|
Discounting of Delayed and Probabilistic Gains and Losses: Carving Discounting at its Joints |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
006AB (CC) |
Area: EAB/SCI; Domain: Basic Research |
PSY CE Offered. CE Instructor: Leonard Green, Ph.D. |
Chair: Federico Sanabria (Arizona State University) |
Presenting Authors: : LEONARD GREEN (Washington University), Joel Myerson (Washington University) |
Abstract: People discount the value of delayed or uncertain outcomes, and the same hyperboloid mathematical function describes both delay and probability discounting. Partly for this reason, discounting of delayed outcomes and probabilistic outcomes often is assumed to reflect similar decision-making processes. However, we will show that several manipulations differentially affect how steeply people discount delayed and probabilistic outcomes, as well as the parameters of the discounting function. In addition, we will show that with respect to discounting, losses are not simply the opposite of gains. Finally, we will present data from individuals with medial temporal lobe damage to argue that mental time travel is not required for discounting delayed and probabilistic outcomes. In summary, this tutorial will highlight the similarities and differences between the discounting of delayed and probabilistic gains and losses, as well as the implications of our recent neuropsychological findings for understanding the mechanisms involved (and not involved) in discounting. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Target Audience: General ABAI attendees, both applied and basic researchers and graduate students |
Learning Objectives:
- Participants will be able to describe and provide examples of the discounting of delayed and of probabilistic rewards, and state a similarity and a difference in their discounting.
- Participants will be able to describe the discounting of gains and losses, and state a similarity and a difference in their discounting.
- Participants will be able to discuss the relation of discounting to issues of impulsivity and self-control.
|
|
LEONARD GREEN (Washington University), Joel Myerson (Washington University) |
Leonard Green received his undergraduate degree from the City College of New York (CCNY) and his Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. After completing post-doctoral research, he ventured west of the Mississippi (despite thinking he still was east of the river) where he is a professor of psychology at Washington University in St. Louis and director of undergraduate studies. His research concerns choice and decision-making in rats, pigeons, and people, with a particular interest in models of self-control, impulsivity, choice and decision-making. He is one of the developers of "behavioral economics," a transdisciplinary field that combines the experimental methodology of psychology with the theoretical constructs of economics. He is co-author of the book Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior, served as editor of the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, is on the Advisory Board of The Psychological Record, and on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition. He served on the Executive Board of Society for the Quantitative Analyses of Behavior and was president and chairman of the board of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Dr. Green is a Fellow of ABAI and Association for Psychological Science, and president-elect of Division 25 (Behavior Analysis) of APA. |
Keyword(s): Delay discounting, Gains-Losses, Mental time, Probability discounting |
|
|
|
|
B. F. Skinner's Analysis of Language: Misconceptions and Misunderstandings |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Grand Ballroom C3 (CC) |
Area: VBC/TPC; Domain: Theory |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Barbara E. Esch, Ph.D. |
Chair: Barbara E. Esch (Esch Behavior Consultants, Inc.) |
Presenting Authors: : MATTHEW P. NORMAND (University of the Pacific) |
Abstract: Some have suggested that the definition of verbal behavior offered by B. F. Skinner (1957) fails to capture the essence of language insofar as it is too broad and not functional. In this tutorial, Dr. Matthew Normand will explain how the ambiguities of Skinner's definition are not an indictment of it, and show that suggestions to the contrary are problematic because they suffer a critical error of scientific reasoning. Specifically, he will explain that (a) no clear definition of verbal behavior is possible because there is no natural distinction between verbal and nonverbal behavior; (b) attempts at an immutable definition are essentialistic; and (c) Skinner's functional taxonomy of language is in no way affected by the particulars of any definition of verbal behavior. Moreover, Dr. Normand will explain how categorical definitions, and the vagaries that sometimes arise from them, are not unique to Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: BCBAs, BCaBAs |
Learning Objectives:
- State the two primary arguments used to question the validity of Skinner’s definition of verbal behavior.
- State the two ways that the term “function” is used by behavior analysts and describe how Skinner’s taxonomy of verbal operants addresses both uses.
- Describe the shortcomings of the argument that Skinner’s definition of verbal behavior is not functional. Use the concept of essentialism in your answer.
|
|
MATTHEW P. NORMAND (University of the Pacific) |
Dr. Matthew Normand received his B.A. in psychology from Western New England College, his M.A. in behavior analysis from Western Michigan University, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in cognitive and behavioral sciences from Florida State University. He is an associate professor of psychology at the University of the Pacific and a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). At Pacific, his primary responsibilities are teaching courses in the experimental analysis of behavior, basic and applied, and supervising behavior analysis research and practicum work. Dr. Normand's primary scientific interests, broadly defined, are the application of basic behavioral principles to problems of social significance (including obesity and community health issues), verbal behavior, and the philosophy of science. He has authored more than three-dozen scientific papers and book chapters and more than 100 conference presentations. He is the current editor of The Behavior Analyst, an associate editor for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, a former associate editor for the journals The Behavior Analyst, The Analysis of Verbal Behavior and Behavior Analysis in Practice, and he serves on the editorial board of Behavioral Interventions. Dr. Normand is the 2011 recipient of the B. F. Skinner New Researcher Award from the American Psychological Association (Div. 25). |
Keyword(s): language taxonomy, Skinner's analysis, VB definition |
|
|
|
|
10 Things Every Behavior Analyst Should Know About Behavior Analysis and Entrepreneurship |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
203AB (CC) |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Sigurdur Oli Sigurdsson, Ph.D. |
Chair: Sigurdur Oli Sigurdsson (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Presenting Authors: : JOSHUA K. PRITCHARD (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: While each entrepreneur's experience differs from the next, there are some broad strokes that can be used to paint a successful venture. Just as withclinical endeavors, data are king. This tutorial will provide the audience with an example of how behavior analytic principles (OBM) were used to found and grow Lodestone Academy, a private school in Florida that serves consumers who exhibit severe behavioral issues. In addition to an examination of organizational data, a discussion of the trials and tribulations of Lodestone will provide "life lessons" to audience members with suggestions to facilitate a smooth entrepreneurial journey. In addition to the example of Lodestone Academy, Dr. Pritchard will describe some other entrepreneurial ventures and the lessons learned from each. This tutorial will conclude with a few recommended directions that a new entrepreneur could explore which would allow for both personal success and a broadened impact of behavior analysis on society. |
|
JOSHUA K. PRITCHARD (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Dr. Joshua K. Pritchard earned his doctorate in psychology from the University of Nevada-Reno. He is a BCBA-D (Board Certified Behavior Analyst-Doctorate). He is currently a full-time assistant professor at the Florida Institute of Technology, program manager of the hybrid master's program and currently serves as the president of Association for Science in Autism Treatment and on several board of editors of scientific behavioral journals. He has provided behavioral services, assessments, and consultation for school settings, residential settings, in-home, and in-center for more than a decade. He also has experience consulting with a variety of agencies across the country and internationally using his experience in applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior management. He owns two companies: JKP Analysts, LLC, and Lodestone Academy, founded in 2006 and 2013, respectively. His research in OBM has examined nurse and doctor behavior in hospitals in Jordan and ethical implications of work in a Nevada brothel. |
Keyword(s): entrepreneurship |
|
|
|
|
Why Behavior Analysts Should Care About Sensory Psychology |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
207AB (CC) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Theory |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Cynthia M. Anderson, Ph.D. |
Chair: Cynthia M. Anderson (Appalachian State University) |
Presenting Authors: : A. CHARLES CATANIA (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
Abstract: Three-term contingencies are relations among stimuli, responses, and consequences as they interact in the context of motivational operations. The stimulus is therefore an integral part of behavior analysis. Experimental psychology courses once routinely included learning and behavior along with sensory psychology and psychophysics as substantive components, but they gradually evolved into methodology courses devoid of specific content. Behavior analysis and sensory psychology then diverged despite their commonalities, not least of which were single-subject research designs. Sensory psychology remains crucially relevant to many things we do. This tutorial explores how it has made and can continue to make significant contributions to both basic research and applications. The examples to be considered include, among others, problem behavior that is sometimes a byproduct of the sensory deficits that often accompany developmental disabilities, the auditory phenomenon of recruitment as it can occur in geriatric populations, and signal-detection analyses of the costs and benefits of false alarms and misses in discrimination tasks such as breast self-examination. Behavior is a biological system, so it should be no surprise that it shares properties with sensory processes, as when contrast effects in behavior are paralleled by similar effects in vision, hearing, and other senses. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: BCBAs, BCaBAs |
Learning Objectives:
- Engaged participants should be able to briefly describe the basic signal-detection payoff matrix and say why it is relevant to behavior analysis.
- Engaged participants should be able to describe the basics of sensory psychology, including the role of inhibitory processes in edge detection, color-blindness and other visual deficits, and recruitment effects in hearing, and say why such phenomena are relevant to behavior analysts.
- Engaged participants should be able to describe the individual-organism methodologies of both sensory psychophysics and behavior analysis, and to identify the common features of these two areas that make them potential partners in a biologically based science of behavior.
|
|
A. CHARLES CATANIA (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
When A. Charles Catania encountered psychology as an undergraduate at Columbia University, the curriculum developed by Keller and Schoenfeld included sensory processes along with learning as crucial components of experimental psychology. His subsequent graduate and postdoctoral work at Harvard University also called for familiarity with both operant and sensory processes. After a stint doing psychopharmacology at the SK&F Laboratories in Philadelphia, he moved to the University Heights campus of New York University and then to the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), where he is now professor emeritus. Along the way, operant research involving sensory systems made up a rich part of his academic environment, comprising such examples as Blough's development of psychophysical procedures with pigeons, Hefferline's work on sensory feedback, Dews' treatment of pharmacological data in terms of drugs as stimuli, and Nevin's application of signal-detection theory to reinforcement schedules. That background in sensory psychology has continued to inform Catania's research, teaching and writing. He has studied visual acuity in the pigeon, extended psychophysical methods to temporal properties of stimuli, and explored parallels between interactions in sensory systems and those in behavioral systems. The current edition of his text, Learning, incorporates many examples drawn from the literature of sensory psychology. |
Keyword(s): sensory psychology, sensory systems, signal detection |
|
|
|
|
The Nuts and Bolts of Scent Detection |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
203AB (CC) |
Area: AAB/CSE; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Christy A. Alligood, Ph.D. |
Chair: Christy A. Alligood (Disney's Animal Kingdom) |
Presenting Authors: : TIMOTHY EDWARDS (APOPO) |
Abstract: In this tutorial, the basic requirements and ideal conditions for successfully training, evaluating, and deploying animals for scent-detection tasks will be outlined. Fundamental chemical and environmental factors that influence scent detection will be described, as will some factors to consider when selecting species and strains for this work. Because operational scent detection often involves detection of a variety of odor combinations, training requirements are similar to those for concept formation, which has important implications for selection of training samples. These and other considerations related to sample presentation will be discussed. Common training methods for both "discrete-trial" and "free-operant" scent-discrimination tasks will be presented and critical components of training highlighted. Evaluation of the scent-detection accuracy of animal detectors is a critical step prior to and during operational deployment. Some key features of precise estimation of performance will be discussed followed by a description of some operational deployment scenarios and features that are more and less conducive to success. Finally, common challenges associated with scent-detection work and some methods of overcoming the challenges will be presented for discussion. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: BCBAs, BCaBAs |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the event, the participant will be able to:
- Describe three factors that influence scent availability.
- Design a basic scent-detection training protocol.
- Conduct an evaluation of a scent-detection animal.
- Describe three challenges associated with scent detection.
|
|
TIMOTHY EDWARDS (APOPO) |
Dr. Timothy Edwards has a Ph.D. in psychology from Western Michigan University. He has conducted basic and applied research on stimulus discrimination, conditioned reinforcement, and motivating operations, all of which are relevant to his current work at APOPO, a Belgian nonprofit organization headquartered in Tanzania that deploys giant African pouched rats to locate land mines, identify tuberculosis-positive sputum samples, and perform other humanitarian tasks. Dr. Edwards serves as APOPO's head of training and behavioral research. He investigates the influence of environmental factors, modifications to training protocol, and the suitability of the rats for new scent-detection applications. Dr. Edwards translates laboratory findings into meaningful improvements in applied scent-detection operations and takes operational puzzles to the laboratory to look for solutions. Much of his research in applied scent detection has been published, and his experience operating in a challenging field in developing countries has afforded him unique insight into the elements of training that are crucial for successful scent-detection operations. |
Keyword(s): Animal behavior, Animal training, Concept learning, Scent detection |
|
|
|
|
Delivering Teleconsultation for Functional Behavior Assessment and Intervention: Things to Consider |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Grand Ballroom C3 (CC) |
Area: DDA/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Anjali Barretto, Ph.D. |
Chair: Anjali Barretto (Gonzaga University) |
Presenting Authors: : STEPHANIE M. PETERSON (Western Michigan University) |
Abstract: Providing consultation from a distance is becoming increasingly more popular, because it allows for expert consultation even if those needing consultation live far from the consultant. This applies to individuals living in rural areas as well as in urban centers, where traffic congestion can make travel to the consultation site just as problematic as driving to rural areas. Teleconsultation is a method of providing consultation using distance technology. In states where behavior analysts are in short supply but demand for their services is great, teleconsultation can be one solution to the problem. In this tutorial, the ins and outs of setting up a consultation model will be provided. Dr. Peterson will share some of the things she has learned (the good, the bad, and the ugly) during the past year and a half of starting up a new teleconsultation service in Michigan, with a goal of helping participants be prepared for the hurdles that will be encountered. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: BCBAs; BCaBAs |
Learning Objectives: 1. Define the tele consultation and how it can be used in behavioral consulting.
2. Identify some of the problems and dilemmas tele consultation can give rise to, as well as potential solutions.
3. Identify HIPAA-related concerns and solutions in tele consultation. |
|
STEPHANIE M. PETERSON (Western Michigan University) |
Dr. Stephanie M. Peterson, Ph.D., BCBA-D, is a professor and chair of the Department of Psychology at Western Michigan University. Dr. Peterson earned her doctorate in special education from the University of Iowa in 1994. She has taught courses in behavior analysis and special education at several different universities (Gonzaga University, Utah State University, The Ohio State University, and Idaho State University). She also served as chair of the Department of Special Education, School Psychology, and Literacy at Idaho State University. Dr. Peterson is senior co-editor of Education and Treatment of Children and has served on or currently serves on the editorial boards of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Behavior Analysis in Practice, to name a few. Dr. Peterson is also an elected member of the Board of Directors for the Behavior Analyst Certification Board. Her research interests include the assessment and treatment of problem behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities, choice making, functional communication training, and behavior analysis in education. |
Keyword(s): teleconsultation, telemedicine |
|
|
|
|
Epicurus and B. F. Skinner: Uncommon Resemblances and Springboards to the Future |
Sunday, May 24, 2015 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Lila Cockrell Theatre (CC) |
Area: TPC/CSE; Domain: Theory |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Timothy D. Hackenberg, Ph.D. |
Chair: Timothy D. Hackenberg (Reed College) |
Presenting Authors: : ALLEN NEURINGER (Reed College) |
Abstract: This talk identifies aspects of Epicurean philosophy that are related to the ideas promoted by B. F. Skinner. A Greek philosopher who lived at the time of Plato and Aristotle, Epicurus was an empiricist who maintained that lawful interactions among atoms were the bases for all things, including physical, biological, and behavioral. He also posited that atoms swerved randomly, this providing for voluntary actions and the creation of novel things. Epicurus argued against soul (in contemporary terms, mind or cognitions) being independent of body, and against superstitious beliefs, including life-after-death and godly influences on humankind. Animals shared, according to Epicurus, many of the same attributes as humans, and he posited that life existed on many worlds other than our own. Epicurus created and lived in a utopian community, the Garden, that was similar in many ways to Walden II--in its emphasis on work and simple rewards, in avoiding aversives and emphasizing positives, and in its inclusion of all members of society, rich and poor, women and men. This talk will compare Skinner and Epicurus and explore why their common views may be helpful to us as individuals, to our culture, and to our world. |
|
ALLEN NEURINGER (Reed College) |
Allen Neuringer obtained a B.A. from Columbia University in 1962 and Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1967. He has been teaching at Reed College in Portland, OR, since 1970 where he is currently MacArthur Professor of Psychology, Emeritus, and teaches one upper-division course, Functional Variability, each year. He has served on National Science Foundation graduate fellowship panels and many NSF and National Institutes of Health research study sections. Dr. Neuringer's research, which has been supported by NSF and NIH, is currently directed at operant variability (see Neuringer, A. [2004]. Reinforced Variability in Animals and People. American Psychologist, 59, 891-906; Neuringer, A. & Jensen, G. [2012] Operant Variability. In G. J. Madden (Ed.) APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis, Volume 1: Methods and Principles (pp 513-546). Washington, D.C.: APA). His most recent work describes a theory of volition based upon operant variability (see Neuringer, A. & Jensen, G. [2010] Operant Variability and Voluntary Action. Psychological Review, 117, 972-993; Neuringer, A. [2014] Operant Variability and the Evolution of Volition. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 62-81). He also has published on self-experimentation, self-control, the "Protestant ethic effect," music discrimination in pigeons, percentage reinforcement, pigeon intelligence (Hick's law), and choice under concurrent reinforcement schedules. |
|
|