quality of treatment approaches being used in a human service organization. (Cautilli & Clarke, BAT, 2000, Weinberg et. al., BAT, 2001). |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: -Develop management by team objective programs. - Analyze performance problems from a traditional operations perspective. - Identify ways that OBM can enhance this approach. - Understand operations and HR approaches to enhance employee performance, and to achieve a company's strategic goals. - Use OBM in operations to enhance treatment integrity. - Use statistical process control to determine when to intervene. (P Chart) - Set up functionally based programs with the supervision of all staff as the cornerstone. - Set up benchmarks and define outcomes for successful interventions. - Understand the essential skills of an effective manager. - Understand key skills to devise performance objectives linked to evaluation, mission of the organization, and performance-contingent salary increases. |
Activities: Participants will work in breakout groups to devise performance objectives for professionals and staff linked to the organization�s mission; participants will practice use of various organizational assessment instruments in evaluating their own or hypothetical human services agencies. |
Audience: Behavior analysts, human resources professionals, program directors or administrators of human services organizations, OBM professionals, and students in OBM track programs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Enhancing Understanding of the Behavioral Approach to the Treatment of Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 4 (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Timothy R. Moore, M.S. |
TIMOTHY R. MOORE (Minnesota Autism Center), JULIE A. WALDOCH (Minnesota Autism Center) |
Description: Autism, a condition more prevalent than ever before, is a developmental disorder whose most valid treatment options (those that are behaviorally-based) are not as widely used or understood as we might hope. Workshop participants will learn about cardinal and secondary characteristics of autism, and behavioral approaches to treatment. Specifically, well discuss theory and practice in several areas: what Applied Behavior Analysis is and is not, approaches to functional assessment, the use of reinforcement and punishment, family and support staff involvement in treatment, prompting, and the management of dangerous behavior. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe the three cardinal characteristics of autism. - Outline essential components of the behavioral approach to the treatment of autism. - Conduct a functional assessment (indirect component). - Conduct a direct functional assessment (direct component). - Develop a reinforcement and behavior management program. - Use prompt hierarchies to teach a simple skill. - Make decisions based on safety during a crisis. |
Activities: Case studies with video samples: Small groups will identify cardinal characteristics of autism; Case studies with written descriptions: Small groups will conduct a brief functional assessment interview with a participant role playing the parent; Case studies with video samples: Small groups will identify important setting events, antecedents, and consequences to behavioral scenarios; Based on the functional assessments with case studies, small groups will discuss and plan treatment, complete with antecedent and consequence programming; Small groups will develop a teaching plan, complete with prompt hierarchy, for a skill to replace a negative behavior; Case studies with written descriptions: Small groups will make decisions on interventions during crisis scenarios. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for clinical staff and educators at teaching or supervisory levels, as the discussion of theory, and practice of application, may be novel or an expansion on a skill set. Parents will also benefit as they wish to enhance their understanding about the behavioral approach to the treatment of autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Using Diverse Strategies to Teach Advanced Social Skills to Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Mary Ellen McDonald, Ph.D. |
MARY ELLEN MCDONALD (The Genesis School), CATHERINE E. FALLEO (Personal Touch), RUTH M. DONLIN (Private practice) |
Description: Children with autism exhibit many deficits in the area of socialization. It is difficult for children with autism to respond to peers in social situations as well as to initiate to others. There are many other areas of socialization that children with autism have great difficulty with such as ending a conversation, listening to another conversation to obtain information and knowing how to join in a conversation. This workshop will discuss a variety of innovative strategies that have been successful for improving social skills in children with autism. Specific strategies to be discussed will include topics such as: the use of behavioral rehearsal, role playing, using video modeling and video rehearsal, and conducting ABC analyses of social situations. Carol Gray's comic strip conversations and social stories will be also be reviewed. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will: - Learn a minimum of 3 new methods for increasing social skills in children with autism. - Learn how to operationalize advanced concepts such as friendship when teaching a child with autism. - Learn how to use behavioral rehearsal with children with autism to improve social skills. - Learn how to use self-monitoring for children with autism to help them to monitor their social skills. |
Activities: Participants will watch video clips of a variety of strategies that can be used to increase social skills in individuals with autism. Specific activities will include writing a story about a social situation for a student, conducting an ABC analysis on a social situation and operationalizing a variety of advanced social concepts. |
Audience: Psychologists, Special educators, social workers, speech pathologists, parents |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
An Updated Version of the Verbal Behavior Assessment and Curriculum for Children With Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Mark L. Sundberg, Ph.D. |
MARK L. SUNDBERG (STARS School) |
Description: Skinners analysis of verbal behavior has proven to be a valuable tool for language assessment and intervention for children with autism. This workshop will provide an overview of the basic elements of Skinners analysis of verbal behavior, and will present an updated version of several aspects of the application of the analysis to language assessment and intervention. Specifically, updated versions of the language assessment sequence, the barriers to language acquisition, the verbal behavior curriculum, and the training procedures for each elementary verbal operant will be presented. A strong focus of the workshop will be on the importance of conducting verbal behavior analyses at all levels of a language intervention program. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Define the elementary verbal operants (i.e., echoic, mand, tact, intraverbal, textual, and transcriptive). - Describe several barriers to language acquisition and explain how to remove them. - Provide a brief task analysis of each of the verbal operants. - Describe procedures for teaching each of the verbal operants. - Explain how typical language development can serve as a guide for a language intervention program. - Describe what constitutes a �verbal behavior analysis.� - Conduct �verbal behavior analyses� of various language acquisition problems. |
Activities: Attendees will participate in didactic presentations, discussions, and exercises in the analysis of verbal behavior. A 300 plus page handout will be provided to each attendee that will contain extensive information on each topic. |
Audience: Participants should have a strong working knowledge of behavior analysis and some interest in its application to language assessment and intervention. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Direct Instruction:Curriculum Overview and Implementation with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4F (4th floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Robert K. Ross, M.S. |
ROBERT K. ROSS (Beacon ABA Services), WENDY KOZMA (Evergreen Center), ANN FILER (Beacon ABA Services) |
Description: This workshop will provide a comprehensive overview of two Direct Instruction (DI) curriculum components; Language for Learning and Reading Mastery. The relevance for use with both typical learners and those with developmental disabilities will be demonstrated. Participants will receive curriculum materials and have hands on practice in the implementation of DI teaching practices. Throughout the course of the workshop, strategies to enable both typical children and individuals with disabilities to access traditional curriculum, while operating within the structures of behavioral teaching, will be highlighted and practiced. The methods and structure of DI incorporate behavioral principles into instruction, including prompt fading, use of multiple exemplars and frequent measurement of efficacy. The instructors will provide in depth review of the types of instructional modifications required to implement DI with atypical learners. These modifications will include the use of token systems, visual schedules, additional visual prompts, presenting tasks in isolation and pre-teaching. These modifications although not specified in traditional DI scripts and trainings will be discussed in detail and practiced in this workshop. In addition, participants will review a model to provide program wide implementation training and effective implementation in home based and school based settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Demonstrate beginning knowledge of Direct Instruction, as a teaching process with specific techniques and strategies. - Be able to implement at least three or more Direct Instruction instructional practices. - Demonstrate beginning knowledge of Direct Instruction, as a curriculum designed to teach reading decoding, comprehension, and language development skills. - Describe the data supporting successful implementation of Direct Instruction programs with children with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. - List at least five modifications effective in the implementation of Direct Instruction programs with children with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. - Be able to implement at least three of the modifications of Direct Instruction programs with children with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. - Describe the implications of parent training and participation in the implementation of Direct Instruction programs. - Be able to implement the DI structures and procedures in a range of settings and to increase generalized compliance in natural settings. |
Activities: Review efficacy data related to Direct Instruction and its curriculum components; Review the Reading Mastery curriculum and practice implementation of lessons and exercises; Review the Language for Learning curriculum and practice implementation of lessons and exercises; Review, observe and practice the modifications of curriculum necessary for effective implementation of DI for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders; View videotapes demonstrating structured DI sessions encompassing modifications for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders; Practice implementation of both curricula with modifications in place; Practice using DI data collection systems and teacher feedback forms. |
Audience: Individuals who are working with children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and developmental disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Activity Schedules: Beyond Independent Activities |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4C (4th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: David M. Corcoran, M.S. |
DAVID M. CORCORAN (Beacon ABA Services), JOSEPH M. VEDORA (Beacon ABA Services) |
Description: The purpose of this introductory workshop is to train participants in the use of various forms of visual activity schedules. Activity schedules will be described and explained, and instruction on how to effectively establish stimulus control using activity schedules. Activity schedules have been employed with individuals with autism to promote independence and increase on-task behavior. In addition to addressing their use with individuals with autism, this workshop will describe their expanded use to a variety of conditions at home and school. The first half of the workshop will include a lecture and training on how to design schedules and teach students to sue this versatile tool using basic close ended activities. The second half will focus on novel uses of activity schedules including the use of activity schedules to increase social and play skills, food acceptance, self-help skills, community behavior, and the use of computerized activity schedules. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Design and implement basic 3-4 task activity schedules. - Identify settings and occasions to use them and learners with which to use them. - Describe various forms and modalities of activity schedules and match them to individuals learning styles. - Demonstrate the teaching procedures necessary to implement basic activity schedules. - Troubleshoot challenges in designing and teaching activity schedules. - Describe modifications enhancing usefulness of activity schedules. - List variations on the basic activity schedule and apply them to real world situations. |
Activities: Describe and set up basic activity schedules; Identify settings and occasions to use them and learners to use them with; Describe various forms and modalities of activity schedules and match them to individuals� learning styles; Implement basic activity schedules; Troubleshoot and describe modifications enhancing usefulness of activity schedules; Expand upon basic activity schedules. |
Audience: Individuals who are working with adults and children with disabilities who are interested in effective methods of teaching a wide range of skills and behaviors that are traditionally difficult to teach this population. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Assembling Case Presentations Using Goldiamond's Constructional Approach |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Williford C (3rd floor) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Paul Thomas Andronis, Ph.D. |
PAUL THOMAS ANDRONIS (Northern Michigan University) |
Description: The functional analysis of behavior has become the generally accepted standard for initial behavioral assessment in the delivery of human services by both public and private agencies, and many other institutions throughout the United States. Goldiamond (1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1979, & 1984) elaborated a thoroughgoing method for the functional analysis of behavior, called the Constructional Approach, that includes linear and nonlinear contingency relations, and that may be addressed explicitly to both topical and systemic treatment programs. In short, Goldiamons approach affords a comprehensive, coherent, and fundamental basis for the functional analysis of behavior. This workshop will provide a brief overview of Goldiamonds (1974) Constructional Approach to social and personal behavior problems, including a brief review of the Constructional Questionnaire, used like an intake interview to gather initial information to guide the functional analysis. The focus will be on the presentation of material collected in this interview (or other formats), in a way that portrays the individual as a competently functioning person, and the problem behavior as an effective, adaptive operant given the individuals personal history and natural ecology. Examples from clinical and organizational casework, as well as any offered by participants, will illustrate the method. The theoretical model used in this workshop treats human behavior as a rational and adaptive outcome of individuals unique personal histories (including both social and biological endowments). Accordingly, we will discuss ways in which the material gathered in the Constructional Questionnaire, as well as other forms of intake interviews, can be assembled to reveal how troublesome behavior can nonetheless benefit individuals in personal ways, and how framing behavior problems within a Constructional approach can makes sense of behavior that, from other perspectives, is classified as senseless, irrational, maladaptive, dysfunctional, pathological, and so on. |
Learning Objectives: At the end of this workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe a contingency-based view of the rationality of behavior, making sense of examples of troublesome behavior drawn from clinical, educational, and other practical settings. - Describe Goldiamond�s Constructional Approach, and critically distinguish it from other behavioral approaches to analyzing and changing behavior. - Describe the kinds of basic information that are useful for Constructional programming. - Identify important assessment and programming variables gathered by means of the Constructional Questionnaire or other intake interview formats. - Define disturbing behavior patterns in terms of their functions as successful operants. - Identify different kinds of ordinary outcomes that can nonetheless maintain disturbing patterns of behavior. - Identify strengths a client/patient/student may possess at the start of the program. - Write a brief description of a client�s behavior problem using Goldiamond�s Constructional Case Presentation Guide. |
Activities: After a presentation of the model, participants will discuss key elements of the Constructional approach, its differences from those procedures that characterize conventional functional analysis, and the importance and utility of distinguishing between linear and nonlinear contingency relations, and between topical and systemic treatment procedures. With materials supplied to them, or information they themselves have contributed, the participants will work in small groups to analyze clinical or other applied vignettes, identify the appropriate contingency matrices, and then present their analyses to the workshop as a whole in Constructional terms (using Goldiamond�s Constructional Case Presentation Guide). If time allows, participants may suggest and discuss outlines for Constructional interventions in those cases. |
Audience: Participants for this workshop should have a basic understanding of the consequential governance of behavior. Familiarity with Goldiamonds Constructional Approach, through previous workshops in the area, would greatly enhance the value of this workshop to participants. The subject and activities would probably appeal most to people working in clinical, educational, or other applied settings with various populations, and those looking for a humane, effective, and radically behavioral approach to helping others who engage in challenging or disturbing behavior. Level: Intermediate |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention and Relational Frame Theory |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: CSE; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Ian T. Stewart, Ph.D. |
JOHN D. MCELWEE (Step By Step Academy), IAN T. STEWART (National University of Ireland, Galway), ERIC J. FOX (Arizona State University) |
Description: Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI) is an effective behavior analysis based approach to remediation of deficits for Autistic Spectral Disorder (ASD) where communication is the core deficit. Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is a modern behaviour analytic approach to human language and cognition, which extends Skinners analysis of verbal behavior by conceptualizing language as generalized relational responding, thus providing new directions for behavioral research and intervention. The purpose of this workshop is to demonstrate how insights and procedures generated by the RFT approach might be applied in the EIBI domain. The first part of the workshop will involve defining and explaining the core concepts of RFT. It will explain the history that gives rise to the core generalized operant of arbitrary relational responding or relational framing and outline the defining properties of this operant, as well as providing research evidence of the link between arbitrary relational responding and language. It will explain how the analysis of verbal behavior in terms of relational framing can explain the extraordinary generativity characterizing language and will outline findings from RFT-based work that has used laboratory generated relational framing to model a diversity of linguistic and higher cognitive skills, with particular emphasis on those most obviously relevant to EIBI such as derived naming, hierarchical relational responding and perspective taking. Finally, this initial portion of the workshop will examine existing EIBI curricula and show how core training protocols might be reinterpreted and extended using Relational Frame Theory, putting particular emphasis on the importance of the RFT-based concepts of multiple exemplar training, contextual control and derived relational performance outcomes. The second part of the workshop will examine how RFT may be combined with the area of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention to provide a comprehensive framework for teaching relational framing beginning with basic conditional discriminations and progressing through various stages of non-arbitrary and arbitrary relational responding. Starting with simple non-arbitrary auditory and visual identity matching, the framework will progressively target auditory-to-visual matching-to-sample, mutually entailed sound-object/object-sound relations, contextually controlled (SAME versus DIFFERENT) non-arbitrary visual and auditory matching, flexibility of contextual control and combinatorial entailment. This half of the workshop will involve greater participation by the audience than the first. The audience will be divided into groups and guided in key features of the implementation of successive stages of the framework. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Understand how RFT approaches language. - Understand key theoretical concepts of RFT. - Be familiar with several of the areas of the RFT empirical research programs that are relevant to Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. - Understand core principles of RFT as they apply in the arena of early intensive intervention . - Understand and use techniques designed to train relational framing from a basic level. - Be knowledgeable with how existing EIBI curricula and core training protocols might be reinterpreted and extended using Relational Frame Theory. - Implement a short Relational Frame based training protocol in an EIBI context. |
Activities: Didactic instruction, small group work, and brief exercises will be utilized. |
Audience: Therapists with expertise in the analysis of verbal behavior and the implementation of EIBI programs that are interested in applying principles of Relational Frame Theory in the EIBI domain. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Promoting Participation in Activity Among People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities Through the Active Support Model |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
5G (5th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Sandy Toogood, Ph.D. |
SANDY TOOGOOD (University of Wales, Bangor), VASO TOTSIKA (University of Wales, Bangor) |
Description: Active Support (AS) describes an empirically tested group of procedures for organizing small community homes to maximize opportunities for adults and young persons with severe or profound intellectual impairments to participate fully in everyday, life-defining activity and social interaction. Active Support has integrated procedures for Activity Support Planning, Individual Program Planning, Community Access Logs, Opportunity Planning, Structured Teaching, data based Team Meetings and Interactive Training. Interactive Training is a structured behavioral approach to on-site staff training that is individually tailored to each staff-client combination. Interactive Training typically covers a) activity preparation and presentation, b) providing support and assistance, c) making participation rewarding, and d) managing personal behavior and the social environment. AS exploits the relationship between active participation and effective antecedent assistance from staff. AS also generates rich data for routinely monitoring service effort (inputs) and individual client experience (outcome). AS complements bespoke behavioral intervention (e.g. via establishing operations) and augmented communication systems where they are clinically relevant. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Relate the ethics and theoretical basis of ABA to the philosophical orientation and core values of Active Support. - Describe the components of Active Support functionally and structurally. - Develop Activity Support Plans in his/her own services settings. - Operate a system of Opportunity Planning using behavioral objectives. - Cite applied research into Active Support as it relates to core concepts and methods in ABA. - Relate, compare and contrast Active Support with other applied behavior analytic approaches (e.g. Positive Behavior Support). |
Activities: Data based presentation and discussion; Multi-media description and discussion; Rehearsing a selection of training exercises; Discussing and reviewing Active Support and other applied approaches. In addition, participants will have the opportunity to take part in, or observe and critically evaluate, a simulated behavioral observation and on-site training exercise. |
Audience: Behavior analysts and other professionals working into small community homes for adults with intellectual disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Fluency-Based Instruction for Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 2 (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michael Fabrizio, M.A. |
MICHAEL FABRIZIO (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), KRISTEN N. SCHIRMER (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), ALISON L. MOORS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), KRISTA ZAMBOLIN (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), SHANE D. ISLEY (University of North Texas) |
Description: This six-hour workshop will introduce participants to Fluency-Based Instruction as applied to learners with Autism. Fluency-Based Instruction, an instructional system derived from the discipline of Behavior Analysis and its subfield Precision Teaching, is a highly effective and efficient system for arranging instructional contingencies. Participants will learn the components of Fluency-Based Instruction, it historical and empirical underpinnings, as well as the support systems needed to effectively implement this model with learners with autism. The workshop uses a combination of slides, multiple video examples, and performance data from children with autism to illustrate key concepts. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - List and describe the components of Fluency-based Instruction for learners with autism. - Describe the historical and empirical underpinning of Fluency-Based Instruction. - Define rate of response and discuss the role it plays in Fluency-Based Instruction. - Describe the clinical and measurement advantages offered by measuring rate of response rather than percent correct. - Describe the levels of data-based decisions that clinicians can make when monitoring Fluency-Based Instruction. - Describe the procedures used to empirically validate skill retention, endurance, application, and stability. - Describe the support systems needed to implement Fluency-Based Instruction in both school and private clinical arrangements |
Activities: The presenters will use a combination of lecture, small group discussion, and large group discussion to ensure that participants learn the skills described in the workshop�s objectives. Throughout the workshop, participants will be encouraged to ask questions as the material is presented. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for parents and professionals involved in the design and monitoring of behavior analytic intervention programs for children with autism and related disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: Super-Charging the Therapeutic Relationship |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
5F (5th floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Robert J. Kohlenberg, Ph.D. |
ROBERT J. KOHLENBERG (University of Washington), REO NEWRING (University of Washington), CHRISTEINE M. TERRY (University of Washington), MARY D. PLUMMER (University of Washington), MADELON Y. BOLLING (University of Washington) |
Description: Do you want to learn how to develop intense therapeutic relationships with your outpatient psychotherapy clients? This workshop is for behavior analysts who want to apply functional analytic principles to outpatient mental health treatment and it is for practicing clinicians who want to incorporate functional analysis in their work. We will explain how a functional analysis in psychotherapy leads to a focus on the client-therapist relationship, and overview the basic principles of Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP). Clinicians that are new to functional analysis or FAP are welcome and we aim to present topics that go beyond the basics. Strategies and techniques for using the client-therapist relationship as a therapeutic tool will be introduced and practiced. Emphasis will be placed on experiential learning, in addition to didactics. Finally, we will address issues in training and supervising therapists. Participants will have time to discuss ways of tailoring FAP to their needs and integrating this approach with other treatments, including ACT. In addition, the presenters will address challenges and concerns about focusing on the client-therapist relationship. |
Learning Objectives: This workshop will overview the basic principles of Functional Analytic Psychotherapy and introduce strategies and techniques to apply these principles: - To familiarize clinical behavior analysts with the notion of in-vivo work. - To demonstrate how the identification, evocation, and modification (i.e., natural reinforcement) of in-vivo behavior can improve clinical outcomes. - To learn the tools and techniques suggested in FAP. - To practice strategies and discuss how these principles can be applied with participants� clients. - To train clinicians to use a functional analysis to assess and interpret client behavior and develop treatment plans. - To experience the intensity of an in-vivo interaction within the constraints of the workshop. - To introduce considerations for supervision and discuss difficulties in training therapists and applying the suggested strategies. By the end of the workshop, attendees should be able to use a number of FAP strategies, including case conceptualizing, identifying and evoking clinically relevant behaviors, assessing the effects of interventions, and focusing on the therapeutic relationship. |
Activities: This workshop is a combination of didactic presentation, videotaped clinical case material, and a variety of exercises and activities. Participants will be encouraged to discuss ways to tailor FAP principles to their own clients. Attendees will have the opportunity to practice with materials frequently used in or adapted for FAP. In addition, materials will be provided to help participants apply the workshop strategies to their own practice. FAP is unique in that the treatment is tailored to the needs, history, and abilities of each client; the workshop presenters will use FAP strategies and techniques to tailor the workshop to the needs, history, and abilities of the attendees. |
Audience: The workshop is aimed at several audiences. One is the behavior analyst who is interested in an introduction to therapy techniques and a behavior analytic interpretation of the therapeutic process. Because FAP is built on behavior analytic principles, anyone who understands BA can learn to supercharge their relationships. Another is the therapist who is interested in applying functional analysis in his/her approach to treatment. Any therapist who is interested in increasing the intensity and/or salience of the therapeutic relationship, regardless of the type of interventions used, is invited to attend. Although the focus of the workshop will be on working with adult, mental health outpatients with generally intact cognitive functioning, we welcome discussion of how these methods may apply to other populations. Because clinical material is being presented, the workshop is open only to faculty, graduate students, or professionals. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Language for Learning: A Direct Instruction Language Development Program |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4D (4th floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Cathy L. Watkins, Ph.D. |
CATHY L. WATKINS (California State University, Stanislaus) |
Description: This workshop is designed to provide training in the Language for Learning program. Language for Learning is a comprehensive oral language development program that teaches the essential concepts and skills all children need in order to be successful. The workshop will provide an overview of Direct Instruction programs, emphasizing language development programs. Training will focus on effective delivery of Language for Learning. Participants will practice teaching formats from the program and receive feedback from the workshop presenter. Issues related to using the program with students who have exceptional learning needs will also be addressed. Teachers Guides for the Language for Learning program will be provided. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe the scope and sequence of skills taught in Language for Learning. - Identify critical design features of the program and explain their importance. - Demonstrate effective program delivery techniques. - Demonstrate effective correction procedures. - Specify the necessary preskills for entering Language for Learning. - Make placement and grouping decision based on the Language for Learning placement test. - Describe appropriate adaptation/modifications for students with exceptional learning needs. |
Activities: Participants will receive information about the design of the Language for Learning program. Videotapes of lessons will be shown. The presenter will demonstrate how to teach selected formats from the program. Participants will practice delivering formats and receive feedback from the workshop presenter. |
Audience: Anyone who is interested in learning how to teach Direct Instruction programs in general and Language for Learning in particular. No previous experience necessary. The workshop is appropriate for teachers, practitioners, and parents. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
A Curriculum for Intensive, Early Intervention Program for Children with Autism: The First Two Phases |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Joliet (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Barbara Metzger, Ph.D. |
BARBARA METZGER (Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools), ANGELA L. POLETTI (Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools) |
Description: A curriculum for teaching young children with autism will be presented. The curriculum is presented in a flow chart format that specifies the sequence of teaching programs. The curriculum has a heavy emphasis on teaching early language and play skills. The curriculum also covers imitation, school readiness and self-help skills. Teaching methodologies and strategies for beginning programs and advanced programs will be presented. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Read the curriculum flow chart to determine the sequence of skills. - Identify the programs of the first two phases of the curriculum as well as the overall goal and ideal timeline for each phase. - Identify the goal of each program. - Identify potential mistakes of each program. - Identify teaching tips for each program. - Demonstrate the steps of discrimination training. - Demonstrate the left to right visual work system. - Identify the types of generalization. - Identify play activities to incorporate into your teaching. |
Activities: Watch video clips of specific programs and specific teaching methods/strategies; Lecture; Question and answer; In vivo practice of teaching methodologies/strategies. |
Audience: Parents and professional who want to learn about the curriculum and methodologies to teach a young child with autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Teaching Sign Language to Hearing Children and Adults with Developmental Disabilities, Including Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Patrick E. McGreevy, Ph.D. |
PATRICK E. MCGREEVY (Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D., P.A. & Associates), TROY A. FRY (Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D., P.A. & Associates) |
Description: Many children and adults with developmental disabilities, including autism, do not communicate using spoken words. At the present time, the most popular alternative communication response form includes selecting pictures. This workshop provides participants with a "new" look at the advantages and disadvantages of sign language, demonstrations of learners using signs, and practice teaching learners sign mands, tacts, and intraverbals. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe the importance of the echoic repertoire. - Decide when an alternative communication response form � signing, pictures, or augmentative devices � is necessary. - Describe the advantages and disadvantages of various alternative communication response forms. - Describe and implement effective procedures for teaching sign mands. - Transfer sign mands to tacts and intraverbals. - Collect data while teaching sign mands, tacts, and intraverbals. - Adjust teaching procedures when common problems occur in teaching sign mands, tacts, and intraverbals. |
Activities: This workshop will provide written descriptions, videotape and live demonstrations, and practice activities for participants. |
Audience: The target audience for this workshop includes teachers, behavior analysts, and others who work with children and adults with developmental disabilities, including autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Incorporating Generalization and Maintenance into Skill Acquisition Programming for Learners with Autism and Related Disorders |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Boulevard B (2nd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: David A. Celiberti, Ph.D. |
DAVID A. CELIBERTI (Private practice) |
Description: Educators and other providers are often faced with situations in which the skills of learners with autism and related disorders do not generalize or maintain over time. Many providers fail to recognize the steps they should be taking to promote generalization and maintenance; nonetheless, the field of applied behavior analysis possesses a framework and a number of methods that can be implemented to circumvent these challenges. During this workshop, the various forms of generalization (stimulus, response, and temporal generalization) will be described along with specific methods that may increase the likelihood that generalization will be observed. Efforts to address generalization and maintenance need to be individualized for each learner, tailored to the target skill, and planned for in a systematic manner. More specifically, methods will be presented that can be incorporated at three broad phases in the teaching process, during treatment planning and prior to the initial teaching of a target skill, during the process of teaching the particular target skill, and after the target skill is mastered. A model for determining how best to maintain target skills after they are mastered will also be offered. |
Learning Objectives: After this workshop, participants will be able to: - Differentiate the various types of generalization. - Recognize common obstacles that impede generalization and maintenance. - Design and implement a variety of strategies to promote generalization. - Design and implement a variety of strategies to promote maintenance. - Recognize learner and task characteristics that will inform when such strategies could be implemented. - Evaluate the effectiveness of efforts to promote generalization and maintenance. |
Activities: Although workshop is primarily didactic, participants will be given many opportunities to engage in discussion and will participate in tasks that will concretize and synthesize the didactic information and increase the likelihood of later implementation. Videotape vignettes of teaching interactions will be provided to illustrate an array of generalization and maintenance strategies. Data collection tools and tracking forms relevant to generalization and maintenance will also be shared along with a bibliography of articles related to generalization. Examples will be provided throughout the presentation and adapted to the interests and needs of the participants. |
Audience: This workshop will benefit professionals from a variety of disciplines, as well as parents who are significantly involved in the educational programming of learners with autism and related disorders. Participants should be familiar with behavior analytic teaching procedures, such as discrete trial instruction. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
ACT in the Treatment of Chronic Illness: Chronic Pain, Epilepsy, Diabetes, Burn-Out |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4K (4th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: JoAnne Dahl, Ph.D. |
JOANNE DAHL (University of Uppsala, Sweden), TOBIAS LUNDGREN (University of Uppsala, Sweden) |
Description: This workshop will illustrate, exemplify, roll play and have practical exercises around the ACT treatment model and its applications to chronic illness in general and specifically in the areas of chronic pain, epilepsy, diabetes and burn-out. Participants will go away with a theoretical orientation, insight and practical skills for applying ACT in individual, or group clinical work. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Obtain a theoretical conceptualisation of the ACT model in the treatment of chronic illness - Obtain an ACT conceptualisation of the actual process of getting stuck in a chronic illness. - Practice applications of ACT techniques of Acceptance - Practice applications of ACT techniques of identifying the context of values - Practice applications of ACT techniques of diffusion . - Practice applications of ACT functional analysis of language. - Practice applications of ACT exposure - Practice application of ACT commitment in a group. |
Activities: Role play, group exercises for values, diffusion, acceptance and commitment. |
Audience: Everyone working in the area of chronic illness |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Radical Behaviorism and the Counseling Process: Constructional Bones, Solution-Focused Flesh |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4L (4th floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jack Keith Williams, Ph.D. |
JACK KEITH WILLIAMS (University of Waterloo) |
Description: This workshop has been continually revised to reflect the emergence of methods that are consistent with a goal-directed, competency-oriented approach to counseling/psychotherapy. Elements of a radical behavioral viewpoint will be related to practices, strategies, and concepts involved in helping others. The aim is to help provide attendees who are interested in and/or familiar with radical behaviorism with the ability to begin using this perspective when working with clients. It will also be of interest to those with a counseling background who wish to explore how counseling approaches are related to a radical behavioral perspective. The workshop will consist of five components: a review of pertinent features of a radical behavioral viewpoint, the relationship to counseling/psychotherapeutic practices and strategies, a description of the basic components of a constructional approach, illustrations of these components(including video, and exercises to facilitate acquisition of these skills and perspective (with take-home material to facilitate continued practice). |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will understand: - Basic aspects of radical behavioral conceptual analysis and their relationship to counselling approaches. - The importance and usefulness of maintaining a radical-behavioral semantic framework and eschewing creeping/tempting mentalistic cognitivism. - The importance of working within a goal-directed framework as opposed to a traditional categorical diagnostic system. - The basic outlook and repertoire of constructional/solution-focused skills. - How these skills reflect a different perspective on client situations than do other approaches. - The skills in use and as they have been used in client situations. - Trial and practice of constructional skills to enable participants to begin developing a constructional repertoire. - Timing and choice of skills in client situations. |
Activities: Teaching activities include: presentation of conceptual and practical material, self-testing of the acquisition of this material, illustration of the skills and their application, practice in using basic constructional skills via exercises and role-play, discussion of participants� application questions. |
Audience: Practitioners, prospective practitioners, and others who see the world from a radical behavioral perspective and wish to develop counseling practices consistent with this perspective. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Childhood Psychiatric Disorders: Assessment & Treatment from a Behavioral Perspective |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Boulevard A (2nd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Jeannie A. Golden, Ph.D. |
JEANNIE A. GOLDEN (East Carolina University) |
Description: Many children with developmental disabilities and children in the child welfare system develop several of the symptoms of various childhood psychiatric disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, bipolar disorder and reactive attachment disorder, due to early abuse/neglect, multiple placements and multiple caregivers. Differential diagnosis becomes a critical issue in providing appropriate treatment and services for these children and their families. However, these children are often diagnosed based on behavior exhibited during office visits and personality assessment instruments with questionable reliability and validity. Additionally, the treatment focus follows the medical model with the assumption that behavioral symptoms are the result of underlying psychopathology. Behavior analysts are in a unique position to provide more comprehensive diagnosis that includes observations of behavior in a variety of settings to determine the effect of various stimulus conditions and setting events, functional assessments to determine the causes and maintainers of various behavioral symptoms, and careful analysis of learning histories to determine the efficacy of various reinforcers and punishers. Behavior analysts are also able to provide assessment-driven treatment approaches, to design therapeutic environments that support the learning of appropriate replacement behaviors and to facilitate typical development rather than psychopathology. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Explain the differences between the medical and behavioral approaches to the etiology, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of psychopathology in children. - Name some of the symptoms used in the differential diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder & reactive attachment disorder. - Describe the unique learning histories of children with psychiatric disorders and how feelings serve as establishing operations in these children. - Tell why children with this learning history often are diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional-defiant disorder, and conduct disorder in different developmental stages of their lives. - Name some of the antecedents, behaviors and consequences that are unique in children with psychiatric diagnoses. - Describe how to provide assessment-driven treatment and target specific behaviors that are unique in children with psychiatric diagnoses. - Explain why structuring and nurturing are necessary components of effective treatments and give examples of how to provide these components. |
Activities: Participants will listen to didactic information and real-life case histories, take notes, ask questions, view a power point presentation, present their own cases for feedback, and participate in role-play situations. |
Audience: Participants would include board certified behavior analysts, psychologists, counselors, social workers and/or teachers who serve children with developmental disabilities or children who typically-developing who have been given psychiatric diagnoses. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
How to Improve Work Performance: The Behavior of Individuals, Work Processes, and Organizations |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
5H (5th floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: John Austin, Ph.D. |
JOHN AUSTIN (Western Michigan University), JOSEPH R. SASSON (Florida State University) |
Description: This workshop will guide participants through various concepts of performance improvement at all levels of the organization. The strategies presented will assist attendees with the tasks of performance analysis and improvement at the organization, process, and human performance levels. This workshop is appropriate for those who conduct human performance improvement activities in organizational settings, as well owners/operators of small companies or administrators/managers in human services facilities. Participants should come prepared with an actual performance problem from their organization that they would like to work through during the session. |
Learning Objectives: By the end of the workshop participants should (be able to): - Identify factors that affect their organization�s performance. - Know a collection of strategies to address organizational problems. - Identify factors that can affect process performance using tools such as process mapping. - Know a collection of strategies that they can use to improve the way work is performed in their organization. - Identify the factors affecting human performance in the workplace. - Know a collection of strategies that they can use to improve human performance. - Understand the systematic processes involved with targeting the actual cause of a performance problem, and matching the actual cause with the appropriate solution. - Understand the relationship between all three of the levels of performance and how factors at each level are interdependent. |
Activities: The workshop will involve lecture on OBM content, group exercises, and discussions among participants. |
Audience: Managers, supervisors, executives, faculty, in any area, including human services and business and industry. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Verbal Foundations for Academic Success in School |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4M (4th floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kent Johnson, Ph.D. |
KENT JOHNSON (Morningside Academy), ELIZABETH HAUGHTON (Haughton Learning Center), KRISTINE F. MELROE (Morningside Academy) |
Description: This workshop will focus upon the visual and auditory skills and the language and knowledge repertoires that learners need in order to learn to read, write, think, reason, and solve academic problems in school. Six research and evidenced based curriculum and methods will be presented, one per hour. The first method, phonological coding, prepares students to make the auditory discriminations necessary to learn phonics and word attack skills. The second method, Rapid Automatic Naming (RAN) builds visual discrimination and rate and prepares students to build reading fluency. Third, students need to learn the typical language that teachers use during early academic instruction. We will present a set of terms and phrases and Direct Instruction and Precision Teaching methods to teach these. Fourth, we will teach you a method for teaching students to retell familiar events from their lives, such as making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, riding a bicycle or tricycle, and other simple directions to follow. The primary goal of the retelling method is to teach verbal description and sequencing skills that do not relie on gestures or other verbal support to communicate. The fifth method is called sentence combining. Through combining short phrases and sentences students can learn all variations of sentence syntax. The method can also be extended to teach the mechanics and other conventions of writing sentences. The sixth area concerns the conventional vocabulary and knowledge that teachers assume students have learned by the time they reach the primary grades. We will introduce the Core Knowledge curriculum for Kindergarten and first grade. We teach you how to use Direct Instruction and Precision Teaching to teach each of the 6 repertoires described above. Workshop participants will receive a minimal amount of materials to allow them to participate in practice exercises. We encourage you to purchase Morningside's Early Learning Essentials three-ring binder available in the ABA Bookstore for $60. It includes all the materials we will present in our slide shows, as well as articles and sample teaching materials which will allow you to implement immediately upon your return home. Your workshop experience will also be enhanced if you purchase this notebook in the ABA Bookstore before you attend the workshop. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Practice teaching auditory sensory behavior with phonological coding materials and methods. - Practice teaching visual sensory behavior with Rapid Automatic Naming (RAN) materials and methods. - Practice teaching language of instruction and following directions. - Practice teaching learners to retell what they know. - Practice teaching sentence syntax and conventions with sentence combining materials and methods. - Practice teaching assumed vocabulary and knowledge necessary for school with Core Knowledge materials and methods. - Understand the research and evidence upon which these 6 methodologies were derived. |
Activities: One hour will be devoted to each of the 6 research-based methods. During each hour a method will be described and modeled. Prerequisite skills necessary to learn each of the 6 skills will also be discussed. Then workshop participants will break into small groups and practice using each method to teach other members of their group. Morningside consultants will provide coaching during your practice sessions. |
Audience: Teachers, behavior therapists, behavior specialists and others who work with clients who need extra support in the primary grades in school, or who working with clients who are being prepared to enter a school setting. Staff development trainers and college professors who teach teachers and behavior therapists to work with clients who show academic promise will also be interested in this workshop. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Teaching Advanced Level Skills to Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Astoria (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kim D. Lucker Greene, Ph.D. |
CHERISH TWIGG (Private practice), HOLLY R. KIBBE (Establishing Operations, Inc.), KIM D. LUCKER GREENE (Behavior Management Consultants, Inc.) |
Description: This workshop is designed for providers of applied behavior analysis services to children with autism. It will focus on teaching advanced skills such as mands for information, answering novel intraverbal questions, initiating and maintaining conversation, as well as peer socialization and independent play skills. Video examples will be used to demonstrate recommended procedures. It is recommended that the participants are familar with and bring a copy of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills (Partington & Sundberg, 1998). An understanding of verbal operants such as mands, tacts, and intraverbals is strongly recommended prior to attending this workshop. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will know: - How to contrive motivation for information in order to teach mands for information. - Steps to teach children with autism to answer novel intraverbal questions of all types (e.g. Why, How, When, etc) - What prerequisite skills are necessary before teaching conversation skills and how to teach conversation when ready. - The importance of and procedures to teach manding for the attention of others. - How to teach advanced tacting skills such as pronouns, prepositions, emotions and composite tacting. - Helpful procedures to teach advanced receptive skills such as following multiple step directions. - Steps to increase peer socialization. - Steps to increase appropriate play skills. |
Activities: Workshop activities will include modeling of procedures as well as video examples. Participants will practice developing lesson plans to incorporate procedures discussed during the workshop. |
Audience: The target audience for this workshop are parents and professionals who deliver behavioral services to children with autism. Knowledge of the verbal operants is recommended prior to attending. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Language Training for Children with Autism & Related Disorders |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
4A (4th floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jonathan J. Tarbox, M.A. |
MARLA SALTZMAN (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), JONATHAN J. TARBOX (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), RACHEL S. F. TARBOX (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), DOREEN GRANPEESHEH (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.) |
Description: One of the primary objectives in teaching young children with autism is to establish and maintain verbal repertoires. Discrete trial (DTT) language training has been found effective in teaching a variety of language forms (e.g., object labels, prepositions, size concepts, etc.) of varying levels of complexity but has faced limitations in terms of application of skills learned to a variety of everyday settings. Other instructional procedures such as incidental teaching and natural environment training (NET) overcame some of these shortcomings by contributing a free operant approach to language instruction, yielding higher rates of spontaneous verbal behavior. However, employing both DTT and incidental teaching / NET procedures within the framework of Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior provides the advantage of outlining all of the functional relationships involved in training a complete language repertoire. This workshop will present CARD's beginning and intermediate level language curriculum and demonstrate how several verbal operants (e.g., echoic, mand, tact, & intraverbal) can be established using the procedures described above. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Demonstrate basic language intervention skills to train impure and pure echoics - Demonstrate basic language intervention skills to train impure and pure mands - Demonstrate basic language intervention skills to train impure and pure tacts - Demonstrate basic language intervention skills to train tact-intraverbals and pure intraverbals - Discriminate between impure and pure verbal operants and understand the relevance of this distinction in building functional, spontaneous language in children with autism - Identify which of Skinner's verbal operants is being taught in videotaped teaching procedures & the relevance of a functional classification of language - Select appropriate data collection systems when teaching spontaneous language (e.g., pure mands & tacts) |
Activities: The instructors will present the training objectives through lecture, videotaped examples, and practice exercise. |
Audience: Parents and professionals working with children with autism and related disorders. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Instrumentation and Programming for the Operant Laboratory |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–5:00 PM |
Boulevard C (2nd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D. |
STEVEN I. DWORKIN (University of North Carolina, Wilmington), KARL ZURN (MED Associates, Inc.) |
Description: This workshop will provide a presentation of the behavioral equipment and research paradigms currently being utilized in operant psychology research. The presentation will be followed by instruction on the design and use of Med associates hardware and software programming tutorials for MED-PC IV. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will (be able to): - Learn about equipment that is available for operant research. - Understand the basics of equipment design. - Understand basics of laboratory design and setup. - Have knowledge of the software that is available for operant research. - Have hands-on experience on experience with equipment. - Write a simple program in MED-PC IV. - Work on specific applications for individual laboratories. |
Activities: Power point presentation; Demonstrations; Workbook; Programming; Program Testing. |
Audience: Anyone interested in setting up a new operant laboratory or updating an existing Operant laboratory. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
A Formal Sequential Program for Shaping Personnel Skills in Educational Programs Serving Children with Special Needs |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–1:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 1 (3rd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Beth Sulzer-Azaroff, Ph.D. |
BETH SULZER-AZAROFF (Browns Group, Naples), MARTIN J. POLLACK (Private practice) |
Description: The pool of personnel skilled in the applied practice of behavior analysis in programs for children with special needs is limited. Even those capable of "talking the talk" of ABA may insufficiently have mastered the capability of "walking the walk." In this workshop, we will present a program that behavior analysts associated with organizations serving children with special needs will be able to used to guide trainees step by step along the path toward competent applied skills. Attendees will receive a sample copy of a printed manual to take to their home sites. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Say why guided and reinforced practice is essential to preparing skilled personnel within applied settings. - Identify instructional objectives of relevance to the personnel they hope to train. - Sketch out a plan for designing and implementing that training. - List a set of methods for assessing the effectiveness of their procedures. |
Activities: Overview of objectives; Case examples; Audience contributions of case examples; Step by step sequence of 15 units designed to support trainee progress; Participant plans to introduce at local program; Evaluate learning and satisfaction. |
Audience: Behavior analysts concerned with promoting skills of personnel employed within their organizations or those coordinating and/or supervising students in practicum or internship settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Teaching a Behavioral Child Development Coure: The Whats and Hows |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
10:00 AM–1:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 3 (3rd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Gary D. Novak, Ph.D. |
GARY D. NOVAK (California State University, Stanislaus), MARTHA PELAEZ (Florida International University) |
Description: This workshop will prepare you to teach an undergraduate course in child development from a behavior analytic perspective. Basic concepts of a behavioral systems approach to development based on the authors' textbook will be covered. Methods for proposing, organizing and teaching a course will be included. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Explain the basic principles of a behavioral systems approach to child development. - Write a course proposal/syllabus for a behavioral child development course. - Take a chapter from the book and write learning objectives for a unit of a child development course. - Identify the pedagogical approach that you will take in teaching a course. |
Activities: Participants will be given a set of chapter objectives related to the textbook as models. They will be asked to generate their own set of objectives for one chapter. These will be discussed and critiqued. They will create sample quiz questions based on the objectives they create. They will create a syllabus for their own course in child development that can be used as part of a course proposal process. Finally, they will discuss methods that would be relevant to their own teaching situation. |
Audience: Graduate students, full-time and part-time faculty interested in teaching a course in child development from a behavioral perspective. Both those who have or have not yet taught a developmental course are welcome. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Generalization Promotion in Education and Human Services |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
2:00 PM–5:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 1 (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Pamela G. Osnes, Ph.D. |
PAMELA G. OSNES (The Ohio State University) |
Description: This workshop will present the generalization promotion strategies of Stokes and Baer (1977) and Stokes and Osnes (1989). Participants will compare and contrast the strategies described in each paper, and will discuss application to their work in school and human services settings. Each generalization-promotion strategy will be analyzed individually, and will be discussed in the context of the participants' education and intervention planning. Both the presenter and the participants will provide examples of interventions for analysis in terms of their abilities to promote (or inhibit) generalization. Challenges to generalization-promotion will be described, and participants will provide programming alternatives to address obstacles they have encountered in their work. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe, compare, and contrast the generalization-promotion strategies of Stokes and Baer (1977) and Stokes and Osnes (1989). - Analyze intervention examples provided by the presenter and from their own work to determine the generalization-promotion methods in each. - Describe obstacles to generalization-promotion that occur in practice. - Generate generalization-promotion strategies when given intervention examples. - Suggest modifications to intervention plans to enhance their generalization-promotion capabilities. |
Activities: Participants will receive copies of the generalization promotion strategies in Stokes and Baer (1977) and Stokes and Osnes (1989). Using these, they will analyze each strategy individually. Given intervention examples by the presenter, they will analyze the interventions and identify the generalization-promotion strategies inherent in each and any obstacles for generalization-promotion that are apparent. Participants will provide intervention examples from their work in schools and human services for analysis and problem solving to determine ways to plan intervention to enhance generalization capabilities. |
Audience: Behavior analysts, human services providers, educators, parents, and other individuals who plan and implement behavior intervention plans. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Case Studies in Ethics in Intellectual Disabilities |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
2:00 PM–5:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 3 (3rd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: R. M. (Duke) Schell, Ph.D. |
R. M. (DUKE) SCHELL (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Description: Most discussions of ethics in the practice of psychology and/or behavior analysis focus on the misconduct of the professional providing services. Behavior analysis, as a methodological perspective, tends to be distanced from ethical issues because it is a science-based approach, but it is not immune from personal and cultural contingencies that create unethical behavior. This workshop will focus on the everyday ethical behaviors of clinicians that enhance habilitation and life quality of those served through discussions of cases that involve ethical dilemmas. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe how the historical concepts of ethics, values, morals are viewed by behavior analysis. - Determine everyday behaviors of clinicians that can be viewed as ethical or unethical and also those behaviors that are less readily placed at either end of the continuum. - Describe how the dimensions of behavior analysis can be used to reinforce ethical behavior. - Review and analyze their behavior and the culture of their clinical setting to recognize where ethical issues may arise and how to resolve them. |
Activities: A brief review of historical information will be followed by casebook-style discussions based on experiences of the presenters as well as composite examples that raise ethical issues. Participants are encouraged to bring their own case histories for discussion with the group. |
Audience: People involved in the development and supervision of behavioral teaching and treatment procedures and applied research with people with mental retardation and related disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Using Excel for Graphing Behavior and Academic Performance of Individuals in Applied Settings |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 1 (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Bryan J. Davey, M.Ed. |
DONALD M. STENHOFF (Utah State University), BRYAN J. DAVEY (Utah State University) |
Description: Visual display of data in single-subject research is imperative when communicating quantitative relationships and behavior patterns to consumers and fellow practitioners. Excel is an application that allows practitioners and consumers to create spreadsheets and graphical displays. Excel graphs convey effect across various single-subject designs (e.g., multiple-baseline, alternating treatment, reversal, cumulative record). While Excel can be difficult to navigate and master, this workshop will provide participants with hands on training promoting effective use. Workshop mini lessons include how to setup spreadsheets and input data sets, chart wizard navigation, graph construction of all data or select data sets within a spreadsheet, manipulation of graph components (e.g., axes, data labels, phase change lines), and updating data sets and graphs. Instructors will provide several models, followed by opportunities for participants to practice skills with feedback. Throughout the workshop instructors will explain and demonstrate the subtle nuances of Excel. These tips allow for easier Excel navigation and enhance the graphical presentation. Additionally, workshop instructors will provide an Excel CD tutorial that will continue to guide participants in future Excel projects. Participants are required to bring a laptop with the Excel application and strongly encouraged to bring their own data sets to graph during the workshop. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Set up measurement specific spreadsheets, input data sets, and manipulate data sets within an Excel spreadsheet. - Create graphs for alternating treatment, reversal, multiple-baseline designs, and cumulative records. - Use the chart wizard, construct graphs of all data or select data sets within a spreadsheet, and update databases and graphs as data collection continues. - Manipulate graph components (e.g., axes, data points, data paths, secondary axis), and use drawing tools to insert additional components (e.g., arrows, data labels, phase change lines, boxes). |
Activities: Participants will be provided concise instruction and several models, followed by two case examples completed with instructor support to ensure skill acquisition. Finally, participants will complete a comprehensive case example that provides opportunities for participants to solve challenges inherent in the Excel application. The comprehensive case example will consolidate and increase fluency of the skills taught during the instructional phase of the workshop. Additionally, participants will be encouraged to bring questions in regard to previous Excel experiences. |
Audience: Practitioners, students, researchers, educational service providers, and others interested in visual display of data in single-subject research and program progress. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Overview of Standard Celeration Charting |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michael Fabrizio, M.A. |
CLAY M. STARLIN (University of Oregon), ABIGAIL B. CALKIN (Calkin Learning Center), MICHAEL FABRIZIO (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), HENRY S. PENNYPACKER (University of Florida), JESUS ROSALES-RUIZ (University of North Texas) |
Description: This workshop will teach participants to read and chart human performance on the Standard Celeration Chart (SCC). Participants will learn: important features of the chart, the rationale for monitoring performance frequencies, standard SCC conventions, how to chart performance across varying lengths of counting time, and how to analyze performance on the chart to assist in making data-based decisions. The presenters will draw from long and varied histories of success using the SCC in a range of setting to illustrate key concept taught in the workshop. Examples from the areas of university teaching, intervention with children with autism, educational intervention with students with learning disabilities, general public school education, and the monitoring of private events will be used. All participants will receive a copy of all materials used in the workshop including a CD-ROM containing additional copies of the presentation materials, forms, example videos, and an animation-based tutorial. |
Learning Objectives: At the end of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Read human performance data charted on all versions of the SCC. - Chart human performance data charted on all versions of the SCC. - Describe data on the SCC in terms of its frequency (level), celeration (trend), and bounce (variability). - Describe performance management systems helpful in maintaining consistent use of the SCC in clinical and educational settings. |
Activities: Applying principles derived from behavior analysis of well-designed instruction, our world-class group of workshop presenters will use a range of activities to ensure participants learn the key skills targeted in the objectives. Participants will engage in choral responding and paced practice, timed practice on key concepts and skills, and both small and large group discussion. |
Audience: Anyone seeking an introduction (or refresher!) to Standard Celeration Charting, including those persons interested in using the SCC to improve their own teaching or clinical practice, as well as individuals planning to take the BACB examination. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Too Many Children, Not Enough Time: Teaching Others to Provide Intensive Behavior Therapy to Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Colin Peeler, Ph.D. |
COLIN PEELER (Florida State University) |
Description: In 1987, Lovaas published the results of the UCLA Young Autism Project, in which 47% of the children receiving intensive behavior therapy (IBT) were mainstreamed into regular education classrooms. Since then there has been an ever increasing demand for well trained therapists that has exceeded the supply. Unfortunately, because of this the quality or quantity of services these children receive is typically below the standard and as such their gains are not maximized. However, it is possible through better training and supervision (i.e., better consultation) behavior analysts can teach almost anyone how to provide quality behavioral services and thereby increase the quantity and quality of therapy a child receives. This workshop will focus on three main sets of skills essential to achieving this outcome: basic therapy skills, consultation skills, and training skills. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe findings from the literature on IBT as a treatment for Autism - Identify critical components of an IBT program that are associated with improved outcomes - Describe funding/training issues and how they impact one�s ability to implement the most effective IBT program - Describe the sequence of training events to maximize the effectiveness of a new therapist working with a child with Autism - Describe the 10 Basic Therapist Skills for working with a child with Autism and correctly score them from videotapes - Learn basic consultation skills each therapist should know that will improve the consistency and efficacy of the therapy across therapists - Describe how to supervise and manage a team of therapists within current funding issues |
Activities: In the first hour the presenter will focus on the difference between best practice as defined by the literature and actual practice as it is affected by training and funding issues. In the second hour the presenter will focus on the key skills all therapists should know and how to assess and train them. In the third hour the presenter will focus on how to efficiently supervise an in home program given a limited amount of time to do so. Video examples will be used throughout. |
Audience: Behavior analysts, parents looking to set up and manage an in home program, autism program directors or consultants, autism therapists, direct care staff, teachers and school personnel. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Evaluating the Efficacy of Autism Programs: Making Evidence Based Decisions |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 3 (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Suzanne Letso, M.A. |
SUZANNE LETSO (Connecticut Center for Child Development), ERICA ROEST (Connecticut Center for Child Development) |
Description: Until recently, parents and professionals where faced with the task of single handedly creating a applied behavior analytic program for a child in need of educational services. Today, a host of programs and services are available throughout the country in both public and private settings. The more challenging question now is to determine whether or not any particular program is actually based on the educational principals of applied behavior analysis, or not. Secondarily, parents and professionals need to assess whether the potential behavioral services and learning environments are appropriate to meet the specific needs of a given child. This workshop will provide information and resources to assist parents and professionals making educational placement decisions. Key programmatic components, environmental considerations, and staff competencies will be discussed. Methods of collecting data to support the decision making process will be described, and samples provided. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will have learned: - A general description of behavior analytic services for children with autism encompassing a wide range of environments will be provided. - Availability of assessment tools to determine a particular student�s readiness for active participation in different learning environments. - Basic program criteria including credentials of staff, staffing ratios, training, supervision, and access to peers and the community. - To create a customized check-list of critical features in relation to a student�s individual educational needs. |
Activities: Didactic lecture, group discussion and guided notes will be utilized. Handouts will include identification of additional resources, sample data collection systems, and sample IEP objectives. |
Audience: Behavior analysts, school administrators, or other educational service providers working in applied settings with individuals with autism or related disorders. Participants should have knowledge of applied behavior analysis and autism treatment. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
ABA-Based Supported School Inclusion of Young Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Williford C (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Joel P. Hundert, Ph.D. |
JOEL P. HUNDERT (Behaviour Institute), NICOLE WALTON-ALLEN (Behaviour Institute) |
Description: Much of the movement of the inclusion of children with autism in regular educational settings based on laudable principles that address why inclusion should occur. Not as much attention has been focused on developing and evaluating procedures to make inclusion for children with autism effective. Numerous studies have indicated that placement of children with disabilities with typically developing children in a regular educational setting, is insufficient by itself, to produce significant gains in social or academic adjustment. Skills and behaviors associated with success in an inclusive setting need to be purposely taught, using systematic interventions feasible to implement in a regular educational setting. This workshop will present ABA-based interventions associated with gains in children with autism in the following areas associated with survival skills for children with autism in inclusive educational settings: a) the ability to follow school routines independently; b) the ability to communicate independently; c) the ability to initiate and sustain reciprocal peer interaction; d) the ability to learn in group instruction; e) the ability to complete seatwork activities independently; and, f) the display of low levels of problem behaviours that interfere with learning (e.g., stereotypy, disruptive behavior, aggression). |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe key points of the outcome literature on supported inclusion with children with autism. - Apply a rating form to hypothetical case examples of children with autism in regular class environments. - Describe alternative strategies associated with having children with autism participate in group instruction and apply those strategies to hypothetical case examples. - Describe alternative strategies associated with teaching children with autism to interact with peers and apply those strategies to hypothetical case examples. - Describe alternative strategies associated with teaching children with autism to follow school routines independently and apply those strategies to hypothetical case examples. - Describe alternative strategies associated with teaching children with autism to communicate and apply those strategies to hypothetical case examples. - Describe alternative strategies associated with teaching children with autism to complete seatwork assignments independently and apply those strategies to hypothetical case examples. - Describe how to set-up a collaborative school-parent team. |
Activities: Participants will receive written material and exercises on such interventions as prompting and reinforcement procedures of teacher assistants, priming of group participation, peer-based strategies of teaching social skill in regular schools, curriculum-embedded instruction, adapted incidental language instruction, and school-parent collaborative teams. Concepts and strategies of ABA-based supported inclusion will be presented using didactic instruction. Participants will clarify points raised in the workshop and apply the skills covered to exercises based on videotapes and case study information. Handouts will be provided on the content of the presentation. |
Audience: This workshop is intended for individuals who work with children with autism in school settings, including teachers and psychologists. It would be particularly applicable to individual who consultant on children with autism and their inclusion in schools. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Data Collection and Analysis Using Computer Technology: Hands-On Discrete and Sequential Applications of the BEST System |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Astoria (3rd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Thomas L. Sharpe, Jr., Ed.D. |
THOMAS L. SHARPE, JR. (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), DANIEL W. BALDERSON (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), JOHN KOPERWAS (Educational Consulting, Inc) |
Description: The workshop will provide hands on application of a sophisticated software package designed to collect and analyze discrete and time-based behavioral data. The program is particularly useful to advanced graduate students and behavioral psychologists interested in analyzing complex configurations of behaviors which are emitted at high rates, oftentimes overlap in time, and which are context dependent. Discussion includes an introduction to (a) recommended procedures when collecting time-based data in the live setting and from videotape records, and (b) computer generated discrete and sequential descriptions, graphic and statistical analyses, and reliability comparisons of discrete and sequential data. Participants will be provided with a complimentary copy of the complete software package on CD ROM, and a .pdf file summary copy of a compatible research methods text published by Sage Publications as a function of workshop participation. *While some computer hardware will be provided, it is recommended that workshop participants bring their own IBM compatible laptop hardware to facilitate hands-on workshop interactions. |
Learning Objectives: Workshop participants will exit with software-based data collection and analysis competencies, including the ability to (a) construct and apply systemic observation systems, (b) generate a time-based behavioral record using an inclusive overlapping category system, (c) perform traditional and sequential analyses using multiple measurement methodologies and interpret Z score transformations, (d) create and edit graphic data representations and apply relevant visual and statistical analyses, (e) conduct reliability and treatment fidelity analyses, and (f) apply a variety of data record edit and merge functions when operating with complex multiple event category systems. At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Discuss in conceptual and applied ways the principles and practice of discrete and sequential behavior analysis methods. - Apply a range of computer-based data collection, reliability, and measurement techniques to their particular behavior analysis interests. - Understand and apply a range of computer-based descriptive and statistical data analysis techniques in relation to discrete and sequential measurement sets. - Construct a variety of behavior graphs and apply appropriate analysis techniques to the graph types covered. |
Activities: Activities include (a) review of traditional behavior analysis recording methods, (b) introduction to, and hands on application of, a computer-based package designed to enhance behavior analyses of complex interactive settings, and (c) detailed hands-on demonstration of data collection features, discrete and sequential analysis capabilities, within and across data-file graphic representations, and a variety of reliability, treatment fidelity, and data manipulation and editing functions. |
Audience: Advanced graduate students and behavior analysts working in experimental and applied settings who are interested in research and development related to the interactive nature of behavior in situations where study of multiple behaviors and events, multiple participants, and changing setting variables are present. Those working in educational and social science settings and who are challenged with how to describe and analyze highly interactive behavioral transactions should find the workshop experience and complimentary software particularly appealing to a wide range of research and assessment applications. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Improve Your Oral Presentations |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Lake Ontario (8th floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Ned Carter, Ph.D. |
NED CARTER (Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions), THOMAS E. BOYCE (Center for Behavioral Safety, LLC), KENNETH NILSSON (Behavior Analysis Group, Sweden) |
Description: Oral presentations play an essential role in individual success in both the public and private sectors. The workshop content is based on detailed practical analyses of speaker and audience behavior. Truly effective speakers conduct a dialogue with their audience, preparing themselves to control and to be controlled by their audience. This workshop will assist participants in identifying variables initiating and maintaining audience attention, interest and participation. Emphasis is placed on using the principles of behavior analysis, particularly the analysis of verbal behavior, to improve speaker behavior. The workshop has been offered annually since 1999 and the majority of attendees have rated the workshop as excellent. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify high probability audience behaviors and requests. - Use multiple techniques to initiate and promote audience participation. - Dealing with situations such as stage fright, "losing your place" and aggressive questioning. - Identify and control extraneous stimuli in order to maximize audience attention. |
Activities: The workshop is interactive and active participation is encouraged. Techniques for creating better overheads, PowerPoint slides and presentation figures will be described. Participants will take part in a series of exercises and structured role-play sessions. Course content will be adapted to the interests of participants. |
Audience: Behavior analysts who desire to improve their presentation skills at meetings, conferences and in teaching. The workshop is appropriate for both novices and experienced public speakers. Participants are encouraged to bring real-life examples for use in role-playing exercises. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Designing Instructional Curricula for Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 2 (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Daniel Cohen-Almeida, M.A. |
DANIEL COHEN-ALMEIDA (Melmark New England), JAMES T. ELLIS (Melmark New England), BRIAN C. LIU-CONSTANT (Melmark New England) |
Description: Intensive educational services for children with autism require instructional curricula that are individualized to each learner, adapted to the teaching environment, minimize errors, and incorporate the collection of meaningful objective data to evaluate progress. Workshop participants will review stimulus control and discrimination learning principles, errorless prompting strategies, curriculum components and organization, and data collection systems. Particular emphasis will be placed on adapting curricula to fit the students learning style and the learning environment. Examples will be provided for teaching academic, communication, and social skills in one-to-one, inclusion, and home-based settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Identify basic stimulus control and discrimination learning principles. - Identify the components of systematic instructional curricula - Identify instructional strategies and prompting methods - Write 2 instructional curricula (given case study examples) |
Activities: Interactive Lecture, Group Discussion, Video review, Case Studies |
Audience: Introductory/Intermediate |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Conducting Verbal and Pictorial Preference Assessments |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Marquette (3rd floor) |
Area: PRA/VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Richard B. Graff, M.S. |
RICHARD B. GRAFF (New England Center for Children), THERESA M. CLEVENGER (New England Center for Children) |
Description: Identifying effective reinforcers is crucial for skill acquisition and reduction of challenging behavior for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disabilities. Although many different types of stimulus preference assessments have been developed and refined over the past 15 years, most of these methods involve exposing an individual to tangible stimuli and measuring approach responses to or duration of engagement with stimuli. Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to assess preferences for large stimuli or community-based activities. In this workshop, participants will learn about two methods to assess these types of stimuli, verbal paired stimulus (VPS) and pictorial paired stimulus (PPS) preference assessments. First, participants will be taught how to conduct pretests to assess whether the individuals possess the appropriate prerequisite skills. Participants will then be taught how to conduct VPS and PPS assessments, and will practice these techniques with feedback from instructors. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Conduct discrimination pretests for VPS and PPS assessments. - Conduct a VPS assessment. - Conduct a PPS assessment. - Generate preference hierarchies based upon the results of VPS and PPS assessments. |
Activities: Participants will be instructed on the use of stimulus preference assessments, with particular emphasis placed on the paired stimulus assessment developed by Fisher et al. (1992). Participants will be taught how to conduct discrimination pretests before conducting VPS and PPS assessments. Next, participants will watch instructors conducting VPS and PPS assessments, and each participant will conduct a VPS and a PPS assessment, with feedback provided by instructors. Participants will be taught how to collect preference assessment data, and how to generate preference hierarchies based upon these assessments. All participants will be provided with hard copies of materials and a compact disk that contains all pretests, VPS and PPS protocols, and blank data sheets, which can be used in any applied setting. |
Audience: Parents, special education teachers, and professionals who work with individuals with ASD or other developmental disabilities who use positive reinforcement to teach new skills and/or to decrease challenging behavior. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Train-to-Code: Using a Software System to Train Behavioral Coding Skills in Students or Staff |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Boulevard B (2nd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Roger D. Ray, Ph.D. |
ROGER D. RAY (Rollins College), JESSICA M. RAY (Rollins College) |
Description: This workshop introduces a software application, called Train-To-Code, designed to shape behavioral observation and coding skills. Observing behavior is a fundamental part of psychology and at the essence of Behavior Analysis. Yet skills required to be an effective and efficient observer are often under stressed in the process of training and education. Often there is not an efficient way to train reliable behavioral coders in the small amount of time available for staff or student training. This workshop is designed to give participants new ideas on how to conduct sampled and/or sequential descriptive behavioral coding and analysis in a concise manner. Issues in sampling vs continuous coding, sequential analysis, and inter-observer reliability measurement will be discussed. With the aid of this software system, participants will take an active role in constructing a coding scheme and loading it into the software system; will engage in coding a brief video so the file may be used as an expert reference for automated training feedback; and will learn how to access the detailed statistical analysis of behavioral sequences observed in the session. Further, inter-observer reliability scores, as measured by Cohens Kappa, will be demonstrated. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Use software-based shaping procedures to shape observational skills in someone else. - Apply behavioral principles to teach observational techniques in staff training situations - Build a simple behavioral coding scheme to use within the software system. - Link any external digital video file to the software for customizing the coding environment. - Use the four alternative modes of successive approximation to expert coding of a selected video. - Explain unconditional and conditional behavioral probabilities and their meaning to others. - Code and save a sample training file as well as measure the inter-observer reliability between this file and the expert reference file. |
Activities: Activities will include an interactive review of observational foundations including methods of sequential analysis; introduction to and detailed use of new software which uses shaping principles to teach observation and coding skills; hands-on experience in creating coding schemes, actually coding behavior via a video, and analyzing session data. |
Audience: Teachers and trainers who have a need for teaching others how to reliably identify and describe behavior in various settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Using Video Modeling to Teach Play to Young Children with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Boulevard C (2nd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: June M. Sanchez, M.Ed. |
JUNE M. SANCHEZ (New England Center for Children), REBECCA P. F. MACDONALD (New England Center for Children), KRISTINE WILTZ (New England Center for Children), SHELLY COTA (New England Center for Children), SALLY N. ROBERTS (New England Center for Children) |
Description: Play is an important part of a typical childs development and contributes to the acquisition of language and social interaction skills. Children with autism often do not develop play skills. Video modeling has been demonstrated to be an effective procedure to teach a variety of skills. We will review several studies that we have conducted demonstrating the effectiveness of video modeling teaching procedures to teach independent pretend play to children with autism, as well as to teach cooperative play between children with autism and typically developing peers. In addition, we will present data from our most recent work, teaching children to generate novel play using video modeling. Video modeling is now an integral part of our preschool social skills and play curriculum. In this workshop, we will review how to develop scripts using commercially available play sets, create video modeling tapes, and provide video instruction to children with autism. We will also discuss the advantages of this teaching procedure and the technical issues encountered when implementing the procedures. We will also discuss the implications for this technology as an easy and effective strategy for teachers and parents to use to teach play and other skills. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Define video modeling as a teaching procedure and describe its advantages. - Describe how to teach simple imitative, toy play, pretend play and reciprocal play with a peer using video modeling procedures. - Describe strategies to generate novel play using video modeling procedures. - Describe how to create new individualized play scripts using a variety of commercially available toys. |
Activities: The participants will work in small groups to plan and create video modeling play scripts. The participants will first complete planning forms. The participants will consider certain child characteristics such as age, interests/preferences, language skills, fine motor skills, and potentially interfering behaviors to aid them in planning individualized play scripts. The participants will then generate the play actions and verbal statements that make up the play scripts. Finally, the participants will create and act out a video modeling play script using commercially available toys. |
Audience: The workshop is designed for educators and consultants currently implementing programs to teach appropriate play skills to children with autism using behaviorally based teaching technologies. Participants should have some knowledge of applied behavior analysis. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
How to Assess Progress in Public School Settings: Data Collection Systems That Anyone Can Use |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4A (4th floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Cheryl J. Davis, M.Ed. |
CHERYL J. DAVIS (New England Center for Children), NICOLE CIOTTI GARDENIER (New England Center for Children), AMY GECKLER (New England Center for Children), JUNE M. SANCHEZ (New England Center for Children) |
Description: Data analysis is a fundamental part of Applied Behavior Analysis. This workshop will provide a review of and practical guidelines for observation and measurement procedures in public school settings. The workshop will briefly review identifying and prioritizing target responses and developing operational definitions. A particular emphasis will be placed on selecting appropriate methods for measuring target responses including baseline, treatment and maintenance data collection techniques. Advantages and disadvantages of various measurement methods will be discussed with particular emphasis on selecting the most accurate measurement methods possible given the other responsibilities one has in the public school. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop the participant will be able to: - Identify the skill to be targeted. - Describe appropriate measurement methods based on video-taped samples of behavior. - Describe advantages and disadvantages of various measurement methods for a variety of target responses. - Summarize, interpret, and evaluate data. |
Activities: This workshop will emphasize trainee participation in a series of exercises. For identifying the target skill, trainees will generate skills to be taught from video-taped behavior samples and case studies. For measurement methods, trainees will (a) use a variety of measurement methods to record behaviors of varying frequency, duration, and temporal distribution; and (b) evaluate accuracy using sampling methods with varying procedures to measure the same target response. Participants will also summarize and interpret data samples and then practice writing progress reports according to the data summaries. |
Audience: This workshop is for clinicians, therapists, teachers, parents, students, and anyone else who would like to collect useful data, who are novel to data collection techniques, or who would like a review of data collection techniques. This workshop is also beneficial for behavior analysts who are preparing to take the board certification examination. The workshop will focus primarily on Task List Content area #7. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
A Curriculum for Intensive, Early Intervention Program for Children with Autism: The Third Phase |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Boulevard A (2nd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Barbara Metzger, Ph.D. |
BARBARA METZGER (Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools), ANGELA L. POLETTI (Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools) |
Description: A curriculum for teaching young children with autism advanced skills will be presented. The curriculum is presented in a flow chart format that specifies the sequence of teaching programs. The curriculum has a heavy emphasis on teaching language and play/social skills. The curriculum also covers imitation/observational learning, school readiness and self-help skills. Incorporating peer play dates and school into a childs program will also be discussed. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Read the curriculum flow chart to determine the sequence of skills. - Identify the programs of the third phase of the curriculum as well as the overall goal and ideal timeline. - Identify the goal of each program. - Identify potential mistakes for each program. - Identify teaching tips for each program. - Identify play activities to incorporate into your teaching. - Identify strategies for increasing peer play success. - Identify strategies for increasing school success. |
Activities: Watch video clips of specific programs and specific teaching methods/strategies; Lecture; Question and answer; In vivo practice of teaching methodologies/strategies. |
Audience: Parents and professional who want to learn about the curriculum and methodologies to teach a young child with autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Advanced |
|
|
Application of OBM Strategies in Service Settings for Individuals with Autism: Promoting Quality Outcomes |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4D (4th floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Daphna El-Roy, Ph.D. |
DAPHNA EL-ROY (Eden II Programs), JOANNE GERENSER (Eden II Programs) |
Description: The past decade has seen a considerable growth in the incidence of autism and a corresponding development of programs serving individuals with autism. While these programs are essential to meet the needs of the autism community, issues of attracting, training and retaining a qualified workforce becomes very difficult. In addition to the competition among programs serving individuals with autism, these agencies must also compete with employment opportunities that are less stressful and less demanding than working with individuals with autism. There have been hundreds of articles and many books published on the effectiveness of using the principles of applied behavior analysis to change behavior. The use of applied behavior analysis has been widely supported for the treatment and education of children with autism. Despite the widespread use of behavioral teaching techniques in the field of special education, few providers apply these same principles to address staff behavior change. Organizational behavior management (OBM), also referred to as Performance Management (PM), is the application of applied behavior analysis to organizational improvement (Abernathy & Harshbarger, 2002). The field of organizational behavior management provides us with an empirically validated, data based framework to impact employee performance, professional development as well as overall organizational health. The purpose of this workshop is to provide an overview of organizational behavior management and how to utilize behavior management techniques to address common issues within the field of human services and more specifically, to programs serving individuals with autism. Topics to be addressed include issues of staff retention and turnover, staff development as well as issues of quality assurance and improvement. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop participants will be able to: - Understand basic principles of organizational Behavior Management as applied to autism service settings. - Apply a variety of assessment techniques to identify program strengths, weaknesses and areas in need of improvement. - Become familiar with components of a quality improvement plan and strategies for implementation. - Become familiar with data collection procedures and strategies for evaluating efficacy of quality improvement efficacy plan. |
Activities: Activities include didactic instruction and small group work. Participants will be given various sample plans and assessment tools for review. |
Audience: Program administrators, clinical supervisors and other related professionals. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Where Do We Begin? ABA/VB Programming for Children Newly Diagnosed with Autism |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Mary Lynch Barbera, M.S. |
MARY LYNCH BARBERA (Pennsylvania Verbal Behavior Project) |
Description: Children receive the diagnosis of Autism at various ages ranging from under two years to over six years of age. Regardless of the age at diagnosis or the severity of the presenting symptoms, newly diagnosed children need effective, individualized programming started as soon as possible. This workshop will utilize Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior to provide a framework for assessing and programming for a child newly diagnosed with autism or a related disorder. The Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills (Partington and Sundberg, 1998)will be discussed with an emphasis on the areas of receptive language, vocal and motor imitation, tacts, mands, and intraverbals . Initial programming for children based on ABLLS will then be demonstrated. In addition to providing participants with specific ways to improve positive behaviors such as language, this workshop will also review ABA principles that are used to reduce negative behaviors such as crying and hitting. Through lecture, video examples, and small group activities, the participants will leave with a better understanding of Applied Behavior Analysis utilizing Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior as it relates to beginning programming for children at various points on the autism spectrum. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Identify three early indicators of autism in young children. - Define and discuss the importance of pairing with reinforcement and mand training for early learners. - Give one example of a receptive skill, a motor imitation skill, a mand, a tact, and an intraverbal. - Name three antecedent and three reactive strategies that may prevent or decrease negative behaviors. |
Activities: Lecture, demonstration and discussion; review of video tapes and small group activities. |
Audience: Professionals who work with children with autism and related disorders including behavior analysts, speech pathologists, psychologists, special education teachers, administrators, and parents. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Teaching Thinking and Reasoning Skills with Thinking Aloud Problem Solving (TAPS) |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Lake Erie (8th floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kent Johnson, Ph.D. |
KENT JOHNSON (Morningside Academy), JOANNE K. ROBBINS (Morningside Academy), KRISTINE F. MELROE (Morningside Academy) |
Description: We often tell students to think, but many are quite unsure what we mean by that. Analytical skill is often an expected ability or talent, and not directly taught. By analytical ability, most teachers mean the set of thinking and reasoning skills that we use to comprehend literature and textbooks, understand lectures, and apply knowledge to solve problems. Analytical ability is also required to score well on tests such as standardized reading comprehension tests, mathematical aptitude tests, and academic aptitude tests such as the SAT. Analytical skills are also important in invention, discovery, creativity and solving interpersonal communication problems. While acknowledging that these analytical skills are very important, most teachers do not have systematic methods for teaching them. Teachers may encourage analytical thinking, and even demonstrate it now and again in their teaching, but such demonstration and encouragement are always deeply embedded in the context of teaching something new in a social or natural science class, or in math or English literature. So how does one systematically teach analytical skills? In a radical behavior analysis, much of what we call thinking and reasoning involves a private conversation with oneself as a speaker and as a listener and reactor to ones own speaking. These conversation skills can be learned. From a radical behavioral account we can identify key thinking and reasoning repertoires that we can teach to learners in order to teach them analytical skills and improve their skills at figuring out solutions to problems. One powerful method for improving students analytical ability is called TAPS, Thinking Aloud Problem Solving. It was designed by Arthur Whimbey, and further developed by the Morningside instructional design team. It is a direct, logical extension of a radical behavioral account of thinking and reasoning. TAPS directly teaches teachers how to directly teach students analytical thinking skills. It does this by teaching both teachers and students how to verbalize their thinkingtheir observations, thoughts, and decisions as a speaker, their reactions and adjustments as a listener to their own speaking, and how speakers and listeners dialogue. The context for learning these skills may be puzzles and brain teasers, logic problems, mathematical word problems, physics problems, verbal analogy questions, or reading comprehension exercises-- whatever the teacher deems appropriate for their learners. In TAPS, teachers model good talk aloud problem solving, and peers practice with each other in pairs. During their talking out loud, students get feedback from their teacher and peers, and often hear themselves more clearly and provide their own self-corrections. Later, students learn to engage in self-dialogue, at first out loud, and then privately as they become expert reasoners and problem solvers. Our data show that students who learn TAPS in addition to basic academic skills make significantly more gains on standardized tests than students who learn only specific academic skills. Workshop participants will receive a minimal amount of materials to allow them to participate in practice exercises. We encourage you to purchase Morningsides TAPS three-ring binder in the ABA bookstore for $60. It includes all the materials we will present in our slide shows, as well as articles and teaching materials which will allow you to implement TAPS immediately upon your return home. Your workshop experience will be enhanced if you purchase this notebook in the ABA bookstore before you attend the workshop This workshop is offered in honor of Arthur Whimbey, who died this past year. We also have a symposium during the convention to pay tribute to Whimbeys important work in showing that intelligence can be taught. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Learn to say and write the speaker, listener, and dialoguing repertoires of TAPS while solving logic and other problems. - Practice the speaker, listener, and dialoguing repertoires of TAPS while solving logic and other problems. - Learn to say and write how to coach others as they practice TAPS. - Practice coaching others as they practice TAPS. |
Activities: We will demonstrate the steps we take to teach students the speaker, listener, and dialoguing behaviors involved in reasoning and analytical thinking. We will model and prompt these behaviors, then you will practice them in speaker/listener pairs while solving logic, verbal analogy, and math exercise of all kinds. During your talking aloud, you will get feedback from Morningside consultants as well as your peers. Then you will practice the behavior out loud "in the same skin" and eventually privately. You will also learn how to coach these behaviors. |
Audience: All teachers, behavior therapists and specialists, staff trainers, college professors, and others who work with learners who need to improve their analytical skills. Students must have the verbal skills necessary to speak their thinking and reasoning out loud. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Behavioral Architecture: Designing Individualized Programs for Children with Severe Mental Disabilities |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Lake Huron (8th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Sebastien Bosch, Ph.D. |
SEBASTIEN BOSCH (California Unified Service Providers), ERIC MAIER (California Unified Service Providers) |
Description: We will present and discuss curriculum issues and program development. There, we will introduce the concept of behavioral architecture and its applications for program design. We will demonstrate the process of behavioral profiling and how it can be used to develop IEP and IFSP goals and objectives that will best meet the needs of the client. We will also give basic rules of behavioral architecture based on cumulative-hierarchical learning and behavioral cusps for professionals involved in programming. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will (be able to): - Practice conducting a behavioral Cusp Assessment. - Conduct a behavioral profile assessment. - Learn/refine their selection of appropriate intervention targets. - Learn/refine their IEP goals writing skills. - Refine their treatment recommendation skills. |
Activities: The instructors will present the training objectives through lecture, guided observation and guided practice. The activities will include, (1) completing a Behavioral Cusp Assessment, (2) completing a Repertoire Mapping chart, (3) writing IEP goals, and (4) writing IEP recommendations. |
Audience: Parents, therapists, consultants and students. Participants should have a basic understanding of behavior analytic terms and verbal behavior. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
A Scientific Approach to Validating Academic Outcomes: A Recipe for Abandoning Cookie Cutter Assessment Practices |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Alison L. Moors, M.A. |
ALISON L. MOORS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), SUSAN K. MALMQUIST (Malmquist & Associates) |
Description: With the recent enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act, school districts and clinicians alike have been forced to look at data collection in a whole new light. The contingencies attached to student progress seem to have shifted, resulting in perceived hardship for many teachers to prove learning has occurred. Moreover, a schools budget may be impacted by the ability to document these performance outcomes in an acceptable fashion. The focus of this workshop will be to illustrate a Behavioral Problem Solving Approach to academic assessment that is consistent with current federal legislation. Topics covered include: 1) how to use a multi-level assessment system, including both summative and formative evaluation; 2) how to make empirically-validated instructional decisions, such as appropriate curriculum placement; and 3) how to demystify the question, How do we prove that no child is left behind? |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Describe at least two historical uses of assessment within behavior analytic program models. - Describe at least five common myths of academic assessment methodology. - Describe at least three features of a problem solving approach to assessment. - Describe at least four assessment modules that lead to effective educational programming. - Describe at least two data collection techniques that efficiently report progress using a Behavioral Problem Solving Approach to assessment. |
Activities: During this workshop, participants will demonstrate the above outcomes by presenter-led small group activities which illustrate the following skill sets: See an example of a common myth of assessment use/ list the rationale against; See an example of assessment data usage/state whether most or least effective approach; See a set of assessment data/ Write possible problem identification; See a set of assessment data and problem/write at least one example of a curricular solution within the participant�s expertise area; See a scenario utilizing a Behavioral Problem Solving Approach to assessment/describe a possible data collection procedure. |
Audience: This is an intermediate level workshop designed for Behavior Analysts, Clinical Psychologists, School Psychologists, Principals, Public School Teachers, and others who work within a service delivery model where assessment data are used to illustrate progress. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Creating Academic Programs for Children with Autism and Other Disabilities Using Microsoft PowerPoint |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4C (4th floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: William A. Flood, M.A. |
WILLIAM A. FLOOD (May South, Inc.), PAUL W. HEERING (May South, Inc.), STEPHEN T. NORTH (May South, Inc.) |
Description: When creating academic programs (school or home-based) for children with Autism and other developmental disabilities, it is challenging to develop programs that are reinforcing to each child. In an effort to find higher reinforcing activities, a greater number of classrooms are using computers for either teaching academic skills or as pure reinforcing activities. Recent advances in technology have allowed for the creation of extremely innovative electronic educational software that many children find reinforcing. Unfortunately, many of these programs are designed for typically developing children and do not use the principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis. This workshop will teach you how to create low-cost academic programs on the computer program Microsoft PowerPoint with the intention of teaching and/or generalizing skills. The workshop will give a basic overview of how to use the program Microsoft PowerPoint. You will learn how to integrate behavioral principles and procedures into the computer program to ensure the most effective teaching. Finally, the instructor will display examples of academic programs created and successfully implemented with children with autism. Participants are encouraged to bring their personal laptops and develop academic programs alongside the instructor. |
Learning Objectives: At the end of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Operate the basic functions of the computer program Microsoft PowerPoint. - Identify common mistakes from traditional multimedia teaching programs. - Create basic academic programs in PowerPoint. - Integrate behavior principles (e.g., prompting, prompt fading, reinforcement, extinction, etc.) into their academic programs. - Recognize various academic programs (e.g., match-to-sample, receptive object identification, reading comprehension) that can easily be taught with PowerPoint. |
Activities: The workshop will begin with a brief lecture about the computer program Microsoft PowerPoint. The remainder of the workshop will consist of interactive hands-on teaching in which the participants are systematically guided through the creation of academic programs in PowerPoint. The participants are strongly encouraged to use their personal laptop computers and create academic programs concurrently with the instructor. |
Audience: Teachers, parents, behavior analysts, or anyone in charge of creating curriculum for children with disabilities/autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Using The Assessment of Basic Language and Learner Skills (The ABLLS) to Develop a Language-Based Curriculum for Individuals with Autism or Other Developmental Disabilities |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: James W. Partington, Ph.D. |
JAMES W. PARTINGTON (James W. Partington, Ph.D., A Psychological Corporation) |
Description: The Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills (The ABLLS), based on Dr. Skinners analysis of verbal behavior, provides a mechanism to analyze learner skills, develop a comprehensive language-based curriculum, and track skill acquisition for individuals with autism or other developmental disabilities. The workshop will provide participants with the necessary information to use The ABLLS to develop and monitor educational programs. Participants will gain a thorough understanding of the multiple uses the information gained from The ABLLS can provide in the development and adjustment of an intervention program. Specific topics will be covered with relevant examples including administering and interpreting The ABLLS, analysis of the learners skills, curriculum development, educational planning, the evaluation of priorities, and determining IEP objectives. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Identify basic learner skills that are important to include in a curriculum for young children with autism. - Identify examples of B. F. Skinner�s verbal operants. - Describe how curricular variables affect the motivation of young children with autism. - Identify how teaching a child to mand for reinforcers results in the development of several other important learner skills. - Identify components of a behavioral language assessment that should be reviewed in order to determine the most appropriate elements to be included in a language intervention program for young children with autism. |
Activities: Information regarding the development of The ABLLS and the concept of basic learner skills will be provided in a lecture format. Scoring of The ABLLS to determine skill strengths and deficits in the 25 assessment areas will be described and practiced. In addition, procedures for transferring the scoring information to the skills tracking grids will be illustrated. Video examples of a child's skills over the course of her intervention program will be used to show how the child's progress is captured by the ABLLS. Discussions regarding the analysis of skills, evaluation of educational priorities, and determination of IEP objectives for two students will be conducted. |
Audience: This workshop would be appropriate for behavior analysts, teachers, speech and language pathologists, or other individuals who are responsible for implementing, developing, or monitoring educational programs for children with autism or other developmental disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Working with Developmentally Disabled Sex Offenders in Community-Based Settings |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: CSE; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Holly V. Steele, Ph.D. |
HOLLY V. STEELE (Psychological Management Group), KIMBERLY E. CHURCH (Human Development Center), HOLLY ARNOLD (Human Development Center) |
Description: In recent years, increasing focus has been placed on the risks and difficulties associated with treating people with mental retardation who engage in sexual misconduct and live in non-secure, community-based settings. The purpose of this workshop is to provide participants with behavioral strategies which have been demonstrated to decrease the relapse/recidivism rate of individuals who are sex offenders and who have developmental disabilities. The subjects are twenty-three adult males with mental retardation, all of whom participate in behaviorally-oriented group treatment in an independent practice setting. Of this number, ten live in community-based group homes, and seven live in non-secure but segregated group homes in a rural setting. Two subjects are in Supported Independent Living, in staffed homes or apartments, and the remaining two live in their own apartments with minimal staff contact. Eleven subjects have engaged in sexual misconduct with both children and adults (rape, coerced sex, sexual battery, lewd and lascivious behavior, etc.), while ten have histories of sexual misconduct with children only. Four subjects have engaged in other types of inappropriate sexual behavior, such as sex with animals, rectal digging associated with using feces as a masturbatory lubricant, fetishism, public masturbation, and exposure. Clients ages range from 19 to 65, and all function within the mild or moderate ranges of mental retardation. Techniques used in treatment of these individuals include direct instruction, modeling, behavioral rehearsal, and guided feedback. In addition, treatment includes sex education, extensive analysis of remote and immediate antecedents to sexual misconduct, consequence anticipation, acquisition of replacement behaviors, identification of risk factors for re-offending, learning the effects of sexual abuse upon victims, and impulse management strategies. Of clients who participate in group treatment, 21 of 23 also receive behavioral programming directly addressing sexual misconduct in their residential and vocational settings. Data from these individual programs will be presented. Measures used by staff to assess clients responses to high-risk situations in community settings will be distributed. An agency policy regarding clients sexual behavior will be presented, and ramifications of its use discussed. Difficulties encountered in collecting data on behavior which is both dangerous and covert will be examined, as will the effects associated with treating this population on clinicians and staff. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: � Name and describe basic behavioral techniques for use with developmentally disabled sex offenders. - Describe the process of obtaining extensive information about antecedents to episodes of sexual misconduct. - Develop and implement a behavior program which includes both reduction procedures for sexual misconduct and acquisition procedures for replacement behaviors. - Use measures (distributed in the workshop) for assessing the responses of sex offenders in high risk situations. - Identify difficulties associated with conducting behavioral research with sex offenders. - Identify difficulties described in the literature as being encountered frequently by therapists, staff, and other caregivers providing services to sex offenders. |
Activities: Each participant will receive a handbook of training materials that includes examples of a functional behavior assessment, a behavior analysis service plan, and risk assessments. Various interventions and assessment measures will be reviewed in detail with participants. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and discuss the material presented. |
Audience: The target audience includes psychologists and other mental health professionals, behavior analysts, administrators, and individuals involved in the provision of services to individuals who have engaged in sexual offending behaviors. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Implementing Behavioral Models in Robots: What a Learning Robot Can Teach Us |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4K (4th floor) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: William R. Hutchison, Ph.D. |
WILLIAM R. HUTCHISON (Behavior Systems), BETSY J. CONSTANTINE (Context Systems) |
Description: The workshop will introduce participants to robot technology and its uses in behavioral research. Participants will be given an overview of robot technology, including sensor types, sensor preprocessing, motors and actuators, and alternative approaches to controlling robot motors. Instructors will present an existing quantitative/computational model of operant learning?the Seventh Generation system?that is currently being used to control robots capable of operant conditioning. By studying the design and operation of the operant model interacting directly with the real world, participants will have an opportunity to reexamine some basic behavior analytic principles, such as primary reinforcement, conditioned reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, transfer of stimulus control, etc. Participants will explore these principles by working with an actual robot whose behavior is learned and controlled by the Seventh Generation behavioral model. After observing demonstrations of a variety of teaching procedures and the effect each has on the robots learning behavior, participants will analyze those processes at a level of detail unachievable with living subjects. Participants will have a hands-on opportunity to develop a simple teaching procedure with the Seventh Generation operant learning system and use it to teach a small mobile robot?the Garcia robot from Acroname, Inc.?to perform a simple behavior. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participants will be able to: - Describe basic learning processes at a level appropriate for control of a robot. - Describe key issues and problems in implementing behavior analytic models in robots. - Discuss parallels and differences between teaching robots and teaching living organisms. - Describe several areas of current research in robotics and machine learning relevant to behavior analysis. - Develop a simple example of computerized training and an example of live training for a Garcia robot with the Seventh Generation operant learning system. |
Activities: Classroom presentation and discussion. The class will break into 2 or 3 lab groups after each topic, each with a robot and instructor to demonstrate the topic. By the last stage of the workshop, the groups will be able to demonstrate a simple training procedure with the robot. |
Audience: Psychologists and behavior analysts interested in computational models of learning and how working with robots can improve our teaching procedures. Behavior analysts who are interested in developing computational behavioral models and robotics are particularly welcome. |
Content Area: Theory |
Instruction Level: Advanced |
|
|
Preparation for Adult Years: Transitioning Individuals with Autism from School to Community |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4L (4th floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Julia R. Fisher, Other |
LINDA S. MEYER (Alpine Learning Group), ERIN RICHARD (Alpine Learning Group), ANGELA RODRIGUEZ (Alpine Learning Group), PETER F. GERHARDT (Alpine Learning Group), JULIA R. FISHER (Alpine Learning Group) |
Description: Consistent with federal mandates (e.g., IDEA, 1990) the IEPs of learners 14 years of age and older must include a statement of transition needs. For this reason, educational goals for these learners need to focus on preparation for adult life (e.g., functioning fully in community settings, developing relevant job skills, and increasing self-care and domestic skills). Some of the skills prioritized include the production aspects of a job (e.g., sorting mail or data entry) as well as skills to address successful integration into the work environment (e.g., using a public restroom, taking a break). Two successful models, supported volunteer and supported employment programs, will be described. The programs goal is to help teenage and adult learners acquire and perform age appropriate, functional skills in a variety of integrated, natural community environments (e.g., a public library, a YMCA). Instructional strategies for teaching job skills and systematic analyses to address problem behavior will be presented. Staff use objective data measures to document the effects of intervention and participants success. Potential employment sites are identified based on empirical data which illustrate the learners proficiency in a particular job, and anecdotal data regarding the learners preferred work environment. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Identify behaviorally based teaching strategies to teach functional skills required for adolescents and adults with autism to hold community job placements. - State specific skill acquisition programs (e.g., expressive and receptive language, social skills, number concepts) which are prerequisites to job placement. - Identify discreet, effective motivational systems used in community job settings. - Identify data collection procedures and summaries to identify successful interventions. - Find community volunteer and employment placements. - Identify successful strategies for problem solving challenging behavior in community job placements. |
Activities: Listen to didactic presentation; View videotapes of adults and adolescents on the job; Participate in problem solving sessions addressing challenging behavior in the community. |
Audience: Professionals who work with learners with autism ages 14 and older; Parents who have children ages 14 years of age and older. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
An Overview of Assessing, Classifying and Treating Feeding Difficulties in Children with Developmental Disabilities |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
4M (4th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Tracey G. Galiatsatos, M.S. |
TRACEY G. GALIATSATOS (New England Center for Children), WILLIAM H. AHEARN (New England Center for Children) |
Description: Feeding problems are common among children diagnosed with developmental disabilities. The feeding difficulties of these children stem from and are maintained by, numerous biological and environmental factors. This workshop will begin by providing an overview of factors which may trigger feeding difficulties. Biological factors, such as dysfunction of the GI system, and environmental factors, such as child-feeder interactions, will be discussed. The workshop will also address feeding evaluations and the role of a comprehensive feeding team. The classification and assessment of feeding difficulties becomes a critical issue in providing appropriate treatment for these behaviors. Participants will learn to classify feeding difficulties. Emphasis will be placed on behavior interventions of three topographical categories: insufficient food intake (i.e. food-type selectivity, food-texture selectivity, insufficient caloric intake), specific skill deficits (i.e. self-feeding, chewing skills), and disruptive behavior emitted during meal times (i.e. crying, food expulsion). Case studies of each category will be discussed. Behavioral interventions that will be reviewed include: food exposure, simultaneous presentation, positive reinforcement, and escape prevention. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, the participant will be able to: - Identify the biological and environmental factors which may cause feeding difficulties - Identify common variables that are related to the development of feeding problems - Describe assessment tools which may be used to conduct feeding assessments - Categorize and prioritize feeding needs given a hypothetical case - Describe environmental factors that occasion and maintain feeding problems - Identify common behavior principles (e.g. reinforcement, prompting, extinction) used to address feeding difficulties |
Activities: Through the use of didactic presentation, handouts, and case illustrations, workshop participants will develop an understanding of feeding difficulties and possible behavioral treatment options. |
Audience: This workshop is targeted for clinicians and therapists who have a basic understanding of behavior analytic terms and theory. |
Content Area: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Developing and Implementing an ABA Program for Students with Autism, PDD-NOS, and Asperger's in a Public School Setting |
Friday, May 27, 2005 |
6:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Private Dining Room 4 (3rd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jill E. McGrale Maher, M.S. |
JILL E. MCGRALE MAHER (Marlborough Public Schools), ALISON R. MOSES (Marlborough Public Schools), JENNIFER TERAKEDIS (Marlborough Public Schools), AMANDA J. SPITZER (Marlborough Public Schools), ROBERT F. POLSINELLI (Marlborough Public Schools), JOSH KOZIOL (Marlborough Public Schools), KERRIE M. OTIPOBY (Marlborough Public Schools) |
Description: Over the past several years, much progress has been made in the emphasis on and the development of programming for students with disabilities in general education settings. While the incidence of students on the autism spectrum receiving programming in public school settings has dramatically increased, quality programming based on the principles of applied behavior analysis is limited. Furthermore, due to the unique challenge public school environments present, very few school systems have successfully implemented a district-wide ABA program. Many of the public schools that have developed ABA programs have not been able to support a growing number and age-range of students while providing high quality comprehensive programming. In addition, school systems that have developed programs often do not have a centralized system of management as well as the appropriate number of qualified supervisory staff. Much ABA public school programming is based on the skills of individuals, and when the individuals resign, the program no longer exists. This data-based workshop focuses on the implementation of a district-wide behavioral treatment program for students of various skill levels on the autism spectrum, ranging in age from 3-13. This workshop will provide participants with the knowledge and skills to identify the essential elements of a comprehensive program based on the principles of applied behavior analysis. Participants will be provided with the skills necessary to: 1. Develop program goals 2. Develop an appropriate organizational structure 3. Develop a thorough supervision model 4. Identify the correct number and qualifications of supervisory staff 5. Develop work performance standards for staff 6. Develop a comprehensive and competency-based staff training program 7. Develop a variety of staff training strategies, including feedback, peer review, goal setting, public posting, and video samples 8. Develop a comprehensive set of teaching programs within the frameworks of general education curriculum 9. Develop and implement a system for management of student programming 10. Develop systems to address/coexist with existing political and administrative policy and protocol |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify the essential elements of a comprehensive school-based program based on the principles of applied behavior analysis - Develop program goals and timelines to evaluate progress on goals - Identify key components a comprehensive and competency-based staff training program - Identify the most appropriate staff training strategies for their respective settings - Develop an appropriate supervision model including organizational structure and job descriptions for staff - Identify the correct number and qualifications of supervisory staff - Identify the scope of a comprehensive set of teaching programs - Identify a system for management of student programming - Identify possible issues with existing political and administrative policy and protocol - Identify a method for addressing district-specific obstacles |
Activities: Didactic instruction; Discuss and develop a list of the essential elements of a comprehensive ABA program; Develop a training outline and a strategy for follow-up/competency-based training; Discuss and brainstorm a list of possible roadblocks and solutions; Develop an outline for implementing a program including goals, organizational structure, clinical supervision, and student programming; Develop realistic goals and timelines for implementation of a program. |
Audience: Behavior Analysts working in public school settings; scholl administrators |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Schedule-Induced Behaviors: Origins of Excessive Behaviors and Procedures to Minimize Their Influence |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Jeff Kupfer, Ph.D. |
JEFF KUPFER (Florida Residential Solutions, LLC) |
Description: Schedule-induced or adjunctive behaviors (sometimes maladaptive and always excessive) are behaviors that are maintained at a high probability by stimuli that derive their reinforcing properties as a function of parameters governing the availability of some other class of reinforcement. In non-human subjects, some schedules of reinforcement have been shown to generate strange behaviors such as: polydipsia, attack against members of its own species, self-induced escape, pica, and hyperactivity; In human subjects, these same schedules can exaggerate behaviors such as fluid intake, aggression, pacing, grooming, eating, stereotyped behavior, smoking and, quite possibly-- wretched excess. This presentation is an introduction to schedule-induced behaviors. A brief video-tape will be shown demonstrating various types of schedule-induced behaviors in a rat and pigeon. Studies describing functional relationships with reinforcement schedules and generator schedules (i.e., schedules that promote schedule-induced behaviors) will be reviewed, as well as functional assessment and measurement strategies. Alternative reinforcement strategies in applied settings will be reviewed and case studies will be presented comparing fixed- vs. variable-DRO schedules. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop participants will be able to: - Provide introduction into schedule-induced behavior and expand functional analysis approaches - Review methods to measure and assess schedule-induced behavior - Describe possible pitfalls in using common schedules of reinforcement - Provide alternatives to minimize the influence of schedule-induced behaviors |
Activities: Participate in discussion regarding: contents of literature review; measurement and assessment suggestions; procedures to maximize effects of positive reinforcement and minimizing the influence of reinforcement schedules that induce excessive behaviors; and environmental management strategies to channel excessive behaviors into more productive and adaptive outlets. |
Audience: Professionals and paraprofessionals actively involved in developing, implementing and monitoring behavior treatment plans, students that desire a review of schedule-induced behaviors and implications. |
Content Area: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Treating Clients with Maladaptive Habits, Tics, Tourettes Syndrome, and Stuttering Using the Habit Reversal and Regulated Breathing Treatment Program |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Boulevard A (2nd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: R. Gregory Nunn, Ph.D. |
R. GREGORY NUNN (National University) |
Description: Maladaptive and undesirable habits, tics, Tourettes Syndrome (TS), and stuttering are extremely common problems which can seriously affect the personal relationships and self-esteem of individuals who suffer from them. Because these problems can cause acute psychological distress, many different types of treatments for them have been developed. Habit Reversal is a behavioral treatment approach which has proven to be an effective, General treatment for habits and tics including TS (Azrin & Nunn, 1973; Azrin & Nunn, 1977; Nunn, 1978; Azrin, Nunn & Frantz, 1980; Azrin & Peterson, 1988a; Finney, Rapoff, Hall, & Christopherson, 1983; Franco, 1981; Zikis, 1983: Miltenberger, 2001). |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify and diagnose maladaptive habits, tics, TS, and stuttering with children and adults. - Understand the theoretical rationales that have spawned the many treatments for these types of problems. - Understand the Habit Reversal and Regulated Breathing Treatment Procedures. - Understand common pitfalls of treatment and ways of overcoming them. |
Activities: In this Workshop we will discuss the identification, nature, and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with these type of problems. Specifically we will cover the diagnosis and treatment of individuals using the Habit Reversal and Regulated Breathing Treatment Procedures of Azrin and Nunn as well as treatment variations that have evolved from their original work. Case studies are included where possible and workshop participants are strongly encouraged to provide input. |
Audience: All practitioners, educators, and other professionals working with children, adolescents, or adults presenting with these types of problems. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Toilet Training for Autistic & Encopretic Children: Data-Based Bio-Behavioral Intervention |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michael Ben-Zvi, M.A. |
MICHAEL BEN-ZVI (NATAV Private Practice, Israel) |
Description: While early intensive interventions are widely used to improve communicative, cognitive and other skills, toilet training for autistic children is still a challenge to behavior analysis. Encopresis is a very disturbing illness, not so rare with normal children. The combination of those two is even worse. The use of Reflexes and Respondent conditioning (in combination with operant conditioning) is needed for complex behaviors that are only partly Operant. The purpose of this workshop is to address that need, especially for the acquiring of proper bowl movement on toilet, both for Encopretic and Autistic children. The workshop will cover the theoretical assumptions behind the intervention, the protocol of treatment and its accommodations to each child. Ethical considerations, Data collection and decision making in the course of intervention will be discussed. Case studies will be presented, and the toilet training of urination will be addressed shortly. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participant will be able to: - Know and understand the protocol of intervention - Explain the intervention to parent of non trained child - Gather the required data for decision making before and through the intervention - Detect the relevant symptom of Encopresis and apply the proper intervention. - Address ethical considerations and rejections. - Support parents through implementation of the intervention. |
Activities: Activities will include presentation of both rational and practical issues, analyzing data records, practicing the collection of data on relevant Data sheets, and discussion of questions. |
Audience: Behavior analysts, consultants and program managers of interventions with autistic population, clinicians who address Encopresis, parent of Encopretic and autistic children. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
How to Train Caregivers in Functional Behavioral Assessment and Treatment Development |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4A (4th floor) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Julia T. O'Connor, Ph.D. |
JULIA T. O'CONNOR (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Description: As the functional behavior assessment methodology has expanded from the highly controlled research context to homes, schools and community settings, more questions have arisen regarding how to incorporate the family and other caregivers of the client into the assessment and treatment process. Caregiver participation in behavioral assessments allows the clinician to establish a context that more closely replicates the conditions in the natural environment. This workshop is designed to train professionals how to collaborate with parents throughout the functional analysis and treatment development process. The primary focus will be to assist the professional in teaching parents and other caregivers of children with developmental disabilities how to analyze behavior and develop function based treatment strategies in a collaborative relationship. Participants will have the opportunity to practice in small groups. Materials will be provided to participants including how to define behavior, identify target situations, and identify potential reinforcers as well as sample data collection sheets and other handouts describing the principles of applied behavior analysis and conducting functional analysis. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Train caregivers how to define target maladaptive behaviors. - Train caregivers to conduct stimulus preference assessments and functional analyses in home and community settings. - Train caregivers to identify appropriate alternative/adaptive behaviors. - Train caregivers how to link functional analysis outcomes to possible treatment strategies. - Assess caregiver integrity on implementation of the functional analysis and treatment. |
Activities: Participants will be involved in didactic presentation, discussion, and interactive activities. |
Audience: Clinicians working with parents with developmentally disabled children with behavior problems. Masters level therapists, psychologists, and family members are welcome. Participants should have a fundamental understanding of the principles of applied behavior analysis. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Pediatric Sleeplessness: Identification and Intervention |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Stevens 5 (Lower Level) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Robert W. Montgomery, Ph.D. |
ROBERT W. MONTGOMERY (Reinforcement Unlimited), JASON T. CAVIN (The Learning Tree, Inc.) |
Description: Pediatric sleeplessness and sleep disruptions are among the most common concerns of parents. Excessive sleepiness in a child is a symptom that is often underrecognized and misinterpreted, but when left untreated can lead to serious behavioral, academic, developmental, and medical consequences. Pediatric sleeplessness is widely prevalent and often behaviorally based. Research supports that pediatric sleeplessness can be treated effectively with nonpharmacologic interventions. This workshop will review the nature of sleep and sleep disruption (including common pediatric sleep disorders), and introduce the participant to behavioral treatment strategies (e.g., extinction, parent education, positive routines, sleep hygiene). Finally, behavioral interventions for children with special needs will be discussed (i.e., developmental disabilities, ADHD, and mood disorders). |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Recognize the three main types of sleep disruption. - Analyze the environment, in light of the research, in order to maximize the potential for restful sleep. - Describe the most common behavioral mistakes made during sleep preparation and list research supported sleep preparation habits that increase the likelihood of productive sleep. - Have criteria for when to refer those with sleep disruption for medical evaluation. |
Activities: Didactic and interactive discussion will be conducted throughout the session. Participants are encouraged to come with questions and case examples as an interactive session will be included. |
Audience: BCBAs, BCABAs, consultants, teachers, parents, and anyone interested in how sleep impacts behavior and how to improve the sleep of children and adolescents. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Private Practice Model of Consulting |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Terence G. Blackwell, M.A. |
TERENCE G. BLACKWELL (CERG Management, Inc.), PAUL F. CONLEY (Paul Conley Publishing) |
Description: The workshop is designed to teach people how to establish their own professional consulting business using a Private Practice Model. Topics include: how to identify clients, pricing of services, leveraging your time, building your business through centers of influence, creating a public presence and getting beyond creating a income, to designing a lifestyle. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will understand: - Defining your niche market - Determining the structure of a Private Practice - Creating a public presence - Assessing the viability of your business |
Activities: Analyzing behaviors that lead to successful business models for Private Practitioners; behavior of successful marketing of services; Business Model review, case study of successful independent Private Practice Models. |
Audience: Individuals interested in establishing Private Practice model consulting business in the field of ABA. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
The Use of Computer and Video Technology with Children with Autism |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Joliet (3rd floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Mary Ellen McDonald, Ph.D. |
MARY ELLEN MCDONALD (The Genesis School), MICHELE LEYKUM (The Genesis School), ERIN SPARACIO (The Genesis School) |
Description: Often children with autism have great difficulty learning new skills, and one factor that often impedes learning by children with autism is the social component of the learning process. The use of video-based intstruction has been successful in teaching a variety of new skills. This workshop will provide information on a variety of video-based instructional methods that can be used successfully to teach skills to children with autism. Specific methods to be reviewed will include: video modeling, video rehearsal, video priming. In addition to video-based instruction, computer-based instruction and a combination of the use of video and computer technology will also be discussed. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe at least 3 video-based instructional methods that can be used with children with autism - Describe at least 2 uses of video modeling with children with autism. - Explain how reinforcement contingencies can be used through video contingencies - Provide a rationale for using computer or video technology for children with autism |
Activities: Participants will observe video clips depicting a variety of video-based instructional techniques. Participants will be asked to select a behavior that they would like to increase using video-based instruction and will work on developing a plan to use video-based instruction to teach a skill. Volunteers will also have an opportunity to sample computer-based technology programs. |
Audience: Special educators, psychologists, school personnel, behavior analysts and parents |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Communication-Based Behavior Interventions |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Continental C (1st floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: John J. Pokrzywinski, M.A. |
JOHN J. POKRZYWINSKI (Arlington Developmental Center), DIANA BRADBERRY (Arlington Developmental Center), RICHARD W. POWELL (Shelby Residential and Vocational Services), IRFA KARMALI (Shelby Residential and Vocational Services) |
Description: This workshop emphasizes positive reinforcement of alternative behaviors to reduce problem behaviors (replacement behaviors). It encourages procedures that increase the contextual fit of behavior support plans; presents procedures that allow identification and manipulation of setting events and discriminative stimuli; Discussion includes procedures to encourage a communication-based environment. The procedures described in the workshop are designed to: Emphasize nonaversive and naturalistic procedures to reduce the likelihood of problem behaviors; increase the acceptance of behavior support plans, and thus the likelihood of success and generality; and increase collaboration between professional and direct-support staff. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify and discuss procedures to reduce problem behaviors by emphasizing positive reinforcement of alternative behaviors (replacement behaviors). - Identify and discuss procedures to modify antecedent & setting event manipulations which reduce the occurrence of problem behaviors and the need for corrective interventions. - Identify and discuss procedures that increase the acceptability of behavior support plans and increase the likelihood of success and generality (contextual fit). - Describe and discuss procedures to encourage a communicative environment. - Describe and discuss procedures to increase collaboration between all team members and direct-support staff. |
Activities: Workshop activities include discussions of Eliminative versus educative strategies to deal with problem behaviors; Antecedent events & contextual variables; Functional behavior assessment & replacement behavior development; Discrete trial training (DTT) and natural environment training (NET); Verbal behavior considerations. |
Audience: Behavior Analysts, Speech-Language Pathologists, Direct-Support Staff & Supervisors, Psychologists, Nurses, Advocates, Independent Support Coordinators, and others. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Graphing with Microsoft Excel |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4C (4th floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Kimberly A. Schulze, Ph.D. |
SARAH E. ROBERTS (Minnesota Autism Center), KIMBERLY A. SCHULZE (St. Cloud State University), EMILY RUDRUD (St. Cloud State University), ERIC RUDRUD (St. Cloud State University) |
Description: articipants will be provided with systematic instruction on graphing single-subject research designs with Microsoft Excel. Single-subject designs covered include: ABAB, Multiple Baseline, Alternating Treatments, and Cumulative Records. Participants will also learn to graph session-by-session learner acquisition data. Participants will be provided with a CD providing detailed text instructions, a streaming video with demonstrations, and templates for learner acquisition data. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Enter data on Excel spreadsheet for appropriate single-subject research design. - Graph data for single-subject design. - Edit graph content (titles, axis, background, condition, trend lines). - Graph learner acquisition data. |
Activities: Participants will be provided with instruction and practice in graphing single-case designs. We encourage participants to bring laptop computers to practice entering data and graphing results. |
Audience: Practitioners and researchers who need to graph data in an efficient manner. Faculty and graduate students who teach behavior analysis. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Introduction to Data Collection Methods |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Boulevard B (2nd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Bobby Newman, Ph.D. |
BOBBY NEWMAN (Room to Grow), TAMMY HAMMOND NATOF (Effective Interventions) |
Description: Too often, individuals who are attempting to apply behavior analytic instruction have not been trained in the usage of a full range of data collection methodologies. They have one or two particular systems that are in use at their program (e.g., percent correct or frequency), but avoid the use of a myriad of other data collection strategies (e.g., fluency, latency, probe data, etc.). This is an introductory level workshop that will describe various systems of data collection commonly used within Applied Behavior Analytic settings (e.g., intensive programs for individuals diagnosed with developmental disabilities, mainstream educational settings, adult rehabilitation programs). Various systems of data collection in applied settings will be introduced and explored. These will include: frequency data, rate measures, latency, magnitude, duration, percent correct (in a trial by trial format), and probe data. In addition, specific data sampling techniques such as Partial Interval Recording and Momentary Time Sampling will be discussed. How and when to use each of the above will be discussed, and practice will be provided from videotaped and audio examples. A pop quiz of given scenarios will also be provided, and participants encouraged to discuss which data collection system they would employ for each scenario and why. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will (be able to): - Learn the definitions of each of the several types of data collection listed above - Learn how to use each type of data collection. - Learn when to use each type of data collection. - Practice systems of deriving inter-observer agreement - Teach others data collection strategies. |
Activities: Participants will hear lecture and will partake in practice in the various types of data collection described. |
Audience: This is an introductory level workshop for parents and direct care providers, as well as staff trainers. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Preference-Based Teaching: Procedures for Helping People with Developmental Disabilities Enjoy Learning Without Problem Behavior |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Dennis H. Reid, Ph.D. |
DENNIS H. REID (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center), CAROLYN W. GREEN (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Description: This workshop will describe a preference-based teaching approach for helping people with developmental disabilities enjoy learning functional skills without problem behavior during teaching sessions. The focus is on how to make teaching programs highly preferred (as indicated, for example, through indices of happiness and absence of indices of unhappiness). A program approach will be described and demonstrated that: (a) enhances the preferred nature of teaching programs to increase learner enjoyment in participating in the programs, and (b) removes the motivation for problem behavior that often occurs in attempts to escape or avoid the programs. Specific strategies to be described include how a teacher or instructor can build rapport with a learner and establish his/her attention as a reinforcer, using preferred events as antecedents and consequences to teaching sessions, interspersing preferred events within instructional trials, incorporating efficient choice opportunities within the teaching process, and timing the scheduling of teaching sessions to promote learner enjoyment. Summaries of recent behavior analytic investigations will also be provided to demonstrate the evidence base of preference-based teaching. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe how to include a preferred event before, during and after a teaching session to enhance the preferred features of the session for a learner with disabilities. - Describe how to use establishing operations to maximize the preferred nature of at least one aspect of a teaching session. - Describe how at least one learner choice can be embedded within a teaching session to enhance the preferred nature of the session for a learner. - Describe three things a teacher can do to establish his/her attention as a preferred event for a learner. |
Activities: Activities of participants will include: (1) listening to instructor lecture/presentations, (2) viewing overhead presentation of key points, (3) completing pencil and paper activities relating to scenarios depicting applications of key points, (4) viewing role-play demonstrations of target procedures by instructors, (5) practicing target procedures in role-play situations with performance feedback by instructors (provided until individual participants demonstrate competency in accordance with performance checklists employed by instructors) , and (6) opportunities to ask questions of instructors and receive instructor answers. |
Audience: The target audience includes anyone who implements skill-acquisition teaching programs with people who have developmental disabilities including autism. Examples of target audience participants include teachers, teacher assistants, residential direct support and supervisory staff, vocational support staff (e.g., job coaches), behavior analysts, behavior specialists and technicians, and parents. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
The Teaching of Successful Intelligence |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Williford C (3rd floor) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: T. V. Joe Layng, Ph.D. |
JOANNE K. ROBBINS (Morningside Academy), T. V. JOE LAYNG (Headsprout) |
Description: When the environment requires a learner to produce verbal stimuli that sequentially and systematically make one pattern of behavior more likely than another in order to meet a contingency requirement, reasoning is defined. This process is akin to what Skinner (1969) described as an "inspection of reinforcement contingencies" such that an individual can describe behavior that meets contingency requirements without direct shaping or rules. Procedures have been developed that train learners in reasoning and in the inspection of the requirements for reinforcement in most problem solving situations. The workshop will begin with a brief introduction to approaches to teaching intelligence, including Sternbergs analytical, practical, and creative intelligences, and an overview of effective and ineffective thinking skills strategies. The body of the workshop will be spent actively applying a Talk Aloud Problem Solving (TAPS) method derived from Bloom, 1950, and Whimbey & Lockhead, 1999) for teaching effective reasoning, and a method of teaching analytical thinking, Fluent Thinking Skills (FTS), (Robbins and Layng, 2004) based upon generating and answering questions that can be used for elementary school through graduate school and for effectively solving everyday problems at home and in the workplace. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Define and distinguish between reasoning and analytical thinking. - Describe the relation between reasoning, analytical thinking, and intelligence - Apply TAPS and FTS to a variety of situations requiring reasoning or analytical thinking. - Describe how to teach TAPS and FTS to others. |
Activities: Discuss reasoning and analytical thinking as described in workshop introduction; Play TAPS game to learn basic concepts; In groups of two, Apply TAPS to solve problems with one person taking the role of problem solver and the other the role of active listener. Both individuals will take turns as problem solver and active listeners; Play FTS game to learn basic concepts, Apply FTS to quickly learn a difficult subject unfamiliar to most participants. |
Audience: Those who work in educational, therapeutic, or business settings where reasoning, thinking or the teaching of intelligence is important. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Using Behavior Systems Technology in Teacher Education Programming: Principles, Practice, and Hands-On Applications |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4D (4th floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Thomas L. Sharpe, Jr., Ed.D. |
THOMAS L. SHARPE, JR. (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), DANIEL W. BALDERSON (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) |
Description: The workshop will provide introduction to, and hands on application of, a data supported protocol for the (a) comprehensive description, (b) discrete and sequential analysis, and (c) feedback and goal-setting activities necessary to effective teacher training in postsecondary classroom and on-site K-12 deliberate practice environments. Workshop activities include (a) introduction to the importance of a behavior systems approach to teacher training, (b) hands-on observation system construction, and (c) simulated data collection and analysis activities designed for instructional purposes. Additionally, detailed explanation and hands-on interaction with protocols designed for a range of logically sequenced training activities are provided, including (a) classroom video observations, (b) on-site data-based assessment and immediate feedback and goal-setting, and (c) research and development into effective educational practice. Workshop participants will leave with a conceptual and applied familiarity with behavior systems educational protocols designed for effective professional training practice. Participants will be provided with a complimentary copy of the complete software tools and methods procedures on CD ROM, and MSWORD files of all necessary illustration materials in relation to the educational protocols discussed as a function of workshop participation. *While some computer hardware will be provided, it is recommended that workshop participants bring their own IBM compatible laptop hardware to facilitate hands-on workshop interactions. |
Learning Objectives: Workshop participants will exit with technologically-based instructional skills in the area of applied behavioral teacher training. Skills include the ability to (a) design observation systems that match with training objectives, (b) construct video-based observational learning laboratory experiences in relation to training objectives, (c) implement on-site data-based feedback and goal-setting experiences to determine if training objectives have been met, and (d) develop a set of applied research activities to document the relative effectiveness of professional training activities. At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Discuss in conceptual and applied ways the principles and practice of applied behavior systems analysis in relation to professional teacher training. - Construct observation systems relevant to their particular professional teacher training objectives. - Design and implement video-based observational learning activities in relation to educational objectives for professionals in training. - Understand and apply a range of computer-based data collection and analysis techniques in relation to recommended data-based on-site feedback and goal setting instructional protocols. - Develop an applied research agenda in relation to professional training objectives to determine the relative effectiveness of instructional efforts. |
Activities: Activities include review of applied behavior systems analysis in relation to professional training activities; hands-on application of observation system construction designed as compatible with professional training objectives; hands-on application of observational laboratory development in relation to the classroom instruction of relevant behavior analytic professional training objectives; hands-on application of data-based on-site feedback and goal-goal setting protocols in relationship to deliberate practice activities of professional trainees; and introduction and review of recommended research activity development in relation to determining the relative effectiveness of recommended professional training activities. |
Audience: Advanced graduate students and behavior analysts working in the area of professional teacher education in specific, and in the area of postsecondary training for professional competencies in general. Those working in postsecondary educational settings where focus is on the education, on-site training, and assessment of professional practice competencies, and who are challenged with how to teach, describe, and analyze highly interactive behavioral transactions should find the workshop experience and complimentary materials particularly appealing to a wide range of professional training, assessment, and applied research applications. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Performance Management in Service Delivery for Children with Autism: Measuring and Attaining Exemplary Staff Performance |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michael Fabrizio, M.A. |
MICHAEL FABRIZIO (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), HOLLY ALMON (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), SARA J. PAHL (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), AMY KING (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), ALISON L. MOORS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Description: This workshop will provide participants multiple opportunities to learn how to evaluate service delivery staff performance in three critical areas: verbal behavior about the service being delivered, contingency-shaped behavior involved in delivering the service, and verbally-mediated behavior involved in problem solving related to the service being delivered. Sample forms and feedback systems will be shown, and participants will practice evaluating staff performance via contrived practice and videotape review. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe three important repertoires to be developed in service delivery personnel. - Evaluate examples of service personnel�s performance related to verbal behavior about service. - Evaluate examples of service personnel�s performance related to contingency-shaped service behavior. - Describe at least three sample repertoire areas which relate directly to each participant�s own service delivery personnel. |
Activities: Throughout this workshop, participants will: Participate in discussion about topics being addressed; complete evaluations measuring service delivery personnel verbal behavior; complete evaluations measuring service delivery personnel contingency-shaped behavior through the review of multiple videotaped examples; complete evaluations measuring service delivery personnel verbally-mediated behavior using real life sample performance data; and begin to develop instruments to measure each of the above in the work each participant supervises or performs in their professional life. |
Audience: People supervising the performance of staff members delivering services to persons with disabilities. Individuals supervising and designing instructional or skill-building programs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Re-evaluating Practice, the Big Picture, or Why We Really Do What We Do |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Private Dining Room 4 (3rd floor) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kimberly A. Smalley, Ph.D. |
KIMBERLY A. SMALLEY (Behavior Support Consultation Advocacy) |
Description: Take a few minutes and remember why we are in this, what our objectives are, and what our output should achieve. This workshop will present lively discussion around the greater context in which we work, peoples lives. With specific regard to individuals with developmental disabilities and challenging behavior we will task analyze our practice to assure that our interventions are socially valid, acceptable, and result in real beneficial quality of life change. Working backwards from where we want to be (LROP) using crowding out, manipulating molar variable to acquire a "goodness of fit" and teaching to strengths, how do we get from here to there? Discussion will hopefully include facilitating contrived and natural networks of support, enriched environments, communication, pivotal skill building, gainful employment, and sex. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Be able to discuss and plan for social validity and acceptability of interventions in schools and families. - Generate practical examples of manipulating molar variables, 'Crowding out", teaching incompatible and or alternative behaviors, that have practical meaning in a consumers life. - Self assess outcomes of behavioral practice and long-term implications for the folks you serve. - Conduct informal ecological assessments (such as circles of support or other social density tools) around the soft and fuzzy components of life (Recreation and leisure skills /friends/ relationships). |
Activities: Brief informal self-assessment/ survey |
Audience: Direct service staff who work with individuals with developmental disabilities (such as individuals with MR/DD ASD), those who design and implement behavior support plans, Teachers, families, consumers. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Strategies for Successful Inclusion Programming in a Public School Setting |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Stevens 2 (Lower Level) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jill E. McGrale Maher, M.S. |
KERRIE M. OTIPOBY (Marlborough Public Schools), JACKIE M. WARD (Marlborough Public Schools), BENJAMIN R. BRUNEAU (Marlborough Public Schools), CARRIE ROBBINS (Marlborough Public Schools), JILL E. MCGRALE MAHER (Marlborough Public Schools), AMANDA J. SPITZER (Marlborough Public Schools), JENNIFER TERAKEDIS (Marlborough Public Schools), ALISON L. MOORS (Marlborough Public Schools) |
Description: As a result of the trend toward inclusion in general education settings, many public schools are faced with the task of developing programming for students on the autism spectrum. Many strategies based on the principles of applied behavior analysis, however, have been more likely to occur in more restrictive settings. Specific guidelines and strategies are limited for successful inclusion. Furthermore, the majority of data-based strategies to promote successful inclusion have been conducted in primarily pre-school settings. This workshop will focus on data-based strategies to successfully include pre-school, elementary, and middle school students on the autism spectrum in general education settings. In addition, strategies for teaching social and age-appropriate leisure skills will be discussed, including social skills groups, social coaching, reverse inclusion strategies, and methods to teach appropriate play skills. Participants will acquire the skills necessary to develop high-quality data-based inclusion programming, including: 1. How to determine which skills to address in inclusion settings; 2. Identification of appropriate inclusion opportunities; 3. Education for general educators; 4. Data collection systems for educational objectives; 5. Development of data systems to determine for individual students the amount and type of support required and data-based strategies to fade staff support; 6. Strategies to fade support; 7. Reinforcement system strategies for inclusion settings; 8. When and how to provide modified academic instruction; 9. Social skills training program will be reviewed, including strategies for the development of assessments, teaching programs, and strategies for generalization; 10. Strategies of teaching appropriate per interaction and play skills. Participants are encouraged to bring actual student profiles to use in exercises. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of this workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify key considerations in the development of high-quality data-based inclusion - Develop data systems to determine for individual students the amount and type of support required - Identify data-based strategies to fade staff support. - Identify strategies for the development of social skills assessments and teaching programs |
Activities: Didactic instruction; Discuss and develop a list of essential data; Develop a plan for collecting data on educational objectives. |
Audience: Behavior analysts and teachers working with students on the autism spectrum |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Instructional Design for Students with Special Needs: Identifying Critical/Variable Attributes for Effective Programming |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Stevens 3 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Alison L. Moors, M.A. |
ALISON L. MOORS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), KELLY J. FERRIS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), MICHAEL FABRIZIO (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), HOLLY ALMON (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), LESLEY LUCAS-PAHL (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Description: Once teachers have established scope and sequences from students Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) or assessment reports, they must still create a plan for how they will break up the skills into teachable units. To divide each skill into teachable units, teachers must (1) identify the critical and variable attributes of instructional stimuli and (2) plan for cumulative programming within the instruction. This workshop will help teachers identify critical and variable features to better design appropriate instructional sequences and plan systematically for ongoing cumulative review necessary to facilitate student learning and skill retention of what they have learned thus far within any given instructional sequence. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of this workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify critical and variable attributes of instruction. - Identify the boundaries of critical attributes. - Design instructional sequences based on the identified critical features. - Plan for cumulative programming within instruction. - Learn to Fast Cycle through the designed sequence based on students performance. |
Activities: Group and individual practice discrimination critical from variable attributes; Individual practice outlining critical attributes of a skill; Practice writing instructional sequences; Writing instructional sequences with cumulative programming; Drawing Fast Cycle tracks on instructional sequences based on data based decisions. |
Audience: Professionals whose job descriptions include program/instructional design for students with special needs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Teaching Students with Autism to Respond to Threatening Social Situations in Mainstream Settings |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Stevens 4 (Lower Level) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Lori E. Bechner, M.A. |
LORI E. BECHNER (Alpine Learning Group), JULIA R. FISHER (Alpine Learning Group), CAREN GANS (Alpine Learning Group), ALEXANDRA HOLBERTON (EPIC School) |
Description: Children with autism who are included in mainstream settings may encounter threatening social situations such as teasing, name calling, bullying, and being told to do inappropriate things for the humor of others. Without the skills needed to respond appropriately in these threatening social situations, individuals with autism in mainstream settings are often at risk for being taken advantage of which can result in physical and emotional harm, as well as result in limited social relationships with peers. Research in training self-protection skills has concentrated on teaching typically developing children to respond when presented with physically harmful situations. Research in teaching self-protection skills to individuals with developmental disabilities, although limited, has also focused on teaching individuals to respond when presented with physically harmful situations. There is, however, little research focused on teaching individuals with developmental disabilities to respond to threatening social situations. This workshop will describe potentially threatening social situations, and discuss strategies to teach students with autism to respond to such situations. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe threatening social situations which may be encountered by children with autism in mainstream settings - List and describe strategies to teach students with autism to respond to threatening social situations - Understand and discuss use of video review and peer procedures - Review and explain sample curricula to teach applicable self protection skills. |
Activities: Didactic presentation, discussion, video, sample curricula. |
Audience: Behavior Analysts, educators, other clinicians working with children with autism, graduate students. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Designing and Implementing Effective, Accurate and Comprehensive Behavior Intervention Plans |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4B (4th floor) |
Area: CSE; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jose D. Rios, M.S. |
JOSE D. RIOS (CalABA Past President), EVANGELINA HURTADO (Therapeutic Pathways), JOHN YOUNGBAUER (North Los Angeles County Regional Center) |
Description: Effective intervention requires well-defined description of procedures, plans must be clinically accurate and they must be implemented with integrity. Support staff and teachers can best assist individuals with problem behaviors when they have the guidance of a well-designed and effective intervention plan. Unfortunately, behavior plans for persons with developmental disabilities are often poorly designed- they often lack clinical accuracy for the individuals specific behavior problems and are often difficult to implement. This workshop will address plans that are clinically challenged and review problems and the necessary steps needed to remedy them. Beginning with the importance of an accurate functional assessment, this workshop will review how to design plans in residential and educational settings. We will discuss and critique poorly designed plans and describe common problems that we have encountered in these plans. The workshop also will address staffs concerns and barriers in the implementation of treatment plans and will also provide some steps to remedy these problems. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants will be able to: - Better evaluate treatment intervention plans for individuals with behavior problems. These guidelines include how to define procedures effectively, implement clinical accuracy, and treatment integrity. - Use the Rights to Effective Treatment when designing plans and understand how they apply to treatment design and implementation. - Address environmental factors that affect the accurate implementation of treatment plans in residential facilities and educational settings. Participants will learn helpful tips used in consulting with staff and supervisors to improve the effectiveness of treatment plan implementation. - To recognize common problems found in poorly designed behavior plans and to correct such problems when they occur. |
Activities: This workshop will be primarily didactic with a review of some handouts and checklists. |
Audience: This presentation is geared for individuals who are or will soon be designing, evaluating or implementing functional assessment and intervention plans. The primary focus is the use of behavior plans within residential settings although examples involved in educational settings also will be addressed. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Talk the Talk, Walk the Walk: A Training Model for Behavior Analysts to Teach Theory and Clinical Skills to Teachers and Paraprofessionals |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Lake Erie (8th floor) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Justin A. DiDomenico, M.S. |
JUSTIN A. DIDOMENICO (Partners in Learning), KATHLEEN MCCABE-ODRI (Partners in Learning), LAURA KENNEALLY (Partners in Learning), LORI A. LORENZETTI (Partners in Learning) |
Description: Developing competencies in Applied Behavior Analysis requires a mastery of both theory and application. Successful Behavior Analysts require both an in depth knowledge of theory and the ability to apply the skills in clinical and school settings. This workshop is designed for trainers to teach the competencies of ABA to teachers, paraprofessionals and other clinical staff to master both theory and demonstrate core clinical skills required to enact IEP goals. Participants will be able to identify core competencies in theory and train staff to display these skills to mastery in applied settings. Trainers will receive a manual and DVD with video models and training modules. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will have learned (about): - The key components of theory required to train teachers and paraprofessionals. This includes paper and pencil mastery exams. - How to teach and measure clinical skills in applied settings. - How to develop skills to measure the staff�s skill acquisition of clinical skills. - create a program to motivate and monitor the staff�s skill acquisition. - To create and design individual core competencies for each staff member tailored to their skill level of both mastery of theory and application. - How to create and maintain home programs to ensure generalization of skills across settings. |
Activities: Using lecture, video demonstrations, handouts and discussion, participants will learn the key training protocols for staff to effectively implement ABA based IEP goals. |
Audience: This workshop is designed for Behavior Analysts who train teachers and paraprofessionals who work with children with autism. This will help teach the staff to understand and demonstrate the core competencies of Applied Behavior Analysis in order to be effective practitioners. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Application of ABA to Learning Disabilities: Strategies for Reading Acquisition and Motivation |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Lake Huron (8th floor) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Sara White, M.A. |
JENNIFER M. GILLIS MATTSON (State University of New York, Binghamton), SARA WHITE (State University of New York, Binghamton), RAYMOND G. ROMANCZYK (Institute for Child Development) |
Description: Approximately 5% of children have a learning disability, including reading disorders. Recent research suggests that children who have a reading disability have impaired phonemic awareness and decoding skills, which are necessary skills for beginning reading. Research also suggests that individuals with learning disabilities have deficits in social skills. This workshop will primarily cover reading disabilities, but will also provide information and strategies for improving students social behavior. The first part of the workshop will provide an overview of the current research on reading interventions. A short-term, intensive, after school reading clinic model that utilizes the framework of ABA for both reading instruction and improving social behavior will be described. Topics will focus on implementing a behavioral assessment specifically designed for reading, selecting individualized reading goals for children, implementation of token economy systems within a reading program, and data collection and analysis strategies to assist with monitoring student progress. This workshop will also review a unique software program to assist teachers, parents, or other professionals, with material selection and construction. This software program contains letters, phonemes, blends, diphthongs, digraphs, nonsense words, and grade-level sigh vocabulary words that are printable in flashcard formats. The software was initially developed in 2000 and refined over the past four years. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will have learned (about): - The current research on interventions for reading disabilities. - An individualized goal selection procedure that includes how to use standardized assessment data and behavioral assessments to select appropriate goals for reading (all levels). - Effective teaching methods for reading instruction within an ABA framework. - Motivational strategies that may be effectively implemented for individuals with reading disabilities. - A database that contains letters, phonemes, blends, diphthongs, digraphs, nonsense words, and grade-level SV words. The database will allow participants to print out flashcards for teaching. - Reading curricula and receive a goal sequence for reading instruction - How to incorporate social skills training into reading interventions, as exemplified by the after school reading clinic model that will be presented. |
Activities: 1. Lecture on current research on interventions for reading disabilities; 2. Lecture on individualized goal selection; 3. Group exercise on developing goals from standardized and behavioral assessment; 4. Lecture on behavior analytic teaching strategies as applied to reading disabilities; 5. Overview of software for instructional material development; 6. Lecture on appropriate curricula for students with learning disabilities; 7. Group exercise on the use of reading curricula; 8. Group exercise on incorporating social skills development into instruction for students with learning disabilities. |
Audience: This workshop is designed for teachers, parents, and professionals and paraprofessionals providing reading instruction to students (Kindergarten through 6th grade level) |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
A Model for Supporting Individuals with Severe Dysfunctional Behaviors in Community Settings |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: CSE; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Stephen C. Luce, Ph.D. |
STEPHEN C. LUCE (Melmark), ANGELA F. SMITH (Melmark), JAMIE PAGLIARO (Melmark) |
Description: Individuals who exhibit severe dysfunctional behaviors can be successfully maintained in community settings with the proper support. Five components have been identified as essential to a successful program: psychiatric consult services, a behavior support plan, staff training, communication amongst staff, and funding. This workshop will provide an overview of the staff training literature, highlighting the pyramidal model and performance feedback methods. Participants will also learn strategies to facilitate meetings with program stakeholders to identify meaningful behavioral outcomes and to conduct functional behavior assessment. Finally, the five essential components will be reviewed, and case studies will illustrate direct applications that resulted in program success. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Identify the five components of a successful program for maintaining individuals with severe dysfunctional behaviors in community settings. - Cite research-based staff training methods (performance feedback, pyramidal model, etc.) - Facilitate meetings with program stakeholders to identify meaningful behavioral outcomes and to conduct functional behavioral assessment. - Identify maintenance and generalization strategies to ensure long-term program success. |
Activities: 1. Lecture and question/answer session on the staff training literature; 2. Practice the task-analyzed steps of facilitating effective meetings with program stakeholders to identify meaningful behavioral outcomes and to conduct functional behavioral assessment; 3. Review the five essential components of successful programming for individuals with severe dysfunctional behavior in community settings; 4. Evaluate case studies. |
Audience: This workshop is geared towards program administrators, behavioral consultants and clinicians providing support to individuals with severe dysfunctional behaviors in community-based settings. Participants should be familiar functional assessment procedures and the current literature on reducing dysfunctional behavior. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Compassion and Behavior Change: Using Relationship to Enhance Acceptance Interventions for Health Related Behaviors |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Private Dining Room 3 (3rd floor) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Elizabeth Gifford, Ph.D. |
ELIZABETH GIFFORD (Center for Health Care Evaluation), BARBARA S. KOHLENBERG (University of Nevada School of Medicine), JOANNE DAHL (University of Uppsala, Sweden), TOBIAS LUNDGREN (University of Uppsala, Sweden) |
Description: This workshop is designed to help clinicians develop usable skills in relational and acceptance-oriented behavior therapies. Specifically, we will focus on using corrective experiences within the treatment session to facilitate client awareness, acceptance, cognitive and behavioral flexibility, and personal fulfillment. Participants will learn skills from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Functional Analytic Psychotherapy. The workshop will focus on health related behaviors, including addiction treatment and behavioral medicine. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will have learned (about): - Acceptance based interventions for health related behaviors, including addiction, epilepsy, and smoking. - The therapeutic relationship in treatment for medically relevant disorders. - How to maximize the potential of acceptance based interventions through relationship processes. - Enhancing the development of competence in functional analysis through supervision. |
Activities: Participants will view tapes, engage in discussion and exercises, and listen to presentation of didactic material. |
Audience: Practitioners interested in enhancing their therapeutic relationships, and improving skills in acceptance based interventions for health related behaviors. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
The ABC's of Consulting in School Districts |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Astoria (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kristen M. Villone, Ph.D. |
KRISTEN M. VILLONE (Melmark), NOELLE M. GREEN (Bancroft NeuroHealth) |
Description: One of the biggest challenges behavior analysts face when consulting in school districts is balancing the role of "invited guest" with the role of "professional with expertise." Consultants working in school districts may also be challenged more by the behavior of the service providers than that of the identified student(s). The experiences of a veteran consultant (with 16 years consulting experience) and a relatively new consultant (with 9 years clinical experience) will offer unique perspectives on strategies and approaches they have found invaluable. |
Learning Objectives: At the completion of the workshop, participants will be able to: - Describe common types of services most often requested by school districts. - Identify/address the primary "client" and/or presenting problem(s). - Understand the importance of body language, staff perceptions, documentation, and communication during classroom observations. - Have a better sense of a consultant's role (and how to establish boundaries). - Learn common mistakes made by consultants and how to avoid them. - Obtain a "blueprint" of how to set up/conduct classroom observations. - Obtain a "blueprint" of the veteran consultant's basic ABA training seminar. - Learn strategies that build teamwork and motivate staff when you're a "visitor" in their "home." - Have a better understanding of the interpersonal dynamics and contingencies in school districts. - Develop a better understanding of how to address ethical issues which may arise during consultations. |
Activities: Participants will receive handouts to aid reviewing the workshop�s learning objectives during the first part of the workshop. The second part of the workshop will consist of a problem-solving discussion of different types of obstacles, scenarios and case examples the presenters have experienced. As time permits, audience members will be encouraged to present their own obstacles/issues for problem-solving. |
Audience: Anyone interested in consulting in school districts, especially relatively new consultants who have ABA experience teaching children with developmental disabilities and training staff in clinical settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
An In-Depth Look at Prompting and Other Strategies for Teaching Cognitive Skills to Children with Autism |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Lake Ontario (8th floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: John McEachin, Ph.D. |
JOHN MCEACHIN (Autism Partnership), DORIS SOLUAGA (Autism Partnership) |
Description: To obtain best outcomes for children with autism it is necessary to identify and develop teaching strategies that enable children with profound learning difficulties to master a body of knowledge that comes easily to typically developing children. Prompting and systematic prompt fading are among the most widely used strategies for enabling children with autism to learn important concepts. There are a number of different methods of selecting prompts and planning for the reduction of prompts which have been demonstrated to be effective. Unfortunately, in the research literature there are very few head-to-head comparisons of various prompting strategies. There is, however, a clearly defined body of knowledge that provides us with general principles from which a systematic, but flexible approach can be derived which serves as a sensible starting point for developing teaching strategies. This workshop will describe the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches in widespread use and to provide a conceptual framework for understanding what we are actually doing when we use prompts. We will look at prompts that occur prior to the SD, simultaneously with the SD, and after a delay. We will also discuss strategies for teaching concepts that do not rely on prompts as traditionally conceptualized, but rather rely on arranging a sequence of learning tasks that lead the student to discovery of the the concept being taught. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: - Recognize important differences between simple discriminations and conditional discriminations and select appropriate teaching strategies accordingly. - Identify advantages and disadvantages of pure trial and error learning vs. errorless learning and considerations for deciding what point to aim for along the high error - low error continuum. - Identify the main sources of possible inadvertent prompts that need to be controlled when conducting discrete trial teaching and methods for eliminating them. - Choose prompting strategies that not only facilitate correct responding, but lead the student to meaningful understanding of the concept being taught. |
Activities: Lecture, discussion, video, role play |
Audience: Individuals who use discrete trial teaching to increase cognitive skills of children with autism and related disorders and those who provide supervision and training. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Behavioral Relaxation: Training and Scale |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
Private Dining Room 2 (3rd floor) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Victoria Stout Kubal, M.S. |
VICTORIA STOUT KUBAL (Independent provider), VANESSA STOUT HUAMAN (Loyola Center for Health and Fitness, Loyola Medical Hospital) |
Description: Relaxation techniques are an integral part of the successful treatment of those exhibiting anxiety-related, pain-related, and/or anger-related behaviors. The sooner a client learns relaxation and other types of self-control techniques, the safer his/her internal and external environments may become. In addition, due to limitations in funding, providers must often demonstrate that extensive treatment progress has been made within a relatively short period of time. Poppens (1998) Behavioral Relaxation Scale (BRS) is an assessment tool for measuring the progress of an individual demonstrating the 10 overt relaxed behaviors taught to criterion with Behavioral Relaxation Training (BRT). BRT can be an effective part of treatment for individuals with emotional/mental disorders, hyperactivity, schizophrenia, traumatic brain injury, physical limitations, and/or restricted cognitive/intellectual capabilities. This workshop will provide an opportunity to experience Poppens (1998) Upright Behavioral Relaxation Training (URT) by means of labeling, modeling, imitation, practice, and corrective feedback. Once workshop participants are proficient in demonstrating URT and can verbally describe these 10 relaxed behaviors and corresponding examples of unrelaxed behaviors, then they will be taught assessment of URT using the BRS. Finally, participants will learn how to calculate inter-rater reliability of the BRS across observers as well as between participant and instructor. |
Learning Objectives: By the end of the workshop, each participant will be able to: - Position his/her own body in alignment with the 10 overt relaxed behaviors from Upright Behavioral Relaxation Training (URT). - Write a description of each of the 10 overt relaxed behaviors from URT in his/her own words and provide corresponding examples of unrelaxed behaviors. - Give another individual appropriate feedback so that the other individual can correct himself/herself according to the 10 URT postures. - Observe, record, and assess another individual�s performance of the 10 relaxed behaviors from URT by accurately using the Behavioral Relaxation Scale (BRS). - Accurately calculate BRS inter-rater reliability across participant observers and also between participant and instructor. - Compare and graph BRS inter-rater reliability scores. |
Activities: Verbal Behavior: Listen to a presentation regarding the physiological effects of relaxation, the history of using relaxation training to treat psychological disorders, and Poppen�s development of Behavioral Relaxation Training and the Behavioral Relaxation Scale. Labeling and Modeling: View a live demonstration of the 10 postures included in Upright Behavioral Relaxation Training (URT). Each relaxed posture will be labeled, described topographically, and demonstrated physically. Modeling and Imitation: Learn how to breathe diaphragmatically, then imitate the other 9 relaxed behaviors of URT while viewing an instructor as model. After each participant has proficiently demonstrated each posture separately, he/she will practice relaxing all 10 areas at the same time. Feedback: Practice silently while the instructors are giving each individual corrective feedback. Later, workshop participants will form pairs and alternate practicing URT and giving each other corrective feedback. Criterion Tests: Take URT Written Criterion Test; score one another�s criterion tests; repeat URT Written Criterion Test. Take BRS Written Criterion Test; score one another�s criterion tests; repeat BRS Written Criterion Test. Assessment: Behavioral Relaxation Scale scoring methodology will be explained and demonstrated. All observers will simultaneously score the model. The instructor will score BRS along with the workshop participants. Reliability: Calculate inter-rater reliability scores. |
Audience: The target audience for this workshop is comprised of BCBAs and BCABAs who work with the following populations: clients with anxiety disorders, pain-related difficulties, or anger management problems; individuals with traumatic brain injury; persons exhibiting hyperactive or repetitive behaviors; clients exhibiting schizophrenic behaviors; and persons who experience an extreme amount of stress. Professionals with a strong interest in Behavioral Medicine, Clinical Behavior Analysis, Family and Child Therapy, and/or Health and Fitness Training will also benefit from attending this workshop. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Even More Evidence Against the Overjustification Effect: A Behavioral Analytic Analysis of the Effects of Reinforcement on Intrinsically Motivated Behavior |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Rebecca A. Barenz (Columbus Organization) |
Discussant: Stephen Ray Flora (Youngstown State University) |
CE Instructor: Charna Mintz, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will include three papers regarding the experimental analysis of the effects of reinforcement on intrinsically motivated behavior. Moreover, results will be discussed with respect to future research and implications for practice. |
|
The Effects of Expected and Unexpected Reinforcers on Play Behavior: A Behavior Analytic Analysis of the Overjustification Effect |
BECKY PENROD (University of Nevada, Reno), Charna Mintz (Columbus Organization), Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of extrinsic reinforcement on intrinsically reinforced behaviors in relation to the overjustification effect. We evaluated the effects of expected and unexpected reinforcers on play behavior. After baseline, reinforcer were delivered based on an increase in play behavior, subsequently extinction was implemented. Results demonstrated that reinforcement (regardless of expectation) increased play behavior and following the implementation of extinction play behavior remained high. Thus these results do not suport the overjustification effect. Results will be discused with respect to future research and with respect to the implications for clinical practice. |
|
A Behavior Analytic Analysis of the Effects of Reinforcement on Intrinsically Motivated Academic Performance |
CHARNA MINTZ (Columbus Organization), Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of extrinsic reinforcement on intrinsically reinforced behaviors in relation to the overjustification effect. We evaluated the effects of expected and unexpected reinforcers on performance during academic activities. After baseline levels were established, reinforcement was provided for increases in academic performance, subsequently extinction was implemented and levels of academic performance were measured. Results indicate that providing reinforcement (regardless of expectations) increases academic performance and that when extinction is implemented performance maintains. Thus, the results do not support the overjustification effect with respect to academic settings. These results will be discussed with respect to future research and clinical practice. |
|
Effect of Reinforcement Schedules on Intrinsic Motivation and the Overjustification Effect |
SCOTT W. HARRINGTON (University of Nevada, Reno), Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: This investigation evaluated the effects of different reinforcement schedules (fixed and variable) on intrinsically motivated playground behavior. After baseline levels of playground behavior were established, reinforcement was delivered based on either a fixed or variable ratio 4 schedule. After increases in playground behavior were observed, extinction was implemented. Following extinction, playground behavior maintained at high levels, thus not demonstrating the overjustification effect. Moreover, followup data were obtained at a 2-week followup, were in participants still engaged in higher levels of playground behavior than during baseline. Implications with respect to the suggestion that rewards harm intrinsically motivated behavior will be discussed. |
|
|
|
|
2005 ABA Tutorial: Designing Instructional Programs and the Systems to Create and Disseminate Them |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:20 PM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Janet S. Twyman, Ph.D. |
Chair: John Austin (Western Michigan University) |
Presenting Authors: : JANET S. TWYMAN (Headsprout) |
Abstract: The knowledge gleaned from behavior analysis, instructional design, formative and summative evaluation procedures, and an organizational systems approach can be combined to create successful instructional programs with a broad, stable effects across numerous learners. An example of this is Headsprout Early Reading, an online reading program currently being used with thousands of children. The development of this highly effective behavioral program, (from identifying instructional objectives, applying the instructional design process, building the program, iterative testing, releasing the program to the public, to ongoing revisions), is non-linear and involves a process of continual adaptations based on sensitive measurement of the entire system. It also requires coordination and collaboration among various components of the organization, from instructional design and user testing, to graphics, sound and engineering. Further systems are needed distribute the program. This tutorial will discuss the organizational systems necessary to build and disseminate instructional programs and describe how they can be replicated across other products. |
|
JANET S. TWYMAN (Headsprout) |
Janet, a noted teacher, administrator, and researcher, is the Vice President of Instructional Development at Headsprout, where she significantly contributed to the development of Headsprout’s Generative Learning Technology and led the effort to build that technology into a highly effective beginning reading program. Janet developed the research methods and systems that led to Headsprout’s ground–breaking scientific formative evaluation model of program development--coordinating all elements of instructional design, scripting, graphic creation, animation, sound engineering, story development and writing, software engineering, and usability testing within the research model.
Janet was formerly the Executive Director of the Fred S. Keller School, a model early childhood center, and an adjunct Associate Professor at Columbia University Teachers College. Janet is a long time advocate and investigator of research–based instruction and systems design. While at the Keller School and Columbia, she conducted research and taught courses focusing on effective instruction, technology and education, teacher development, and systems approaches to effective education. She has published experimental studies with a particular emphasis on the verbal behavior of children, and on topics of broader conceptual interest.
She is a board member of several schools and organizations, and is currently on the Executive Council of the Association for Behavior Analysis. In addition, she oversees the Association’s graduate program accreditation processes.
Janet earned her Ph.D. from Columbia University, Teachers College. She holds certification as an elementary and special education teacher and as a principal/school administrator. |
|
|
|
|
Eliminating Meaningful Differences in Young Children: What Behavior Analysts Can Now Do: A Discussion of Dr. R. Douglas Greer's Tutorial |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:20 PM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: DEV/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jacob L. Gewirtz, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jacob L. Gewirtz (Florida International University) |
JACOB L. GEWIRTZ (Florida International University) |
DOLLEEN-DAY KEOHANE (Teachers College, Columbia University & CABAS) |
RUTH ANNE REHFELDT (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: This panel is dedicated to Ernst Moerk |
|
|
|
|
Contemporary Issues in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Rehabilitation: Staff Interaction, Fluency and Discounting |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: John M. Guercio (Center for Comprehensive Services) |
Discussant: Michael P. Mozzoni (Timber Ridge Group, Inc.) |
CE Instructor: Michael P. Mozzoni, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will look at diverse issues in staff-client interactions, client skill acquisition and impulsivity. The first study deals with assessing staff-client interactions using the PEARL Interactional assessment tool, and Group Activity Monitoring Form developed by Reid and Parsons. The second study uses the hyperbolic discounting laboratory model to assess adolescent impulsivity. Implications of the data may be helpful in gaining a better understanding of impulsive behavior as being a trait or a state. The third study used fluency training to help an adult re-learn his own autobiography. These studies demonstrate the multifaceted nature of applied behavior analysis within the neurorehabilitation setting, from organizational behavior management to clinical applications, and to experimental inquiries. They are all designed to increase client outcomes and our understanding of ABI. |
|
The Observer Effect and its Role in Effective Staff Training in Rehabilitation Settings for Persons with Acquired Brain Injury |
JOHN M. GUERCIO (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: A staff training package was utilized across residences in a facility treating individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) and severe unwanted behavioral issues. A pre-test questionnaire was distributed to staff to determine their views related to participant care and proactive behavioral approaches. The training package incorporated both elements of public posting and having staff perform some of the observations related to appropriate staff interactions in order to build upon their skill sets in these areas. The elements of the treatment package were introduced sequentially across each of the residences employed in the study in a multiple baseline format. The dependent measures that were employed in the study were the pre-test assessment mentioned above, as well as the PEARL Interact ional assessment tool, as well as the Group Activity Monitoring Form developed by Reid and Parsons (Reid & Parsons, 2002). Posttest measures were also taken to determine the degree of improvement not just in staff behavior, but also in staff attitudes towards positive, proactive behavioral rehabilitation. |
|
Delay Discounting in Adolescents with Acquired Brain Injury |
DANYL M.H. EPPERHEIMER (Center for Comprehensive Services), Pamela A. Tibbetts (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: The present paper describes a series of studies which attempted to assess the utility of hypothetical choice money tasks for adolescents with acquired brain injuries. First, we assessed choices between hypothetical monetary amounts of 1000 dollars at various delays and smaller amounts of money available immediately. After observing significant deviations in performance from other published studies, we adjusted the maximum amount down to 100 and then to 20 dollars. Closer approximations to hyperbolic discounting were observed. Finally we arranged conditions in which real monetary amounts were available to the adolescents either immediately or after 1 week based on their preference. Again, closer approximations to hyperbolic discounting were observed. These data suggest a need for slight modifications of the traditional hypothetical money choice task when utilizing participants with acquired brain injury. Implications of our data for a better understanding of impulsive behavior as being a “trait” or a “state” are presented. |
|
Comparing Accuracy Training with Fluency Training Using Autobiographical Questions with an Individual with a TBI |
JEFFERY SMITH (Timber Ridge Ranch), Mark Sigler (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: A single subject multiple baseline design was used to compare the effects of fluency training with accuracy training with an amnesic adult with a severe brain injury. Autobiographical memory questions were presented on flashcards to test accuracy and fluency acquisition. Baseline data was conducted for one week; twice per day, once for each set of accuracy and fluency questions. Training for accuracy was conducted for 22 days while training for fluency occurred for 56 days. Questions were delivered twice a day similar to that in the baseline phase. Edibles were delivered contingent upon correct responses to each question during training. Results for accuracy show an increase in correct answer frequency from 1.9 correct per minute during baseline to 6.4 correct per minute during training and showing a 337% increase in frequency of correct answers per minute after treatment. There was a 633% increase in frequency of correct answers per minute concerning fluency after treatment while the individual correctly responded to 1.5 questions during baseline to 9.5 correct per minute during treatment. |
|
|
|
|
Functional Analysis and Treatment of Complex Interresponse Relations between Severe Behavior and Stereotypy |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Discussant: Wayne W. Fisher (Marcus Autism Center) |
CE Instructor: Louis P. Hagopian, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Although not typically targeted for intervention, stereotypic and ritualistic behaviors can be problematic when they occur at high rates, interfere with acquisition of new skills, or when they lead to more severe behavior such as aggression or self-injury. The current symposium will address issues related to the assessment and treatment of stereotypic and ritualistic behaviors that are functionally related to severe problem behavior. The first presentation will illustrate two forms of response-response relations: one in which blocking stereotypic behavior induces aggression; and one in which self-injury had a higher probability of occurrence following stereotypy (revealed via a conditional probability analysis). The second presentation will illustrate how severe problem behavior can be maintained by gaining access to materials that are necessary for engaging in automatically reinforced stereotypy. The third presentation will illustrate a similar response-response between complex ritualistic behavior and severe problem behavior. In addition to presenting assessment methodologies for identifying response-response relations between stereotypic behavior and severe problem behavior, interventions designed to reduce these behaviors, based on an analysis of those relations, will be presented and discussed. |
|
Analysis and Intervention of Stereotypy-Severe Behavior Relations |
ERIC BOELTER (Kennedy Krieger Institute), David E. Kuhn (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Stephanie A. Contrucci Kuhn (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: Although not typically targeted for treatment, stereotypic behavior can be problematic when it is excessive such that it interferes with adaptive behavior or when it leads to more severe behavior. Data are presented from four individuals with developmental delays, ages 5-20 years, that engaged in various forms of stereotypic behavior that appeared related to aggression or self-injury. For the first two participants, response blocking for stereotypic behavior was found to occasion aggression. An intervention including competing stimuli targeting stereotypic behavior effectively reduced stereotypy as well as aggression. Conditional probability analyses were conducted with the other two participants and indicated that probability of problem behavior (self-injury) was increased following the occurrence of stereotypy. A procedure that interrupted engagement in stereotypy was then implemented and resulted in decreases in self-injury. These data suggest that stereotypy may function as part of a response chain that culminated in self-injury. Collectively, the findings suggest that response-response relations between |
|
An Examination of the Relation Between Core and Associated Symptoms of Autism |
ROBERT-RYAN S. PABICO (Marcus Autism Center), Wayne W. Fisher (Marcus Autism Center), Henry S. Roane (Marcus Autism Center), Terry S. Falcomata (Marcus Autism Center), Alyson N. Hovanetz (Marcus Autism Center) |
Abstract: Autism is a disorder characterized by core (e.g., stereotypic behavior) and associated symptoms (e.g., aggression, SIB). The present study examined the relationship between these two types of behavior exhibited by two boys diagnosed with autism. For both participants an alone analysis demonstrated that stereotypy (e.g., fast-forwarding and rewinding videos) persisted in the absence of social reinforcement (i.e., automatic reinforcement). Analyses of associated symptoms indicated that these responses were maintained, in part, by access to the materials necessary to engage in stereotypy (e.g., a television to manipulate). That is, the core and associated symptoms of autism were maintained by an interrelated functional relation. These results were used to develop an intervention in which the participants received access to stereotypy contingent upon appropriate communication while problem behavior was placed on extinction. Results indicated that the use of an alternative response decreased problematic behaviors to socially acceptable levels. Interobserver agreement, which was calculated for at least 25% of the sessions, exceeded 90% for both participants. Results are discussed in terms of examining potential interrelated functions between the essential and associated symptoms of autism. |
|
Functional Analysis and Treatment of Problem Behavior Maintained by Access to Rituals-Permitted Situations Through the Use of Functional Communication and Discriminative Stimuli |
STEPHANIE A. CONTRUCCI KUHN (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Lynn G. Bowman (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Dawn E. Resau (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Lisa M. Toole (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: Individuals with autism often display restricted patterns of behavior described as inflexible adherence to specific nonfunctional routines or rituals (DSM-IV-TR). It has been hypothesized that some individuals may engage in problem behavior to gain access to situations where ritualistic behavior is permitted (Murphy, Macdonald, Hall, & Oliver, 2000). However, experimental functional analyses and treatment evaluations targeting this behavioral function have not been described. In the current study, functional analyses indicated that the problem behavior of two individuals functioned to gain access to rituals-permitted situations. The individuals were taught to communicate for permission to engage in rituals using picture exchange. Next, a discriminative stimulus was used to signal periods of time when reinforcement for communication was available and another stimulus was used to signal periods of time when reinforcement was not available (i.e., extinction was in place for communication). Both procedures were used in conjunction with extinction for problem behavior. This intervention was effective in reducing problem behavior for the two children who participated. For one participant, the discriminative stimuli alone were effective in reducing problem behavior at the terminal schedule goal. For the other participant, schedule thinning with discriminative stimuli was necessary in order to maintain low levels of problem behavior. |
|
|
|
|
Future Directions in Incorporating Fluency-Based Instruction into ABA Intervention for Older Learners with Autism |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Sandra L. Harris (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Discussant: Robert LaRue (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
CE Instructor: Mary Jane Weiss, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center has been in the process of incorporating fluency-based instruction for learners with autism over the past few years. The papers will address an overview of the research outcomes compiled over a two-year period, implications related to quality of life, and the use of these data to direct future research for adolescents and adults with autism. The first paper will review the results of preliminary single-subject studies with one adolescent and two adults with autism. Data will be presented on the acquisition of fluency targets and the generalized effects of this type of instruction. The paper will also include reliability data and procedural integrity measures on 20% of instructional sessions for all three studies. The second paper will focus on the collateral effects of fluency-based instruction on quality of life indicators for the three subjects used in the preliminary research reviewed in the first paper. The third paper will discuss the overall implications for future research in fluency-based instruction for older learners with autism. A review of the conclusions based on preliminary research in light of the most efficient approach to this type of instruction and the most widespread generalized effects will be detailed. |
|
Establishing the Effect of Fluency-Based Instruction in Adolescents and Adults with Autism: A Review of Three Single-Subject Studies |
MARLENE COHEN (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Donna L. Sloan (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: Many learners with developmental disabilities may demonstrate challenging behavior in a number of contexts. Challenging behavior that occurs during the completion of vocational tasks may significantly impact employment prospects for an adolescent or adult with autism. Fluency-based instruction is documented to be effective in building fine motor component skills to fluent rates across learners of various age and skill levels. In order to establish the effects of fluency-based instruction with regard to rates of challenging behavior and the development of skills necessary for increased independence, three single-subject studies were conducted using an A-B design with replications. The papers will address an overview of the research outcomes compiled over a two-year period and the evaluation of generalized effects of such instruction. |
|
Quality of Life Indicators Associated with Fluency-Based Instruction for Older Learners with Autism: Some Possible Collateral Effects |
DONNA L. SLOAN (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Marlene Cohen (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: In the field of Applied Behavior Analysis, intermediate and ultimate goals should be selected with regard to quality of life issues. When establishing and implementing these goals, professionals should keep in mind the associated positive effects on the person as well as their caregivers. While these principles guide our practice, we frequently do not conduct direct measurement of quality of life indicators. One presumed effect of fluency-based instruction on three older learners with autism is that positive affect was increased as a result of instruction. This paper will review quality of life measurement outcomes for three subjects collected through ratings of randomly presented video clips by independent observers. The method of data collection and the results will be detailed. |
|
Guidelines for Future Research in Fluency-Based Instruction with Older Learners: Conclusions Drawn from Preliminary Research |
MARLENE COHEN (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Donna L. Sloan (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: Preliminary fluency research indicates the utility of placing emphasis on the instruction of component skills and adduction to composite skills as well as the reduction of response effort and the decrease in challenging behavior. This provides valuable information for professionals as a future direction for working with older learners with autism. Conclusions drawn from this research were compiled to make inferences with regard to common skill deficits and the corresponding cumulative impact on learning, selection of research design, selection of targets for fluency, meaningful measures of progress, and the generality and maintenance of fluency-based instruction. Initial findings from ongoing research will also be discussed. |
|
|
|
|
Practical Applications of Preference-Assessment Technologies for People with Severe Disabilities |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Carolyn W. Green (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Discussant: Dennis H. Reid (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center) |
CE Instructor: Dennis H. Reid, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Three investigations will be presented demonstrating how behavioral preference-assessment procedures can be used in practical ways to enhance life quality among people with severe disabilities and autism. In the first presentation, data will be presented showing conditions in which opinions of support staff can be used to accurately identify certain preferences of people with severe disabilities (validated through systematic assessments). Data will also be presented showing conditions in which opinions of support personnel are not likely to be accurate. In the second presentation, a practical protocol for empirically identifying work preferences will be presented. The protocol provides a means of using the most time-efficient process to identify preferences, followed by subsequent assessment processes if necessary that are more likely to identify preferences but are more time consuming. Data demonstrating the validity of the protocol will be presented based on results involving 11 workers with severe disabilities. In the third presentation, a teaching process will be presented that increases indices of happiness and reduces problem behavior occasioned by teaching programs. The process, involving embedding of preferences within teaching strategies, will be described using validation data from three behavior analytic studies. |
|
Use and Misuse of Staff Opinion to Identify Consumer Preferences |
CAROLYN W. GREEN (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Marsha B. Parsons (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Dennis H. Reid (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center) |
Abstract: This presentation will present data collected with 33 support staff and 11 adults with severe disabilities concerning the accuracy of staff opinion regarding the work preferences of the consumers. Staff opinion was assessed using rankings of preferred work tasks and then validated through systematic preference assessments. Results indicated that when staff strongly agree with each other regarding most preferred work tasks, the tasks are more likely to be preferred by respective consumers relative to tasks for which the staff do not consistently agree. Results also indicated that staff are more accurate in identifying work tasks that are most disliked or nonpreferred among workers with severe disabilities and autism than they are in identifying work tasks that are highly preferred. Overall, results indicate that staff opinion of work preferences among workers with severe disabilities are likely to be accurate only under well-specified conditions. |
|
A Practical Protocol for Identifying Work Preferences Among Adults with Severe Disabilities and Autism |
MARSHA B. PARSONS (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Donna Towery (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Dennis H. Reid (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center), Carolyn W. Green (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Lindsey P. Lattimore (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Leah Brackett (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Abstract: This presentation will describe results of an evaluation of a protocol for identifying work preferences among adults with severe disabilities and autism. The protocol begins with the most time-efficient, systematic preference assessment (multi-stimulus without replacement), followed by less time-efficient assessment processes (e.g., paired-item assessment) that are more likely to identify work preferences but require more time to administer. Results indicated that the protocol identified work preferences for 10 of 11 participating workers with severe disabilities. Time efficiency measures supported the least-to-most time requirements of the sequential assessment processes. Data on work performance further validated the accuracy of the assessments, in that each worker consistently worked on chosen or preferred work tasks. Work tasks that were less preferred also were accompanied by more problem behavior relative to highly preferred work tasks. |
|
A Preference-Based Approach to Enhancing Learning and Reducing Problem Behavior During Teaching Sessions |
CAROLYN W. GREEN (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Dennis H. Reid (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center), Jeannia Elaine Rollyson (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center), Susan Passante (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Abstract: This presentation will describe a preference-based approach to teaching learners with severe disabilities. The preference-based teaching program involves presenting identified learner preferences before, during, and after teaching sessions. Results from an investigation using a multiple probe design across learners will be presented to demonstrate that the approach fosters skill acquisition while reducing problem behavior occasioned by instructions presented as part of teaching sessions. Results also demonstrate that improvements in teaching proficiency by instructors do not represent a confound to the effects of the preference-based aspect of the teaching approach, which was a concern with previous research with the program. Discussion focuses on removing the establishing operation for problem behavior by making the teaching more preferred and less aversive for learners. |
|
|
|
|
Int'l Symposium - Stimulus-Stimulus Pairings: Effects on Vocal/Verbal Behavior in Children |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Stevens 3 (Lower Level) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Caio F. Miguel (New England Center for Children) |
Discussant: Caio F. Miguel (New England Center for Children) |
CE Instructor: Caio F. Miguel, Ph.D. |
Abstract: We present three papers discussing the role of stimulus-stimulus pairing in the acquisition of vocal/verbal responding in children. Recent studies have shown that pairing adult vocalizations with preferred stimuli can increase speech sound vocalizations. Termed automatic reinforcement since no direct reinforcement is provided, the procedure may establish self-produced sounds as reinforcing events to the degree that vocalizations resemble the model during pairing; thus a childs vocalizations would function as conditioned reinforcers for vocalization responses. However, effects of this procedure are temporary, suggesting that direct reinforcement may be necessary to establish durable vocal behaviors. Esch and Carr report results of 3 experiments in children with autism in which the pairing procedure (1) failed to affect echoic responding and (2) failed to increase the frequency of post-pairing responding. Normand and Knoll report similar lack of effects of the pairing procedure on post-session target vocalizations in a child with autism. Practical and theoretical implications will be discussed.Dugdale reports research using combined behavioral and cognitive protocols to investigate rapid vocabulary acquisition of typically developing children via an equivalence procedure using stimulus-stimulus pairings between words and objects. Results suggest pairings produce emergent verbal skills that have relational properties associated with stimulus equivalence. |
|
Evaluating Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing and Direct Reinforcement in the Establishment of an Echoic Repertoire of Children Diagnosed with Autism |
BARBARA E. ESCH (Western Michigan University), John L. Michael (Western Michigan University), James E. Carr (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: Pairing adult vocalizations with preferred stimuli can increase a child’s vocalizations. Termed ‘automatic reinforcement,’ the procedure may establish sounds as reinforcing events to the degree that those vocalizations resemble the model during pairing; thus a child’s vocalizations would function as conditioned reinforcers for vocalization responses. However, effects of the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure are temporary, suggesting that direct reinforcement may be necessary to establish durable vocal behaviors. Experiment 1 evaluated the strength of directly reinforced echoic responses following stimulus-stimulus pairings in a multiple baseline design across phonemes in 3 children with diagnoses of autism. Results showed no improvement over baseline of the pairing procedure on subsequent echoic responding. Experiment 2 was then conducted with 2 of the participants to identify effects of pairing on post-pairing vocalizations (i.e., automatically reinforced responses). This experiment, a replication of Miguel, Carr, and Michael (2002), found no increased post-session responding over pre-session vocalizations. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that, for one of the 2 participants, shaping increased overall vowel frequency. The results of these experiments suggest that variables are yet to be delineated that influence the effectiveness of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on (1) post-pairing vocalization frequency and (2) acquisition of a verbal operant following such pairings. |
|
Effects of Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing on Vocalizations of a Child Diagnosed with Autism |
MATTHEW P. NORMAND (Florida Institute of Technology), Melissa Louise Knoll (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: This study replicated and extended the evaluation of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure reported in two recent studies in which researchers have suggested that vocalizations can become conditioned reinforcers for their own emission as a result of stimulus-stimulus pairing. A multiple baseline design across phonemes evaluated effects of a stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure on frequency of phonemes uttered by a child with autism. Data were collected during pre-session, post-session, and follow-up periods across three conditions: baseline, control, and stimulus-stimulus pairing. During baseline, frequency of targeted phonemes was recorded absent any experimenter interaction and prior to introduction of the pairing procedure. During the control condition, the experimenter vocalized the target phoneme and, after a 20-s delay, presented a preferred stimulus to the child. Preferred stimuli were identified via stimulus preference assessment. During pairings, the same phoneme was paired with delivery of preferred items by eliminating the 20-s delay between the experimenter’s utterance and delivery of the preferred stimulus. Results from post-session observations during the pairing condition showed little or no increase in target sounds. Data from the follow-up sessions, occurring 30-m after the post-session observations, showed occasional but inconsistent increases. Practical and theoretical implications of the results will be discussed. |
|
Symmetry, Equivalence, and Emergent Verbal Behavior in Young Children Following Unreinforced Exposure to Stimulus-Stimulus Pairings |
NEIL DUGDALE (University of Wales, Bangor) |
Abstract: During their second year of life, most normally-developing children exhibit a 'vocabulary spurt', a sudden and sustained increase in the rate at which they comprehend and produce new words. Through independent lines of study, cognitive psychologists and behavior analysts have each developed research protocols that have been (or can be) used in order to examine the emergent processes underlying this phenomenon of rapid word learning. My research program combines procedural elements from both behavioral and cognitive protocols in an attempt to advance our understanding of early vocabulary acquisition. The findings thus far suggest that very young children can learn relations between words and objects after merely a few unreinforced exposures to the word-object stimulus pairings, and that these emergent verbal skills have the relational properties associated with stimulus equivalence. |
|
|
|
|
Behavioral Safety and Ergonomics in Organizations |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
Marquette (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Sigurdur Oli Sigurdsson (Western Michigan University) |
Discussant: Alicia M. Alvero (Queens College, City University of New York) |
CE Instructor: Sigurdur Oli Sigurdsson, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will present data-based research in the area of postural safety and behavior analysis. Postural safety is a growing field because repetitive motion injuries can cost employees and organizations a considerable amount of time and money, as well as cause unecessary pain and difficulty for the employee. The first presenter will discuss using a descriptive assessment to identify environmental variables that contribute to safe positioning and behaviors in a pharmacy . The second presenter will present a study that utilized equipment changes and behavioral safety techniques to improve safe typing postures in an office. The final presentation will discuss factors that related to the effectiveness of a commonly used safety intervention, peer observations. The presentation will conclude with a discussion of these procedures and the future of postural safety and ergonomics in behavior analysis by an expert in the area. |
|
A Descriptive Analysis of Safe and At-Risk Behaviors and Postures Performed by Pharmacy Employees |
RHIANNON M. FANTE (Western Michigan University), Nicole E. Gravina (Western Michigan University), Alison M. Betz (Western Michigan University), John Austin (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: This study employed a descriptive assessment to determine factors that contributed to ergonomic safety in a small pharmacy. The pharmacy was located on a university campus and employed eight full-time workers. Three of the pharmacy employees had experienced various repetitive-motion injuries that resulted in a total of 36 lost days and 161 restricted days. Observers collected detailed naturalistic data on the pharmacy employees’ ergonomic behavior in the presence and absence of various environmental variables including a box that they placed under the computer keyboard and shoe type. Results indicated that employee behaviors were considerably safer when certain environmental conditions were present. The descriptive analysis proved valuable for aiding in the development of an intervention. |
|
Using Workstation Changes and Behavioral Safety Techniques to Improve Typing Postures in an Office |
NICOLE E. GRAVINA (Western Michigan University), John Austin (Western Michigan University), Debra Lindstrom-Hazel (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: This presentation will describe a study aimed at improving ergonomic typing postures in an administrative office. Participant's workstations were optimized for ergonomic safety by an occupational therapist. Results showed an improvement in some but not all postures. Participants were then provided information on ergonomic safety in an office setting resulting in very few improvements in safety. Finally, peer observations were implemented followed by graphic feedback. Postures that remained low in safety with the other interventions improved substantially during the behavioral safety intervention. |
|
The Safety Observer Effect Across Various Work Conditions |
ADRIENNE R. ROBEK (Queens College, City University of New York), Alicia M. Alvero (Queens College, City University of New York) |
Abstract: The literature on the effectiveness of feedback is abundant but the literature on the effects of the observation process (in relation to safety) is relatively novel. The purpose of the present study is to expand on the existing observer effect findings. More specifically, it examines: (a) if observing and collecting safety data on someone engaged in particular tasks will increase the safety performance of the observer, and (b) if this effect varies across two work conditions: (1) alone condition and (2) presence of a peer condition. There is a probe of subjects in both conditions every three sessions in which the experimenter comes into the room and looks through a filing cabinet for two minutes. In other words, does employees safety performance vary in the presence of other co-workers (peers), when they are working alone, or in the presence of a supervisor (an authority figure), after conducting safety observations? |
|
|
|
|
Do We Do What We Say We Should Do? Integrity, Satisfaction and Follow-up in Publication |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
Lake Huron (8th floor) |
Area: CSE/DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Theodore A. Hoch, Ed.D. |
Chair: Theodore A. Hoch (Northern Virginia Training Center) |
JAMES KUHAGEN (Northern Virginia Training Center) |
DENISE BARTIZAL (Catawba State Hospital, VA) |
BARBARA J. KAMINSKI (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) |
YAN JIN (Central State Hospital) |
Abstract: Applied Behavior Analysis is applied, behavioral, analytic, technological, conceptually systematic, effective, and concerned with generality. Prior research examined technological and conceptually systematic aspects of publication patterns. We discuss a retrospective analysis of behavior analytic publication that replicate prior work, and extends it to consider applied, analytic, effective, and generality issues. Outcome of this analysis and of a survey of ABA members regarding training and reporting practice as they pertain to these is discussed. |
|
|
|
|
Brief, Effective and Acceptable Staff Training Methods |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
4:00 PM–5:20 PM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Jamie Pagliaro (Melmark) |
Discussant: Dennis H. Reid (Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center) |
CE Instructor: Carolyn S. Ryan, M.A. |
Abstract: Although didactic training methods are not always successful in increasing workplace performance (Dyer, Schwartz, & Luce, 1984), more effective methods (modeling, immediate feedback, etc.) are often time intensive and less acceptable to participants. The present three studies demonstrate refinements of validated training methods to address these issues. The purpose of the first study was to evaluate the effect of a brief staff training procedure on number of learner-initiated incidental teaching episodes and on instructors use of the five trained incidental teaching responses. A large-scale replication of the brief instruction procedure was then conducted with 40 instructors from two schools serving learners with autism spectrum disorders. In the second study, video technology and self-monitoring were used to train instructors on correct implementation of complex behavior support plans for learners exhibiting dysfunctional behavior. Improvements in treatment integrity were achieved with minimized supervision. The third study illustrates how performance feedback and continuous improvement methods were used to initiate and maintain change in a multi-component human service agency shifting towards a behavior analytic model. A variety of measures targeting safety, protocol compliance, departmental coordination, student engagement levels and samples of staff activity will be presented in addition to scaleable strategies for affecting organizational change. |
|
Effects of a Brief Staff Training Procedure on Instructors’ Use of Incidental Teaching and Learners’ Frequency of Initiation Toward Instructors |
CAROLYN S. RYAN (New York Center for Autism), Nancy S. Hemmes (Queens College, City University of New York), Peter Sturmey (Queens College, City University of New York) |
Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a brief staff training procedure on number of learner-initiated incidental teaching episodes and on instructors’ use of the five trained incidental teaching responses. In Experiment 1, the lead and assistant instructors from two classrooms serving learners with autism spectrum disorders were provided with a brief instruction session about how to use incidental teaching. The effects of training on frequency of learner initiations and the assistant instructors’ use of incidental teaching were measured in the assistant instructors’ classrooms during unstructured activities. Following evaluation of the effects of instruction, the two lead instructors were trained to teach their assistant instructors on conducting accurate incidental teaching. In Experiment 2, a large-scale replication of the brief instruction procedure of Experiment 1 was conducted with 40 instructors from two schools serving learners with autism spectrum disorders. Feedback from acceptability surveys revealed that instructors from both experiments found the staff training methods satisfactory. These findings suggest that the brief method improving for instructor training used in the present study is a valid initial step toward level of learner initiation and likelihood of incidental teaching in classrooms. |
|
Investigating the Effectiveness of Video Technology to Train Direct Care Staff: Implementation of Multi-Component Behavior Support Plans |
LAURA M. FREDERICK (Melmark), Jamie Pagliaro (Melmark), Stephen Gallagher (Melmark), Jeffrey R. Luke (Melmark) |
Abstract: Current practice in the behavior analytic treatment of problem behaviors relies heavily on functional analysis methodology. Effective and ethical behavior support plans now include procedures to increase adaptive skills as well as reduce problem behaviors. While a positive trend, it also brings with it numerous challenges, for instance: staff training. Although didactic training methods are not always successful in increasing staff’s workplace performance (Dyer, Schwartz, & Luce, 1984), more effective methods (modeling, immediate feedback, etc) are much more time intensive. The current intervention attempted to combine video technology and supervisor feedback to develop an effective and efficient staff training model. Staff viewed a video of themselves implementing a behavior support plan with their supervisor present. They scored their performance according to a treatment integrity checklist, and the scored checklist then provided a structured format for the supervisor to provide feedback. A multiple baseline across staff showed that this staff training package was successful in increasing staff’s correct implementation of complex behavior support plans. The need for generalization of this intervention and further applications are discussed. |
|
A Case Study on Scaleable Strategies for Affecting Organizational Change in a Human Service Agency |
JAMIE PAGLIARO (Melmark), Stephen C. Luce (Melmark), George P. Linke, Jr. (Melmark) |
Abstract: This case study will describe scaleable strategies implemented in a multi-component human service agency to affect organizational change. Staff training, performance feedback, and continuous improvement methods were evaluated across a variety of organizational measures. These measures targeted safety, protocol compliance, departmental coordination, student engagement levels and samples of staff activity. Time constraints and staff acceptability will be discussed as primary considerations in applying behavioral technology. |
|
|
|
|
Ethics and Organizational Effectiveness Within ABA |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
4:00 PM–5:20 PM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Rita M. Gardner (Melmark New England) |
CE Instructor: Frank L. Bird, M.Ed. |
Abstract: The Association for Behavior Analysis is an organization devoted to promoting behavior analysis as a science and a profession. Behavior analysis is a natural science approach to the study of behavior. Behavior analysis includes research on environmental factors that influence behavior as well as applications of the results of this research to problems of concern to individuals and society. Practitioners of behavior analysis include persons working in a wide variety of settings and dealing with a great diversity of behaviors and populations. Behavior analysts serve many kinds of consumers including service recipients, parents or guardians of recipients, institutional representatives, private or public agencies, and firms or corporations.Ethics and organizational effectiveness are inextricably linked. Dramatic examples of organizations that ignore their ethical responsibilities to various stakeholders and suffer serious consequences abound. Nevertheless, even in the absence of these drastic examples, organizations suffer serious consequences from their failure to address ethical issues. These consequences include high levels of staff turnover, poor staff morale, poor reputations in local communities, and the inability to provide services that are well respected. Attention to making ethics as an on-going part of the organizational discourse can provide tangible benefits to the organization.This symposium presents three papers regarding applied behavior analysis and the role of ethics. The papers discuss that a code of ethics is designed to educate and protect consumers, to provide guidance for professionals, and to retain the integrity of the discipline of behavior analysis |
|
Ethical Concerns in Organizational Consultation |
ARTHUR RICHARD CAMPBELL (Melmark New England) |
Abstract: Consultants who provide applied behavior analytic support to the educational and behavioral needs of students in organizational settings such as public schools, are often confronted with ethical concerns which can negatively influence outcomes. Analyzing the environments in which consultation is provided is an essential component of the assessment process, which is often overlooked by consultants. As a result, support and guidance is often provided to teaching staff that have little to no control over the critical components that influence the implementation of the consultants plan. Ethical considerations arise when consultants fail to recognize and proactively address prerequisite organizational variables that influence outcomes. Methods to identify and address organizational prerequisites that set the occasion for successful consultation outcomes will be presented with specific attention to the ethical dilemmas that arise when these issues are not addressed. |
|
Providing Effective Consultation Services in the Public School Environment: Maintaining the Balance Between Best Practices and the Law |
JAMES T. ELLIS (Melmark New England) |
Abstract: The families and educators of children with special needs are constantly faced with the challenge of making decisions about providing effective services for children. Every child with special needs is entitled to a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment. Although there are guidelines for providing these services, it is not uncommon for members of a child’s IEP team to differ in terms of what they think are appropriate services. Professionals who are providing consultation to children’s educational programs often play a key role in making these decisions. Furthermore, consultants are faced with the dilemma of making educational recommendations that ensure that a child is provided with a free and appropriate education as mandated by the law but that are also based on best practices as informed by the research and literature. This presentation will provide a comparison of legal guidelines and best practices as they relate to services for children with special needs and will highlight some of the ethical dilemmas that professionals can face when providing consultation services with public schools. |
|
Reconciling the Business of ABA with the Science of ABA |
PAUL A. DORES (Private practice) |
Abstract: This presentation focuses on the issues that are raised when an empirically based technology becomes the centerpiece of a multi-million dollar commercial enterprise. Of greatest concern is the extent to which we, as behaviorists, remain true to the science of applied behavior analysis at the same time that we become promoters of that same product in a competitive market. Can science coexist with commerce without sacrificing the exact qualities that make the technology valuable in the first place? Can we continue to demand and rely upon data-based assessment of every one of our outcomes when we are faced with the realities of competition and the marketing axiom that programs that fail do not sell? |
|
The Role of a BACB Mentor |
FRANK L. BIRD (Melmark New England) |
Abstract: The Role of a BACB Mentor |
|
|
|
|
Teaching Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders in Inclusive Settings |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
4:00 PM–5:20 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Mariela Vargas-Irwin (CEC-Behavioral Services) |
CE Instructor: Mariela Vargas-Irwin, Psy.D. |
Abstract: The education of children with autism in natural environments poses a unique set of challenges to the field of Applied Behavior Analysis. Rather than transporting children to environments that have specifically been designed to meet their needs, inclusion strives to both help children adapt to their community and to change these natural environments to meet their needs. This symposium examines different issues in the education of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in the natural environment. |
|
How Do Kids Talk? Using Skinner's Classification of Verbal Behavior to Analyze Natural Language Samples |
MARIELA VARGAS-IRWIN (CEC-Behavioral Services), Christine Florentino (CEC-Behavioral Services), Madhuri Vengala (CEC-Behavioral Services), Emily McCort (CEC-Behavioral Services), Steffanie Richards Koue (CEC-Behavioral Services), Rafael Castro (CEC-Behavioral Services) |
Abstract: Skinner's classification of verbal behavior in mands, tacts, echoic, and intraverbals was used to analyze natural language samples of kindergarten, first grade, and second grade typically developing students. When compared to natural language samples of children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders, typical children were found to have larger proportions of tacts and intraverbals. Significant differences between typically developing girls and boys were also observed. Implications for language pragmatic and social skills training are discussed. |
|
Teaching Critical Social Skills in Inclusive Settings |
MADHURI VENGALA (CEC-Behavioral Services), Mariela Vargas-Irwin (CEC-Behavioral Services), Christine Florentino (CEC-Behavioral Services), Emily McCort (CEC-Behavioral Services), Steffanie Richards Koue (CEC-Behavioral Services), Rafael Castro (CEC-Behavioral Services) |
Abstract: Proximity to children, receipt of social bids from other children, spontaneous verbalizations towards adults and children, and focus on toys have been identified as critical indicators of social skills in pre-school children with autism. This case presentation examines the data collected on the social behaviors of a pre-school student with Pervasive Developmental Disorder who was integrated in a typical pre-school with the support of instructor trained in Applied Behavior Analysis. During the baseline observation, the subject remained within three feet of other children 40% of intervals. He initiated verbal interaction towards another child once and did not receive any bids from other children. He remained focused on toys 100% of intervals. Post-intervention data revealed that the subject remained within three feet of other children 100% of intervals, initiated verbal social interaction with peers 53% of intervals, initiated verbal social interaction with adults 6% of intervals, received social bids 17% of intervals, and remained focused on toys 100% of intervals. For comparison purposes, social behavior data were collected on two randomly selected typically developing peers. The subject’s social behavior closely approximated that of his typically developing peers. |
|
LATE Intervention for Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders |
EMILY MCCORT (CEC-Behavioral Services), Leila Meehan (CEC-Behavioral Services), Mariela Vargas-Irwin (CEC-Behavioral Services), Steffanie Richards Koue (CEC-Behavioral Services), Rafael Castro (CEC-Behavioral Services) |
Abstract: In the field of autism there is extensive empirical support for the importance of beginning intensive intervention immediately after diagnosis. However, intensive services are sometimes offered by local school districts only after strong parent advocacy. This case study presents pre and post intervention data for a child with Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified who began receiving one-to-one instruction based on Applied Behavior Analysis at age eleven. The data documents the importance of advocating for behavioral education for older children. |
|
Teaching Sports Skills and Sports General Knowledge to children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders |
CHRISTINE FLORENTINO (CEC-Behavioral Services), Mariela Vargas-Irwin (CEC-Behavioral Services), Emily McCort (CEC-Behavioral Services), Steffanie Richards Koue (CEC-Behavioral Services), Rafael Castro (CEC-Behavioral Services) |
Abstract: Many children with PDD acquire basic ball kills, such as kicking, throwing, and catching through discrete trial training. These skills, however, are difficult to put to use in natural social situations. This study examines the effect of video modeling and discrete trial training on the acquisition of basketball and soccer skills. |
|
|
|
|
The Role of Technology and the Development of Play in Young Children with Autism |
Saturday, May 28, 2005 |
4:00 PM–5:20 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Rebecca P. F. MacDonald (New England Center for Children) |
Discussant: Mary Jane Weiss (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
CE Instructor: Rebecca P. F. MacDonald, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Play is an important part of a typical childs development and contributes to the acquisition of language and social interaction skills. Children with autism often do not develop play skills. Behavior analysts have been examining strategies for developing normalized play in children with autism for the past two decades. Modeling, prompting, and use of typical peer role models are just a few of the strategies in the literature. Most recently, video modeling has been used to teach a variety of skills, including play to children with autism. The purpose of this symposium is to present data on effective strategies for promoting play in children with autism, as well as, an overview of procedures involving technology to teach children with autism. |
|
Strategies for Expanding Pretend Play in Children with Autism using Video Modeling |
REBECCA P. F. MACDONALD (New England Center for Children), Sally N. Roberts (New England Center for Children), Shelly R. Cota (New England Center for Children), Kristine Wiltz (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: Video modeling has been demonstrated to be an effective procedure to teach a variety of skills, including pretend play. We will review several studies that we have conducted demonstrating the effectiveness of video modeling teaching procedures to teach independent pretend play to children with autism, as well as to teach cooperative play between children with autism and typically developing peers. In addition, we will present data from our most recent work, teaching children to expand on the scripted play using video modeling. Using a strategy that involves introducing scripted loops into the video models scripts and presenting extra toys that could be used in these loops, we found that children expand on the scripted play observed in the video. We will discuss these findings as they relate to the development of pretend play in children with autism. |
|
The Effects of Choice-Making on Appropriate Play Behavior in an Integrated Preschool Classroom |
ILENE S. SCHWARTZ (University of Washington), Bonnie J. McBride (University of Washington), Mark J. Larson (University of Washington) |
Abstract: Three preschool children with autism participated in this study during free choice in their integrated preschool classrooms. The purpose of the study was to determine if providing children with choice of activity would be sufficient to increase their engagement during free choice time. The research questions were: 1.Is presenting children with autism a clear, 2-option choice sufficient to affect the rate of engagement during free play in an integrated classroom? 2. If not, does adding a short, but intense period of prompting affect engagement.The results of this study demonstrate that choice alone was not effective in increasing engagement for children with autism. The results also indicate that when choice was accompanied by a brief, but intense period of prompting the rate of engagement for all three children increased to levels similar to that of nondisabled children in the classroom |
|
Use of Technology in Interventions for Children with Autism |
TINA R. GOLDSMITH (Western Michigan University), Linda A. LeBlanc (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: A growing number of studies have investigated diverse applications of technology-based interventions with children with autism. The purpose of this paper is to review the growing empirical support for the efficacy of technology-based interventions with children with autism and to recommend future directions for research. This review will focus on five examples of technology introduced as a temporary instructional aid to be removed once the goal of behavior change has been met: (a) tactile and auditory prompting devices, (b) video-based instruction and feedback, (c) computer-aided instruction, (d) virtual reality, and (e) robotics. Future directions for research and practice with each technology are discussed. |
|
|
|
|
2005 ABA Tutorial: Are We Ready to Explain and Modify Complex Social Behavior? |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Area: CSE; Domain: Theory |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Kurt Salzinger, Ph.D. |
Chair: Janet Ellis (University of North Texas) |
Presenting Authors: : KURT SALZINGER (Hofstra University) |
Abstract: Ever since Skinner (1938), early on after presenting an extensive study of the rat, invoked his Let him extrapolate who will, we have been hesitant to do so. It is, nevertheless, also true that just a few sentences before that fateful one, in the very same book, Skinner had said: The importance of a science of behavior derives largely from the possibility of an eventual extension to human affairs. In that sense, John Stoddard (2001) should not have been so surprised that Skinner engaged in what the former called premature extrapolation. As we well know, Skinner went on to engage in much-attacked extensive, not to say excessive, extrapolation and for that reason I will try for some more modest, but not too limited, extrapolation, examining how one could apply the basic reinforcement contingency paradigm to complex human behavior and thus (eventually) shed light on how to improve it. Beginning immodestly with some of my early work with conditioning of speech deficient children and flat-affect schizophrenic patients, I will try to elucidate human error, communication (all the while not ignoring the overlap of the latter two), and other human vagaries by means of behavior analysis most basic concepts. |
|
KURT SALZINGER (Hofstra University) |
Kurt Salzinger, Ph.D. is Senior Scholar in Residence at Hofstra University in Hempstead, N.Y. since January 2003. He was Executive Director for Science at the American Psychological Association 2001 to 2003. He’s been President of the New York Academy of Sciences, has served on the Board of Directors of the APA, and been president of Divisions 1 (General Psychology) and 25 (Behavior Analysis), and of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology. He also served as the first Chair of the Board of the Cambridge Center 1986 – 1988, subsequently as a member until 1991 and again a member of the Board since 2004. He is author or editor of 12 books and over 120 articles and book chapters. The most recent book was edited by Rieber, R.W., and Salzinger in 1998: Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. He has varied research interests, including behavior analysis applied to human beings, dogs, rats, and goldfish, schizophrenia, verbal behavior of children and adults and history of psychology. He has both given grants (when a program officer at the National Science Foundation) and received them (when professor of psychology at Hofstra University and Polytechnic University of New York and Principal Research Scientist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute) for his own research. He received the Sustained Superior Performance Award from the NSF, the Stratton Award from the American Psychopathological Association, and the Most Meritorious Article Award from the Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. In 2002 he was Presidential Scholar for the Association for Behavior Analysis. |
|
|
|
|
Int'l Panel - Developing and Maintaining Training Programs in Behavior Analysis: Lessons and Tips |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Lake Erie (8th floor) |
Area: TBA/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Pamela G. Osnes, Ph.D. |
Chair: Pamela G. Osnes (The Ohio State University) |
PAMELA G. OSNES (The Ohio State University) |
INGUNN SANDAKER (Akershus University College, Norway) |
MICHAEL R. JOHNSTON (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: This panel will discuss training programs in behavior analysis from the perspectives of the developers, the implementers, and the consumers (the students who receive training). The panelists will discuss the development of new programs, as well as variables affecting the post-development maintenance and strengthening of programs. Mr. Johnston will provide the consumer's perspective, as well as a unique training model, the Satellite Master's Programs in Behavior Analysis offered by the University of Nevada-Reno. Dr. Sandaker will proffer the international perspective, describing the development of the newly-accredited program at the University of Akershus in Oslo, Norway. Dr. Osnes will offer information from the vantage point of a previous Program Director and as the Coordinator of ABA's Education Board. Audience participation will be encouraged throughout. |
|
|
|
|
Advances in Functional Analysis Methodology: Implications for Assessment and Treatment |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Discussant: Brian A. Iwata (University of Florida) |
CE Instructor: Michele D. Wallace, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will include three presentations demonstrating advances in functional analysis methodology. The first paper will discuse the importance of familiar and unfamilar therapists and settings in identifying behavioral functions. The second paper will discuse the implications of conducting functional analyses on precursor behavior in order to develop effective treatment of severe problem behavior. The thrid paper will discuse the extenstion of functional analysis methodology tn school setting with children with emotional/behavioral disroders. Finally, comments relating to the implications of these three papers for research and clinical practice for evaluation and treating problem behavior will be addressed. |
|
Correspondence of Functional Analyses Across Settings and Therapists |
JESSICA L. THOMASON (University of Florida), Brian A. Iwata (University of Florida), Jennifer N. Fritz (University of Florida) |
Abstract: Functional analyses (FA) are typically conducted in controlled environments to avoid potential confounds introduced by uncontrolled sources of reinforcement or stimulus control that may reduce both experimental control and the likelihood of obtaining clear results. However, one critisim of FA methodology is that analyeses conducted by unfamiliar individuals (therapists) in unfamiliar environments (clinics) might not provide accurate information about problem behavior that occurs with parents or caregivers in home, school, or day care settins. We evaluated correspondence between FAs conducted by therapists in clinics with FAs conducted by caregivers in the home. Study 1 consisted of caregiver training, during which direct instruction, video modeling, and feedback were used to teach correct Fa contingency implementation. In study 2, FAs were first conducted in a clinic by a therapist, followed by FAs conducted in children's homes by caregivers. Results of the two analyses were compared, and function was determined via visual analysis. If the analyses did not yield similar results, further FAs were conducted with combinations of familiar and unfamiliar therapists and settings. Results are discussed in terms of implications for research and clinical practice for evaluating problem behavior. |
|
When Functional Analyses of Problem Behavior are Not Possible: An Evaluation of a Precursor Assessment |
ALICIA N. MACALEESE (University of Nevada, Reno), Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno), Adel C. Najdowski (University of Nevada, Reno), Carrie Ellsworth (University of Nevada, Reno), Jacki Cleveland (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: Functional analyses have been repeatedly demonstrated to be an effective behavioral assessment methodology used to identify environmental variables maintaining problem behavior. However, there are inherent limitations in using functional analyses for severe behaviors or problem behaviors that cannot be provoked. The current study applied functional analysis methodology to precursor behaviors that preceded severe problem behaviors and devised treatments based upon the maintaining variables identified. Results indicated that not only did the assessment provide information with respect to maintaining functions, but lead to the implementation of successful interventions for all participants. Results will be discussed with respect to implications for research and clinical practice. |
|
Functional Analysis and Intervention for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disroders in a Public School Setting |
THOMAS S. HIGBEE (Utah State University), Glenna Wright-Gallo (Utah State University) |
Abstract: Federal special education law (IDEA) requires that functional assessments be completed for students exhibiting behavior problems in classroom settings. The law does not specify, however, what type of functional assessment is completed. Despite their demonstrated accuracy in determining behavioral function, experimental functional analyses usually not conducted in school settings, likely due to their perceived complexity and duration. To demonstrate the utility of experimental functional assessments ins school settings, we conducted a classroom-based experimental functional assessment with two students with emotional/behavioral (e/BD). To validate the functional analysis, we designed a DRA + extinction intervention for each student based on information gathered in the experimental functional analysis. Rates of aberrant behavior decreased for both students as a result of this intervention validating the results of the experimental functional assessment. |
|
|
|
|
Alterative Communication Systems for Individual with Developmental Disabilities: Comparisons of Acquisition, Generalization, and Response Strength |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Stevens 2 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Iser Guillermo DeLeon (Johns Hopkins University) |
Discussant: David P. Wacker (University of Iowa) |
CE Instructor: Iser Guillermo DeLeon, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Individuals with developmental disabilities frequently display serious deficits in verbal abilities. Researchers and clinicians have therefore adopted or developed various alternative/augmentative communication systems to strengthen or supplement the communicative abilities of these individuals. Popular forms of alternative communication include manual signs, pictures exchange systems (or PECS), and microswitch-activated devices. Each of these systems are associated with distinct relative advantages and disadvantages that make them more or less appropriate for use depending on individual circumstances. The present series of studies will explore the conceptual bases for, and applied implications of, differences among these systems. More specifically, these studies involved meaningful comparisons with regard to factors including the assessment of prerequisite skills, ease of acquisition of one form versus another, generalization to new settings and communicative partners, preference across modalities, and the effects of prompts. Collectively, the studies will provide valuable, evidence-based insights towards the selection and promotion of one system versus another. |
|
Structured Assessment to Predict Ease of Acquisition for Manual Sign and Picture Exchange Communication Systems |
MEAGAN GREGORY (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Iser Guillermo DeLeon (Johns Hopkins University), David M. Richman (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
Abstract: Certain prerequisite skills are required for an individual to successfully acquire and use alternative and augmentative communication systems. For manual signing, these skills include (but are not limited to) motor imitation and gross and fine motor skills. For picture exchange systems, the skills necessary include identity matching and the ability to scan an array of pictures and discriminate among them. The purposes of the current investigation were to, first, design and implement a brief assessment battery to predict an individual’s success with an alternative communication system based on their prerequisite abilities and, second, to validate the predictions of the assessment by attempting to teach the participants 4 unrelated mands using both forms of alternative communication. Three individuals with developmental disabilities and extremely limited vocal verbal abilities participated. Assessment results suggested that two of the individuals would be able to rapidly acquire varied mand responses using both communication systems, whereas a third would have difficulty acquiring mand responses using either communication system. These predictions were subsequently validated during mand training. The results are discussed in terms of the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two communication systems and the need for evidence that the assessment has more specific discriminative validity. |
|
An Evaluation of Communication Modality |
TERRY S. FALCOMATA (University of Iowa), Joel Eric Ringdahl (University of Iowa), Eric Boelter (University of Iowa), Tory J. Christensen (University of Iowa) |
Abstract: We conducted an assessment to determine the most effective modality for communication to be used by a woman with developmental and communication disabilities. Using a differential reinforcement schedule, three modalities of communication were evaluated separately (speech, picture exchange, and microswitch activation). In addition, we evaluated the effect of specific prompts on communicative behavior. Two conditions were conducted within each modality: prompt and no prompt. The final phase of the assessment consisted of an evaluation of choice of communication modality (i.e., each modality was available and under identical reinforcement schedules). Results of the assessment demonstrated a clear effect both modality and prompt presence. In addition, an apparent preference for one communication modality (microswitch actiation) was demonstated. Interobserver agreement was obtained during at least 20% of all sessions and averaged above 90% for all target responses. |
|
Comparing the Acquisition, Generalization, and Emergence of Untrained Verbal Operants for Two Mand Forms in Adults with Severe Developmental Disabilities |
MEGAN M. ZIOMEK (Southern Illinois University), Ruth Anne Rehfeldt (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: We compared the number of training trials required to master mands for preferred items using PECS and manual sign in three adults with severe developmental disabilities. Generalization across settings and communicative partners was evaluated for both communication modalities. Next, in order to ensure that mands were truly under control of establishing operations and not multiply controlled by the presence of the preferred items, participants were taught to mand for several inaccessible items that were needed to complete one of several chained tasks, thus establishing control by transitive conditioned establishing operations. Finally, throughout all training phases, participants were probed for their ability to use PECS and manual sign to tact or answer questions about items that were used in mand training. Preliminary results suggest that participants acquired mands using both communication modalities, but mands using PECS were acquired within a shorter time period than mands using sign. |
|
|
|
|
Broadening Perspectives on Social Skills for Children with Autism: School, Family and Community |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Stephanie Lockshin (Institute for Child Development) |
Discussant: Stephanie Lockshin (Institute for Child Development) |
CE Instructor: Stephanie Lockshin, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Social impairment is one of the core deficits in autism. As such, much time is spent developing interventions to address social skills for children with autism. However, there can be a tendency to view socials skills from a narrow perspective of simply teaching greetings and simple games within the school environment. While these skills are useful, social behavior permeates all facets of a students life. As such, the importance of targeting social skills in the broader context of school, family and community must not be overlooked. Social skills instruction needs to be incorporated into every aspect of the curriculum. The current symposium presents some novel methods of integrating social skills instruction into everyday classroom routines, and emphasizes the importance of teaching skills at school that enhance participation in family and community activities. |
|
Targeting Family- and Community-Friendly Social Skills: Social Skills at the Movies |
ROSE F. EAGLE (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University), Emily Huber (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University), Sara White (State University of New York, Binghamton), Stephanie Lockshin (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University) |
Abstract: The current presentation describes an intervention conducted with at the Institute for Child Development at Binghamton University and provides some preliminary data on the effectiveness of the program. The intervention is an example of our model of partnership between the school program and families, wherein specific family-friendly skills are taught in school and generalized to home and community settings. The intervention was focused on decreasing maladaptive behaviors and increasing appropriate movie-watching behaviors in a simulated movie theater environment. A token economy system was developed for each child. Target behaviors for the token economy included sitting quietly and remaining seated. In addition, related movie-watching skills were addressed, including buying snacks and discussing the movie. Participant data indicate that the intervention may be effective in reducing maladaptive behaviors during movie-watching. In addition, data suggest that the program may be effective in promoting movie-related conversation, and collateral social initiations. This intervention is currently in progress. Future assessment will focus on the effectiveness of the program in the criterion environment (e.g. community movie theaters). |
|
Programming for Social Behaviors in the Home Environment for Children with Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities |
STEPHANIE LOCKSHIN (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University) |
Abstract: Our model of partnership between home and school emphasizes the importance of teaching social behaviors in the school environment and assisting parents in generalizing these skills to the home. The first step in this process involves discussion with family members to determine their needs and priorities regarding their child’s social development. Second, the family’s needs should be taken into consideration when selecting social and communication goals for the child. Areas frequently addressed include: leisure skills, self-control, social awareness, social communication, and social tolerance. Examples are given of specific interventions developed at our program that highlight collaboration between home and school. |
|
Incorporating the Instruction of Social and Communication Skills into an Everyday Classroom Activity |
EMILY HUBER (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University), Rose F. Eagle (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University), Tammy Hammond Natof (AMAC), Stephanie Lockshin (Institute for Child Development, Binghamton University) |
Abstract: Social skills instruction is an important component of the curriculum for children with developmental disabilities. Educational providers and psychological professionals face the challenge of integrating the instruction of social skills naturally into the classroom environment. Social skills instructional contexts that are frequently overlooked include snack and mealtimes. Snack and mealtimes are often used to teach adaptive skills (such as using utensils). However, they also provide a natural context for teaching the appropriate use of social skills. The current presentation describes an intervention that was focused on changing a previously unstructured classroom activity (snack time) into an opportunity to practice social communication with peers, including greeting, inviting, requesting, and saying “thank you.” Preliminary data suggest that the intervention is successful in teaching preschool children with developmental delays social communicative behaviors such as greeting and requesting, as well as increasing collateral social interaction. Future directions for the intervention include generalizing the program to the home environment through parent training. |
|
|
|
|
Cambridge Center Symposium: Unity of Purpose, Unity of Effort: Collective Response to the 9/11 Commission Report |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
International South (2nd floor) |
Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Mark P. Alavosius (Western Michigan University) |
CE Instructor: Mark P. Alavosius, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The 9/11 Commission Report provides a detailed account of the nature and extent of terrorism facing us and recommendations for a global strategy to combat terrorism and build respect among cultures. Their recommended strategy includes a remarkable range of initiatives seeking a coalition of forces to build respect for cultures, tolerance for diversity, opportunities for the disadvantaged, defense of western values, and defeat of terrorism. Many of their recommendations pertain to restructuring the US governments systems for security and defense and will require wide scale organizational change. The challenges and complexity of this are enormous and the struggle will require a unity of purpose and effort perhaps unseen in our lifetimes. The 9/11 Commission has wisely called for an open dialogue on this process. In response, this symposium presents four papers by behavior analysts reacting to the 9/11 Commission report. Our purpose is to contribute to the dialogue needed to develop a coherent response to global terror and suggest contributions by behavioral scientists to this endeavor. |
|
The Struggle Against Intolerance |
JASON LILLIS (University of Nevada, Reno), Steven C. Hayes (University of Nevada, Reno), Akihiko Masuda (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: The war on terrorism is at its core not so much a war on terrorism as it is a struggle against intolerance. It is not possible to overcome that struggle with bullets alone: we must also learn to how to change human prejudice. The usual view is that we are without prejudice until a sick culture pours it into us. While there is a seed of truth in that view, it misses the larger truth. Prejudice is built into humans beings through our ability to arbitrarily form verbal categories, give those categories attributes, to compare one category to another, and to do so in such a way that we end up on top at the expense of others. Because the human nervous system works by addition, not subtraction, we have little hope of getting rid of prejudicial categories once they are formed, as least as echoes of the past. We can, however, reduce or even eliminate the perverse role these categories play in human behavior. Evidence of the impact of acceptance, defusion, and values based methods on human prejudice will be presented. |
Jason Lillis is a doctoral student of Clinical Psychology at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). He received his B.A. from Loyola College in Maryland and his M.A. in clinical psychology from UNR. His interests include Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) approaches for enhancing treatment compliance and outcomes in medical populations, and Relational Frame Theory (RFT) accounts of prejudice and discrimination. |
|
Seeking Cooperation Post 911: A Behavior Analytic Account of Linked Contingencies |
DWIGHT HARSHBARGER (Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies) |
Abstract: Events like those of September 11, 2001 change political, economic, cultural, and psychological forces and powerfully influence how we live, work and play. Uncertainty, fear, economic instability, anger, patriotism are just some of the factors that influence our everyday behaviors. The complexity of these contingencies creates enormous challenges to those leaders seeking to maintain the stability, productivity, and security of populations under their span of influence, be they leaders of work organizations, communities, and nations. Some may find appeal to ‘faith-based’ initiatives that inform public policy and sustain a clash of opposing faiths; others can find guidance from a science of behavior that serves as a foundation for initiatives seeking to establish common ground among conflicting cultures. This presentation provides an overview of how behavior analysis contributes to understanding the complexity of socio political contexts under threat of terror and how consideration of contingency management, particularly linked contingencies, might assist efforts to enhance cultural awareness and renew communities, economies, businesses, and relations with other nations. |
Dwight Harshbarger, Ph.D. is Executive Director and Senior Fellow of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. His interests are in strengthening human performance in organizations. Dwight has headed human resources in two corporations; as a corporate senior vice president for Reebok International, Ltd., and corporate vice president of Sealy, Inc. He served as a consultant in RHR International’s Chicago office and later as director of strategic consulting and vice president at Aubrey Daniels International. He heads The Browns Group, Inc., and has successfully implemented behavior-based performance improvement programs in the United States and Asia. Prior to entering corporate work, Dwight was a tenured professor of psychology at West Virginia University and later served as CEO of a community mental health center in the southern West Virginia coal fields. Dwight has edited and authored books and articles on organizational performance. He is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and American Psychological Society. |
|
Verbal Networks in the Face of Terror |
RAMONA HOUMANFAR (University of Nevada, Reno), Joe Rodrigues (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: Environmental ambiguity is one factor affecting verbal networks in organizations and is the topic of this paper. Our analysis considers the investigative data offered by the 911 Commission Report particularly in terms of the complex verbal networks among security agencies. Our descriptive recount demonstrates the gaps and redundancies in verbal networking processes that appears to have contributed to the failure of the US government and military to thwart the attacks on September 11, 2001. The ambiguity associated with the chain of command and individuals’ roles are discussed particularly in regards to the ‘lack of imagination’ that the 9/11 Commissioners identified as underlying the systemic failure of our security forces. Process analysis occasions a number of behavior analytic interpretations of verbal events and their role in organizational effectiveness. We address the significance of the analysis of reciprocal relations among verbal networks and human performance in organizations by using data from a series of analog preparations that shed some light on the design of effective organizations operating in times of terror. |
Dr. Houmanfar is an Assistant Professor, the Program Coordinator of the Behavior Analysis Program, and Director of Performance Systems Technology Program at the University of Nevada, Reno. Currently, Dr. Houmanfar is serving as the senior co-chair of the Association for Behavior Analysis, a trustee of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies, editor of the Performance Systems Analysis of Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies, and an editorial board member of Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. In the area of improving human performance Dr. Houmanfar has published articles and chapters, delivered more than 100 presentations at regional, national, and international conferences, and has co-published a book, “Organizational Change” (available through Context Press). |
|
Life in Wartime: Organizational Behavior, Systems Analysis, Private Sector Preparedness |
MARK P. ALAVOSIUS (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: The publication of the 9/11 Commission Report provides a detailed accounting of the nature and extent of terrorism facing our culture. The report reviews extensive investigative data available on the 9/11 attack on the United States and recounts the evidence revealing al Queda as the perpetrator. The Commission report provides a vivid and unsettling assessment of the extent and sophistication of terrorists' threats to homeland security and the current limitations of our government's ability to detect and preempt future attacks. One stark assessment of the 9/11 Commission is that more attacks more terrible than those of September 11, 2001 will occur. This talk summarizes the report and offers considerations for behavioral science applications towards improving the private-sector’s prevention of and preparedness for future attacks. |
Mark P. Alavosius, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of psychology joining the faculty of Western Michigan University in August, 2003. Dr. Alavosius received his BA in psychology from Clark University in 1976 and earned his MS (1985) and Ph.D. (1987) in Psychology from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. His interests are in developing behavioral and instructional systems to improve work performance particularly in the areas of health and safety. Dr. Alavosius has a proven track record with NIOSH as a recipient of Small Business Innovations Research Grants to develop and test behavioral safety technologies. With over twenty years of experience in behavioral approaches to work performance and occupational safety, Dr. Alavosius has over 90 publications and conference presentations. As President of MPA & Associates, Inc., Dr. Alavosius works with specialists in instructional design, multi-media interactive systems, software development, business strategy, and performance management to develop and provide behavioral systems to improve performance in business and industry. |
|
|
|
|
New Developments in Peer Tutoring |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Lloyd D. Peterson (Idaho State University) |
Discussant: Debra M. Kamps (University of Kansas) |
CE Instructor: Stephanie M. Peterson, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will consist of three presentations that describe experimental studies of the applications of peer tutoring to children with and without disabilities and how pre-service teachers can be prepared to implement classwide peer tutoring (CWPT). First, Lisa Bowman will describe how CWPT was implemented in secondary classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). Her data suggests that CWPT is useful for promoting both academic and behavioral performance in children with EBD. Next, Renee Van Norman will discuss how peer-tutoring procedures can be adapted when tutors do not have sufficient academic skills to provide accurate feedback to tutees. Her results show that adding pre-recorded answers to tutoring flashcards promoted more accurate feedback and error correction from tutors. Then, Larry Maheady will describe how general education pre-service teachers were trained to implement CWPT via a 2-hour workshop. Results indicated that pre-service teachers could quickly learn to implement the procedures, and their students demonstrated increased performance in the academic area in which peer tutoring was implemented. Finally, Deborah Kamps will summarize the findings of these studies and discuss how these findings could impact educational practice. |
|
ClassWide Peer Tutoring as an Intervention for Middle and High School Students with E/BD in Alternative Education Classrooms |
LISA J. BOWMAN (University of Kansas, Juniper Gardens Children's Project) |
Abstract: This study was conducted in two high school and one middle school alternative education classrooms as an initial look at the effectiveness of ClassWide Peer Tutoring (CWPT) and CWPT with class-wide self-management (CWSM) on students' academic and behavioral outcomes. Nineteen 5th-12th grade students with E/BD in urban and suburban schools participated: 17 male, 2 female, 12 Caucasian, 6 African American, and 1 Hispanic. Students at the middle school were introduced to CWPT with CWSM; students at the high school received CWPT only. Students in all three classrooms who were lower academically made the greatest gains during CWPT versus teacher-led instruction. All students had fewer off-task behaviors during CWPT than teacher-led instruction. Fidelity of implementation and reliability measures and teacher and student satisfaction data were collected. Successes included (a) the use of praise between peers, (b) opportunities for students to work cooperatively, (c) frequent opportunities to respond and be actively engaged with academic content, and (d) reduction in off-task and inappropriate behaviors. Challenges included changes in school and student schedules, and student absenteeism. Results of this preliminary investigation of CWPT in alternative education settings suggest that CWPT is a viable academic and behavioral intervention. |
|
If Only There Were a Mini-Me…The Effects of Pre-Recorded Sight Words on the Accuracy of Tutor Feedback |
RENEE VAN NORMAN (The Ohio State University), Stephanie M. Peterson (Idaho State University), Wendy Swazuk (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: Reciprocal peer tutoring can be an effective means for students to learn new academic material, such as high frequency sight words. In peer tutoring, effective and efficient error correction is an integral part of peer tutoring success. To be effective, error correction must: 1) be accurate, 2) guide the student through the correct response, and 3) be immediate (Heward, 1997). However, when both learners of the peer tutoring dyad are identified as at-risk for potential reading difficulties, accurate error correction may not occur. This study investigated the effects of providing pre-recorded sight words on the accuracy of tutor feedback and word acquisition by tutees during peer tutoring sessions with kindergarten students identified as at-risk for reading difficulties. Specifically, following tutor training, a reversal design embedded within a multiple baseline experimental design was used to evaluate the accuracy of tutor error correction with and without the pre-recorded sight words. Results indicated that the pre-recorded sight words resulted in better error correction accuracy than when sight words were not pre-recorded. In addition, tutor and tutee word acquisition results will be discussed in relation to accurate error correction. Results will be discussed in terms of how accurate error correction leads to more effective stimulus control. |
|
Preparing Preservice General Education Teachers to Implement Class Wide Peer Tutoring |
LAWRENCE J. MAHEADY (State University of New York, Fredonia), Gregory F. Harper (State University of New York, Fredonia) |
Abstract: This study describes how a small group of preservice general education teachers were prepared to use an evidence-based educational practice and what effects the practice had on their pupils' academic performance. Preservice general educators learned to use Juniper Gardens Children's Project's Class Wide Peer Tutoring (CWPT) program through a two-hour workshop and with in class assistance. The amount of time required for each preservice teacher to reach a pre-established training criterion was calculated and specific implementation comments and concerns were recorded. Academic effects on pupils' spelling test performance were assessed using weekly pre- and post-tests and social validity data were collected from all primary consumers. Findings indicated that: (a) preservice teachers could implement CWPT with a high degree of accuracy with about 60 minutes of in class assistance, (b) their use of CWPT resulted in high spelling grades on weekly post-tests for all pupils, (c) preservice and cooperating teachers and their pupils liked CWPT, and (d) some preservice teachers made procedural adaptations that appeared to be related to lower levels of pupil satisfaction. Findings are discussed in light of recent movements in the use of evidence based teaching practices, professional accountability, and preservice teacher preparation. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Research on Assessment in Organizational Behavior Management |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Marquette (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Byron J. Wine (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Discussant: Thomas E. Boyce (Center for Behavioral Safety, LLC) |
CE Instructor: David A. Wilder, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Three data-based papers will be presented on the role of assessment in organizational behavior management. The first paper describes a comparison of two methods of assessing preference among employees in organizations. The second paper describes an antecedent analysis and intervention of the conditions under which employees greet customers in a restaurant. The third paper describes the use of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist to identify an intervention to increase employee completion of tasks in a physical therapy clinic. |
|
A Comparison of Methods for Assessing Preference Among Employees: A Reinforcer Survey Versus a Forced Choice Procedure |
DAVID A. WILDER (Florida Institute of Technology), Kelly L. Therrien (Florida Institute of Technology), Byron J. Wine (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: We compared two methods of assessing preference for items among four administrative assistant employees. A reinforcer survey was compared with a verbal forced choice procedure to determine which of the two would more accurately identify items as reinforcers. Results showed that the reinforcer survey was more accurate than the forced choice procedure. |
|
Antecedent Analysis and Improvement of Customer Greeting in a Restaurant |
BYRON J. WINE (Florida Institute of Technology), Kelly L. Therrien (Florida Institute of Technology), David A. Wilder (Florida Institute of Technology), Manuel A. Rodriguez (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: We examined customer greeting by employees at one location of a sandwich restaurant chain. First, an antecedent or structural analysis was conducted to determine the conditions under which greeting a customer within 3 seconds of their entry into the restaurant did and did not occur. Results suggested that an appropriate customer greeting was most likely to occur when a door chime was used to indicate that a customer had entered the store and when the store manager was present behind the service counter. Next, a performance improvement intervention which consisted of the combination of the use of a door chime and manager presence was evaluated. Results showed that during baseline, a mean 6% of customers were greeted; during intervention a mean of 63% of customers were greeted. The addition of manager-delivered verbal and graphic group feedback resulted in 100% of customers being greeting across two consecutive sessions. |
|
Use of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist to Assess and Improve Employee Task Completion in a Physical Therapy Clinic |
MICHELLE J. VANWAGNER (Western Michigan University), Nicole E. Gravina (Western Michigan University), John Austin (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of task clarification, graphic feedback, and minor work environment modification on employee completion of items on 2 behavioral checklists for morning preparation procedures at a physical therapy clinic. The study employed a multiple baseline design across checklists and areas. During baseline, the average percentage of completion for the therapy area checklist and the change area checklist was 18.4% and 56.5% respectively. A functional assessment was conducted to aid in the development of the treatment package. During the first intervention, the mean percentage of tasks completed in the therapy area increased to 82.1%, and the mean for changing area preparation tasks increased to 87.7%. During the supervisory feedback phase, task completion for the therapy checklist dropped 6.6% from the previous phase to a mean of 75.6% and change area task completion increased to a mean of 100%. The results of this study suggest that the package intervention was effective at increasing preparation task completion. |
|
|
|
|
Int'l Symposium - The Evolution of Verbal Behavior in Children |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: DEV; Domain: Theory |
Chair: R. Douglas Greer (Teachers College and Graduate School, Columbia University) |
Discussant: Olive Healy (CABAS Ireland) |
CE Instructor: R. Douglas Greer, Ph.D. |
Abstract: There is growing evidence of a developmental trajectory for key verbal capabilities. The evidence comes from research guided by Skinners (1957) theory of verbal behavior and the accomplishment of schools based entirely on scientific practices. The broad verbal developmental factures identified include: listener, speaker, speaker-listener exchanges with others, speaker as own listener (self-talk, conversational units and naming), reader, writer, writer as own reader, and advanced verbal mediation. Many of the capabilities, and related subcomponents identified in this research, are higher order operants or relational frames. Our work in this area began when we first identified missing verbal capabilities in children, which, in turn, led to the identification and induction of pre and co-requisite repertoires. Once the missing verbal capabilities were induced, the children acquired repertories that had not been previously possible. We suggest that new evidence on the role of behavioral and cultural selection in the acquisition of verbal capabilities dismantles accounts of language as instinct. We shall present 2 papers on the evidence and related theories. |
|
The Identification of Verbal Capabilities from A Verbal Behavior Analysis Perspective |
DOLLEEN-DAY KEOHANE (Teachers College, Columbia University) |
Abstract: Although Skinner’s work is often described as theory, there is now a body of research supporting and expanding the theory. There are over 88 experiments devoted to testing Skinner’s theory as well as a significant body of related work in relational frame theory. Much of our work has been devoted to identifying prerequisite or co-requisite repertoires and scientific tactics that provide ways for children to progress from one verbal capability to the next in a hierarch of verbal independence. We worked our way inductively toward identification of the components and subcomponents within the verbal capabilities suggested by Skinner. We propose that these verbal repertoires represent verbal milestones realized as developmental verbal capabilities. |
|
The Roles of Behavioral and Cultural Selection in the Evolution or Induction of Verbal Capabilities |
R. DOUGLAS GREER (Teachers College and Graduate School, Columbia University) |
Abstract: I shall describe the evidence that supports the role of behavior selection in the mergence of generative verbal capabilities. The effects of behavior selection, together with the results of natural selection, on the emergence of these capabilities provide the processes that, in turn, allow the establishing operations called on by cultural functions to evoke new verbal capabilities. These explanations will then be contrasted with the prevailing notions of language as instinct. The current evidence no longer permits the linguistic community to ignore the significant roles of behavioral and cultural selection in the evolution of complex verbal behavior in the child or the species. |
|
|
|
|
Towards a Behavioral Analysis of Joint Attention in Young Children with Autism |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
9:00 AM–10:20 AM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Rebecca P. F. MacDonald (New England Center for Children) |
CE Instructor: Rebecca P. F. MacDonald, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Joint attention is recognized as one of the earliest forms of communication in young children. Joint attention involves the coordinated attention between a social partner and an object in the environment. For young children, episodes of joint attention provide the context for communication with others. These reciprocal interactions are characterized by glances and gestures and are viewed by many as critical to the development of symbolic language. It has been demonstrated that children with autism often manifest deficits in joint attention skills. The development of behavioral assessment procedures for identifying deficits in joint attention and effective teaching procedures to teach these skills is critical to our ability to provide effective treatment for these children. The purpose of this symposium is to describe several research projects in which the authors are using the principles of applied behavior analysis to develop protocols for evaluating joint attention in children with autism. The implications of these analyses will be discussed as they relate to a behavior analysis of this traditionally developmental phenomenon. |
|
An Analysis of Responsiveness to Joint Attention Bids in Children with Autism |
REBECCA P. F. MACDONALD (New England Center for Children), Gretchen O'Sullivan (New England Center for Children), William V. Dube (E.K. Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School), Jaime Cohen (New England Center for Children), Renee C. Mansfield (New England Center for Children), Jennifer L. Klein (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: This paper describes a highly structured assessment protocol with objective behavioral measures for evaluating children’s responsiveness to the joint attention of an adult. The assessment was administered to both children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and typically developing children, aged 2 to 4 years. Interobserver agreement was high for all behavioral measures. Results showed that children with autism responded to joint attention bids when the object of interest was within their field of vision but showed deficits when these objects were outside this area. In addition, differences in performance were also seen between the structured assessment sessions and a more naturalistic assessment setting. Typically developing children showed high levels of responsiveness regardless of setting or position of stimuli. These results extend previous research and have implications for the behavioral treatment of joint attention. |
|
Joint Attention and Socially Mediated Reinforcers in Children with Autism |
WILLIAM V. DUBE (E.K. Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School), Rebecca P. F. MacDonald (New England Center for Children), Renee C. Mansfield (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: This paper will describe a contingency analysis of joint attention initiation in which the characteristic gaze shifts, gestures, vocalizations, and so forth are shaped and maintained by conditioned socially mediated reinforcers. According to this analysis, joint attention deficits in children with autism spectrum disorders may be related to failures of socially mediated consequences to function as conditioned reinforcers. This paper will present data from concurrent choice procedures that can be used determine the value of social reinforcers for the child. Applications for research and intervention will be discussed. Key words: autism, joint attention, social reinforcer |
|
Teaching Children with Autism to Respond to Bids for Joint Attention |
BRIDGET A. TAYLOR (Alpine Learning Group), Hannah Hoch (Alpine Learning Group) |
Abstract: This study used a multiple baseline design across three children with autism to assess the effects of prompting procedures to teach the children to respond to an adult’s bid for joint attention. During five minute play sessions, an adult referenced a novel or interesting object in the environment by pointing and commenting. During play sessions, the children were taught to look in the direction of the point and to make a comment about the object referenced by the adult. Generalization was assessed to non-trained stimulus items and to novel environments. Data were collected on three responses: 1. looking in the direction of the adult’s point, 2. making an appropriate comment about the object, and 3. if the child initiated any bids for joint attention. Interobserver agreement data were collected by a second observer during 30% of the sessions. Results will be discussed in terms of the social relevance of teaching children with autism to respond to bids for joint attention and the effects of intervention procedures to teach these responses. |
|
The Etiology of Infant Social Referencing: A Learning Paradigm |
MARTHA PELAEZ (Florida International University) |
Abstract: When human infants begin confronting ambiguous or uncertain situations, they also begin to search their mothers’ reactive facial expressions to cue their approach or avoidance responses in those contexts. This behavior pattern, in the literature observed for the most part in 9-to 13-month olds, is known in mainstream child psychology as social referencing. To date, conceptual and research work has focused on delineating the phenomenon, with the only theory advanced being that the underlying process is preformed – that infants are born able to understand the meanings of maternal facial emotional expressions. No attention has been given hereto fore to the possibility that the social referencing pattern is learned. Results from two experiments involving conditioning infants “reaching” responses to maternal facial cues will be summarized and discussed as they relate to an analysis of social referencing as a learned response pattern. |
|
|
|
|
2005 ABA Tutorial: One Behavioral Approach to College Teaching |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: John L. Michael, Ph.D. |
Chair: Linda J. Parrott Hayes (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Presenting Authors: : JOHN L. MICHAEL (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: Many college courses have fairly clear goals related to a specific verbal content, and are taught by assigning text material, giving lectures, and assessing student repertoires with in-class exams. Some learning occurs during class attendance, but most results from out-of-class study. This tutorial will describe the evolution, rationale, and current status of the use of detailed study objectives and frequent exams as a way to produce highly effective out-of-class study, excellent student performance, and very good course evaluations. The approach does not require any resources other than those ordinarily available to an instructor, nor any special class-scheduling arrangements, and over time can result in a course that approaches programmed self-instruction in appearance and effectiveness. |
|
JOHN L. MICHAEL (Western Michigan University) |
ack L. Michael was born in 1926 in Los Angeles. He entered UCLA in 1943 as a chemistry major, served two years in the army, and returned to UCLA in 1946. He obtained a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. at UCLA, finishing in 1955. As a graduate student his main interests were statistical methodology, physiological psychology, and learning theory. During his first teaching job (in the Psychology Department at Kansas University) he was much influenced by reading B. F. Skinner's Science and Human Behavior, and since then has been primarily involved in teaching behavioral psychology; at Kansas University, the University of Houston, Arizona State University, and Western Michigan University. At Houston in 1957 as a result of influence by the rehabilitation psychologist, Lee Meyerson, he began to apply Skinner's behavior analysis in the areas of mental retardation, mental illness, and physical disability. During the next several years behavior modification was in a period of rapid expansion and Michael contributed with his teaching, writing, and public presentations. At ASU as a result of contact with Fred S. Keller, he became interested in college instructional technology from a behavioral perspective. Most recently he has been concerned with the technical terminology of behavior analysis, basic theory regarding motivation, and verbal behavior.
He contributed to the founding of the Association for Behavior Analysis in 1974 and served as president of that organization in 1979. In 2002 he received the ABA Award for Distinguished Service to Behavior Analysis, and the American Psychological Association Division 25 Don Hake Award for research that bridges the gap between experimental and applied behavior analysis. He is author of a laboratory manual and a number of articles and chapters dealing with basic and applied behavior analysis. He retired from WMU in 2003. |
|
|
|
|
Applications for Court Involved Youth and High School Students with Learning Disabilities |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Diane Raymond (Simmons College) |
Discussant: Michael J. Cameron (Simmons College) |
CE Instructor: Susan Ainsleigh, Ed.D. |
Abstract: The purpose of this session is to demonstrate how the principles of applied behavior analysis can use used to effectively assess and treat individuals that are rarely represented in the extant literature. The first paper demonstrates how a modification in functional assessment procedures can result in the successful assessment of truant adolescents. The second paper demonstrates the relevance of a constructionalist approach for teaching critical content areas (e.g., math) to high school students with learning disabilities. And the final paper demonstrates how a word-picture association method was used to teach high school students with dyslexia to prepare for the Scholastic Aptitude Test. |
|
Functional Assessment of Truant Behavior |
TERRELL THEODULE (Simmons College), Michael J. Cameron (Simmons College) |
Abstract: The majority of functional assessment guides available to behavioranalysts have been designed to develop a hypothesis about themotivating variables maintaining the aberrant behavior of people with developmental disabilities. Although these tools are valuable, they do notprovide guidance to behavior analysts who work with a substantially different population, such as adolescents under the care of the Departmentof Social Services (DSS) who has protracted truancy problems. The purpose of this presentation is to demonstrate how functional assessment procedures can be modified to extract critical information surrounding the issues of urban youth. The results from a modified functional assessment will be presented and a hypothesis-driven intervention will be reviewed. |
|
Constructionalism: A Behavior Analytic Approach to Teaching High School Students |
ROBERT DASILVA (Simmons College), Michael J. Cameron (Simmons College) |
Abstract: Behavior analysts have been criticized for not demonstrating how behavioral principles can be applied in public school classrooms with non-disabled individuals. In fact, some authors have indicated that both typical and gifted students require a educational approach appreciably different from a behavior analytic approach to education. The purpose of this presentation is to demonstrate how a behavior analytic “constructionalist” approach can be used to teach high school students mathematics and on-task behavior. |
|
Word-Picture Associations for Teaching Vocabulary Skills to High School Students with Dyslexia |
CHRISTINE SPIGNESI (Simmons College), Michael J. Cameron (Simmons College), Susan Ainsleigh (Simmons College) |
Abstract: The traditional approach for teaching vocabulary skills to high school students is the “find and define” method. This involves a high school student finding a word in a dictionary and then defining its meaning. Unfortunately, this method does not always work, especially when a student has a disability such as dyslexia. An alternative teaching method requires the teacher to pair pictures with vocabulary words. This method has been proven to be effective because pictures can serve as a thematic prompt during recall tests. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate, via an alternating treatments design the superiority of a word-picture association task for teaching vocabulary skills to high school students with dyslexia. |
|
|
|
|
Assessing Social Behavior of Preschoolers with Autism in Natural Settings |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Sandra L. Harris (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Discussant: Gail G. McGee (Emory University) |
CE Instructor: Lara M. Delmolino Gatley, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Social behavior deficits, while central to the diagnosis of Autism, remain an elusive behavioral target. In ABA, specific behaviors related to social functioning are often measured and targeted for treatment. Skills such as eye contact, intraverbals, or other specific responses are successfully developed through systematic instruction and programming for generalization. However, it remains much more difficult to define, assess, and target social competence as a more abstract concept. Agreement in the literature and clinical field as to what constitutes key social behavior and appropriate tools for direct measurement has not been established. Such agreement, to whatever extent possible, is necessary for more universal outcome research and comparison across individuals and interventions. This session will address a number of issues related to this central topic. The first paper will describe a series of pilot investigations developing a methodology for measuring social behavior in various settings. The second paper focuses on measuring social behavior in contrasting settings and over time as an instrument of assessing change and examining how setting and time interact. The final paper will examine the ways in which these systems are sensitive to change, with regard to other measures of social behavior. Future directions will be discussed. |
|
Establishing Reliable Systems of Measurement for Social Behavior: Issues and Key Variables |
MARY JANE WEISS (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: The abstract nature of social skills and qualitative aspects of social interaction and competence lead to significant issues in reliability and face validity. The current paper describes the development of a behavior code for assessing social behavior occurring during natural settings for preschoolers with autism, with specific attention to issues of reliability. A systematic process by which a series of behavior codes were developed and adapted from the literature will be described. Limitations of each pilot investigation will be discussed, highlighting the implications for each successive study. Data will be presented from multiple groups of preschool students (with and without autism/PDD) attending both segregated and integrated preschool settings. Data will be shared demonstrating significant and reliable differences among groups along measures of social behavior. Further, data will also be shared indicating greater difficulty in capturing to changes over time, attempts to increase the sensitivity of the code to such issues, and correspondence to subjective measures. Findings are related to published literature in this area with implications for future revisions and pilot investigations. |
|
Assessing Improvement in Social Competence of Preschoolers with Autism: Changes in Structured Versus Unstructured Contexts |
MEGAN P. MARTINS (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Lara M. Delmolino Gatley (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Mary Jane Weiss (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: Since social competence is a primary focus of autism intervention, it is essential to include assessments of social behavior change when evaluating comprehensive programs for children with autism. Preschoolers with autism attending an intensive treatment program using applied behavior analysis and comparison peers were repeatedly observed throughout an academic year. Using a behavior code previously demonstrated to be sensitive to social behavior change in children (McGee, Feldman, & Morrier, 1997), participants were observed during naturally occurring periods of structured and unstructured play. Structured play differed from unstructured play due to arrangements in the classroom such as introduction of games and materials that encourage social interaction, prearranged proximity to peers, and increased teacher facilitation of play. Data suggest that children with autism displayed fewer key social behaviors but that social behaviors change over time was noted for both groups of children. However, changes in key social variables (proximity to peers, receipt of social bids, and time spent focused on children) were more noticeable in structured play settings for children with autism. Findings will be discussed in terms of implications for assessing the effectiveness of autism intervention. |
|
Direct Measurement of Social Behavior: Sensitivity and Relationship to Other Measures |
LARA M. DELMOLINO GATLEY (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
Abstract: There is very little agreement in the field of autism and developmental disabilities about the need for measurement of social behavior, as a means for identifying treatment targets and evaluating intervention outcomes. Predominant measurement of social behavior in treatment studies often involves subjective and indirect measurement. This is in contrast to the preferred methodology in Applied Behavior Analysis in which direct measurement is the procedure of choice. Previous studies have presented models for direct observation of social behavior of preschoolers with autism. The current paper explores the relationship between data gathered from direct observation and information from caregiver and teacher report on standardized survey instruments. Correspondence and differences between data gathered from these sources will be discussed in light of utility to longitudinal treatment outcome studies and generality of findings. |
|
|
|
|
Child Clinical Applications of Behavior Analysis |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Teresa A. Rodgers (Florida Department of Children & Families) |
CE Instructor: Jeannie A. Golden, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Children and adolescents can be treated effectively using functional behavioral assessment and behavioral interventions for social, emotional and medical difficulties in a variety of settings. These settings include: a hospital treating children for chronic or terminal illnesses, a permanent residence with a loving family, a group home specifically designed to treat adolescents with multiple diagnoses, and a regular public school. The speakers in this symposium will present research-based approaches from the behavioral literature, as well as techniques they have used in clinical case studies, that effectively deal with numerous social, emotional and medical difficulties in children. Diagnoses that have been given to the children in these case studies include: Cancer, Diabetes, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Conduct Disorder, Moderate Mental Retardation, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Motor Stereotypy, Depression, Psychosis, Learning Disability, School Phobia with Panic Attacks and Social Anxiety Disorder. In each of the case studies discussed, these children either: were able to be receive necessary medical treatments that were previously refused, had one or more of their diagnostic labels removed or were able to be served in a typical setting after previously being removed due to their behavioral, social and emotional difficulties. |
|
Using Functional Behavioral Assessment to Identify Appropriate Treatment Strategies for Children in Hospital Settings |
LYNN A. OLSON PAGE (Regent University) |
Abstract: Children with chronic and acute medical conditions face a number of challenges, both medically and psychologically. Pediatric psychologists are often to assist with issues that arise during hospitalization. Concerns about patient functioning may revolve around the physical consequences of emotional or behavioral distress, emotional or behavioral symptoms resulting from the diagnosis, or psychological trauma (Kush & Campo, 1998). Often these difficulties require an individualized, problem-solving approach to address difficulties quickly. A functional behavioral assessment approach represents a feasible and effective means of addressing problems within the hospital setting, but there is a paucity of research documenting the use of functional behavioral assessment in the acute hospital setting. Three case examples are used to provide a model of functional behavioral assessment in the hospital setting to improve coping, increase exercise and physical activity, and decrease distress to a medical procedure. |
|
Using Applied Behavior Analysis to Provide Stability in a Foster and Adoptive Home for a Child with Multiple Diagnoses |
JEANNIE A. GOLDEN (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: A five-and-a-half-year-old girl with diagnoses of ADHD, Depression & Psychoses was placed in foster care after having been removed from her biological home due to abuse and neglect, two other foster homes and several day care settings. The foster mother was a behavioral psychologist who used several behavioral interventions including: positive reinforcement, tokens, role-playing, feedback, coordinating of all adult caregivers, and consistent follow-through. The child was taken off of all medications within three weeks, was adopted two-and-a-half years later, and is currently eleven-and-a-half, in a regular six-grade class and has no diagnoses. There are some, however, behavior problems that the child and her parents are currently dealing with that require continued use of behavioral techniques. |
|
Using Applied Behavior Analysis to Treat School Phobia with Panic Attacks & Social Anxiety Disorder |
JEANNIE A. GOLDEN (East Carolina University), Adam A. Spencer (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: A twelve-year-old boy who appeared to have been the victim of a traumatic event developed school phobia and was being home-schooled one hour a week due to his school avoidance. When attempting to return to school, he was told by the principal to return for a full day or he would be expelled from school. Working with another school principal who was willing to try a more gradual approach, the behavioral consultant was able to use systematic desensitization, shaping, token reinforcement, role playing, and feedback to return the child to full days at school. Comparison of several treatments from the research literature will be discussed, as well as the use of functional behavioral assessment to understand school avoidance. |
|
Using a Variety of Behavioral Treatments to Reduce Inappropriate Social Behavior in an Adolescent Girl with Multiple Diagnoses |
JEANNIE A. GOLDEN (East Carolina University), Jennifer Maness (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: The present study investigated the effectiveness of using role-play, contracts, and progressive muscle relaxation training to decrease inappropriate social behaviors in a 15-year-old female with Moderate Mental Retardation, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, and Motor Stereotypy. The intervention was implemented in the adolescent’s group home facility. A changing conditions design with reversals was used to compare the effectiveness of multiple components on the percentage of one-hour intervals in which aggression, self-injury, throwing materials, disruptive running and screaming, and cursing and name-calling. Results indicate that the contract component of the intervention was more effective in decreasing the targeted inappropriate behaviors. During the final two treatment conditions (role-play + contract condition and role-play + relaxation training condition), the mean level of inappropriate behaviors decreased to 0% of intervals for all targeted inappropriate behaviors. |
|
|
|
|
Current Topics in Precision Teaching with Autism/Developmental Disabilities |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Stevens 2 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Alison L. Moors (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
CE Instructor: Alison L. Moors, M.A. |
Abstract: A rich body of literature now exists supporting the efficacy of implementing Precision Teaching methodologies within intervention practices for students with autism and related developmental disabilities. This symposium will highlight current and on-going research which uses Precision Teaching to document progress within specific educational programs |
|
Teaching Peers to Conduct Functional Assessments for Inappropriate Behavior in a Classroom Setting |
HOLLY C. ALMON-MORRIS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Michael Fabrizio (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Kristin N. Schirmer (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Abstract: This presentation illustrates the process of teaching peers of a child with autism to identify inappropriate behavior, conduct a quick assessment regarding the probable function of the inappropriate behavior, to label the inappropriate behavior for the child with autism, and to provide a more socially appropriate replacement behavior. A classroom of first through third graders were taught how to conduct this assessment, and measures were used to identify the effect of the treatment package on rate of specific feedback and replacement behaviors given by peers, in addition to the effect on the child with autism’s rate of inappropriate behavior. Generalization effects and social validity measures will also be discussed. |
|
Teaching and Measuring "Pre-Attending" Skills in a Pre-school Child with Autism |
ALISON L. MOORS (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Holly C. Almon-Morris (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Abstract: Clinicians working with children with developmental disabilities often experience a lack of progress in what is often consider the most basic of skills; ie, compliance, imitation, and “instructional control” (reinforcement effectiveness). This paper will highlight a sequence of component skills lying before those basic skills. Data and video clips will be presented to highlight the effectiveness of programming for these “pre-attending” skills for a single subject. |
|
Establishing Frequency Aims |
KRISTIN N. SCHIRMER (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Sara Pahl (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Michael Fabrizio (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Alison L. Moors (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Abstract: When building skills in learners with autism and related disabilities, certain outcomes are critical if the skills are to be useful to the learner. Those outcomes include skill retention, endurance, stability, and application. Given their importance, these outcomes can and should be measured before teaching ends. The application of measurement procedures from Precision Teaching allows clinicians to predict those outcomes by measuring learners’ performance rates and comparing them to frequency aims suggested within the extant literature. The current paper will document ongoing efforts to validate, through empirical testing, frequency aims used as performance benchmarks for children with autism. Data on the performance of more than 40 children and 350 individual student Standard Celeration Charts will be presented showing the frequency ranges of performance for each skill that predicted skill retention, endurance, stability, and application. |
|
Teaching Children with Autism Independent Play Skills Using Precision Teaching |
KRISTA ZAMBOLIN (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Heidi Calverly (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting), Kelly J. Ferris (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Abstract: This paper will demonstrate how play skills were taught to three preschoolers with autism using the Standard Celeration Chart. Data will show generalization of independent play skills into functional living as well as scope and sequences of teaching procedures. |
|
|
|
|
Effects of Access to Stimuli During Stimulus Preference Assessments |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Myrna E. Libby (New England Center for Children) |
CE Instructor: Myrna E. Libby, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The four papers in this symposium discuss refinements in preference assessments for participants with developmental disabilities and autism. Articles present recent research regarding the impact of access to stimuli during systematic preference assessments on preference and reinforcer assessment results. The first paper compared preference and reinforcer assessments across two conditions (a vocal only condition and a vocal plus tangible condition). Reinforcer assessments indicated that the verbal plus tangible assessment more accurately identified reinforcers than the verbal assessment. In the second study, tangible, pictorial with access, and pictorial without access paired-stimulus preference assessments were conducted with 5 individuals with developmental disabilities. Although the tangible and pictorial with access assessments generated similar preference hierarchies, the pictorial without access assessment generated different preference hierarchies for some participants. The third paper investigated the effect of frequency of access during preference assessments on subsequent reinforcer assessments. Results suggested that the limited number of stimulus pairings in a typical paired-stimulus assessment might lead to inconsistent results in subsequent reinforcer assessments. The fourth presentation studied the effects of duration of access to the stimuli used in preference assessments on the outcome of reinforcer assessments; results suggested that duration measures were better predictors of preference than selection measures. |
|
Comparison of Verbal Preference Assessments in the Presence and Absence of the Actual Stimuli |
CINDY T. TERLONGE (Louisiana State University), David E. Kuhn (Johns Hopkins University), Iser Guillermo DeLeon (Johns Hopkins University) |
Abstract: Stimulus preference assessments for individuals with developmental disabilities typically involve offering choices among tangible stimuli and providing immediate access to the chosen stimuli. Certain stimuli and activities have generally been excluded from preference assessment research because they are difficult to present in tangible form and often cannot be conveniently delivered immediately after a selection response. Researchers have explored the utility of presenting choices verbally, thereby obviating the need to present the choices in tangible form. However, these studies have nonetheless used easily presented items and/or have delivered them following selections, calling into question the generality of these procedures for use with stimuli that cannot be presented in this fashion. The current study compared preference assessment results for 3 participants in which either (a) the stimuli were presented and selections were made verbally, or (b) the stimuli were presented both verbally and in tangible form. Reinforcer assessments were conducted to test contradictory predictions of reinforcer efficacy made by the two methods. Comparisons between the two assessments yielded mixed correspondence across participants. Reinforcer assessment results suggested that the verbal plus tangible stimulus preference assessment more accurately predicted reinforcer strength, particularly with regard to non-tangible stimuli. |
|
The Effect of Differential Consequences on Pictorial Preference Assessment Outcomes |
MARK P. GROSKREUTZ (New England Center for Children), Richard B. Graff (New England Center for Children), Kelly K. Collins (New England Center for Children), Nicholas Chappell (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: Tangible, pictorial with access, and pictorial without access paired-stimulus preference assessments were compared with 5 individuals with developmental disabilities. During tangible (A) and pictorial with access preference assessments (B), the participant gained access to the stimulus approached or touched; during pictorial without access preference assessments (C), touching a photograph did not lead to the corresponding stimulus being delivered. In Phase 1, short blocks of trials of each assessment type were alternated. Percentages of approach responses were calculated, and preference hierarchies were generated for each assessment. Results indicated that all 3 assessments yielded similar preference hierarchies for all participants. Reinforcer assessments verified that items identified as highly preferred functioned as reinforcers for all participants. In Phase 2, all trials of the pictorial without access assessment were conducted first, followed by the tangible and pictorial with access assessments (2 participants experienced the assessments in CAB order, while the other 3 participants experienced the assessments in CBA order). Results of Phase 2 indicated that the 3 assessments yielded similar preference hierarchies for only 2 of 5 participants. Interobserver agreement data were collected in over 50% of preference and reinforcer assessment sessions and was above 99% for all participants. |
|
Some Anomalous Findings from Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments |
LEAH KOEHLER (University of Florida), Liming Zhou (University of Florida), Brian A. Iwata (University of Florida), Natalie Rolider (University of Florida), Sarah E. Bloom (University of Florida) |
Abstract: This study presents some unusual findings from preference assessments. The paired-stimulus assessment is a commonly used method for developing rank-ordered preference hierarchies. Although results of previous studies have shown that outcomes of this assessment accurately predict preference for high- versus low-ranked stimuli under a concurrent-reinforcement arrangement, there have been a few notable exceptions (e.g., Fisher et al., 1992; Roscoe, Iwata, & Kahng, 1999) in which individuals failed to show consistent preference for the high-ranked item. The reason for these anomalous findings is unclear but may be due to the fact that a given pair of items is presented only once or twice during assessment, resulting in a limited sample. We first conducted typical preference assessments for 30 individuals, in which items (9 or 16) were presented in pairs (each item was paired with every other item once or twice). We subsequently presented the highest and lowest ranked items repeatedly for 50 trials. Results indicated that, although the majority of participants showed consistent preference for the high-ranked stimulus, a number of the participants showed no preference. These findings suggest that the limited number of pairings in typical paired-stimulus preference assessments may lead to inconsistent results during subsequent tests for reinforcement effects. |
|
Evaluation of Duration-Based Procedures for Assessing Leisure Item Preference |
JODY M. STEINHILBER (New England Center for Children), Cammarie Johnson (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: The predictive value of selection- and duration-based measures of preference was evaluated. Two different types of MSWO preference assessments were conducted. In one MSWO condition (short), selected items were available for a brief duration (15 s); in the other MSWO condition (long), selected items were available for up to 15 min. Between 4 and 7 sessions of each condition were conducted using a multi-element design. Selection measures given the two assessment contexts yielded a difference of two or more rank orders for 2 or more stimuli for 2 of 3 participants. The duration measure yielded a difference of two or more rank orders relative to the selection measure (short MSWO) for 2 or more stimuli for 2 participants. Stimuli with the greatest rank order difference given selection and duration-based measures were then presented in a concurrent chain procedure for 2 participants. Comparisons of a higher preference stimulus given the selection measure (SHP) and the duration measure (DHP) were made. Results suggested that duration measures were better predictors of preference. Results are discussed in terms of the importance of context and dependent measure used in preference assessments. |
|
|
|
|
Increasing the Range of Reinforcers for Students with Autistic-Spectrum Disorders |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Dana R. Reinecke (Room to Grow) |
Discussant: Dana R. Reinecke (Room to Grow) |
CE Instructor: Dana R. Reinecke, M.A. |
Abstract: This symposium will present empirical research studies examining procedures for encouraging students with autism to make varied choices of reinforcers. A general methodology has been developed and evaluated across three age groups and in different settings for students with autism. Generalization of the effectiveness of the procedures is examined and discussed. |
|
Increasing the Number of Play Activities Chosen by Children with Autism: Effects of Exposure and Response-Independent Reinforcers |
DANA R. REINECKE (Room to Grow), Nancy S. Hemmes (Queens College, City University of New York) |
Abstract: Children with autism tend to choose the same activities repeatedly. In the present study, simple exposure to new activities was used to increase choices of activities as reinforcers during teaching sessions. In some conditions, exposure to activities was paired with preferred edible stimuli. Students tended to choose activities to which they had been previously exposed more often than when these activities were not exposed. |
|
Generalization of the Exposure Effect within Categories of Activities |
ERIC H. SHYMAN (East Meadow UFSD), Dana R. Reinecke (Room to Grow) |
Abstract: Students with autism may choose activities more frequently when additional exposure to these activities is programmed. For three adolescent males with autism, choice of age- and socially-appropriate activities was encouraged through prior exposure to other activities within a given category. |
|
Simple Exposure in the Development of New Reinforcers for Preschoolers with Autism |
AMY GEWIRTZ (Room to Grow), Dana R. Reinecke (Room to Grow) |
Abstract: Preschoolers with autism were exposed to new activities during regularly scheduled periods. Students chose these activities more frequently later on as reinforcers for other behavior. These activities remained durable reinforcers even when other, previously more preferred, activities were simultaneously available. |
|
|
|
|
Is Verbal Behavior Necessary to Understand Gambling? |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
International South (2nd floor) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
Chair: Beau Laughlin (Southern Illinois University) |
Discussant: Steven R. Hursh (Johns Hopkins University) |
CE Instructor: Mark R. Dixon, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will address how an understanding of verbal behavior can contribute to a behavior analytic account of gambling. |
|
Toward an Animal Model of Gambling: Rats Playing a Slot Machine |
JEFFREY N. WEATHERLY (University of North Dakota), Jeri Nurnberger (University of North Dakota), Carla J. Demaine (University of North Dakota) |
Abstract: Although gambling behavior in people can be studied in the laboratory, it is sometimes impossible to manipulate variables (e.g., debt) that likely contribute to that behavior. Thus, it may be worthwhile to develop an animal model of gambling because it may become possible to manipulate such variables. The present study was an initial step toward developing an animal model of gambling. Rats were trained to press a lever on a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule. Upon completion of the FR, stimulus lights in a 3 X 3 grid flashed for 5 s. At certain probabilities, the left column of lights (small win, 0.05 ml of 5% sucrose), middle column (medium win, 0.2 ml of 5% sucrose), right column (big win, food pellet), or diagonal pattern (loss, nothing) resulted. The behavior of rats on this mock slot-machine procedure was compared to control rats responding on a similar procedure minus the stimulus lights. Results demonstrated that the “gambling” rats behaved differently than controls. Perhaps more importantly, their behavior was also similar to that of humans playing a slot machine. The results are discussed in the context of how additional research using this model may advance our understanding of gambling behavior in people. |
|
Biasing Response Allocations on Concurrently Available Slot Machines via Rule Governed Behavior |
ASHTON J. ROBINSON (Southern Illinois University), Mark R. Dixon (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: Though slot machines are the most popular form of gambling behavior, a complete analysis of slot machine play is lacking from a behavioral analysis perspective. Because investigating slot machine play in the natural casino environment is not feasible, it is logical to create analog simulations to study this behavior. Visual Basic.NET provides flexibility for creating realistic slot simulations that allow for control over every aspect of play. This presentation will focus on two experiments that were designed to examine common variables occurring during slot play and assess relative impacts on preference. In the first experiment reinforcer magnitude and density were manipulated at various unit prices. Results showed that for most subjects, preference across the two machines was sensitive to altering these variables, yet deviations could be readily produced via in introduction of various classes of rules (tracks, plys, and augments). In the second experiment, the proportion of trials that were close to winning, or “near-misses” was manipulated along with the establishment of conditioned non-gambling stimulus functions. Obtained results suggest that topography of the near miss is not as important as its derived psychological function. Such derived functions are the product of verbal behavior, understood only with a post-Skinnerian analysis. |
|
Verbal Relations Contribution to the Behavioral Economics of Gambling |
MARK R. DIXON (Southern Illinois University) |
Abstract: Although most gambling opportunities expose the subject to random-ratio schedule contingencies, these contingencies alone are insufficient to explain resulting behavior. This paper will describe the neglected role of verbal behavior research and how limited advances of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior have hindered a behavioral understanding of gambling. Data will be presented illustrating the impact of verbal rules, self-generated and experimenter presented, on a behavioral economic analysis of gambling. The role of verbal stimuli as complements, substitutes, and commodities that alter demand elasticity will be highlighted using subjects playing the table games of roulette and craps. Implications for future basic research, applied treatments, and conceptual analyses of risk taking and gambling will be presented. |
|
|
|
|
Theory of Mind: A Behavior Analytic Perspective |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: T. V. Joe Layng, Ph.D. |
Chair: David C. Palmer (Smith College) |
T. V. JOE LAYNG (Headsprout) |
Joe Layng co-founded Headsprout, and serves as the company's Senior Scientist where he led the scientific team that developed Headsprout’s patented Generative Learning Technology. This technology forms the basis of the company’s Headsprout Early Reading program, for which Joe was the chief architect.
Joe has over 25 years of experience in the experimental analysis of behavior and the learning sciences both in the laboratory and in applied settings. Joe earned a Ph.D. in Behavioral Science (Biopsychology) from The University of Chicago, where he conducted basic research on animal models of psychopathology. Specifically, he, in collaboration with P. T. Andronis and I. Goldiamond, investigated the recurrence of chronic, un-reinforced, self-injurious behavior (SIB – head-banging by pigeons) as a function of past selection contingencies for SIB, and current selection contingencies which maintained a different class of behavior (key-pecking). He also collaborated with P. T. Andronis and I. Goldiamond on research investigating the adduction of untrained complex symbolic social-behavior, which led to the key elements upon which the Headsprout Generative Learning Technology is based. From 1991 to 1996, Joe was the Director of the Academic Support Center, and then Dean of Public Agency and Special Training Programs at Malcolm X College in Chicago. |
Abstract: In the past few years there has been growing interest in what some investigators have come to call Theory of Mind. Catalyzed by work with Chimpanzees by David Premack and his colleagues, it has been postulated that certain animals, particularly humans, develop a model for what another may be thinking. This model is used in turn to guide how the organism responds in various social situations. In essence, an individual generates a theory concerning the mind of another, and uses that theory to help maximize his or her own social effectiveness. Where such ability is lacking, social effectiveness is said to diminish. Recently, it has been suggested that such diminished capacity may be at the root of Autism. This presentation explores some of the data, both behavioral and from brain imaging studies, which are used to support some of the theory of mind hypotheses. Further, it suggests a behavioral alternative based on Skinners (1957) analysis of Verbal Behavior, with particular emphasis on autoclitic responses, and the steps behavior analysts might take to further explore this interesting area of animal and human research. |
|
|
|
|
2005 ABA Tutorial: Professional Development Series: Disseminating Research Findings through Peer-Review Publication |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Domain: Applied Research |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Brian A. Iwata, Ph.D. |
Chair: Rachel S. F. Tarbox (Center for Autism and Related Disorders) |
Presenting Authors: : BRIAN A. IWATA (University of Florida) |
Abstract: Although a common mechanism for disseminating research findings is the conference presentation, the standard for determining quality in scientific communication is publication in a peer-reviewed journal. However, traditional thesis and dissertation requirements, and the way in which these requirements are met, typically fail to produce research competence that survives the peer-review process. My presentation will focus on strategies for acquiring general research skills, formulating research questions, generating publishable data, and learning the ins and outs of the peer-review process. |
|
BRIAN A. IWATA (University of Florida) |
Brian Iwata received his Ph.D. in Clinical and School Psychology from Florida State University as a student of Jon Bailey. He subsequently held faculty appointments at Western Michigan University and at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and he is currently Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at the University of Florida, where he directs research programs on self-injurious behavior, the Prader-Willi syndrome, and autism. Brian’s primary areas of interest are research methodology, developmental disabilities, functional analysis of severe behavior disorders, and program evaluation. He has published over 200 articles and chapters on these topics and has received over $5 million in research grants to support that work. Brian is the former editor of JABA and past president of ABA, APA Division 33, FABA, SABA, and SEAB. He has chaired study sections for both NIH and NIMH and is a fellow in AAMR, ABA, APA, and APS. Brian has received a number of significant awards for his work, including the D.F. Hake Award for Contributions to Basic and Applied Research as well as the Award for Applied Research from APA, the Award for Distinguished Contributions to Service from ABA, and the R. B. Dillard Award for Excellence in Research from AAMR. Brian is just as much a teacher of researchers as he is a researcher: Half of the recipients of the B.F. Skinner Award (APA Division 25) have been his former Ph.D. students. |
|
|
|
|
ABA and Autism: An Unfinished Agenda |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:20 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jack Scott, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jack Scott (Florida Atlantic University) |
WILLIAM H. AHEARN (New England Center for Children), Rebecca P. F. MacDonald (New England Center for Children) |
William H. Ahearn is Board Certified Behavior Analyst who serves as the Director of Research at the New England Center for Children and a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Masters in Applied Behavior Analysis (MABA) Program at Northeastern University. He is also Past-President of the Berkshire Association for Behavior Analysis and Therapy (BABAT). Bill received his doctorate at Temple University in 1992 and subsequently completed a post-doctoral fellowship in the Department of Behavioral Psychology at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Dr. Ahearn then served as Program Manager for the Inpatient Pediatric Feeding Program at the Children’s Seashore House in Philadelphia before moving to the New England Center for Children in 1996. Bill has published studies that have appeared in the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Behavior Modification, Animal Learning and Behavior, The Lancet, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, The Behavior Analyst, and Behavioral Interventions. Dr. Ahearn currently serves on the Board of Editors for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Behavioral Interventions and provides service to the Behavior Analyst Certification Board and the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. |
Abstract: The success behavior analysts have had in treating individuals with autism has had a substantial impact on our membership and has led to a much wider profile for our discipline. However, many challenges and obstacles face us that we have either not met or that we choose to ignore. Though agencies, such as the National Institute of Mental Health, acknowledge ABA as an empirically based effective intervention, they also state that there is no single best treatment option for children with autism. Prominent members of the autism community often criticize ABA as; not addressing social functioning, failing to establish dramatic play skills, incapable of establishing a theory of mind, and of creating children with robotic responding that lacks spontaneity. Other more practical critiques state that it is unclear what the effective components of ABA are, how many hours of service delivery are necessary to achieve gains, and what setting ABA services should be delivered in. The main purpose of this presentation is to describe what is necessary for ABA to address these criticisms. Among the recommended courses of action we will describe the importance of local, regional, and national advocacy and public relations. |
|
|
|
|
Addressing the Complex and Dynamic Nature of Organizations |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:20 PM |
Marquette (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Maria E. Malott, Ph.D. |
Chair: Ramona Houmanfar (University of Nevada, Reno) |
MARIA E. MALOTT (Malott and Associates) |
Dr. Maria E. Malott received her Ph.D. in applied behavior analysis from Western Michigan University in 1987. She has worked in process improvement and organizational management for nearly two decades in a variety of industries, including service, manufacturing, retail, education, and government. She has done organizational management work in public administration, the private sector and for educational systems in several Latin-American countries, including Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay, Peru, and Venezuela.
Dr. Malott has served as the Executive Director of the Association for Behavior Analysis and Secretary-Treasurer of the Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis since 1993. She is an adjunct faculty member at five universities and has collaborated with 33 universities around the world. She has presented over 150 papers and nearly 50 workshops in 17 countries. |
Abstract: Organizations are complicated entities: They incorporate constant, countless dynamic interconnections among behavioral contingencies of many individuals, and yet each configuration of interconnections is unique and temporary. In this context, linear approaches are insufficient to account for and manage organizational change. This presentation will address the complex, transient dynamics within organizations and propose methodological considerations for successful organizational change. |
|
|
|
|
Sources of Novel Behavior: Implications for the Development of Verbal Behavior |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:20 PM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: DEV; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Jacob L. Gewirtz, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jacob L. Gewirtz (Florida International University) |
A. CHARLES CATANIA (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
A. Charles Catania began his career in behavior analysis in Fall 1954, when he enrolled in Fred Keller’s course in introductory psychology at Columbia. That course included a weekly laboratory on the behavior of rats, and Catania continued working with rats and pigeons and other nonhuman organisms over subsequent decades. In Spring 2004, having closed down his pigeon laboratory the previous summer, he celebrated his half century of animal lab activity with a classroom rat demonstration in a learning course that he had shared for many years with his late colleague, Eliot Shimoff. He regards the study of nonhuman behavior as essential to our understanding of verbal behavior, because verbal behavior is necessarily supported by a nonverbal scaffolding. That lesson too came from Columbia, where, as a senior, Catania took a seminar on verbal behavior jointly taught by Fred Keller, Nat Schoenfeld and Ralph Hefferline. Ever since, Catania has been addicted to the field of verbal behavior, teaching courses in it whenever possible. One function of his text, “Learning,” is to integrate the topics of nonverbal and verbal behavior, which have too often been given separate treatments. |
Abstract: Among the criticisms of B. F. Skinners analysis of verbal behavior is Noam Chomskys claim that it had nothing useful to say about productivity, the generation of novel grammatical utterances. Yet the behavior analytic armamentarium includes a variety of sources of novel behavior, including shaping, fading, adduction, the direct reinforcement of novelty, and the emergence of novel instances of higher order classes. This presentation will consider the implications of such sources for the development of productive verbal behavior and will address Chomskian arguments such as the argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In so doing, it will examine semantic as well as syntactic novelty, as when verbal behavior allows the creation of novel entities such as angels and demons.This address is dedicated to Eliot Shimoff |
|
|
|
|
A Celebration of Ogden R. Lindsley: The History of Precision Teaching and the Standard Celeration Chart |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:50 PM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Michael Fabrizio (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
Discussant: Michael Fabrizio (Fabrizio/Moors Consulting) |
CE Instructor: Michael Fabrizio, M.A. |
Abstract: This symposium, part of a three-symposia series celebrating Ogden Lindsley, will present an historical analysis of the important life events that shaped Ogdens repertoire and led to the development of one of his most important contributionsthe Standard Celeration Chart (SCC). Starting their analyses with Ogdens early work and moving through major contributions that punctuate Precision Teachings history to date, the authors of the symposiums papers will tell the story of the SCC and the man behind it. |
|
Where Did the Standard Celeration Chart Come From? |
JULIE S. VARGAS (B.F. Skinner Foundation) |
Abstract: This paper traces some of the factors that led to Ogden Lindsley’s development of the Standard Celeration Chart. Among the influences were his engineering background, his graduate work with B. F. Skinner at Harvard University, and his experiences running the first behavior therapy program with patients at Metropolitan State Hospital. |
|
The Standard Celeration Chart: Its Development and Uses |
ABIGAIL B. CALKIN (Calkin Learning Center) |
Abstract: From the lessons of Skinner, Lindsley took frequency from the animal laboratory to human behavior, developing the Standard Celeration Chart in the mid-1960s. With the use of a 1-min timing, precision teachers developed frequency aims for fluent performance. In the early 1970s, came the development of celeration, the measurement of the growth of learning. |
|
Past into Future: Lindsley's Enduring Legacy of Standard Celeration |
JOHN W. ESHLEMAN (Optimal Instructional Systems) |
Abstract: Ogden R. Lindsley may become best remembered for contributing to how we measure and view change in behavior frequency over time. Lindsley named this measure "celeration," and defined it as count per minute per week. On a chart developed by a team headed by Lindsley, we depict celeration as a straight-line slope. The steeper the slope, up or down, the more rapidly frequency changes over time. Celeration lines on the standard celeration chart form a powerful measure of behavior change: you can monitor frequency trends over time, make straight line projections into the future, compare concurrent celerations, and compare consecutive celerations to determine independent variable effects on trend, and to determine improvement and make discoveries about learning. This paper projects various Precision Teaching trends on yearly standard celeration charts, and closes with Lindsley's own predictions, warnings, and hopes about the future from his 1985 ABA Presidential Address, from his 1979 "Rate of Response Futures" address, from his 1997 "Do Times Two Then Go for Four or More" address, and from his final conversation to me in September 2004 about celeration and agility. |
|
|
|
|
Analysis and Treatment of Problem Behavior in School Settings |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:50 PM |
Williford B (3rd floor) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Michael M. Mueller (May South) |
Discussant: T. Steuart Watson (University of Miami of Ohio) |
CE Instructor: Bryan J. Davey, M.Ed. |
Abstract: The symposium will highlight the application of functional analyses methodology in a variety of school settings. The session will begin with a review of current literature on functional behavioral assessments that include experimental analyses conducted in public schools. The review will present collective data from 42 empirical studies. Population characteristics, educational placement, functional behavior assessment methodologies and outcomes, and treatment selection and outcomes will be presented. The literature review will be followed by two data-based presentations. The presentations will present multiple data sets depicting traditional and innovative functional analyses conditions conducted in school settings for a variety of problem behaviors. Additionally, outcomes from functional analyses based interventions will be presented. The presentations address analyses and interventions responsive to the dynamic environment of public school settings. A synthesis of the presentations and general comments regarding the current state of analysis and treatment of problem behavior in schools settings will conclude the symposium. |
|
Functional Behavioral Assessments Including Experimental Manipulations in Public School Settings for Students with Mild, Moderate and Severe Disabilities |
BRYAN J. DAVEY (Utah State University) |
Abstract: The presentation examines the research literature on functional behavioral assessments that included experimental manipulations (e.g., functional analyses) conducted in special education settings within public schools. While it is true that the majority of published research that utilizes such analyses is conducted in hospitals and institutional settings (see Hanley, Iwata, & McCord, 2003), a growing literature base is evolving on functional behavioral assessment that included experimental manipulations within special education settings within public schools. The investigators sought a better understanding of the methodologies used to asses target behaviors, intervention selection, and intervention outcomes. The purpose of this presentation is to examine experimental analyses conducted in public school, special education settings. This review examined participants receiving FBA services, their educational placements, target behaviors which lead to assessment, and practitioners/researchers conducting assessments within public schools. Data were collected on population characteristics such as disability category, educational placement, functional behavior assessment methodologies and outcomes. Additionally, data were collected, when provided, on treatment selection and outcomes. Results are discussed in terms of current trends in the literature, and areas in which future research is necessary. |
|
Innovative Approaches to Functional Analysis and Treatment of Severe Problem Behavior in School Settings |
MICHAEL M. MUELLER (May South) |
Abstract: Functional analysis has been demonstrated as an effective assessment procedure used to determine the reinforcers for severe problem behavior. Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, and Richman (1982) described for the first time what has become typical conditions used in functional analyses. Given the dynamic and often changing environment of public school settings, procedures can, and should, be modified to fit those instances when the referral environment differs from typical functional analysis conditions. Some of those changes include shortening or lengthening the duration of functional analysis conditions, including atypical reinforcers in test conditions, testing abnormal school behaviors, using other professional as therapists, etc. When functional analyses yield specific results that identify reinforcers, treatments are often created that incorporate the functional reinforcers. Creating easy to use, nonaversive, effective, and acceptable interventions should be the goal of behavior analysts in the schools. The proposed data-based presentation will present multiple data sets depicting innovative functional analyses and effective interventions based on those results. All data sets identified reinforcers for severe behavior in school settings and all interventions were based on those results and conducted in school settings. |
|
Using Functional Analysis to Design Intervention Plans to Facilitate Inclusion |
DEBORAH A. NAPOLITANO (University of Rochester), Tasha C. Geiger (University of Rochester), Caroline I. Magyar (University of Rochester), Amy R. Leo (University of Rochester) |
Abstract: Problem behavior can be disruptive to classrooms and a barrier to placement in least-restrictive settings. Although analogue-functional analyses are effective in identifying the function of problem behavior leading to appropriate intervention plans, teachers familiar with this assessment procedure often report difficulty in school implementation. This is due to time constraints and teachers’ lack of training to successfully conduct functional analysis. Despite these issues, use of functional analysis in schools is increasing. The purpose of this study was to conduct functional analyses in various school settings to design function-based intervention plans for three participants with autism. These intervention plans facilitated a successful transition to the next grade level, decreased the restrictiveness of student placement, or maintained a fully inclusive placement. Functional analyses were designed to be conducted in school environments and each student’s intervention was designed to be implemented within their school by school staff. Functional analyses were conducted by general and special education teachers and 1:1 aides. Data collected from these functional analyses were used to develop classroom intervention plans. Strategies for decreasing resistance to conducting functional analyses by school professionals, the clinical importance of conducting analogue-functional analyses in school settings and directions for future research will be discussed. |
|
|
|
|
Enhancing the Direct Care Professional's Ability to Implement Effective Behavior Supports |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:50 PM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Richard W. Powell (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services) |
CE Instructor: John J. Pokrzywinski, M.A. |
Abstract: The papers in this symposium examine positive behavior support procedures that emphasize identifying and manipulating contextual or antecedent variables related to problem behaviors in individuals with developmental disabilities. Variables examined include staff and supervisor training, the role of choice making, setting events and discriminative stimuli, and the inclusion of direct support staff in the development and implementation of positive behavior support plans. The effects of these different strategies are examined and discussed in terms of changes in the trends of problem behaviors, changes in staff behavior, and changes in the acceptability of behavior support plans. |
|
Using Feedback to Improve Direct Support Staff and Supervisor Performance |
IRFA KARMALI (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Richard W. Powell (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), John J. Pokrzywinski (Arlington Developmental Center) |
Abstract: A supervisor’s primary job is to make sure that the quality of staff performance is at a level satisfactory to provide the support needed by agency consumers. When staff work is not up to par, it is the supervisor’s job to ensure that performance rises to adequate criteria. When the staffs’ performance is good, a supervisor’s job is to see that the staff continues to do a good quality work. Selected training modules from a standardized positive behavior support curriculum were used to teach supervisors three basic supervisory skills. Supervisors were taught to describe four guidelines for obtaining information about staff performance, and how to conduct an observation in a manner likely to be acceptable to direct support staff. Next, supervisors were trained on the use of performance checklists for observing job duty in the work environment. Finally, supervisors were trained to use verbal and written feedback as a practical and effective means of training and motivating direct support staff. This included a seven-step feedback protocol. The effects of these interventions are discussed by examining changes in target behavior trends, and changes in staff performance. Direct support staff performance was assessed by changes in individualized performance checklists, absenteeism, and agency performance evaluations. Supervisors were also rated for changes in the ability to conduct observations, complete performance checklists, and provide effective feedback. |
|
Identifying Contextual Variables to Improve Preventative Procedures in Behavior Support Plans |
JOHN J. POKRZYWINSKI (Arlington Developmental Center), Richard W. Powell (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Irfa Karmali (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Tandra S. Hicks (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services) |
Abstract: The purpose of the contextual assessment is to identify situations that are likely to lead to problem behavior. There are two types of factors that increase the chances of problem behavior: setting events and discriminative stimuli. Contextual assessment refers to focusing on whole events and facilitating understanding a person’s behavior within a historical and situational context. Sensitivity to the role of context in understanding the nature and function of an event focuses on the implicit consequences of an on-going action. A firm grasp on a pragmatic truth criterion focuses on what works and what does not work. Applied behavior analysis strategies usually consist of: setting event strategies, predictor strategies, teaching strategies, and consequence strategies. This study examines the first two strategies as potential antecedent preventive procedures. These antecedents are setting events, establishing operations, discriminative stimuli, and discriminative punishers. Potential ecological/setting events examined included: medications, medical or physical problems, sleep cycles, eating routines and diet, daily schedule, numbers of people, and staffing patterns and interactions. Immediate antecedents events examined included: time of day; physical setting; behaviors that occur more consistently in the presence of particular people; and specific activities related to problem behaviors. |
|
Using Enhanced Direct Support Participation to Increase the Proficient Implementation and Integrity of Behavior Support Plans |
ANGELIQUE DILWORTH (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Richard W. Powell (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Irfa Karmali (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), John J. Pokrzywinski (Arlington Developmental Center) |
Abstract: Current systems theory looks at methods to increase the proficiency with which direct support professionals implement and carry out behavior support plans. One frequently recommended technique is to involve these staff in the planning and development of positive behavior support interventions. Little data, however, has been presented evaluating this technique. The purpose of this study is to investigate how involving staff in the planning of the behavior support plan improves the proficient implementation and integrity of the procedures. During this study direct support professionals attended planning sessions to construct a behavior support plan for an individual under their care. The staff participating received standard training and had worked with their person for at least six months before being involved in this process. During the baseline weekly data and treatment reliability/implementation checks were conducted. Also, monthly follow up sessions were conducted to discuss changes in behavior. Prior to and at the completion of the study, staff members were asked to complete several assessments scoring plan acceptability. Their ratings and implementation data were be compared with similar staff members who supervise similar individuals who had not had this experience. |
|
Teaching Staff to Neutralize Problem Behaviors Through Identifying and Increasing Choice-Making Opportunities |
TANDRA S. HICKS (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Irfa Karmali (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), Richard W. Powell (Shelby Residential & Vocational Services), John J. Pokrzywinski (Arlington Developmental Center) |
Abstract: Many adults with developmental disabilities are rarely allowed to make reasonable choices about everyday issues such as what to wear, what to do during free time, whom to sit with, what time to go to bed, etc. The consequences of limiting choices lead to protests in inappropriate ways when his or her preferences are not reflected in these decisions. Such aberrant behaviors are observed primarily in individuals whose communication skills are extremely limited. Among a series of behaviors, non-compliance being the least severe response to a series of inevitable events, could be avoided by encouraging the individual to make choices that reflect his or her preferences and what happens to him or her on a daily basis. Checklists were used to assess the opportunities that individuals had to make to make choices in their daily routine. Additionally, the individuals’ current behavior plans were assessed to identify whether choices were part of the plan. If choices were not an identified objective in the behavior plan, an addendum was developed to add the additional objective for the purpose of measuring outcomes for this study. Using a component of a standardized positive behavior support curriculum, direct support staff members were then trained to: identify the importance of making choice for enjoying life; demonstrate how to provide a choice to individuals who do talk; identify when to give choices; and identify positive outcomes of giving choices. The effects of these interventions are discussed by analyzing the results of the data collected on target behaviors, changes in choice making opportunities, and changes in ratings of behavior support plan acceptability. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Research on Functional Analysis and Function-Based Interventions |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:50 PM |
Williford A (3rd floor) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Julie Atwell (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Discussant: Michele D. Wallace (University of Nevada, Reno) |
CE Instructor: David A. Wilder, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Three recent studies on functional analysis and function-based interventions will be presented. In the first study, a brief functional analysis was conducted to identify a treatment for tantrums associated with transitions in typically developing preschool children. The second study describes a functional analysis and treatment for food refusal maintained by multiple sources of reinforcement. The third study describes a functional analysis of feeding problems and evaluates a novel negative reinforcement-based intervention. |
|
Brief Functional Analysis and Treatment of Tantrums Associated with Transitions in Preschool Children |
DAVID A. WILDER (Florida Institute of Technology), Liyu Chen (Florida Institute of Technology), Julie Atwell (Florida Institute of Technology), Joshua K. Pritchard (Florida Institute of Technology), Phil A. Weinstein (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: We examined tantrums associated with transitions from one activity to another exhibited by two preschool children. First, preference assessments and informal interviews were used to identify activities and tasks to which participants were exposed during an analysis of tantrums associated with transitions. Next, a brief functional analysis examined the influence of termination of prechange activities and initiation of postchange activities on tantrums. Results showed that for one participant, tantrums were maintained by access to certain (pre-transition) activities. For a second participant, tantrums were maintained by avoidance of certain task initiations. Finally, results of a treatment consisting of advanced notice of an upcoming transition showed that the procedure was ineffective; a treatment consisting of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) plus extinction was effective for both participants |
|
A Systematic Evaluation and Treatment of Multiply Controlled Inappropriate Mealtime Behaviors |
MELANIE H. BACHMEYER (Marcus Autism Center), Cathleen C. Piazza (Marcus Autism Center), Gregory K. Reed (Marcus Autism Center), Stephanie Bethke (Marcus Autism Center), Sam Maddox (Marcus Autism Center), Amanda Bosch (Marcus Autism Center) |
Abstract: Prior research has demonstrated that analogue functional analyses may be useful in identifying the environmental events that play a role in feeding disorders. The results of this research has suggested that even though negative reinforcement (in the form of escape from bites of food) may play a primary role in the maintenance of feeding problems, a significant number of children with feeding disorders also may be sensitive to other sources of reinforcement (e.g., access to adult attention). However, no studies to our knowledge have systematically evaluated function-based treatments for multiply controlled feeding problems. Thus, in the present study, we conducted functional analyses of inappropriate mealtime behaviors to identify children whose inappropriate mealtime behaviors were maintained by both negative and positive reinforcement (in the form of access to adult attention). Then, treatments matched directly to each maintaining variable were evaluated. Specifically, various extinction, differential reinforcement, and punishment procedures were evaluated. Two independent observers achieved over 80% agreement on over 25% of sessions. Results will be discussed in terms of the relative contribution of secondary functions in the development and efficacy of treatments for multiply controlled food refusal. Areas for further study will also be discussed. |
|
Function-Based Treatment of Feeding Problems in the Absence of Escape Extinction |
ANGELA PRUETT (Marcus Autism Center), Cathleen C. Piazza (Marcus Autism Center), Gregory K. Reed (Marcus Autism Center), Melanie H. Bachmeyer (Marcus Autism Center), Stephanie Bethke (Marcus Autism Center), Barbara S. Wimberly (Marcus Autism Center), Percy Milligan (Marcus Autism Center) |
Abstract: Prior research on the assessment and treatment of feeding problems has produced two major findings: (a) negative reinforcement in the form of escape from the feeding situation is often primarily responsible for maintaining refusal behavior, and (b) negative reinforcement-based interventions such as escape extinction (EE) are highly effective for treating feeding problems. Largely, research examining the effects of positive reinforcement-based interventions for feeding problems has suggested that feeding problems can be highly resistant to positive reinforcement in the absence of EE. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of negative reinforcement-based alternatives to EE, and research on the specific conditions under which positive reinforcement can be effective remains in need. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of positive and negative reinforcement-based interventions for treating food selectivity without EE. Specifically, we conducted functional analyses of each child’s feeding problem, and then systematically evaluated the efficacy of positive (access to high preferred stimuli) and negative (avoidance of low preferred foods) reinforcement contingencies for increasing food consumption. Independent observers achieved over 80% agreement on 25% of sessions. Results will be discussed in terms of the utility of function-based treatments for feeding problems, particularly with regard to negative reinforcement-based alternatives to EE |
|
|
|
|
Treatment Interventions for Children with Autism: Expanding the Toolbox |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
1:30 PM–2:50 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Robert K. Ross (Beacon ABA Services) |
Discussant: David M. Corcoran (Beacon ABA Services) |
CE Instructor: Robert K. Ross, M.S. |
Abstract: This symposium will present outcome data from the use of instructional methods and formats that may not be widely used in programs for children with autism. Given the challenges that these learners present, it is imperative that behavior analysts make efforts to ensure be aware of and fluent in newer procedures that have data demonstrating efficacy. These procedures represent skills that can enhance the repertoires of practitioners and thus enhance learning outcomes for children with autism. The procedure to be reviewed include; video modeling procedures to teach play skills, the use of photographic activity schedules to increase food repertoires in selective eaters, and a comparison of rates of acquisition of the most commonly used methods for increasing the production of expressive language in children with autism. |
|
Using Video Modeling to Teach Play Skills and Language to a Five-Year-Old with Autism |
JOSEPH M. VEDORA (Beacon ABA Services), BethAnne Miles (Beacon ABA Services) |
Abstract: Video modeling is a technique often used to teach children with autism. To date, video modeling has been used to teach a variety of social, play, academic and self-help skills. The present study used video modeling to increase play skills and accompanying play language with a 5 year old boy with autism. Specifically, the student viewed videos of his older sister engaging in familiar play routines while modeling the language of the activity. Prior to the intervention the student engaged in appropriate but non-verbal play. The results showed a rapid increase in appropriate play language. These results replicate previous research on teaching play and language skills. |
|
Expanding Food Preferences with a Photographic Activity Schedule |
KELLY KELM (Beacon ABA Services), Joseph M. Vedora (Beacon ABA Services), Robert K. Ross (Beacon ABA Services) |
Abstract: Photographic activity schedules have been used to teach a variety of independent play, social, self-help, and academic skills in children with autism. In the present study, the use of an activity schedule was expanded to increase food preferences for a 3 year old boy with autism. The participant rapidly learned to follow a 3-5 item photographic activity schedule consisting of preferred and non-preferred play activities. Next non-preferred foods were introduced as a snack in the context of the activity schedule. Once successful with preferred foods, non-preferred foods were introduced. Results demonstrate that this student learned to accept previously non-preferred foods in the context of a photographic activity schedule. Additionally, the family noted significant improvements in behavior during the presentation of foods that historically evoked highly emotional responses. This study extends previous research in the use of activity schedules and offers a novel approach to expanding food preferences in children with autism. |
|
Acquisition of Intraverbal Behavior for Two Young Children with Autism: A Systematic Replication |
LAURA MEUNIER (Beacon ABA Services), Robert K. Ross (Beacon ABA Services) |
Abstract: This study compared the effects of echoic prompts and textual prompts on acquisition of question answering for a 4-year-old boy and a 5 year-old boy with Autism. The authors taught the responses to 10 questions (e.g., what do you do with a phone?) using each type of prompt. For example in the echoic prompt condition, the teacher said “talk”, the child then imitated the statement. In the textual prompt condition, the typewritten words were presented to prompt the response and the student read the response. In both conditions a progressive time delay was used to fade the prompts. The data are discussed in terms of rate of acquisition and occurrence of spontaneous productions. Data indicate that more rapid acquisition and spontaneous production were seen in the textual prompt condition for both subjects. These results are consistent with previous research. |
|
|
|
|
Int'l Panel - Discussion of Dr. A. Charles Catanias Invited Address: Sources of Novel Behavior: Implications for the Development of Verbal Behavior |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:20 PM |
Lake Michigan (8th floor) |
Area: DEV/EDC; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: A. Charles Catania, Ph.D. |
Chair: Martha Pelaez (Florida International University) |
MARTHA PELAEZ (Florida International University) |
A. CHARLES CATANIA (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
PER HOLTH (Randstone University) |
MARGARET VAUGHN (Salem State College) |
Abstract: A discussion of Dr. A. Charles Catanias Invited Address: Sources of Novel Behavior: Implications for the Development of Verbal Behavior |
|
|
|
|
Optimizing Applied Behavior Analysts' Functional Effectiveness in Educational Programs for Youngsters with Special Needs |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Marquette (3rd floor) |
Area: OBM/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Beth Sulzer-Azaroff, Ph.D. |
Chair: Beth Sulzer-Azaroff (The Browns Group of Naples) |
STEVEN LUCE (Melmark) |
KATHLEEN DYER (The River Street School at Coltsville) |
SAUL AXELROD (Temple University) |
ROBERT F. LITTLETON JR. (Beacon ABA Services) |
Abstract: Federal legislation, public policies and humanitarian concerns have led to a worldwide increase in the demand for capable behavior analysts to provide services in educational programs for children with special needs. Those trained and certified as meeting standards of competence in ABA bring a breadth of knowledge and skills to those programs. Included are functional, reinforcer and environmental assessment, methods of shaping social and educational performance, techniques for monitoring, recording, graphing and analyzing data and much more. Satisfying everyone simultaneously by meeting managerial, staff and parental priorities generally is not feasible. How behavior analysts in these setting are most efficiently and effectively to apportion and prioritize their time and effort becomes a real challenge. We shall address this issue, emphasizing 1) behavior analysts' performance functions in such settings and 2) tactics for setting long and short-term priorities and 3) for effectively managing that performance. Panelists and audience members are invited to share their own most successful strategies and materials. |
|
|
|
|
Applying Behavioral Economic Theory in Providing Services to Individuals with Developmental Disabilities |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:00 PM–4:20 PM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: William H. Ahearn (New England Center for Children) |
CE Instructor: William H. Ahearn, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium was developed with the intention of bringing to clinicians some research influenced by economic analyses of behavior that might have a significant impact on providing clinical and educational programming to individuals with skill deficits and/or problem behavior. In behavioral economics, reinforcers are treated as commodities, and the environmental contingencies that govern access to those commodities as the price or effort necessary to access a commodity. One indication of the value of behavioral economic principles is the range of topics that they have been applied to. Though the most impressive demonstrations of the utility of behavioral economics have come in the area of drug abuse, it has also been recently applied in two distinct lines of investigation. The first line of research is in establishing more effective reinforcer assessment strategies while the other involves analyzing problem behavior and functional alternatives as substitutes for one and other. The present symposium will discuss the attempts by three groups to translate behavioral economic theory into practical application. Presentations, delivered by William H. Ahearn, Henry S. Roane, and Iser G. DeLeon, will detail several investigations conducted with individuals with developmental disabilities in attempts to translate behavioral economic theory into practical applications. |
|
Applications of Behavioral Economics to Enhancing Performance and Skill Acquisition |
WILLIAM H. AHEARN (New England Center for Children), Ruth M. DeBar (New England Center for Children), Christine M. Florentino (New England Center for Children), Kelly K. Collins (New England Center for Children), Kathleen M. Clark (New England Center for Children), William V. Dube (E.K. Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School) |
Abstract: Behavioral economics views behavior as a transaction between the supply of a functional consequence and the demand for that functional consequence. This transaction occurs in an environmental context whereby the amount of reinforcer accessed per unit of time is analyzed with respect to the responding that was emitted for that access. Hursh (1980) presented a comparison of discrepant results from similar studies of responding under schedules of reinforcement. He showed that similar studies obtained different results because of differences in how access to the experimental reinforcers was controlled. When access to reinforcers occurred only during experimental sessions, a closed economy, responding persisted in the face of increases in work requirement. This presentation will describe the effects of closed and open economic conditions on both performance and learning. In two studies, mastered tasks were presented to students with developmental disabilities under both open and closed economic conditions. Generally more responding was observed during the closed economy but exceptions were observed. A third study involved teaching novel leisure skills to children via behavioral chaining. Skill acquisition was more rapid during the closed economic conditions. These results and a brief discussion of the concept of demand will be included in the presentation.Keywords: behavioral economics, supply, reinforcer assessment, skill acquisition |
|
Analysis of Unit Price Within the Context of Reinforcement-Based Programs for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities |
HENRY S. ROANE (Marcus Autism Center), Terry S. Falcomata (University of Iowa), Ashley C. Glover (Marcus Autism Center), Robert-Ryan S. Pabico (Marcus Autism Center) |
Abstract: Previous research has shown that choice responding is often influenced by the number of responses required to access a reinforcer and by the magnitude of that reinforcer. Within the context of behavioral economics, the ratio of response requirements to reinforcer magnitude is referred to as unit price. Results of several basic and clinical investigations have shown that changes in the unit price of different reinforcers may affect choice responding. In this presentation, we will present data for several on-going lines of research in which unit price modifications have altered response allocation. All analyses were conducted within the context of positive reinforcement-based treatments for problem behavior displayed by individuals with developmental disabilities. The first analysis shows the relative effects of unit price adjustments when identifying highly preferred reinforcers. The second illustrates the influence of price ratios self-control and impulsive responding. The final dataset is an examination of using unit price adjustment to facility the thinning of a differential reinforcement procedure. These results will be discussed in terms of the importance of conducting translational research that examines clinical applications of economic principles. |
|
Functional Similarity, Reinforcer Substitutability, and Elasticity of Demand: Paradoxical Implications for the Treatment of Behavior Disorders? |
ISER GUILLERMO DELEON (Johns Hopkins University), Stephanie A. Contrucci Kuhn (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Meagan Gregory (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Lynn G. Bowman (Johns Hopkins University), Melissa Shuleeta (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: Function-based interventions for the problem behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities typically involve promoting alternative behaviors that produce reinforcers that are identical or functionally similar to those that maintain the problem behavior. However, some studies have revealed that the effects of these interventions may wane during schedule thinning as the ratio of responses to reinforcers is increased. In behavioral economic analyses, demand for a commodity (reinforcer) is often shown to be a joint function of its price (the number of responses required to produce that reinforcer) and the extent to which concurrently available alternatives are substitutable. Demand is more elastic (e.g., more sensitive to increases in price) when concurrently available commodities are more substitutable. We present a series of preliminary behavioral economic analyses with individuals with developmental disabilities suggesting that (1) demand is more elastic when functionally similar reinforcers are concurrently available (i.e., functionally similar reinforcers are more substitutable), and (2) this may translate into more durable treatment effects when reinforcers that are less substitutable for that which maintains the problem behavior are used during schedule thinning. Thus, under certain conditions, exclusive provision of the functional reinforcer contingent upon an alternative behavior may not always be the best treatment option. |
|
|
|
|
Experimental Analyses of Behavioral Processes Relevant to Applied Behavior Analysis |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:00 PM–4:20 PM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
Chair: Craig H. Kennedy (Vanderbilt University) |
CE Instructor: Craig H. Kennedy, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Decades of laboratory research has yielded functional relations that have been useful for improving peoples living conditions. Historically, the basic to applied research model has been largely unidirectional. However, with the increased interest in basic behavioral processes among applied behavior analysts, there is an emerging focus on studying applied issues in the laboratory. This symposium will feature research from rodent laboratories at the University of Florida and Vanderbilt University. A range of schedule-oriented analyses and pharmacological manipulations will be presented that relate to issues of interest to applied behavior analysts. |
|
An Evaluation of Response Persistence and Response Suppression under Time-Based Schedules of Food Presentation |
JOHN C. BORRERO (University of the Pacific), Timothy R. Vollmer (University of Florida), Andrew Samaha (University of Florida) |
Abstract: Fixed-time (FT) schedules are commonly implemented as interventions to decrease severe problem behavior in applied settings. However, in some circumstances, FT schedules may be implemented to maintain appropriate responding. In our prior research, FT schedules produced persistent responding among rats, when alternated with a response-dependent condition and extinction in the context of mixed, or multiple schedule arrangements. In the present experiment, rats were exposed to a FI 60-s baseline followed by a FT condition. For all subjects response rates decreased under FT conditions. Following reversals of the FI 60-s and FT conditions, subjects were exposed to an interspersal test condition in which FT sessions were conducted until the rate of responding decreased by 10% or more of the mean response rate during the last 6 sessions from the previous FI 60-s condition. When response rates in the FT schedule decreased by 10% of the baseline mean, a FI 60-s session was conducted. The purpose of this condition was to determine the proportion of FI sessions required to maintain responding under FT schedules. Results suggested that intermittent introduction of response-dependent sessions produced response persistence under FT conditions. Results will be discussed in terms of potential applications to socially significant behavior. |
|
Access to Aggression as Positive Reinforcement under Various Time and Ratio Schedule Requirements in Mice |
MICHAEL E. MAY (Vanderbilt University), Maria H. Couppis (Vanderbilt University), Craig H. Kennedy (Vanderbilt University) |
Abstract: Violent behaviors, such as aggression, appear in most phyla and seem to serve an adaptive function (Scott, 1958). However, the appearance of these behaviors in human beings can be associated with a range of detrimental societal outcomes (Reiss et al., 1994). For people with developmental disabilities, the occurrence of aggression is associated with placement in more restrictive residential and educational settings and a diminished quality of life. Although a great deal of preclinical research has been done on the neurobiology of aggression, little is known about the operant characteristics of these behaviors and the neurobiology that might underlie their occurrence. It is plausible that a better understanding of possible reward mechanisms related to aggression may lead to improved behavioral and/or pharmacological treatments. An important first step in pursuit of this goal is to isolate aggression as an operant response that can be studied in its own right. In this poster, we present data on aggression as a positive reinforcer for an arbitrary response (i.e., nose poking) in mice. The experiments used Male Swiss-Webster mice in the resident-intruder paradigm. Initially, mice were taught to nose poke as an operant response to earn liquid. Once stable patterns of responding were established, the liquid was withdrawn as a consequence and a novel intruder mouse was introduced when the response contingency was met. We obtained response patterns characteristic of fixed-ratio, fixed-interval, and DRL reinforcement schedules suggesting that access to aggression functioned as a positive reinforcer. Tests using a progressive-ratio reinforcement schedule showed a “break point” significantly lower than for liquid reinforcement, suggesting that access to aggression was a lesser valence stimulus than liquid. Our findings provide a potential model system and experimental paradigm for analyzing the neurobiology of aggression within the context of its stimulus properties as a positive reinforcer. |
|
Some Effects of Contingency Manipulations on Responding with Rats |
ANDREW SAMAHA (University of Florida), Timothy R. Vollmer (University of Florida), Laura E. O'Steen (University of Florida) |
Abstract: Effects of positive and negative contingencies were examined in two experiments. A positive contingency was programmed by arranging a higher probability of pellet delivery following periods with lever presses than following periods without lever presses. Negative contingencies followed the opposite pattern. In Experiment 1, responding was acquired and maintained under a positive contingency but not under a negative contingency. In Experiment 2, the contingency was gradually shifted from positive to negative across several sessions. Results are presented in terms of responding under various contingency values and applied implications with respect to treatment integrity are discussed. |
|
Behavioral Pharmacology of Aggression in Mice Lacking the Tailless Gene |
PABLO JUAREZ (Vanderbilt University), Maria G. Valdovinos (Vanderbilt University), Maria H. Couppis (Vanderbilt University), Michael E. May (Vanderbilt University), Craig H. Kennedy (Vanderbilt University) |
Abstract: Aggressive behaviors are of great concern to people who care for, provide services to, and with developmental disabilities. A number of studies examine the neurogenomics of aggression in animal models such as the tailless (tlx) mouse. The tlx gene belongs to a superfamily of genes that encode transcription factors for ligand-activated receptors expressed in the brain. Tlx gene deficiency results in telencephalon, corpus collosum, amygdala, and hippocampus reduction, and leads to visual, olfactory, and loco-motor deficits. Tlx mice exhibit behavior during testing that indicate decreased inhibition to tasks which control mice typically do not engage in readily (e.g. time spent distally on open arms of an elevated maze). The present study utilizes a resident/intruder model, in which wildtype mice are introduced to the tlx resident cage for 10m sessions. Measurements of latency to first attack, total duration of aggression, locomotion, and grooming are taken. During intervention, clozapine, a borad spectrum antagonist for multiple receptor types is injected at graduated levels from 0.1 mg/kg to 1.5 mg/kg. In general, aggression in the intervention is lower than in baseline with the levels of grooming and locomotion remaining stable across conditions. This indicates that decreased aggression is not a result of sedation. |
|
|
|
|
Implementing Behavior Analytic Models in Mobile Robots: Where the Rubber Meets the Road (Literally) |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:00 PM–4:20 PM |
Waldorf (3rd floor) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Betsy J. Constantine (Context Systems) |
CE Instructor: William R. Hutchison, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Science fiction has presented many futuristic images of robots that behave and learn like animals and humans. Behavior analysis is the scientific discipline most able to engineer the processes that would be involved in such an artificial learning organism, but behavioral engineering has been applied to animals and humans rather than robots. The papers in this symposium will describe research by Hutchison and Constantine in which computer models of behavior analytic formulations have been implemented in robots. The three papers will describe the practical and conceptual challenges that must be solved to fill the gaps between the environment and behavioral processes; how the behavior of robots can illustrate basic behavior analytic principles such as primary reinforcement, conditioned reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, transfer of stimulus control, etc.; the value of such work for behavior analysis and practical applications; and major theoretical and philosophical issues raised by this work. Live demonstrations of this work with a research robot will be shown in the second paper. |
|
Implementing a Behavior Analytic Model in a Mobile Robot |
WILLIAM R. HUTCHISON (Behavior Systems) |
Abstract: This paper will describe some of the issues that arise in implementing a quantitative behavior analytic model in a robot, especially sensory, motor, and consequence issues that do not arise when working with animals. Raw sensory data are far removed from the conceptual level at which behavior analysts typically describe “stimuli”, and the same is true of “responses” that in robots consist of motor movements. We must also look at the basic meaning of “reinforcement” to implement primary and secondary reinforcement in a mechanical being. Solutions to these issues will be described in a complete working computer model of operant learning?the Seventh Generation system?that is currently being used to control robots. |
|
Practical Demonstration of a Mobile Robot Controlled by a Behavior Analytic Model |
BETSY J. CONSTANTINE (Context Systems), William R. Hutchison (Behavior Systems) |
Abstract: This paper will describe how a robotic implementation of operant behavior can illustrate some of the basic behavioral processes that have been extensively studied with animals. The paper will present one or two cases with detailed descriptions of the sensory, motor, and reinforcement processes involved. The descriptions will be illustrated by live demonstrations with a research robot. |
|
Implications of Developing Behavior Analytic Models in Robots |
WILLIAM R. HUTCHISON (Behavior Systems), David C. Palmer (Smith College), Betsy J. Constantine (Context Systems) |
Abstract: The implications of implementing behavioral models in robots range from stimulating basic behavior analytic research to the thorny social issue of creating artificial creatures. Complete models of behavior in computer simulations are more useful than isolated equations as a medium for describing the complex set of relationships between organisms and environment. But only when implemented in robots can those detailed models be put to the ultimate tests of sufficiency and accuracy. By studying the design and operation of an operant model in a robot, researchers have an opportunity to reexamine some basic behavior analytic principles, such as primary reinforcement, conditioned reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, transfer of stimulus control, etc. at a level of detail that is not possible with animal subjects. Developing robots that may become smarter, stronger, faster, etc., than humans raises issues that can no longer be dismissed as hypothetical. Behavior analysts are essential participants in this complex emerging social issue. |
|
|
|
|
Teaching Social Skills to Children with Autism with Empirically Validated Procedures |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:00 PM–4:20 PM |
Continental A (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Marjorie Charlop-Christy (Claremont McKenna College) |
Discussant: Chris A. LaBelle (University of Florida) |
CE Instructor: Marjorie Charlop-Christy, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium addresses social skills training procedures for children with autism. Empirically validated training procedures for a wide range of social behaviors from specific behaviors such as joint attention to more abstract social behaviors such as social perspective-taking will be presented. Implications for design and implementation of social skills training packages and future directions of research will be discussed. |
|
The Generalization and Maintenance of Affective Perspective-Taking Skills of Children with Autism |
DEBRA BERRY MALMBERG (Claremont Graduate University), Marjorie Charlop-Christy (Claremont McKenna College) |
Abstract: The generalization and maintenance of skills is an important concern for treatment providers. This study focused on the generalization and maintenance of affective perspective-taking skills on a long-term basis. An Affective Perspective-Taking (APT) task was designed to teach children to take the perspective of another person in an emotional situation. This training package used multiple exemplar training in a match-to-sample format. The APT training was an effective protocol for teaching these skills to children with autism (IOA = 100%; Procedural integrity = 99%). Children generalized skills to additional people and across settings. Skills maintained at high frequencies at post-treatment follow-up. These results have implications for the design of social skills intervention packages to promote generalization and maintenance of these important social behaviors. |
|
Increasing Coordinated Joint Attention in Children with Autism Using Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS) |
KATHERINE K. BYRD (Claremont Graduate University), H. Michael Carpenter (Claremont Graduate University), Marjorie H. Charlop-Christy (Claremont McKenna College) |
Abstract: Children with autism display social/communication difficulties in the form of deficits in joint attentional skills. In this study, a multiple baseline design across participants was used to examine the acquisition of coordinated joint attention skills in three children with autism using Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS). In addition, the study examined the relationship between nonverbal social/communication development and speech. It was hypothesized that children would show an increase in coordinated joint attention and speech after treatment and that this effect would generalize across persons, settings, and stimuli. Coordinated joint attention was defined as a child looking at a person, shifting gaze at a desired item, and then returning gaze to the person within 10 seconds of the presentation of the stimulus. The average interobserver agreement across the target behavior for each child was between 85% and 89%. Results indicated that all three children met learning criterion for the acquisition of coordinated joint attention and showed generalization. Ancillary data demonstrated that after treatment all children showed increases in speech and verbalizations as compared with baseline levels. Ancillary gains were also associated with a shift from supported joint attention behavior to more complex coordinated joint attention behavior for all children. |
|
The Effects of Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS) on Acquisition of Gestures and Subsequent Increases in Speech in Children with Autism |
KARI BERQUIST (Claremont Graduate University), H. Michael Carpenter (Claremont Graduate University), Marjorie H. Charlop-Christy (Claremont McKenna College) |
Abstract: This study examined the acquisition of gestures and its effect upon later subsequent speech development in three children with autism. Children were taught instrumental gesturing (pointing and tapping) to request desired items, thus promoting overt functional communication. Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS) were used to increase children’s motivation for learning, maintaining and generalizing gestures. It was hypothesized that children with autism would show increases in the use of gestures after treatment was implemented and a subsequent increase in speech development after the nonverbal behavior was taught. A multiple baseline design across participants was used. Interobserver agreement was between 81% and 91% for each child. Results demonstrated that all three children met criterion for the target behavior; however, generalization and maintenance varied with each child. In addition, ancillary gains in spontaneous speech were observed in two of the three children. |
|
|
|
|
How Does Stimulus Control Develop with Automatic Reinforcement? |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:30 PM–4:20 PM |
Stevens 3 (Lower Level) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Mark L. Sundberg, Ph.D. |
Chair: Robert G. Vreeland (Behavior Analysis & Intervention Services) |
MARK L. SUNDBERG (Behavior Analysts, Inc.) |
Mark L. Sundberg received his doctorate degree in Applied Behavior Analysis from Western Michigan University (1980), under the direction of Dr. Jack Michael. Dr. Sundberg is a Licensed Psychologist and Board Certified Behavior Analyst who has been conducting language research with children with autism for over 30 years. He is the founder and past editor of the journal The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, and is the co-author (with James W. Partington) of the books Teaching Language to Children with Autism or Other Developmental Disabilities, The Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills: The ABLLS, and (with Jack Michael) A Collection of Reprints on Verbal Behavior. He has published over 40 professional papers, given over 350 conference presentations and workshops, and taught over 70 college courses on behavior analysis, verbal behavior, sign language, and child development. Dr. Sundberg received the 2001 “Distinguished Psychology Department Alumnus Award” from Western Michigan University. |
Abstract: Behavior that is automatically reinforced must come under some type of stimulus control. However, the development of stimulus control is not discussed much by Skinner (1957), or by others who have since written about automatic reinforcement. The current presentation will briefly describe the concept of automatic reinforcement, its applications, and then suggest how stimulus control develops when behavior is automatically reinforced. The analysis may help to explain behavior such as delayed echolalia, self-stimulation, and verbal perseverations. In addition, techniques to evoke desirable behavior (e.g., infant babbling) related to a history of automatic reinforcement will be presented. |
|
|
|
|
Int'l Symposium - Implementing Quality Assurance In An Organization Providing Home-Based Early Intensive Behavior Intervention |
Sunday, May 29, 2005 |
3:30 PM–4:20 PM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Joel P. Hundert (Behaviour Institute) |
CE Instructor: Joel P. Hundert, Ph.D. |
Abstract: One of the challenges in providing home-based early intensive behavior intervention (EIBI) is to put into place mechanisms to ensure the quality of the services. This is particularly challenging in home-based services where staff and the children are not physically in a center. This symposium will present a series of papers describing quality assurance mechanism in an agency delivering early intensive behavior intervention for young children with autism in their homes. Each of the presenters will describe an aspect of quality assurance, discuss evidence of its impact, how it is used and case examples to illustrate its use |
|
A System of Evaluation and Feedback on Therapist’s Skills in Implementing EIBI |
NICOLE WALTON-ALLEN (Behaviour Institute) |
Abstract: The continued skill development of therapists working with young children with autism in EIBI programs requires a system monitoring their skills and providing corrective feedback. This paper will present a system that consists of observing a therapist’s performance either in live situation or on videotape. The system consists of rating the correctness of components of EIBI trial by trial. The results are summarized into a percent score and feedback is given to the individual therapists. A description of how staff feedback is provided and its use in staff compensation and promotion will be described |
|
System To Assess Skill Level of Children With Autism And Select Instructional Targets |
MIRANDA SIM (Behaviour Institute) |
Abstract: Typically, the day-to-day data of a child’s progress in a EIBI program is kept at the child’s home where therapy is being provided. This presents a challenge of how to monitor the child’s progress when it is difficult to get direct access to the child’s data. A system will be described of summarizing the data by tracking the number of data points (typically results of a set of 10 items). The presentation will illustrate the use of this data summary to make decisions about the child’s progress and identify performance problems in particular programs. Results on the reliability of this data summary systems and its use within an organization will be discussed. |
|
System To Assess Skill Level Of Children With Autism And Select Instructional Targets |
DONNA C. CHANEY (Behaviour Institute) |
Abstract: No matter how well therapists are implementing EIBI programs, significant gains in a child’s development are unlikely to occur unless those programs are targeting relevant areas for development for the child. This paper will describe three tools used to select appropriate instructional targets initially when the child first begins service and also to select targets as the child progresses over time. These tools are: a) a system to probe a child initially against curriculum; b) a system to visually monitor programs the child has mastered, is currently receiving, waiting to use as well as adjustment of long-term goals; and, c) a tool to periodically assess a child against key areas of a curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
2005 ABA Tutorial: The Importance of Understanding and "Extending" Skinner's Extended Tacts for Behavior Analysis Applications |
Monday, May 30, 2005 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
International North (2nd floor) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Theory |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: T. V. Joe Layng, Ph.D. |
Chair: Janet S. Twyman (Headsprout) |
Presenting Authors: : T. V. JOE LAYNG (Headsprout) |
Abstract: Some have maintained that the investigation and teaching of higher cognitive function is outside the domain of behavior analysis or at least Skinners treatment of Verbal Behavior. In contrast, this presentation will argue that Skinners treatment provides the foundation for understanding a range of complex verbal phenomena important to behavior analysts or anyone interested in higher cognitive function. This is particularly true for those who build programs to teach verbal behavior skills. Building on Skinners analysis, this talk offers a heuristic that may be useful for those who design Verbal Behavior programs. This heuristic helps delineate a hierarchy of repertoires and the contingencies that define them. These extended relations include: Basic units or sameness relations, which include concepts and simple equivalence relations; linked units or ordered relations, which include principles and more complex equivalencelike relations; and combined units or generative repertoires, which include reasoning, problem solving, and the use of metaphor. Generative repertoires are of particular importance for they provide the learner with the means for more autonomous learning. Accordingly, this category will be emphasized, drawing heavily from the work of Joanne K. Robbins (and others) and her analysis of how to teach the various types of intelligence. |
|
T. V. JOE LAYNG (Headsprout) |
Joe Layng co-founded Headsprout, and serves as the company's Senior Scientist where he led the scientific team that developed Headsprout’s patented Generative Learning Technology. This technology forms the basis of the company’s Headsprout Early Reading program, for which Joe was the chief architect.
Joe has over 25 years of experience in the experimental analysis of behavior and the learning sciences both in the laboratory and in applied settings. Joe earned a Ph.D. in Behavioral Science (Biopsychology) from The University of Chicago, where he conducted basic research on animal models of psychopathology. Specifically, he, in collaboration with P. T. Andronis and I. Goldiamond, investigated the recurrence of chronic, un-reinforced, self-injurious behavior (SIB – head-banging by pigeons) as a function of past selection contingencies for SIB, and current selection contingencies which maintained a different class of behavior (key-pecking). He also collaborated with P. T. Andronis and I. Goldiamond on research investigating the adduction of untrained complex symbolic social-behavior, which led to the key elements upon which the Headsprout Generative Learning Technology is based. Other work has included Signal Detection Theory experiments on the discrimination of ambiguous stimuli, particularly those of social consequence, in collaboration with J. K. Robbins, H. Karp, and M. Mauldin while at the University of Houston–Clear Lake.
From 1991 to 1996, Joe was the Director of the Academic Support Center, and then Dean of Public Agency and Special Training Programs at Malcolm X College in Chicago. While at Malcolm X College Joe founded the Personalized Curriculum Institute (PCI), which rapidly equips under-prepared students with the skills needed for college success, and worked with the Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago White Sox Charities to bring research-based instruction to Chicago's schools. |
|
|
|
|
Is Autism on the Rise? Issues of Prevalence and Early Risk Factors |
Monday, May 30, 2005 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Continental B (1st floor) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Marygrace Yale Kaiser, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jack Scott (Florida Atlantic University) |
MARYGRACE YALE KAISER (University of Miami), Keith Scott (University of Miami) |
Marygrace Yale Kaiser is a Research Assistant Professor and Assistant Director of the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Project at the University of Miami. Her work and that of her colleague Keith Scott, has focused on prevalence of serious disabilities in children with special attention to the epidemiology of autism. Dr Kaiser received her doctorate in psychology from the University of Miami where she coordinated the Early Social Communication Project. This project examined the development of joint attention and other forms or early social interaction in children with autism. Her current research puts her in a unique position to build on her background in autism and now to apply the tools of developmental epidemiology to account for the increasing rates of autism and related disabilities. |
Abstract: Recently, issues concerning Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) have received a great deal of attention. Comparisons of epidemiological data from the last 30 years suggest that there has been a significant increase in the prevalence of the disorder. However, the meaning of this increase is currently poorly understood and few population-based studies have been conducted with large U.S. samples. This talk will detail past and present efforts to document the prevalence of autism, as well as discuss implications of the apparent increase in the number of individuals affected by the spectrum of disorders. In addition, characteristics that may increase the risk for developing autism will also be discussed. The few studies that have explored possible association have mostly involved analyses of small, ethnically similar samples which may make results more difficult to generalize. Data from two investigations of large ethnically diverse populations will be highlighted and areas of future investigation will be presented. |
|
|
|
|
Achieving Fluent Responding in Young Children with Disabilities |
Monday, May 30, 2005 |
10:30 AM–11:50 AM |
Stevens 1 (Lower Level) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Brian Doyle (HMEA) |
Discussant: Brian Doyle (HMEA) |
CE Instructor: Robyn E. Stewart, M.Ed. |
Abstract: Teachers often encounter students who present with both academic deficits and social-behavioral difficulties. Deficiencies in basic academic skills can eventually lead students to be excluded from general education classrooms, while a lack of appropriate social skills affects not only their development of advanced communicative abilities, but also further exacerbates their isolation from peers. Both of these deficit areas are strong predictors of later problems in life. Fluency training, with its emphasis on ?the student knows best? approach, offers alternate strategies for addressing these issues. Fluency training has been found to increase acquisition and retention of both component and composite skills. This presentation examines how fluency training in combination with other treatments can improve a basic academic skill (i.e., oral reading and comprehension) and social skills in young children with developmental disabilities. Results will be discussed with respect to the retention, endurance, and application of these skills in classroom settings. |