|
Identifying Priorities for Teaching Children With Autism: Where Do We Begin? |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4C-1 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Chata A. Dickson, Ph.D. |
CHATA A. DICKSON (New England Center for Children), RENEE C. MANSFIELD (New England Center for Children) |
Description: Although there is considerable research on the effectiveness of teaching procedures across a variety of skills, it can be challenging to determine which skills are important to teach first. This issue becomes even more complex when you consider the range of ability levels and the individual differences in specific strengths and weaknesses across individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Although different students require different goals, there are some skills that are useful for all individuals with ASDs. These are the fundamental skills for participating in a broad range of environments, communities, and activities—the skills that provide a foundation upon which more complex skills can be built. In planning programs of instruction for individuals with ASDs, behavioral educators must consider the extent to which the selected skills will open new possibilities for the individual student. These skills that open new doors for individuals have been referred to as "behavioral cusps," and they are prerequisite to more advanced independent, competent behavior (Rosales-Ruiz & Baer, 1997). In this workshop we will discuss important considerations related to identifying and prioritizing instructional goals, and we will describe to attendees a skills assessment that has been developed to assist in selecting critical goals for students with autism. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, when considering and selecting educational and behavioral goals for students with autism spectrum disorders, participants should be able to:
State the most important issues to consider
Define and provide examples of "behavioral cusps"
Describe the importance of considering future environments
Discuss the importance of independence, work, and community participation for adults |
Activities: Activities will include lecture, individual workbook responding, and small group discussion. |
Audience: The target workshop audience is professionals who develop educational treatment plans for children with autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Autism Curriculum, Behavioral Education, Foundational Skills, Goal Selection |
|
|
CANCELED: Creating Sustainable Services for Children With Autism in Developing Countries |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4C-2 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mareile A. Koenig, Ph.D. |
TRACY VAIL (Let's Talk Speech and Language Services, Inc.), MAREILE A. KOENIG (West Chester University) |
Description: This workshop will present a model training program to create sustainable behavioral services for children with autism in developing countries. Participants will receive guidelines and materials for raising capital to develop programs, determining countries/programs with the leadership needed to sustain services, determining training needs based on the current knowledge base of the leadership in the developing country, developing training materials based on needs assessments, finding and training volunteers to provide trainings, the process of transferring "ownership" to the leadership in the country, and developing political influence to increase the service options. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Develop a fundraising plan for initiating programs
Measure the capacity of a leadership team in a developing country to provide sustainable services for children with autism
Conduct a needs assessment to determine training needed
Evaluate volunteers' applications to match specified needs
Develop a training program with materials and data collection systems to ensure sustainability of services to children with autism
Develop strategies and contacts for meeting with political leaders in developing countries |
Activities: Participants will review the progress of an ongoing effort in Nepal to create sustainable services for children with autism. Video samples of training sessions, assessment results, training protocols, and assessments of leadership and volunteer applications will be shared. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for speech pathologists, behavior analysts, parents, students, and anyone with a passion for increasing the availability of behavioral programs for children with autism in developing countries. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism, communication, international, verbal behavior |
|
|
Assessing and Teaching Functional Skills to Children With Autism in Home, School, and Community Settings |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
2B (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Michael M. Mueller, Ph.D. |
JAMES W. PARTINGTON (Behavior Analysts, Inc.), MICHAEL M. MUELLER (Stimulus Publications) |
Description: This workshop will describe the assessment and teaching of functional skills in children with autism. Functional skills will be discussed in terms of how they differ from basic conceptual skills on several levels that include when, where, and why functional skills are demonstrated, as well as the immediate benefit to the child. Children with autism require learning sequences and teaching curricula in various "everyday" aspects of their lives. These useful and necessary functional life skills are naturally clustered into skills used at school, in the community, at home, and skills that impact all aspects of life. Within these broad skill cluster areas, 31 specific skill groupings have been identified. This workshop will present information on the assessment of these specific skill groupings. The results of the assessment of functional skills will be useful for understanding which skills are required to enable independence within any given skill area. Next, using the assessment results to establish teaching sequences for functional learning programs will be discussed. Finally, specific strategies for teaching certain functional skills will be taught. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify the differences between functional and basic/conceptual skills
Identify four broad skill clusters of functional skills
Identify and assess 31 specific skill groupings of functional skills
Choose initial instructional skills for teaching functional skills
Identify methods to teach functional skills in various settings
Identify methods to measure and track progress of functional skills from initial assessment and throughout the teaching process |
Activities: Workshop activities will include lecture, handouts, group participation, and group discussions. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts who work with children with autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Assessment, Autism, Functional Skills, Teaching |
|
|
Technology and Learning: Developing Innovative Teaching Methods for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
612 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mary Ellen McDonald, Ph.D. |
MARY ELLEN MCDONALD (Hofstra University), NANCY PHILLIPS (The Genesis School), MARIA GARRETT (Nassau Suffolk Services for Autism), JAMIE OBRIEN (The Genesis School/Eden II Programs) |
Description: The workshop will provide information on a variety of technology-based instructional methods that can be used to teach skills to individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Specific areas as they pertain to skill development will include the use of iTouch, iPad, SmartBoard, video technology, tactile prompts, and a variety of other technology-based tools. Computer programs will be presented, including lessons such as individualized PowerPoint applications. Specific areas of learning will focus on promoting independence, vocational skills, effective communication, and social skills. The future applications of technology for those with ASD will be explored as well. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Use a variety of technological applications to assist learners with ASD
Use technology to teach both in a classroom setting and portably
Use technology with adolescents to promote independence
Identify specific needs of the learner with ASD and design the appropriate intervention using any of a variety of technology-based interventions |
Activities: Workshop activities will include discussion, video review, and case examples. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for psychologists, special educators, social workers, speech pathologists, and parents. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism, independence, learning, technology |
|
|
Fitness and Autism: Evidence-Based Practices to Promote Healthy Lifestyles and Inclusion Opportunities for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
201 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Linda S. Meyer, Ed.D. |
LINDA S. MEYER (Autism New Jersey), RANDY I. HOROWITZ (Eden II Programs), BARBARA WELLS (Autism New Jersey) |
Description: Individuals with autism spectrum disorders may be at risk for being physically inactive. The characteristics of the disorder may interfere with successful participation in traditional forms of physical activity. The goal of a fitness program is to maximize the health, fitness, and appearance of each individual. For individuals with ASDs, acquiring appropriate fitness levels and skills promotes the productive use of leisure time in less restrictive settings, inclusion in family recreational activities, expansion of employment opportunities, and increased independence. Access to community health/fitness clubs and programs has not been an option for many individuals with ASDs. Effective fitness and exercise programs for individuals with ASDs require strategic collaboration. Certified personal fitness trainers are experts in physiology and function. Parents are experts in their own children with ASDs. Applied behavior analysts objectively define and improve socially significant behavior. Individuals with ASDs and their families seeking to participate in an inclusive fitness program benefit from a collaborative approach. Extensive research supports the effectiveness of a behavioral approach for individuals with ASDs and their families. This workshop, presented by three professionals, one of whom is also a parent of an adolescent with autism, will address the application of behavioral principles to promote the physical fitness of individuals with ASDs as well as inclusion in family and community health and fitness programs and activities. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify research-based instructional strategies used to promote physical fitness safety, sports performance, and leisure skills for individuals with ASDs in community settings
Identify measurement procedures to promote accountability in fitness programs, including measures of social validity in a school-based running program and a community fitness center
List the necessary components of an effective leisure and fitness programs for individuals with autism spectrum disorders |
Activities: Participants will view a PowerPoint presentation, receive handouts, and view videos. They will have opportunities to respond to the information presented in a didactic presentation and participate in problem solving discussions. |
Audience: The workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts and family members who are interested in starting, expanding, or enhancing health and fitness programs for individuals with autism spectrum disorders to promote inclusion in families and communities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
CANCELED: Bridging Socio-cultural Differences and Distance in the Treatment and Support of Children With Autism and Related Developmental Disorders |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
213 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/CSE; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Elizabeth Fong Hughes, M.A. |
ROBYN M. CATAGNUS (Rethink Autism), LIN CHONG (Rethink Autism), ELIZABETH FONG HUGHES (Multicultural Alliance of Behavior Analysts), FRANCINE BAFFA (IBEST, LLC), SAKURAKO SHERRY TANAKA (Multicultural Alliance of Behavior Analysts) |
Description: This workshop will present four cross-cultural models of behavior analytic practice for children diagnosed with autism: "Leveraging Technology to Provide Evidence-Based Educational Services for Students With Autism" by Robyn Catagnus and Lin Chong from Rethink Autism, "Bilingual Verbal Behavior Intervention" by Sakurako Tanaka, "Using Peers to Support Social Development Within Different Cultures" by Francine Baffa, and "Translating Clinical Counselling Strategies for Immigrant Families" by Elizabeth Hughes Fong from Rethink Autism. Behavior analysts practicing in global societies are required to expand their cross-cultural knowledge and skills in order to effectively deliver contextually fit ABA services. This workshop will cover some critical concepts and standard practices widely held and recommended by the broader science communities—to the extent that they will provide practical advantages to behavior analysts.The workshop will address strategies for working with families with a child who has a diagnosis of ASD, as well as functioning in a diverse social, cultural, economic, and linguistic environment. Some limitations include an inability to address each individual cultural background and case details. The workshop is intended to increase awareness of the social and ethical issues pertaining to the delivery of ABA services in diverse cultural communities. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Modify their consulting techniques and interventions based on a goodness of fit survey to enhance contextual fit
Describe three ways in which technology could enhance service to their clients and discuss the ethical considerations for each use
Define subtractive bilingualism, additive bilingualism, and semilingualism and provide one example of each
Describe at least five key elements of a functional common ground between behaviour analysis and applied linguistics
Develop an example of a play-based scenario to enhance social communication in the form of reciprocity, joint attention, and relatedness
Identify and respond to ethical questions pertaining to cross-cultural treatment settings and practices in accordance with BACB ethics guidelines |
Activities: Participants will be introduced to four related but separate presentations on cross-cultural delivery of ABA-based practices in which they will review written and orally presented materials, engage in discussions, role play, and do analytic exercises. More specifically they will be introduced to a) promising applications of scalable technology to provide behavior analytic training and support for educators and parents, effectiveness of video modeling as a teaching tool, and ethical considerations of a remote consultation service delivery, and b) the current research in bilingualism and second language education as these are compared to and contrasted with contemporary developments within ABA, including DTT, NET, PBS, and verbal behavior approaches, as well as engage in a discussion on a synthetic model of bilingual intervention. Moreover, via role play and scenario analysis, participants will explore how self-advocacy and social skills can be strengthened and provided for young children across cultures; using material based on counselling techniques cited in related journals and text, participants will discuss techniques in working with children who are identified as multicultural based on their ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or religious affiliation. |
Audience: The target audience consists of clinical practitioners, behavior consultants, teachers, therapists, and parents with experience or interest in treating children with diagnoses of ASD from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds; autism service providers extending or with plans to extend their ABA-based services to overseas communities, or overseas clinical experts, service providers, and schools adapting ABA-based interventions for autism and related developmental disorders within their cultural communities; and clinicians, behavior consultants, and teachers who are working within a bilingual context and community, socio-economically challenged groups/families, and immigrant families. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): autism treatment, bilingualism, distant consulting, social-cultural difference |
|
|
Decreasing Problem Behaviors of Children with Autism—Part 2 in a Series |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
205 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Helen P. Mader, M.A. |
HELEN P. MADER (Behavior Frontiers, LLC) |
Description: Learn to use research-based methods, which are effective in decreasing problem behaviors for children with autism. Each technique discussed will have a definition, guidelines/procedure, video examples, questions, and role play or discussion. Participants will receive a take-home training manual, which includes sample data sheets, as well as professional on-line access to Behavior Frontiers Applied Behavior Analysis Training Program With an Autism Specialization, so that they can take the on-line examination to become a Certified Behavior Instructor for Autism-1. Registration for the workshop Increasing Appropriate Behaviors of Children With Autism—Part 1 in a Series is recommended but not necessary. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Use ABA methods such as extinction and differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors (DRA) to decrease problem behaviors in children with autism and other special needs
Describe the effective use of additional reductive techniques, such as DRO, DRI, DRL, NRC, behavioral momentum, time out, and response cost, as demonstrated by their ability to answer questions regarding these methods |
Activities: Participants will watch video demonstrations of ABA methods while filling in their interactive training manual. They will also engage in role play activities to practice using ABA methods under the guidance of the training consultant. Participants will engage in break-out and group discussions, as well as Q and A of specific participant issues. |
Audience: This workshop will benefit individuals such as behavior analysts, assistant behavior analysts, line therapists, teachers, paraprofessionals, speech pathologists, and psychologists working directly with children with autism or other special needs who desire comprehensive information on the ABA methods effective to decrease problem behaviors. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): DRA, Extinction, Functional Assessment, Video Demonstrations |
|
|
Teaching "Learning to Learn" Skills to Children Diagnosed With an Autism Spectrum Disorder |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4C-3 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Justin B. Leaf, Ph.D. |
RONALD B. LEAF (Autism Partnership), MITCHELL T. TAUBMAN (Autism Partnership), JOHN JAMES MCEACHIN (Autism Partnership), JUSTIN B. LEAF (Autism Partnership) |
Description: Teachers and parents are often eager to teach children language and social and academic skills. Clearly, these are important objectives that are essential for children's well-being. It is generally recognized that in order for children to be successful in learning these skills, their disruptive behaviors must not interfere in the learning processes. Therefore, behaviors such as aggression, non-compliance, and self-stimulation must be targeted prior to teaching more formal skills. However, there is another critical prerequisite skill that is essential in order to maximize learning success. Acquiring "learning to learn" skills is absolutely pivotal in a child's success. It is really teaching children the process of learning. It is the foundation, perhaps the pivotal skill necessary for them to acquire all other skills. Often when a child is struggling in learning beginning or even advanced skills, it is because the child is deficient in this area. Learning to learn skills include attending, waiting, and changing one's behavior based upon feedback. This workshop will discuss the importance of learning to learn skills, how to set up an appropriate curriculum, and the research behind the importance of learning to learn skills. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify various curricula targeting learning to learn skills
Implement procedures to teach learning to learn skills
Identify how learning to learn skills can help improve other behaviors (e.g., language, social skills, decrease in aberrant behaviors) |
Activities: The workshop will consist of lectures from the presenters, videos of children and adolescents with autism, other videos to highlight points on the importance of "learning to learn" skills, discussion with audience members, and questions from members of the audience. |
Audience: The targeted audience for this workshop is clinicians who implement behavioral intervention with children and adolescents with autism. Teachers, professors, school administrators, parents, and graduate students would also benefit from attending the workshop. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Curriculum Development |
|
|
Evidenced-Based Practice and Building Capacity |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
618/619 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Hanna Rue, Ph.D. |
HANNA RUE (May Institute), MARISA PETRUCCELLI (May Institute), MARIA KNOX (May Institute) |
Description: There are a number of systematic reviews of the treatment literature for individuals with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) published in recent years. These reviews have led to the identification of evidence-based practice (EBP) for individuals with an ASD. In order to apply EBP in an agency, school, or community-based setting, professionals must develop a systematic plan to build capacity. Capacity building can include many components including assessment of needs, goal setting, leadership development, competency-based training, and monitoring of progress. This workshop will clarify what is meant by EBP so behavior analysts can speak meaningfully about this movement. Behavior analysts will become familiar with a range of EBP reviews of the treatment literature for individuals with an ASD. A comprehensive review of the results of the initial National Standards Project and the follow-up project, National Standards Project II, will be provided. A model and tools to build capacity in a systematic manner will be reviewed. The model will focus on systems change in human service agencies and schools, but tools can be valuable in other settings as well. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Define evidence-based practice for individuals with an ASD
Identify specific interventions and/or treatments found to have quality empirical support in the treatment literature
Describe several sources of evidence-based intervention reviews including target populations and key review standards
Identify steps necessary to systematically build capacity within a human service agency or school setting
Utilize tools provided in the workshop to initiate capacity building |
Activities: Participants will review the results of the National Standards Project and other evidence-based literature, evaluate current capacity within their system, and develop plans to build capacity by utilizing tools, guides, and worksheets provided by workshop instructors. |
Audience: The target audience for this workshop is behavior analysts, psychologists, educators, administrators, and managers in human service agencies and educational settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): capacity building, evidence-based practice, National Standards, systemic change |
|
|
First 3 Months of Behavioral Intervention for Children With Autism: A Developmental Perspective |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
602 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/DEV; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Monika M. Suchowierska, Ph.D. |
MONIKA M. SUCHOWIERSKA (Warsaw School of Social Psychology), LINDA S. HEITZMAN-POWELL (University of Kansas Medical Center) |
Description: The first 3 months of early intensive behavioral intervention are a crucial period for a young learner with autism. It has been recommended that the behavioral intervention take into account a developmental perspective, especially as it relates to behavioral cusps leading to autistic development. In this workshop, we will examine several related skills that may be present or absent in young children with autism: stimulus overselectivity, facial recognition, mutually responsive orientation, joint attention, social referencing, and relational framing. Based on this information, we will propose major therapeutic goals for the first 3 months of intervention, together with teaching strategies to accomplish those goals. Major challenges of the first 3 months will also be discussed. Video material will be used. The workshop will conclude with some suggestions for the next months of therapy. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
List developmental concepts that relate to early behavioral intervention
Characterize skills that are present or absent in young children with autism and that are behavioral cusps for autistic development
List major therapeutic goals for the first 3 months of intervention as they relate to the precursors of autism
Describe teaching strategies to accomplish the major therapeutic goals for the first 3 months of intervention
Plan the following months of therapy |
Activities: During the course of the workshop, participants will have an opportunity to analyze videos of typically developing children and autistic children to search for the behavioral cusps discussed in the workshop as well as to plan—based on videos of autistic children—goals for the beginnings of their therapy. Small group activities will be organized. |
Audience: This workshop is designed for behavior analysts who work with families of young children with autism and are responsible for programming therapeutic goals for their pupils. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Using the iPad to Aid Students With Autism to Communicate and Be Included in General Education Settings and the Community |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
616/617 (Convention Center) |
Area: AUT/AAB; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Laura Kenneally, Ed.D. |
LAURA KENNEALLY (Advance, Inc.), KATHLEEN MCCABE-ODRI (Advance, Inc.), JENNIFER CORNELY (Partners in Learning, Inc.), NICOLE PEASE (Partners in Learning, Inc.) |
Description: The iPad is being touted as a "miracle" for individuals with autism. This workshop will illustrate simple strategies that can make lasting, life-long changes for our students. Using video and lecture formats, this workshop will demonstrate how the iPad combined with the tenets of ABA can help students with autism learn to communicate and be successful in inclusion settings. The presenters will illustrate the use of several different apps and how they are used to aid students in a variety of settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Combine the technology of ABA and the technology of an iPad to create behavior change in individuals with autism
Identify how different apps on the iPad can help learners using shaping, modeling, and imitation
Use the iPad to maximize incidental teaching opportunities via making curriculum adaptations on the iPad
Use the iPad to teach students self-management
Use the Pad as a behavior change procedure to promote stimulus and response generalization
Design and implement programs on the iPad that will help monitor treatment integrity and treatment adherence to protocols |
Activities: The workshop includes lecture, video examples, and live demonstrations of the iPad applications. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for BCBAs, teachers, CST members, and psychologists. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Changing Thoughts, Feelings, and Urges |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
3A (Convention Center) |
Area: CBM/VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Abigail B. Calkin, Ph.D. |
ABIGAIL B. CALKIN (Calkin Consulting Center) |
Description: This workshop looks at thoughts, feelings, and urges as inner behaviors that a person can observe, count, and change. It reviews definitions, exercises, and the history of private events and inner behavior. The presenters will show and discuss charts of people who have counted inner behaviors as a part of improving thoughts about and feelings towards themselves, and those who have used the technique to cope with bereavement issues. The workshop also shows how to use the bottom half of the Standard Celeration Chart to record the frequencies and changes of any inner behavior. Each person will leave with a plan designed to use with someone such as a student or client. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
State the behavioral and theoretical foundations on which the study of inner behavior rests
Define thoughts, feelings, and urges and name specific ones in each category
State the behavioral theory and fundamental points and their familiarity with the research on observing and changing inner behavior
Practice writing positive thoughts, feelings, and/or urges at 30–35 per minute and saying them at 50–75 per minute
Count and record some specific inner behaviors for the duration of the workshop
Discuss and develop a plan to change inner behaviors of self or clients |
Activities: The workshop will open with an exercise that shows how it is possible to observe inner behaviors and another exercise on counting inner behaviors. The primary focus of the three hours is to identify, list, count, record, and change inner behavior and to practice these skills. There is a minimal amount of lecture on the literature and successes of this technique. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for psychologists, clinical behavior analysts, social workers, teachers of regular or special education children, and other professionals interested in behavior change of thoughts, feelings, and urges. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): inner-behavior, private-events |
|
|
CANCELED: Behavioral Methods and Strategies for Children and Adults With Brain Injury in School, Home, and Community-Based Settings |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
606 (Convention Center) |
Area: CBM/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Mahin L. Para-Cremer, M.A. |
Michael P. Mozzoni (Lakeview NeuroRehabilitation Center), MAHIN L. PARA-CREMER (Lakeview Specialty Hospital & Rehabiliation Center), JAMES PARA-CREMER (Lakeview Specialty Hospital & Rehabilitation Center) |
Description: Challenging behaviors can limit the opportunities of the individuals we serve, including access to the least restrictive educational setting, community activities, and many other quality of life activities. This workshop will review the characteristics, limitations, and challenging behaviors that are often exhibited in children and adults with brain injury; identify and review skill acquisition and teaching strategies that are successful with persons with brain injury; discuss strategies to support individuals with brain injury in day to day activities; and review components of behavior intervention planning and strategies for successful behavior management. Practice sessions and hands on activities are included to increase learning and mastery to enable participants to implement strategies to support children and adults with brain injury in school, home, and community-based settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify at lease two aspects of fluency training for classroom interventions
Identify at lease two antecedent training methods to address recall deficits
Identify three behavior management techniques useful in the classroom and community |
Activities: This workshop will involve discussion, short pairings to practice fluency methods, writing brief intervention strategies for participant-identified consumers, and training material generation activities. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts working in school and community settings with a minimum of BCaBA competence. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Adult, Brain Injury, NeuroRehabilitation, Pediatrics |
|
|
Parent Training and Consultation: Effective Strategies to Increase Buy-in and Compliance of Parents and Other Caregivers |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
304 (Convention Center) |
Area: CBM/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Susan E. Henson, M.S. |
SUSAN E. HENSON (Wellspring) |
Description: We as behaviorists have shown ourselvesto be effective at achieving behavior change with consumers, such as children/adolescents with developmental disabilities; however, we may struggle achieving generalization of skills across settings/implementers due to challenges with parent compliance and fidelity. How many times have we arrived at a session only to discover the parent or caregiver did not collect data outside of the session or implement the recommended strategies? This workshop will review contingencies with regard to parent/caregiver behavior and will teach strategies to achieve buy-in and compliance by parents/caregivers to achieve long-term change in the consumer's behavior as well as generalization across implementers (caregivers). |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify contingencies (antecedents, consequences, functions, replacement skills, and reinforcers) for parent/caregiver behavior
Identify intervention strategies (preventative and reactive) to use to achieve effective implementation by parents/caregivers |
Activities: Interaction is a must in this workshop. A comprehensive teaching style will be used, including but not limited to active verbal discussion, video, and practice activities. Take-home materials, such as tools, checklists, and sample data sheets, will be provided. |
Audience: This workshop's target audience includes introductory and intermediate BCBAs, other behaviorists, and other professionals who want to increase their skill set as related to effective parent training in applied settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): parent training |
|
|
Solving Ethical Dilemmas in the Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
211 (Convention Center) |
Area: CSE/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Weihe Huang, Ph.D. |
WEIHE HUANG (Regional Center of the East Bay) |
Description: In making decisions about behavioral interventions and services, many behavior analysts encounter ethical dilemmas when societal values, including those of service recipients and behavior analysts, conflict with each other. This workshop is designed to help enhance participants' ability to practice applied behavior analysis in an ethically responsible way by describing the characteristics of ethical dilemmas, discussing the Behavior Analyst Certification Board's Guidelines for Responsible Conduct, and introducing an ethical decision making model. In many situations where ethical dilemmas exist, the guidelines are useful in helping behavior analysts solve problems. In some cases, however, real ethical dilemmas cannot be resolved by appealing to the existing guidelines or regulations. Part of this workshop is aimed at providing applied behavior analysts with an ethical decision making model in the event that the guidelines alone are insufficient. Strategies included in this model are based on the relevant experience of the workshop instructor and the available literature in the field of behavior analysis and related areas. The emphasis of the discussion will be on the application of this model as well as the guidelines to various clinical settings, including natural homes, residential facilities, day programs, and educational programs. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify ethical issues in the field and their importance to the general public as well as to behavior analysts
Describe primary ethical principles that underlie the content of the Guidelines for Responsible Conduct
Identify and analyze ethical dilemmas that are often encountered by behavior analysts and other service providers
Assess and realize the usefulness of the Guidelines for Responsible Conduct as a tool in making ethical decisions
Use the six steps delineated in the ethical decision making model to resolve ethical dilemmas that are likely to occur in the service delivery process |
Activities: This workshop will use real life cases both provided by the instructor and generated by participants to illustrate the implementation of the Guidelines for Responsible Conduct and the steps in the ethical decision making model. Participants in this workshop will be encouraged to a) identify their values and associate these values with primary ethical principles, b) recognize the characteristics of ethical dilemmas in the field of ABA, and c) apply codes in the Guidelines for Responsible Conduct and the six steps specified in the ethical decision making model to cases that involve ethical dilemmas. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts working in various clinical settings, including natural homes, residential facilities, day programs, and educational programs, as well as psychologists working in these settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): decision making, ethical dilemmas, societal values |
|
|
Navigating the Ethics of Service Delivery for Children With Autism and Their Families |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
604 (Convention Center) |
Area: CSE/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Nanette L. Perrin, M.A. |
NANETTE L. PERRIN (University of Kansas), AMANDA L. LITTLE (University of Texas at Austin) |
Description: Why are ethics important? And if they are so important why is there not a clear path? The practice of behavior analysis is by its nature an interaction with individuals in many environments. This requires the implementation of services in an array of ways, while interacting with a variety of individuals. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board has clearly illustrated the importance of ethics in the implementation of ABA with individuals. First, they require ethical content in coursework as well as three credits of ethical content in continuing education for recertification. Beginning in 2015, the BACB will require 45 contact hours in a course devoted to ethical and professional development (www.bacb.com). Addressing the real world ethical dilemmas during implementation of applied behavior analysis with families of children with autism can be a challenging endeavor, especially for new professionals. This workshop will involve the participants in active discussion surrounding real world examples of ethical dilemmas—both in home and center based, as well as while interacting with schools. Utilizing video examples, the instructors will guide the participants through identifying the appropriate ethical guidelines; there will also be discussion regarding the appropriate options and monitoring of their ethical compass. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify what ethical guidelines are and why they are important
Identify the BACB's 10 Guidelines for Responsible Conduct (www.bacb.com)
Identify the BACB ethics application
Accurately identify ethical dilemmas presented in video role plays
Accurately identify which guideline is addressed
Accurately identify appropriate responses to ethical dilemmas |
Activities: Participants will review video scenarios and identify the ethical dilemmas and appropriate responses. Multiple scenarios involving in home, center based, school based, and community interactions will be presented. We will also review the applicable code of ethics and appropriate standards. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analysts seeking additional practice identifying and appropriately responding to ethical dilemmas they may face in their professional interactions with children and families. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism, community, ethics, home |
|
|
CANCELED: DIY Behavioral Tool Kit: Developing and Implementing Visual Materials That Support the Success of Behavior Plans |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
305 (Convention Center) |
Area: DDA/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jennifer M. Derderian, M.S. |
JENNIFER M. DERDERIAN (May Institute), DIPTI MUDGAL (May Institute) |
Description:
Visual supports, including token economies and schedules, can be used with a wide variety of students to increase target skills and decrease maladaptive behaviors. Schedules can range from simple icons boards representing one to two activities, to full day written schedules and monthly planners. The use of schedules can help students better plan and predict within their environment, as well as increase independence. Token economies are used to increase target behaviors, and can be used in combination with a response cost to decrease maladaptive behaviors. The primary focus of this workshop is to teach therapists and caregivers how to create and implement visual supports for individuals with developmental disabilities, and to serve as a platform to problem solve real life challenges facing field based clinicians and parents. After a general explanation of the theories behind these visual supports, participants will break into small groups to practice creating their own visual supports and receive feedback from presenters. Materials provided will include printouts of various visual supports and their descriptions, a sample behavior support plan, a sample of a self-monitoring data sheet, and a bi-fold communication folder that can be used to create a schedule and token board. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
-
Describe the reasoning behind using visual supports with students with disabilities
-
Identify which visual support should be used given a target behavior or skill
-
Create visual schedules, ranging from basic to complex
-
Create visual token boards, with and without a response cost component
-
Implement a wide variety of schedule and token boards
-
Discuss how to incorporate and adapt parts of the BSP development process into their current practice
|
Activities: Participants will be involved in didactic presentation, discussion, and interactive activities (e.g., making sample schedules, token boards, and response costs, and role playing how to use them).
|
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for clinicians or parents of developmentally disabled children with behavior problems. Master’s level therapists, psychologists, and family members are welcome. Participants should have a fundamental understanding of the principles of applied behavior analysis. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): behavior plans, behavioral intervention, private school |
|
|
CANCELED: Designing Single Subject Graphs Using Excel |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
615 (Convention Center) |
Area: EAB/TBA; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Heidi L. Hillman, Ph.D. |
HEIDI L. HILLMAN (Heritage University) |
Description: Single subject design graphs are critical elements in displaying research results. However, developing a graph that conveys the results as well as adheres to a manuscript preparation checklist can be a daunting experience. This workshop is intended to provide the attendee with a basic understanding of how to create both a multiple baseline and an ABA experimental design graph using Excel. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Design a multiple baseline experimental design and an ABA experimental design using Excel
Move the zero off the X-axis
Eliminate lines that cross condition lines
Modify graph features |
Activities: This workshop will involve observing graphs being conducted using Excel. Attendees will have the opportunities to ask questions throughout the workshop. |
Audience: The target audience is graduate students who are having difficulty designing single subject experimental designs using Excel. |
Content Area: Methodology |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): ABA Design, Excel graphing, Multiple baseline design |
|
|
CANCELED: Data Collection in the Schools—Implementation, Integration, and Integrity in the Age of Accountability |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
605 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Kaycee Bennett, M.A. |
BENJAMIN N. WITTS (University of Nevada, Reno), KAYCEE BENNETT (University of Nevada, Reno), ELIZABETH SEXTON (Washoe County School District) |
Description: Over the last 10 years, the Washoe County School District in Nevada has worked to develop an integrative program to help students who struggle behaviorally. In the course of their work, the team has created integrated streams of data that support each other without the necessity of additional resources. By concentrating on data that are easy to collect, code, and interpret, and that are redundant in nature, individuals in a school setting can provide accurate data reports with limited staff involvement. This workshop is aimed at individuals in school settings with either complex systems that require constant data collection, or individuals with limited personnel who require accurate data collection. Through the methodologies developed and disseminated through these efforts, it is anticipated that participants will have the ability to implement or adjust data collection such that greater utility and accuracy occur. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Select or create appropriate data collection tools
Interpret one data set with the support of another data set
Use multiple data sets to provide feedback to team members
Create and maintain unique databases for their schools |
Activities: Workshop attendees will participate in the creation of mock data streams and coding systems from which multiple analyses can be derived. |
Audience: This workshop has been designed primarily for educators, school administrators, school psychologists and counselors, and behavior analysts working in school districts. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Accountability, Classroom, Data collection, School |
|
|
Applications of Learning Efficiency Research |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
203 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Guy S. Bruce, Ed.D. |
GUY S. BRUCE (Appealing Solutions, LLC) |
Description: Is your job to teach the skills that students, staff, or clients need to achieve their goals? Effective teaching procedures are those that produce necessary performance improvement, but efficient procedures produce that improvement in the least amount of instructional time. This workshop will provide you with tools to evaluate and improve "learning efficiency," a new measure of performance improvement per amount of learner interaction time. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Define "learning efficiency"
Measure and evaluate current learning efficiencies
Describe the benefits of improving learning efficiencies
Summarize the research on learning efficiency and its application to the design of more efficient learning activities and teaching procedures |
Activities: In this workshop participants will a) discuss research findings on variables that affect learning efficiency and the application to the design of more efficient learning activities and teaching procedures, b) measure learning efficiencies, and c) evaluate learning efficiencies using a charting tool. |
Audience: This workshop will be useful to anyone interested in tools for evaluating and improving the efficiency with which learners acquire knowledge and skills. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Improving Classroom Behavior Support Practices Through Applied Behavior Analysis Interventions |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
310 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Robert F. Putnam, Ph.D. |
ROBERT F. PUTNAM (May Institute), ADAM FEINBERG (May Institute) |
Description: This workshop will provide behavior analysts with an evidence-based approach to designing effective classroom interventions. It includes the use of functional assessment as a method to systematically evaluate the classroom environment in order to design, implement, and evaluate effective classroom-wide behavioral support practices. Once the environment is assessed, the model incorporates both indirect (i.e., lecture, written training materials) and direct (i.e., modeling, performance feedback) instruction. Finally, participants will learn how teachers participate in a data-based decision making process in order to establish more effective practices, procedures, and interactions with students. Data will be presented supporting the need for a comprehensive training method that includes both indirect and direct instruction for teachers to adequately implement classroom-wide behavior support practices. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Apply functional assessment strategies to the selection and implementation of effective classroom-wide practices
Employ evidence-based methods used to train teachers in classroom-wide behavior support practices
Employ a data-based decision process used with teachers to modify classroom behavior support practices
Use instructional and behavior support practices that establish more effective interactions between teachers and students and increase on-task behavior |
Activities: Participants will have an opportunity to engage in discussions with other behavior analysts, analyze sample data, draw conclusions about relevant classroom-wide interventions, and role play the direct instruction (e.g., performance feedback) provided to teachers. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts who provide training and consultation to school teachers or paraprofessionals. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Validating Treatments Through School-Based Consultation |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
306 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Maureen O'Connor, M.A. |
MAUREEN O'CONNOR (University of Nebraska-Lincoln), POLLY DARO (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) |
Description: Typically, programs specializing in behavior analysis do not offer extensive training in consultation. Yet, behavior analysts play an indirect role by working with teachers to implement behavioral interventions. Behavioral consultation (BC) has been shown to produce greater client outcomes than other models in schools (Erchul & Martens, 2010; Martens & DiGennaro, 2008). Despite its popularity, there are reasonable grounds for being concerned with its efficiency. BC requires lengthy interviews, and practitioners typically generate hypotheses and develop interventions based on information reported by consultees without validation through direct assessment. The consultation model presented in this workshop is a revised version of BC that seeks to make the process more efficient and that integrates recent technological innovations in the field (Andersen et al., 2010). The interview objectives have been re-sequenced to reduce meeting time and arrive at an intervention more quickly. Consultant and consultee work collaboratively to determine target behaviors and select intervention components on the basis of recent technological innovations that are lacking in the original BC model. These innovations include collecting curriculum based measurement, direct observations of academic engagement, stimulus preference assessments, and brief functional analysis. This model is applicable for typical school-based referrals for both academic and behavioral problems. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Conduct and apply research-based innovations in assessment and consultation in order to identify functionally relevant interventions to address clients' academic and/or behavioral difficulties
Collectively integrate stimulus preference assessments, performance deficit analyses, brief experimental analyses, and functional assessment information in the consultation process
Utilize the data through strategic and structured decision making protocols in order to maximize productivity of consultation interviews within the school setting
Apply research-based strategies that have been shown to enhance and sustain treatment integrity
Utilize performance feedback and evaluate treatment effectiveness based on fidelity and outcome data |
Activities: Realistic case scenarios will be presented to participants, who will learn how to interpret, synthesize, and analyze case data to arrive at conclusions about target behaviors and make recommendations for treatment. Case scenarios will include interview and assessment information from each step of the consultation process, and participants will be prompted to and guided in interpretation, analysis, and application. Case scenario information will include interview data, observational data, direct assessment data, stimulus-preference assessment results, performance-deficit analysis results, and brief functional analyses. Furthermore, participants will also receive, interpret, and analyze case outcome data (client outcomes, treatment integrity, social validity information) for the purpose of summative case evaluation. Presenters will explain, demonstrate, provide learning activities, and use case examples to teach and illustrate how to validate interventions through consultation. |
Audience: This presentation is geared toward practitioners, researchers, and/or students seeking to learn how to do school-based consultation for typical academic and behavioral problems. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): School-Based Consultation |
|
|
Precision Teaching and Standard Celeration Charting Part Deux: Application of the Science |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
613/614 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Kerri L. Milyko, Ph.D. |
JEFFREY GESICK (Precision Teaching Learning Center), KERRI L. MILYKO (Precision Teaching Learning Center), JENNIFER TESTA (Morningside Academy) |
Description: Precision Teaching (PT) beginners are often proficient with the mechanics of the Standard Celeration Chart (SCC). For example, they are often able to chart frequencies, draw celerations, and discuss learning pictures displayed on the chart. However, many of these individuals are uncertain how to apply the principles of PT or the SCC to their clinical or educational work. The present workshop, therefore, will address how to take the mechanics of charting and the underlying principles of PT and use them to transform a typical education classroom, a discrete trial program, and other clinical settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Shape sensitivity to the learner
Train necessary teacher repertoires for high-quality instruction
Develop programs for new learners
Transform current programming/curriculum to a PT-friendly curriculum
Test for emergent repertoires
Sequence component/composite repertoires
Employ various interventions
The objectives will be discussed and explained by data and key representatives from Morningside Academy and Precision Teaching Learning Center. |
Activities: Participants will engage in interactive, direct instruction techniques to become fluent with the educational objectives. Next, they will practice how to transform various learning environments to those that employ PT techniques. Finally, through the review of clinical data from the two PT agencies and data provided by participants, participants will evaluate actual clinical data and interventions that led to successes or failures. Requirement: attendees are required to bring charted data to the workshop. Preferably, these data will be charted on the SCC. If not, data charted in Excel using a logarithmic y-axis will be accepted. |
Audience: The target audience will include practitioners looking to incorporate Precision Teaching, fluency-based instruction, and direct instruction into their practice. Audience members should be practitioners at or beyond the graduate level, and they should be at the programming and decision-making level of their practice. Participants should be familiar with Precision Teaching and the Standard Celeration Chart. Participants should have attended to the beginner Precision Teaching workshop prior to attending this workshop. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Component/Composite, Curriculum Development, Fluency, Precision Teaching |
|
|
Decreasing Staff to Student Ratios: Assessment Protocol and Instructional Strategies to Systematically Fade Staff Support and Promote Independent Futures for Students With Developmental Disabilities |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
3B (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Jill E. McGrale Maher, M.S. |
MICHELE D. BROCK (Crossroads School for Children), BRITANY WOJTYSIAK (Crossroads School for Children), BENJAMIN R. BRUNEAU (Crossroads School for Children), KEVIN HARDY (Crossroads School for Children), RACHEL ABRAHAM (Crossroads School for Children), MATTHEW SANKO (Crossroads School for Children), JILL E. MCGRALE MAHER (Crossroads School for Children) |
Description: Current scientific literature indicates that children with autism and other developmental disabilities learn most efficiently using individualized teaching practices based on the principles of ABA. Current economic resources require that practitioners prepare students for learning formats commonly found within the community and less restrictive environments. Typically, these environments require students to function at a high level of independence and acquire skills in groups, often not in 1:1 instructional formats. To achieve these ends, practitioners need a systematic plan to transition students from these formats, to small groups, and, when appropriate, to inclusion settings, including vocational and community settings. The model utilized in the current workshop is based on an empirically validated assessment and teaching protocol to assess and fade levels of staff support. In this workshop, participants will develop a specific assessment protocol to identify the amount and types of support necessary for students to acquire new skills and demonstrate high rates of active engagement and low rates of interfering behaviors across instructional formats. Additionally, activities will include identification of criteria for student placement in classroom groupings that maximize learning potential. Attendees will also identify teaching strategies (e.g., empirically validated systems) designated to effectively fade staff support in a systematic and empirically based manner. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Demonstrate accurate implementation of the group working skills assessment(i.e., correctly complete the data sheet and understand three specific dimensions of the assessment—student learning profile, behavioral profile, andage)
Based on the results of each student's assessment, determine the appropriate tier within the six level system
Assign students with similar profiles across the three dimensions into classroom groupings
Determine classroom learning objectives (scope and sequence) for an academic year
Identify objective criteria for determining the amount and type of staff support that a student requires across curriculum content areas and settings (1:1 vs. small group formats) and group types (academic, classroom routine, nonacademic)
Develop, implement, and evaluate strategies to transition students through the levels of support
Write individualized educational program objectives based on levels of support
Promote the use of best practices and ethical standards in levels of support |
Activities: In this workshop participants will complete the group working skills assessment (collect data using assessment, assess student working behaviors across dimensions); assign students to group levels using assessment results; identify target skills for each student; develop a schedule of support based on students' levels; evaluate data to determine a system for fading support; and create IEP objectives. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for practitioners and administrators. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Managing a Human Service Agency Using Human Performance Technology |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
308 (Convention Center) |
Area: OBM/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Kathleen S. Marshall, M.S. |
DONNIE M. STAFF (West Coast Behavioral Consultants, Inc.), SHANE D. ISLEY (West Coast Behavioral Consultants, Inc.), KATHLEEN S. MARSHALL (West Coast Behavioral Consultants, Inc.) |
Description: This workshop introduces a comprehensive approach for analyzing and managing the performance of a school, agency, or program as a system. Understanding and appreciating an organization's systemic nature is the key to managing its operations and achieving its organizational goals. In this workshop, participants will be introduced to several tools enlisted from human performance technology (HPT) to help them assess and understand the host of contextual variables operating inside and outside of their organization that might influence the accomplishment of mission related objectives. These tools drive the analysis and design of performance systems that can be maintained by employees within your organization. Well-suited for executive directors, program directors, and staff supervisors, this presentation will show how Optimal's approach to organizational management can be adopted by ABA service provider agencies to improve organization level performance. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Describe the importance of analyzing and managing your organization as a system
Describe three tools for identifying and assessing the host of contextual variables operating inside and outside of your organization
Describe Optimal's approach to organizational management and how it can significantly improve the quality of services delivered by your agency |
Activities: Participants will fill in a relationship map identifying all the components of their organization and complete a strategic planning exercise that requires them to identify/describe the following: a) one or more business results, b) goals that their agency must accomplish to achieve the business result(s), c) how they will achieve these goals, and d) the actions/tasks that must be completed to achieve these goals. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for executive directors, program directors, and staff supervisors. |
Content Area: Methodology |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Autism Center, Director, Management, OBM |
|
|
Forensic Behavior Analysis and Expert Testimony: Applications to the Legal Arena |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
212 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: W. Joseph Wyatt, Ph.D. |
W. JOSEPH WYATT (Marshall University) |
Description: The workshop applies a behavioral perspective to common forensic activities and will be helpful to the behaviorally trained practitioner who may feel overwhelmed upon walking into the forensic arena. For optimal utility, the training will focus on behaviors (e.g., criminality, disabilities), practitioner activities (e.g., assessment, functional analyses), and courtroom activities (e.g., direct and cross-examination) common to all jurisdictions. Content derives from the presenter's years as a behaviorally oriented board certified forensic psychologist who has provided testimony and consultation in hundreds of cases ranging from murder and partner abuse to assessment of developmental disabilities. Limitations relative to differences in state laws will be addressed as will ethical guidelines and standards. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Describe, in behavioral terms, common forensic activities including assessment of competence to stand trial and criminal responsibility
Assess for malingering
Functionally analyze a number of behaviors including murder, chronic fire setting, shoplifting, obscene phone calls, and repetitive return to an abusive partner
Identify skills that will help them better cope with cross-examination |
Activities: The workshop will be conducted in a didactic/interactive style that includes a number of participant exercises deriving from cases within the presenter's files and high-profile forensic cases such as that of the DC Beltway sniper. |
Audience: Participants should be doctoral and master's level practitioners who are involved in the court/legal arenas, or who anticipate being so involved. It also will be useful to faculty members who anticipate that their students may someday be involved in forensic activities such as forensic assessment, expert testimony, and the like. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Clinical Behavior Analysis: Mode Deactivation Therapy and Behavioral Coaching |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
620 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Michael Weinberg, Ph.D. |
JACK A. APSCHE (Apsche Center), MICHAEL WEINBERG (Achieve Beyond Pediatric Therapy and Autism Services, Bilinguals, Inc.) |
Description: Mode Deactivation Therapy (MDT) as a CBA was developed by Apsche through a series of studies to address adolescent males who were not amenable to regular cognitive therapy. MDT was developed out of a necessity to address the growing number of "treatment failures" at a residential treatment center, and then continued development in out-patient settings. Strategies of DBT (radical acceptance and validation), FAP (developing and addressing the function of the problem of the client), and ACT (addressing a problem contextually rather than in typical content) are used as part of MDT. MDT is a manualized approach to treatment that strongly emphasizes good case conceptualization and respectful collaboration with the adolescent. MDT family therapy is also fully manualized, having been developed for families of adolescents who are receiving MDT individual therapy. This workshop will focus on treating adolescents who have issues with conduct and personality characteristics (i.e., both physical and sexual aggression, and trauma) with Apsche's MDT. MDT, a so-called "third wave" therapeutic approach, has been shown to be effective with this population in a series of treatment research and case studies. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
State theoretical constructs of MDT
Use functional analysis of complex adolescent behavior
Describe ways in which MDT implements a complete functional analysis
Identify the steps in MDT
Define and implement key components of behavioral coaching methods |
Activities: This workshop will include breakout activities to first identify client behavior problems and practice function analysis of the problem behaviors, apply results of FA and implement MDT, and practice behavioral coaching methods.
|
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for practitioners interested in the use of clinical behavior analysis approaches with clinical populations of adolescents and adults. This is an introductory level workshop for those just entering the field or interested in providing behavior analytic methods for traditional clinical populations (i.e., non-DD/non-ASD groups). |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Aggressive Adolescents, Behavioral Coaching, CBA, MDT |
|
|
Disability to Management: From Function to Treatment |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
303 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/EAB; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Martin Thomas Ivancic, Ph.D. |
MARTIN THOMAS IVANCIC (J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center) |
Description: Treatments based on function from long-established applied and animal studies are used to present a broad perspective on function including overt and covert control. Personal experimental case studies from more than 36 years of practice are used to exemplify function-based treatments to solve behavior problems of people with disabilities and the staff delivering those services with an emphasis on the different issues presented when the participant does and does not have language for both positive reinforcement (pride in work, positive self-concept) and negative reinforcement/punishment (escape/avoidance, suffering, elicited aggression) conditions. Problems people present are viewed as a normal result of learning experiences as opposed to a diagnosed condition. A value is placed on viewing behavior as something that is done (a verb) as opposed to traditional therapy models suggesting that behavior is something your client is (a diagnosed condition). Discussions are conducted to articulate automatic positive and automatic negative reinforcement contingencies, concerns with covert behavioral explanations, and how desirable behavior might be maintained without the constant need for a supervisor. Discussion of current clinical issues will include attempts to suggest behavior analytic functions and possible treatments for meltdowns, "going postal," PTSD, psychosis, depression, etc. and when to refer to another clinician. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Categorize treatments related to functions for positive and negative reinforcement, and positive and negative punishment; for social, tangible, and automatic contingencies; and for when the most salient stimulus is outside or inside the body
Identify the difference between behavior reduction that occurs from presenting a larger punisher (something bigger to worry about), replacement behavior (something better to do), or extinction (absence of the historic reinforcer)
Identify the biological precedence aversive control takes over positive control
Describe covert contingencies—that is, although not completely worked out, consider the utility of covert (internal) control for the organization of information (i.e., derived behavior such as stimulus equivalence and relational framing) and the maintenance of behavior occurring in prescribed programs (typically with positive control) and without any prescribed program (typically with aversive control)
Take data—without a count of the behavior you have nothing to consider
Describe and always consider multiple control as the potential explanation for a response
Describe the importance of holding information lightly and supporting an appreciation for how much more there is to know about influencing behavior with a constant (inductive) readiness to change our understanding of past data when new information suggests what we believe is incorrect
Describe the considerations that go into knowing when to refer by understanding potential controls, the danger of the behavior, and one's own skills |
Activities: In this workshop, participants will do the following:
Use a table to help relate form and function of a target response to determine treatment.
Participate in discussions of recognized events (e.g., melt-down, "going postal," assimilation/accommodation, self-concept, pride, depression, etc.) to offer behavior analytic explanations for these potential functions.
Rank order a list of positive and aversive experiences for their potential relevance in a program, and practice how the list changes when one of the upper items is removed.
Read a scenario that offers a condition such as showing a problem behavior occurring whenever a caretaker walks by and asking for a potential behavior analysis (i.e., social attention). Add information that the participant has had a bowel accident to see if the assessment changes (i.e., social need).
Complete a brief outline to place a response within a function, level of danger, and your own skills to determine if referral is required. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for practitioners who are concerned that their clients receive effective treatments that are derived from relevant functions, and that the behavior of the individuals who conduct these treatments maintain the integrity of those programs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): behavior analysis, covert contingencies, practice |
|
|
Applying the Concepts of Error Prevention and Root Cause Analysis to Events Related to Crisis Behaviors |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
2A (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/TPC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Merrill Winston, Ph.D. |
LARAINE WINSTON (Professional Crisis Management, Inc.), MERRILL WINSTON (Professional Crisis Management, Inc.) |
Description: Unlike professionals in medical fields and the allied therapies, behavior analysts and other human services professionals are not routinely trained in medical error (i.e., treatment error) prevention and management, and are rarely given the training and tools needed to conduct a thorough root cause analysis when adverse events related to crisis behaviors and responses to them do occur. This presentation covers important principles and practices borrowed from the medical error prevention movement that will help non-medical human services organizations increase the safety of their consumers and staff and reduce the risk to their organizations related to serving persons with behavioral challenges. A tool to use proactively as a risk assessment and for conducting a thorough root cause analysis will be presented and provided to participants. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
State significant events in the history of the error prevention movement and root cause analysis
Identify three methods used for conducting root cause analyses
Define sentinel events and behavioral sentinel events
Apply root cause analysis methods to a real life case study.
Demonstrate the use of the BCIRA tool |
Activities: Workshop participants will learn about current issues in crisis management and safety of consumers who engage in aggressive behavior, significant events in the history of the error prevention movement, and root cause analysis and how all of these issues apply to the work performed by behavior analysts. Methods for preventing, and conducting root cause analyses in response to, sentinel events will be presented, demonstrated, and practiced using real life case scenarios. The BCIRA risk assessment tool will be presented and reviewed. |
Audience: The target audience of this workshop is behavior analysts and other behavioral professionals who work hands on with consumers who exhibit aggressive behavior and who are subject to physical crisis management strategies (physical restraint). |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
CANCELED: Bridging the Gap Between Applied Behavior Analysis and a Health and Fitness Practice |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
309 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Megan M. Coatley, M.A. |
MEGAN M. COATLEY (SPARK Behavior Solutions, LLC), RAUL MENDOZA (Walden University) |
Description: As behavior analysts we are armed with the capability to increase healthy behaviors and the obligation to tackle issues of social significance. Obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, and other degenerative diseases currently plaguing our society are, in many cases, the byproduct of disordered patterns of behavior. Health practitioners are constantly dealing with a revolving door of preventable health problems. No matter our career focus, it is increasingly clear that, to "save the world with behavior analysis," we need to utilize our skill set to promote healthy lifestyle habits for our clients, our employees, and ourselves. Participants will learn to use behavior analysis to assess and improve nutrition, physical fitness, and health-related lifestyle habits, as well as how to incorporate health and fitness goals within their current practice (e.g., family services, developmental disabilities, organizational management, etc.). The speakers will describe unique marketing and PR techniques for reaching out to potential clients and teaming with traditional and integrative health practitioners to increase the reach of behavior analysis and to access a larger client base. The workshop will cover identification of health-related goals, data-based decision making, and disseminating the strategies of behavior analysis to promote ongoing healthy changes. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Assess current health and fitness related behaviors using industry standard metrics and functional behavioral assessment
Identify personalized health and wellness goals and break these down into achievable benchmarks via task analysis
Through preference assessments, identify preferred activities, possible reinforcers, and incentives for and environmental barriers to participating in healthy behaviors
Employ specific behavioral strategies such as self-monitoring, behavioral contracting, performance management, and public posting to achieve health and fitness goals
Use unique methods of data collection, charting, and graphing (including Internet gaming, mobile phone applications, and social media) to improve health and fitness related behaviors
Build a collaborative network of health and wellness practitioners and disseminate behavior analytic health and fitness programming through targeted marketing and public relations strategies |
Activities: Participants will a) be guided though presented information with PowerPoint slides, worksheets, demonstrations, and lecture handouts that will provide the information necessary to develop effective programs for improving healthy lifestyle behaviors; b)have the opportunity to sample unique and innovative activities, technologies, and equipment designed to promote physical fitness; c) engage in discussion regarding the use of behavior analysis strategies for health and fitness in their current line of work, and brainstorm applications and how to locate potential clientele within their community; and d) demonstrate new skills acquired by developing a program to facilitate health-related behavior change. |
Audience: The target audience is BCBAs, BCaBAs, psychologists, personal trainers, and other professionals in the field of behavioral medicine who are looking to broaden their practice or learn more about behavior analytic principles as they relate to health and wellness. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Behavioral Wellness, Eating Habits, Health Coaching, Prescriptive Exercise |
|
|
CANCELED: Ethical Considerations for Applied Behavior Analysts |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
603 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/TPC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Tyra P. Sellers, Ph.D. |
TYRA P. SELLERS (STE Consultants), MATTHEW T. BRODHEAD (Utah State University), KRISTEN KELLEY (Utah State University), JOY S. POLLARD (Utah State University), THOMAS S. HIGBEE (Utah State University) |
Description: This workshop is designed to advance the understanding of ethical standards of the behavior analyst. We will review the ethical guidelines of the BACB and discuss scenarios related to common ethical dilemmas in a clinical practice. We will provide tools to develop supervisory systems for monitoring and maintaining ethical conduct. We will address training direct-line staff on maintaining the ethical standards of your organization. Finally we will cover the limits of scope of practice as well as address requests to integrate non-empirically based practices and procedures. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify a situation in which an individual has violated the BACB code of ethics and discuss various situations in dealing with that violation
Outline a simple ethics supervisory system to apply to their organization
Identify the six steps of behavioral systems analysis and how they can be applied to developing an ethics management system
Describe the three steps of performance-based instruction and how they can be applied to teaching ethical behavior
Develop strategies for dealing with ethical concerns when they arise during consultation or clinical services, such as addressing concerns with non-empirically based practices and procedure |
Activities: The workshop will begin by reviewing the BACB code of ethics and having participants answer via response cards whether or not a specific code has been violated. Strategies for dealing with that violation will be discussed. Then, the basic principles of behavioral systems will be reviewed and applied to developing a system of ethics management in an organization. The basic foundation of performance-based instruction will be covered, and participants will practice developing strategies for teaching ethical behavior in their organization using performance-based instruction. Finally, we will cover ethical issues that often arise during clinical practice. The group will share common concerns and stories of their own experiences, and together, we will develop possible solutions to those problems. |
Audience: The target audience includes MA or Ph.D. behavior analysts who work in clinical settings. Behavior analysts who run applied research settings may also be interested in this workshop. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): behavioral systems, clinical practice, ethics, service providers |
|
|
CANCELED: Using Excel for Analyzing Treatment Outcomes in Applied Settings |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
307 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Christina Barosky, M.A. |
CHRISTINA BAROSKY (The BISTA Center), REBECCA RENEE WISKIRCHEN (ACCEL), LISA M. STEWART (The BISTA Center), LYDIA MACKAY (The BISTA Center) |
Description: Participants are required to bring a laptop with the Excel application. Visual display of data is imperative when communicating functional relationships and intervention outcomes with consumers and fellow practitioners. BCBAs are expected to be skillful in using graphs to convey results. However, simply possessing knowledge of graphical displays may not transfer to effective or efficient software use. Excel is an efficient way for behavior analysts to create graphs. Excel graphs convey effect across multiple-baseline, alternating treatment, and reversal designs. In addition, Standard Celeration Charts and cumulative review graphs are often used to display client progress. These graph types are often used to display interview results (e.g., FAST, MAS), preference assessment, structural and functional analyses, treatment (i.e., DRA, DRNO, FCT, etc.), and discrete trial program outcomes. While Microsoft Excel 2003 and 2007 can be difficult to use, this workshop will provide participants with hands on training promoting effective use. At the completion of the workshop attendees will be able to create spreadsheets and data sets, as well as graphs (e.g., alternating treatment designs, reversal designs, cumulative record), and manipulate graph components (e.g., axes, phase change lines). Instructors will provide several models, followed by opportunities for participants to practice with feedback. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Set up specific spreadsheets and input and manipulate data within an Excel 2003 and 2007 spreadsheet
Create graphs for alternating treatment, reversal, multiple-baseline designs, standard celeration, and cumulative records
Use the chart wizard, construct graphs of all data or select data sets within a spreadsheet, and update databases and graphs as data collection continues
Manipulate graph components (e.g., axes, data points, data paths, secondary axis) and use drawing tools to insert additional components (e.g., arrows, data labels, phase change lines, boxes) |
Activities: Participants will be provided concise instruction and several models, followed by two case examples completed with instructor support to ensure skill acquisition. Finally, participants will complete a case example that provides opportunities to solve challenges inherent in the Excel 2003 and 2007 and Mac 2011 applications. The case examples will consolidate and increase fluency of the skills taught during the instructional phase of the workshop. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for behavior analysts, practitioners, students, researchers, educational service providers, and others interested in visual displays of data in single-subject research and program progress. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Excel, graphing |
|
|
CANCELED: iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch Applications for Behavioral Assessment and Intervention |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
204 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Paul Chrustowski, Ph.D. |
PAUL CHRUSTOWSKI (Future Help Designs), CHRISTIAN MARCILLO (Future Help Designs), GLEN KONOPASKIE (Future Help Designs) |
Description: Attendees will be introduced to two applications for the iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch platforms that will maximize efficiency in conducting behavioral assessments and interventions. iBAA (Behavioral Assessment Application) is an application for comprehensive behavioral assessment including qualitative assessment, cumulative frequencies, interval recording with peer referencing, and functional behavioral assessment (FBA). Features also allow for the assessment of the training or teaching environment and of trainer/teacher behavior. iBAA allows for discreet use and easy entry of behavioral data and generates meaningful reports, graphs, and tables, which can easily be exported and integrated into a psychological report. Keep In Mind is a companion application for assisting in implementation of behavior intervention plans. The application delivers fully customizable prompts to clients or to behavior plan implementers. A required response to the prompt provides feedback to the plan administrator/behavior analyst, which can be used as treatment compliance and intervention fidelity data. Devices will be available so that attendees can obtain hands on training in the use of these applications. Other advances in technology in development that may be of interest to behavior analysts will also be discussed. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Access the applications and available resources to successfully and independently use them for practice
Use iBAA for qualitative assessment, cumulative behavioral frequencies, interval recording with and without peer referencing, functional behavioral assessment, and assessment of the learning environment
Generate and export reports of behavioral data
Use Keep In Mind to develop and deliver fully customizable prompts as part of a behavior intervention plan and access feedback data to assess treatment compliance and/or fidelity of implementation |
Activities: Workshop trainers will demonstrate all aspects of the applications through didactic methods. Comparisons will be drawn to other existing behavioral assessment and intervention tools, highlighting how these applications maximize cost effectiveness and efficiency. Attendees will be able to practice with the devices under the tutelage of the trainers. |
Audience: The target audience is behavioral practitioners with an interest in the use of technology to enhance their practice. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Behavior Intervention, Behavioral Assessment, FBA, Technology |
|
|
From Stabilization to Generalization: The Role and Importance of Behavior Analysis in All Levels of Post Acute Interdisciplinary Treatment Planning With Survivors of Traumatic Brain Injury |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
214 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Chris M. Schaub, M.Ed. |
CHRIS M. SCHAUB (ReMed), CHRISTINA M. PETERS (ReMed) |
Description: The workshop will include an overview of behavior analytic philosophy, principles, and procedures toward developing effective interventions for specific target behaviors as well as more broadly developing and implementing comprehensive, interdisciplinary treatment programs for individuals with intensive neurobehavioral needs, including aggression, elopement, resistance, dual diagnosis, etc. The primary focus is to present information that will help clinicians and others identify and prioritize treatment plan elements that are essential to integrated, comprehensive neurobehavioral rehabilitation. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Demonstrate beginning knowledge of the complex medical, behavioral, and cognitive sequelae associated with survivors of TBI with co-occurring issues
Describe the phases of post acute TBI programming, from stabilization, evaluation, and treatment to discharge planning, preparation, and transition
Identify the ways in which the role of the behavior analyst can impact interdisciplinary treatment at all phases of planning and implementation
Describe how key behavior analytic concepts and principles can be incorporated into each phase of neurobehavioral programming
Demonstrate a beginning knowledge of the behavior analytic model established by the co-presenters to guide interdisciplinary team efforts to integrate, prioritize, and program for this challenging population |
Activities: The presenters will provide an overview of ReMed's neurobehavioral population and services, followed by an in-depth discussion of the philosophy and programming that have been developed for this population. Attendees will participate in a hands on activity designed to review relevant behavior analytic concepts, principles, and procedures and learn how and when each is used within the model to guide the interdisciplinary treatment. Participants will practice implementing the model presented via analysis and discussion of specific case examples to demonstrate application of basic concepts, principles, and tools. |
Audience: This workshop is intended for behavior analysts and/or interdisciplinary treatment team members currently working or interested in working with survivors of traumatic brain injury with complex neurobehavioral sequelae. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Brain Injury, Interdisciplinary team, Neurobehavioral, Rehabilitation |
|
|
CANCELED: Data Collection and Measurement Strategies in Community Settings That Have Variability That Cannot Be Controlled |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
611 (Convention Center) |
Area: PRA/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mary Roberta Hoadley, M.Ed. |
MARY ROBERTA HOADLEY (Parley Services Limited) |
Description: In community settings, reporting data is increasingly recognized as necessary for the effective allocation of system resources. ABA offers a unique best practice in this regard. Adults who live in and participate in community settings receive variable supports from variable supporters, where valid and reliable data collection can be challenging. In this session we will consider the importance of good data collection to ensure that interventions are effective, and to provide feedback and outcomes measurement. We will look at effective methods for data collection and measurement reporting, to facilitate a contextual fit for measurement tools with nonprofessional observers and environments. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Operationalize objective, observable, measurable actions for the ongoing evaluation of interventions as outcomes for the purpose of measurement
Describe at least three single-case designs for systematically analyzing variables, and for demonstrating functional relationships, which include the basic essentials of establishing baselines and increasing inter-observer agreement in data-taking in community settings with nonprofessional observers
Identify behavioural and environmental contexts in which each type of data collection methodology would be appropriate, and identify how to ethically report the data |
Activities: This presentation will enhance the ability of behaviour analysts to design and implement effective data collection for adults in community settings with high variability such that valid and reliable data collection can be challenging. We will consider the importance of good data collection to ensure that interventions are effective and to provide feedback and outcomes measurement. We will look at effective methods for data collection, to facilitate the contextual fit of measurement tools in nonprofessional environments. We will also explore the added benefits of incorporating data collection as a tool to improve fidelity in interventions through focusing staff attention or client attention on targeted behaviour and specific technologies. We will review how to use Excel for graphing reports, and digital copies of a variety of measurement strategies will beprovided. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for ABA practitioners working with adults or working in community and facility settings. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Advanced |
Keyword(s): Adults, Behavior Measurement, Community settings, Data collection |
|
|
CANCELED: Interteaching: A Practical Pedagogy for Promoting Performance in Higher Education |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
206 (Convention Center) |
Area: TBA/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Michelle Turan, M.A. |
CHRYSTAL E.R. JANSZ (Texas Tech University), BRYAN K. SAVILLE (James Madison University), MICHELLE TURAN (University of Windsor) |
Description: The current emphasis on accountability within fields such as education, behavior analysis, rehabilitation, and psychology translates directly to higher education institutions' responsibility to demonstrate effective teaching to produce students who are able to perform effectively outside of the classroom. This workshop will define, describe, and demonstrate interteaching (Boyce & Hineline, 2002), an evidence-based method of classroom instruction. Interteaching is rooted in behavior analytic principles, incorporating components of personalized systems of instruction (Keller, 1968), Precision Teaching (Lindsley, 1896), and cooperative learning (Halpern, 2004) and has been shown to improve student learning more than traditional methods of instruction (e.g., Saville, Zinn, & Elliott, 2005; Saville, Zinn, Neef, Van Norman, & Ferreri, 2006). Participants will have the opportunity to work through an interteaching session and practice each of the individual components with instructors who use and conduct research on interteaching in their classes. This workshop will prepare participants to implement interteaching in their own classrooms. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Identify the conceptual basis of interteaching
Identify the literature demonstrating the effectiveness of interteaching
Demonstrate a solid foundation in each interteaching component (i.e., preparation guides, teaching records)
Write effective study guide questions and follow-up lectures
Implement interteaching in their own classrooms |
Activities: Participants will have the opportunity to work through an interteaching session as students experience it in the classroom. Specifically, students will work in pairs to complete a preparation guide, complete a teaching record, and experience a brief follow-up lecture. Following this activity, instructors will work with participants as they practice formulating quality preparation guide questions, an integral part of interteaching. Instructors will also engage in problem solving with participants, discussing possible challenges instructors may face in their own institutions when incorporating interteaching into their classrooms. Examples of challenges to be presented include incorporating interteaching into longer and less frequent class periods, managing the "start-up" workload, engaging in discourse with colleagues about moving to novel methods of instruction, and sharing data with colleagues. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for those engaged in classroom instruction (e.g., professors, instructors) as well as program and department chairs in higher education. It will also be beneficial to graduate students pursuing faculty positions. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): classroom instruction, higher education, student performance, teaching |
|
|
CANCELED: The Historical Origins of B. F. Skinner's Theory of Operant Behavior |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
8:00 AM–11:00 AM |
4C-4 (Convention Center) |
Area: TPC/VBC; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Kristjan Gudmundsson, Ph.D. |
KRISTJAN GUDMUNDSSON (Reykjavik College of Women) |
Description: In this workshop will be an explanation and demonstration of the exact historical origins of B. F. Skinner's experimental research, with emphasis both on the beginnings of Skinner's operant research and his neglected and original research on human verbal behavior, which the present author has demonstrated to have begun as early as 1934. The course of Skinner's research from the time he began his studies at Harvard in 1928 all the way up to and including 1938, when he published his groundbreaking work, The Behavior of Organisms, will be covered. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to:
Connect their own current research to the origins of operant research, whether it be basic experimental work or higher level work on, for example, verbal behavior
Examine and explain the exact historical beginnings of B. F. Skinner's work (it is well known that this work is experimental, but it is also interpretative, in the sense that Skinner was all along also interested in complex human—verbal—behavior) |
Activities: This workshop will involve going through the papers and unpublished material of B. F. Skinner from the time he entered Harvard graduate school up to the time he published his groundbreaking work, The Behavior of Organisms. Topics will include the debate with Konorski and Miller, the early and original research on the verbal summator, and of course the very early experimental work with rats and other animals, in the attempt to find a pure unit of behavior and a way to measure it. |
Audience: This workshop is appropriate for researchers in both basic animal research and also verbal behavior, as well as applied research, as Skinner very early on showed excellent ability to develop his own unique research interests. By way of example, the audience can benefit from Skinner's approach, whether it be basic, verbal, or applied. |
Content Area: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): operant, origins, Skinner, verbal |
|
|
Building Children's Emotional, Social and Academic Bank Accounts: Working in Schools |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–1:50 PM |
6E (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jennifer L. Austin (University of Glamorgan) |
CAROLYN WEBSTER-STRATTON (University of Washington) |
Dr. Carolyn Webster-Stratton is Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington. She is a licensed clinical psychologist and nurse-practitioner and over the past 30 years has conducted numerous randomized control group studies to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programs for promoting social and emotional competence, school readiness skills and preventing conduct problems in high risk populations. She has also evaluated teacher, parent and child treatment programs for children diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Conduct Disorder, and ADHD. She has developed the Incredible Years Series which include separate training programs, intervention manuals, and DVDs for use by trained therapists, teachers and group leaders to promote children's social competence, emotional regulation and problem solving skills and reduce their behavior problems. The objectives of these interventions are to help parents and teachers provide young children (0-12 years) with a strong emotional, social, and academic foundation so as to achieve the longer term goal of reducing the development of depression, school drop out, violence, drug abuse, and delinquency in later years. She has published numerous scientific articles and chapters as well as a book for parents entitled, Incredible Babies, Incredible Toddlers and The Incredible Years: A trouble shooting guide for parents of children aged 2–8 years, a book for teachers entitled, How to promote children's social and emotional competence, a book for therapists entitled, Troubled Families-Problem Children, and four books for children concerning problem-solving, anger management and learning problems. These interventions have been translated in many languages and are being used in more than 15 countries and have received many awards including the 1997 National Mental Health Lela Rowland Prevention Award for best mental health prevention program, the Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention "Blueprint" award and the Department of Health and Social Services, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention award for "exemplary" interventions. Dr Webster-Stratton has been the recipient of the prestigious National Mental Health Research Scientist Award. Please see www.incredibleyears.com for articles and more information. Note: Dr. Webster-Stratton provides training and supplemental instructional materials for these programs, and therefore stands to gain financially from a positive report. This financial interest has previously been disclosed to the University of Washington and research is being managed consistent with federal and university policy. |
Abstract: As many as eight percent of young children are highly aggressive, oppositional, impulsive, inattentive and difficult to parent or teach. Long-term studies show that such children are at high risk for developing conduct disorders that lead to school drop-out, delinquency, violence, and substance abuse. Because conduct disorders are the most expensive mental health disorder in this country, this is a problem of public health importance. Identifying these high risk children as early as possible in schools and helping teachers and parents work together to promote their social competence and self-regulation skills and reduce their aggression is key to preventing the development of conduct disorders. Dr. Carolyn Webster-Stratton will present an overview of her evidence-based prevention and treatment programs for teachers, parents and children including a review of research outcomes and video examples of the different programs. |
Target Audience: Psychologists |
Learning Objectives: 1. To describe the benefits of early identification of children likely to develop conduct disorder 2. To describe the content of the Incredible Years classroom and parent training programs 3. To describe the evidence base of the Incredible Years classroom and parent training programs |
|
|
|
|
Birds ofa Feather: Applied Behavior Analysis and Quality Of Life |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–1:50 PM |
303/304 (TCC) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Eileen Gambrill, Ph.D. |
Chair: Ronnie Detrich (Wing Institute) |
EILEEN GAMBRILL (University of California, Berkeley) |
Eileen Gambrill is the Hutto Patterson Professor of Child and Family Studies at the School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley where she teaches both research and practice. Her research interests include professional decision-making; evidence-informed practice and the role of critical thinking within this; propaganda in the helping professions and its effects; and the ethics of helping. Recent publications include Propaganda in the helping professions (2012), Oxford; Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgements and decisions (3rd Ed.) (2012); John Wiley & Sons; and Critical thinking for helping professionals: A skills-based workbook (with Len Gibbs) (3rd Ed.) (2009), Oxford. |
Abstract: Applied behavior analysts have been helping people to enhance the quality of their lives for decades. Its very characteristics as described by Baer, Wolf and Risley in 1968 continue to guide efforts to help clients and their significant others. Yet this knowledge often languishes unused and unappreciated. Distortions and misrepresentations of applied behavior analysis and radical behaviorism abound. Applied behavior analysis is deeply contextual and deeply concerned with social validity—with the views of clients and significant others in terms of what matters. These very characteristics make it radical in terms of shedding light on dysfunctional contingencies that some may wish to remain hidden. But given that ABA and quality of life are birds of a feather, we must become more adept at highlighting this close relationship. An agenda for accomplishing this is suggested. This agenda includes drawing on technologies such as the Internet including interactive opportunities to highlight avoidable ignorance and related harms and missed opportunities to help clients to enhance the quality of their lives. Related research in the areas of critical thinking, evidence-informed practice and social persuasion is drawn on in designing this agenda. |
Keyword(s): critical thinking, evidence-informed, social persuasion |
|
|
|
|
Why Skinner Considered Verbal Behavior His Most Important Work |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–1:50 PM |
6BC (Convention Center) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Julie S. Vargas, Ph.D. |
Chair: Per Holth (Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences) |
JULIE S. VARGAS (B. F. Skinner Foundation) |
Dr. Julie S. Vargas is president of the B. F. Skinner Foundation and a former president of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. Along with Dr. Scott Wood, she was a founder and senior editor of The Behavior Analyst. Dr. Vargas is on the editorial boards of several journals, including The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. She is author of four books, including Behavior Analysis for Effective Teaching, published in 2009. Her publications include two encyclopedia entries on B. F. Skinner as well as articles on instructional design, on Skinner’s life and work, and on verbal behavior. Dr. Vargas is currently involved in archival work in conjunction with the B. F. Skinner Foundation and the Harvard University Archives. |
Abstract: B. F. Skinner called Verbal Behaviorhis most important work. It is the only book entirely devoted to human behavior, a topic he had avoided in his 1938 book Behavior of Organisms. However, by 1938 Skinner had already begun work on the book that was to become Verbal Behavior. This paper traces Skinner’s comments in personal notes, correspondence, talks, and publications about verbal behavior and its importance for a science of behavior. |
Target Audience: #none# |
Learning Objectives: 1. List two features of the book Verbal Behavior that were responsible for Skinner saying the book was “his most important work.”
2. Explain how the main characteristics of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior extended his experimental laboratory work.
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment and Treatment of Restricted and Repetitive Behavior |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
305 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Stacie Bancroft (New England Center for Children) |
Discussant: Timothy R. Vollmer (University of Florida) |
CE Instructor: Stacie Bancroft, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Abstracts for talks submitted individually |
|
Increasing Variability During Play for Children With Autism |
STACIE BANCROFT (New England Center for Children), Rachel H. Thompson (Western New England Universtiy), Nate Rodriguez (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: Invariable or repetitive behavior is a defining feature of autism and can often emerge during the play time of children with this diagnosis. In some situations invariable play may limit learning opportunities and delay developmental growth. Results of basic and applied research suggest that reinforcement of variable responding may be a viable intervention strategy for use with individuals diagnosed with autism. Three children diagnosed with autism participated in the current study. Each of the children demonstrated a type of invariable selection of play materials during play time activities. We implemented lag schedules of reinforcement to increase variability and added additional procedures (e.g., blocking, added discriminative stimuli, intensive training sessions) when necessary. Although variable responding was achieved for all three participants, varying levels of intervention were required for each participant. Generalization of effects across activities was found for one participant, whereas effects did not generalize for the remaining participants. The results of the current study support previous findings in which variable responding was shown to be sensitive to reinforcement. Additionally, we demonstrated practical solutions for increasing variability in play item selection when lag schedules alone are or are not effective. |
|
Functional Analysis and Treatment of Perseverative Behavior |
DAVID E. KUHN (Westchester Institute for Human Development), Stephanie A. Contrucci Kuhn (Westchester Institute for Human Devleopment), Patricia A. Moss-Lourenco (Westchester Institute for Human Development), Nicole Pearson (Westchester Institute for Human Development) |
Abstract: Stereotypic and/or restricted patterns of behavior are defining characteristics of autism spectrum disorders. Within this cluster is a group of behavior referred to as perseverative speech referring to the repetition of the same word, phrase or topic when it is no longer appropriate to continue speaking (about that topic). The demonstration of these behaviors can significantly interfere with the development of appropriate social and communication skills. In the current study, two participants (ages 9yrs and 21yrs) diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders were referred for the assessment and treatment of persistent perseverative speech. Initially, functional analyses were conducted with each participant. It is often assumed that these behaviors persist independent of social consequences. For one participant the results of the functional analysis confirmed this assumption; however, results with the second participant demonstrated that contingent delivery of social attention maintained the perseverative speech. For each participant function-based treatments were developed where-in perseverative speech was reduced and appropriate speech increased. Results of this study support the utility of conducting functional analyses regardless of prior assumptions based on response topography, and add to existing research on the effectiveness of function-based interventions on behaviors identified as symptoms of autism spectrum disorders. |
|
Evaluating the Use of a Multiple Schedule for Identifying Treatment Effects and Motivational Effects |
DELNA H. BHARUCHA (New England Center for Children), Julie Elizabeth McKendry (New England Center for Children), William H. Ahearn (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: Many traditional treatment evaluations, such as withdrawal designs, are time and labor intensive. One purpose of this study was to evaluate the multiple schedule as a method to rapidly identify treatment effects when implementing response interruption for stereotypic behavior. Additionally, given that it has been suggested that response blocking can function as an establishing operation for stereotypy (Rapp, 2006), this study also examined whether consistent motivative effects were obtained in baseline components following components in which response interruption was implemented. Participants were males diagnosed with autism whose stereotypy was maintained by automatic reinforcement. Multiple schedules were arranged in which BL and response interruption components were alternated. Two types of response interruption were used for each participant. The multiple schedule analyses were then compared to the results of a withdrawal design comparison of the same conditions (i.e., ABABACAC). IOA was collected for 33% of sessions and was always above 90%. Treatment effects were detected via a proportional analysis of the treatment relative to the baseline conditions for the multiple schedule analysis. More profound treatment effects were obtained during the ABABACAC comparisons. Abolishing operations were seen in the RIRDm and RIRDv components, while establishing operation effects were seen with the RI component. |
|
|
|
|
Contemporary Research in the Acquisition of Complex Social Skills |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
LL02 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Marianne L. Jackson (California State University, Fresno) |
CE Instructor: Marianne L. Jackson, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium presents a range of presentations on the development of complex skills considered necessary for effective social interactions. The first study analyzed the effects of deictic frame training, thought to be necessary for perspective taking, on performance on traditional Theory of Mind tests. Participants were all children with a diagnosis of autism. Data suggest that training on deictic frames is not sufficient to impact performance on Theory of Mind tests. The second study examined one type of deictic frame (I-YOU) by training multiple exemplars and testing for generalization across all levels of complexity. Data suggest that responses to the relations of I-YOU show the property of generalization only after multiple exemplar training has occurred within that level of complexity. These data add weight to the suggestion that deictic relations form a generalized operant. The third study evaluated the use of multiple exemplar training to teach children with autism to understand and respond to metaphorical questions. Result show that this methodology was effective in teaching appropriate responses to metaphorical statements. In addition, all participants showed generalization to untrained metaphors. The final presentation discusses the evolution of a data-driven behavioral social skills program. Issues discussed include the difficulty of obtaining rigorous and comprehensive data on all relevant target behaviors while preserving some elements of a natural social situation, methods of obtaining direct and indirect data on generalization of these skills, and the selection of an appropriate unit for data collection given the interdependent nature of responses. All presentations discuss their topic in relation to advancing the social skills of individuals with a diagnosis of autism or Asperger's Syndrome. |
Keyword(s): Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Perspective taking, Social skills |
|
An Examination of the Relation Between Basic Deictic Frames and Performance of Traditional Theory of Mind Tasks |
DENA MENDOZA (California State University, Fresno), Marianne L. Jackson (California State University, Fresno) |
Abstract: Social skills are a core deficit in children with all forms of autism. Klin, Volkmar, and Sparrow (1992) have attributed the lack of social skills to a deficit in perspective-taking abilities, or the ability to think about other peoples thinking. Developmental research on perspective-taking has utilized the concept known as Theory of Mind, an understanding of other peoples mental states. A relatively recent approach to language and cognition has emerged from the field of behavior analysis called Relational Frame Theory (RFT). McHugh, Barnes-Holmes, and Barnes-Holmes (2004) developed a perspective-taking protocol named the Barnes-Holmes protocol. The protocol consists of 62 trials assessing the relational frames of I-You, Here-There, and Now-Then across three deictic relations (Simple, Reversed, & Double-Reversed). Although research has not been published regarding the effects of the Barnes-Holmes protocol on Theory of Mind tasks, there appears to be an underlying assumption that acquiring these skills will increase Theory of Mind abilities. The current study attempts to teach deictic frames to three children diagnosed with autism using multiple exemplar training and positive reinforcement. In addition, it will evaluate the effects of this training on traditional Theory of Mind tasks. |
|
Programming for Generalization of Perspective-Taking Abilities Using Deictic Relational Responding in Children With Autism |
AMBER MARIE CANDIDO (University of Nevada, Reno), Marianne L. Jackson (California State University, Fresno) |
Abstract: The development of perspective-taking has attracted interest from educators and psychologists due in part to its role in developmental disabilities such as autism. The current study is using a behavior analytic approach to train perspective-taking skills using a perspective-taking protocol. In addition, the training has also incorporated a multiple exemplar design in attempt to program for generalization of the skills. In doing so, children acquired the skills by introducing one question and perspective at a time. As acquisition of the material furthers, questions and perspectives being taught will increase in level of difficulty. It is believed that through the use of the selected protocol and training design that participants will acquire both the perspective taking skills and the ability to generalize these skills to novel settings. |
|
Establishing Metaphorical Reasoning in Children With Autism |
Angela M. Persicke (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), Jonathan J. Tarbox (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), JENNIFER RANICK (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.) |
Abstract: Research has shown that children with autism have difficulty with non-literal language, such as irony, sarcasm, deception, humor, and metaphors. To date, few studies have attempted to remediate these deficits and no studies, of which we are aware, have attempted to teach children with autism to understand metaphors. Metaphorical reasoning consists of complex verbal behavior, involving relations of reflexivity, hierarchy, and distinction, at a minimum. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate multiple exemplar training for teaching children with autism to attend to relevant features of the context in which a metaphor is used, and to engage in the required relational responding, in order to respond correctly to metaphorical questions. Participants included 3 children, ages 5-7. Results suggest that multiple exemplar training is effective for teaching children with autism to understand metaphors. Furthermore, generalization to untrained metaphors was found. |
|
Issues in the Development and Evaluation of a Data-Driven Social Skills Program for Individuals With Asperger's Syndrome |
LAURA BARCELOS (California State University, Fresno), Marianne L. Jackson (California State University, Fresno), Allie Baldwin (California State University, Fresno), Jovonnie E-Leal (California State University, Fresno) |
Abstract: This presentation discusses the evolution of a data-driven behavioral social skills program. One of the major difficulties encountered in the development of a social skills program involves the collection of relevant data in ways that minimize reactivity and intrusiveness into the social interactions. An additional difficulty concerns the evaluation of such a program's effectivness outside of the training situation. Although indirect data involving data reported by parents or the individuals themselves are easier to collect, direct observations and data prove to be more difficult. Data suggest that the organization of activities and outings involving typical peers present one potential solution to this issue. A further difficulty encountered centers around the interdependence of measures both within and across participants. For example, procedures targeted at increasing question asking often deceased question answering and / or commenting and vice-versa. In addition, large increases in the responses of one individual, often correlate with decreases in responses from some other participants. Data suggest that interventions targeting a dependent variable that includes the whole interaction, in conjunction with goal setting, self-monitoring, may help to alleviate some of these difficulties. Future directions are also discussed. |
|
|
|
|
Video Modeling: Evidence-based Practice for Teaching Students and Educators a Variety of Skills |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
301 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Laura J. Hall (San Diego State University) |
CE Instructor: Hillary Whiteside, M.S. |
Abstract: The extensive research on video modeling has established this tool as an evidence-based practice due to its effectiveness in teaching learners to acquire a variety of new skills as well as reducing problem behaviors (LeBlanc et al., 2003; Nikopoulos & Keenan, 2004). Video modeling allows teachers to emphasize critical features and reduce extraneous stimuli and it also provides a consistent model for learners so that each viewing of the model is exactly the same, every time. Video modeling is a cost-effective intervention that is easy to use and easy to individualize to your learner. The following four studies were conducted at a non-public school with a range of learners. The researchers will provide supporting evidence for using video models to teach students essential social communication skills, including manding for assistance, offering help to others in need of assistance, and reciprocal play interactions between peers. Additionally, one study will show that video modeling is also effective in teaching paraprofessional teachers to implement complex instructional practices, specifically the use of most-to-least prompting procedures |
Keyword(s): Communication Skills, Social Interactions, Teacher Training, Video Modeling |
|
Video Modeling and Video Feedback in Training Paraprofessionals to Teach Daily Living Skills to Children With Autism |
SHERRY LACSON (The Institute for Effective Education), Yasemin Turan (San Diego State University) |
Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate effectiveness of video modeling and video feedback for training 3 paraprofessionals on use of most to least prompting procedures. A multiple-baseline design across participants was utilized to determine the effects of the intervention on paraprofessionals correct use of most to least prompting procedures to teach daily living tasks to students with autism. Following baseline, each participant was required to watch a 3-minute video of a teacher demonstrating a most-to-least prompting procedure to teach a typical daily living task. Video feedback was delivered as a secondary intervention to the paraprofessional when skill acquisition was not immediately observed after the video-modeling phase. Results indicated an improvement in most-to-least prompting skills for all paraprofessionals as well as quicker acquisition of skills for the corresponding students. These findings address the need for paraprofessional training in non-public schools and have similar implications for promoting staff development in public schools. |
|
The Use of Video Modeling to Teach Children With Autism to Offer Assistance to Others |
ALICIA RITTER (The Institute for Effective Education), Hillary Whiteside (The Institute for Effective Education) |
Abstract: The effectiveness of video modeling to teach social skills to students with autism has been well documented. The purpose of this study is to further this research and demonstrate that video modeling is an effective method to teach students with autism to offer help. In preliminary studies, the researchers used a multiple baseline design in which a video model with multiple exemplars was shown to 6 students across two different school settings (3 in each setting). The video models varied by people, environments and materials in order to facilitate generalization. After viewing the model, similar situations were directly presented. Offering help was measured on a per opportunity basis. Four of the participants acquired the skill by watching the video model alone. Two of the participants required either direct or indirect prompts to acquire the skill. Based on this research video modeling was then adopted into the school curriculum to teach helping behaviors. The researchers determined a follow up study expanding the video models to new helping scenarios would be valuable. Additionally the definition of the target behavior will be broadened (e.g., helping topography, latency of responding). |
|
Teaching Social Reciprocity Between Peers With Autism Using Video Modeling |
HILLARY WHITESIDE (The Institute for Effective Education), Laura Hoge (The Institute for Effective Education) |
Abstract: Individuals diagnosed with autism have difficulty developing and sustaining relationships with others due to qualitative impairments in social interaction and communication (American Psychiatric Association, DSM-IV-TR, 2000). In the area of social interaction, persons with autism have problems responding to, sustaining and initiating reciprocal social interactions. In the area of communication, it is estimated that 50% of persons with autism may not develop spoken language or may have severely limited speech and language skills (Wing & Atwood, 1987), thereby increasing the difficulty for participating in meaningful social interactions. In a preliminary study, a video model was designed to teach a 9 yr. old, non-vocal child with autism to engage in basic conversation with a peer by utilizing an augmentative communication device (ACD). The peer tutor in the study, a 10 yr. old child with autism, communicated using vocalizations. The video model showed communicative initiations on the part of the peer tutor, as well as the participants responses from a point of view perspective. During the course of the intervention, two different prompting strategies were introduced (i.e., video prompting, gestures) to highlight each response for the participant, as video modeling alone was minimally effective. Ultimately, video modeling was reintroduced and mastery criteria was achieved and maintained. The authors of this subsequent study intend to expand upon these findings by conducting a multiple baseline design across 3 peer dyads with varying communication topographies. The effectiveness of a video model demonstrating reciprocal social interactions during play will be evaluated and the treatment effects on both the initiations of the peer tutor and the responses of the peer learner will be measured. |
|
Video Modeling to Teach Manding for Assistance |
MATTHEW WILBAT (The Institute for Effective Education), Hillary Whiteside (The Institute for Effective Education), Laura J. Hall (San Diego State University) |
Abstract: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of video modeling on teaching young adolescents with autism to mand for assistance when encountering difficult steps within daily living tasks that require adult assistance (e.g., setting the time on a microwave, tying shoelaces, opening containers). A multiple baseline design across 3 subjects will be conducted. Data collected during baseline data revealed that the participants either skipped the difficult step, altering the outcome of the task, or gave up on completing the task all together after persisting without success. A point of view video model depicting 3 different scenarios in which help is requested will be shown to the participants. After viewing the video model, the participants will encounter one of the situations displayed on the video and helping responses will be recorded. By capitalizing on multiple exemplar training, the researchers hope to enhance the participant’s generalization of this skill across various situations and settings. |
|
|
|
|
Establishing Clinical Integrity Within Residential Services for Individuals With Challenging Behaviors |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
602 (Convention Center) |
Area: CSE/AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: John C. Randall (Amego, Inc.) |
Discussant: Paul A. Dores (Psychologist in Private Practice) |
CE Instructor: Lisa A. Studer, M.S. |
Abstract: Serving children with severe behavior challenges within a residential delivery system requires extensive clinical supports and resources. The direct care personnel within these homes are critical to the eventual success of these children and it is imperative that the clinical systems provide the necessary training and oversight by qualified on-site clinicians. This symposium will present three papers which focus on residential services and will emphasize programming that addresses the importance of personal welfare, on-going assessment, functionasl skill development, function based interventions and the presence of working BCBA clinicians within the group homes. Data will be presented that will demonstrate positive long-term outcomes in regards to both behavior reduction and adaptive skill development. The Discussant will generate a discussion among attendees regarding the integrity of services within residential programs, the need to ensure clinical resources are made available to the needs of our most vulnerable consumers, the role of a BCBA in providing direct supervision and training for direct staff, and the need to make sure the residential environment has been behaviorally prepared. |
Keyword(s): Applied, Behavior Challenges, Residential |
|
Clinical Systems and Support Within Residential Services |
LISA A. STUDER (Melmark New England), Frank L. Bird (Melmark New England) |
Abstract: This paper will discuss the implementation of behavioral programming and clinical oversight within a residential service delivery system. The paper will discuss the importance of assessing the 'Rights to Effective Treatment" (Van Houten, et al., 1985), including, establishing behavior support plans, implementing a clinical operating system which emphasizes ongoing assessment and review, and the critical feature of staff training and development. The authors will discuss some of the premises of "Lessons Learned: Thirty Years of Applied Behavior Analysis in Trerating Problem Behaviors (Foxx, 2001) as it relates to residential servives including making sure the environment is proactive in its design, that behavioral expertise must be present within the setting and be an active contributor to program design and implementation, using a hypothesis-driven treatment model, employing skill building interventions, and maintaining treatment effects. A case study highlighting the critical features of the clinical model will be demonstrated by reviewing a case study that exhibits significant behavior reduction over an extended period of time and the simultaneous increase of adaptive and functional skills. |
|
Transitioning to a Residential Program with Comprehensive Clinical Supports |
JULIE HAYES (Amego, Inc.), Annie K. Barlow (Amego, Inc.) |
Abstract: Making transitions from children's services to adult services is an area that is far too often left open for errors. There is no standard way that has found to be successful; often a transition can vary depending on the situation surrounding the need to transition. In many cases a provider has a base vacancy that needs to be filled and an individual in need will be placed within that vacancy. Ensuring effective system supports for individuals transitioning into residential programming can be a challenge for providers. System supports include family involvement, staff training, medical and clinical over site as well as funding source involvement. The following case study outlines how continuity in care is essential in creating a seamless transition from children services to adult services at the age of 22. This individual was supported within a 24 hour residential educational setting. Active transition planning and preparation for the transition to adult services begansixmonths in advance of her 22nd birthday. Although transition planning initiated six months prior to entering adult services, providers and options had been explored by family members and stakeholders prior to this time. Lead staff were identified to assist and be part of the transition. Through an overlap with service delivery, essential staff familiar with the individual's history would likewise make the conversion from working within children's services to adult services. The primary focus of the training included transferring stimulus control from familiar staff to new staff who would be supporting the individual in adult programming. Prior to the transition this individual's target behaviors were at a stable rate of responding. Initially after the transition there was a slight increase with one target behavior while the other two showed a significant decrease in rates. Through effective system management, clinical supports remained consistent across both settings. System supports that were put in place were proven to be effective in creating a flawless transition into adult services. |
|
Evaluating the Effects of Long-Term Implementation of Behavioral Strategies Within a Residential Setting |
KIMBERLY L. MAYER (Melmark New England), Frank L. Bird (Melmark New England), Kathy Crane (Melmark New England) |
Abstract: One case study will be presented that will demonstrate positive long-term effects of behavior intervention within a group home setting. This individual attended a nonprofit private school for children and young adults with severe behavior challenges. The young adult with autism exhibited high rates of aggression and self-injury and required 1:1 services throughout the day in the residence. A comprehensive multicomponent intervention plan was developed emphasizing functional communication training, progressive relaxation training, reinforcement contingencies and a functionally-based consequence for problem behaviors. Data exhibiting the reduction of targeted behaviors and the development of prosocial behaviors will be shown. The paper will discuss generalization and maintenance effects over a 9 year period and this individual's transition from a group home into an apartment setting with faded results. The success of this individual resulted from a comprehansive model of clinical supports within the residence emphasizing direct care training, feedback, and the presence of a skilled BCBA clinician during programming hours. |
|
|
|
|
Identifying Empirically Supported Treatments for Individuals Diagnosed With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
LL04 (TCC) |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Griffin Rooker (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Discussant: Timothy A. Slocum (Utah State University) |
CE Instructor: Griffin Rooker, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Recent American Psychological Association guidelines on empirically supported treatments (EST) suggest that treatments can be designated as "well established," "probably efficacious," or "experimental" based on the number of studies that have a good experimental design and demonstrate an effective outcome. Treatments with the most empirical support are designated as "well established." Although a multitude of reviews of behavior analytic procedures as effective treatment exist in the literature, few treatments have been examined using the EST criteria. The purpose of these studies was to apply the standard of empirically supported to several treatment areas. These areas included behavior associated with specific disabilities (e.g., autism and acquired brain injury) and specific behaviors (e.g., pica) across disorders. Results of these studies suggest that behavior analytic treatments are "well established" in the treatment of a number of behaviors. These results are discussed in reference to the larger field of psychology and the dissemination of behavior analytic treatments therein. |
Keyword(s): Developmental Disability, Empirically Supported, Intellectual Disability, Treatment |
|
A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research in the Area of Acquired Brain Injury |
MEGAN RAE HEINICKE (Auburn University), James E. Carr (Behavior Analyst Certification Board) |
Abstract: The scope of this meta-analysis was to complete a systematic evidence-based review of published behavioral treatment studies employing single-case designs with both children and adults with acquired brain injury. Peer-reviewed journals were searched using PsycINFO, Medline, and ERIC database search engines with combinations of terms such as brain injury, behavior disorder, behavior therapy, behavior modification, behavior analysis, and verbal behavior. A total of 115 acquisition and reduction studies met established inclusion criteria. The data extracted from each study included specific details about the participants, target behaviors, intervention characteristics, use of functional assessment, and outcome characteristics. A data extraction software program was also used to extract data from graphs to calculate multiple nonoverlap effect sizes such as the percentage of nonoverlapping data and Taunovlap. The studies were evaluated along several dimensions such as APA Division 12 guidelines, special education guidelines, and experimental control. A variety of methodological concerns and areas for future research are also discussed. |
|
Behavior Analysis as an Empirically Supported Treatment for Problem Behavior Associated With Autism |
JOSHUA JESSEL (University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Griffin Rooker (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: For a treatment to meet criteria as well-established and empirically validated (as defined by APA divisions 12 and 16) a large number of single-subject design studies displaying experimental control with baseline or other treatment comparisons must be examined. The current study critically reviewed 29 research articles examining the effects of applied behavior analytic treatment techniques for the severe problem behavior (e.g., aggression, self-injury, disruption) of those diagnosed with autism since 2005. The treatments included were either reinforcement based (e.g., differential reinforcement of an alternative response, noncontingent reinforcement) or included both reinforcement and punishment (e.g., time-out). Twenty-six of those studies conducted experimentally sound designs and 23 reduced problem behavior by at least 80%. Additionally, 15 of those 23 studies displayed reductions of 90% or higher. The results suggest the designation of applied behavior analytic techniques as well-established and empirically validated treatment for the severe problem behavior of those diagnosed with autism. |
|
Identifying Empirically Supported Treatments for Pica in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities |
NATALIE ROLIDER (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Griffin Rooker (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: Pica as problem behavior is of particular concern because even one instance of the behavior may cause tremendous harm. A number of reviews have examined the effectiveness of behavior analytic treatments; however, none have done so using the American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines on empirically supported treatments. The purpose of the current study was to critically examine the existing literature on the treatment of pica displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Criteria for empirically supported treatments as described by Divisions 12 and 16 of APA, and adapted for studies employing single-case designs were used to review this body of literature. A total of 34 treatment studies were identified, 25 of which were well-designed and reported at least an 80% reduction in pica (21 studies reported 90% or greater reduction in pica). Results indicated that behavioral treatments in general, and treatments involving the combination of reinforcement and response reduction procedures in particular, can be designated as well-established treatments for pica exhibited by individuals with intellectual disabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Using Technology to Increase Academic and Leisure Skills for Students With Learning Difficulties |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
LL05 (TCC) |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Sharon A. Reeve (Caldwell College) |
Discussant: Paul Argott (Educational Partnership for Instructing Children) |
CE Instructor: Sharon A. Reeve, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The use of technology for interventions involving skill acquisition has been demonstrated to be promising for students across a wide range of learning difficulties. As technology advances, it is important to investigate effective applications to teach a variety of skills to students in more efficient ways. This symposium will review three different applications of technology to increase academic and leisure skills. In the first study described, interactive, computer-based practice was used to increase sight words, color words, and number identification (11-20) in two students with moderate intensive educational needs. In the second presentation, a specific computer program, Headsprout Comprehension, was used to increase comprehension skills of six students diagnosed with mild to moderate disabilities. In the third study, an iPod touch was used to teach four children with autism to follow an activity schedule composed of leisure activities. Collectively, these three studies showed effective uses of technology in teaching a variety of skills. |
Keyword(s): Academic Skills, Leisure Skills, Technology |
|
The Effects of Computer Based Practice on Basic Skills for Children With Moderate to Intensive Disabilities |
ELIZABETH SPOTTS (The Ohio State University), Julie Everhart (Westerville City Schools), Sheila R. Alber-Morgan (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether interactive, computer-based practice would increase the acquisition and maintenance of basic academic skills for students with moderate to intensive educational needs. The academic skills selected for this study were based on the each participant's Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals. Specifically, the skills selected were: sight words, color words, and number identification (11-20). The intervention consisted of interactive computer games using discrete trials and immediate feedback. Acquisition of basic skills was assessed using flash cards 1 day following each computer practice session. Results showed a substantial increase in all skills for one participant. These skills were also maintained over a period of time. The results also showed a slow, but steady increase in the skills from the second individual. Data were also collected throughout the study on the amount of times each participant became off task during the computer games. Results showed that both students remained on task during the majority of the sessions. Overall, the computer game intervention was an effective means to increasing the academic acquisition of the participants. |
|
The Effects of Headsprout Comprehension on the Reading Skills of Urban Elementary Students With Disabilities |
JENNIFER MARIE CULLEN (The Ohio State University), Joe Wheaton (The Ohio State University), Sheila R. Alber-Morgan (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: Urban students with learning disabilities and behavior problems typically struggle with reading comprehension. Using technology for academic interventions has been demonstrated to be promising for children with a wide range of learning difficulties. This study investigated the effects of Headsprout Comprehension, a computer program designed to increase reading achievement. The experimenters used Headsprout Comprehension to improve the reading skills of 5 fifth-grade students diagnosed with mild to moderate disabilities and 1 third-grade student diagnosed with an emotional/behavioral disorder. A multiple probe across participants design was used to examine the effects of Headsprout Comprehension on the number of correct responses on AIMSWEB maze passages and the number of comprehension questions answered correctly on state reading achievement practice passages. All 6 students showed improvement in the number correct of correct responses on state achievement comprehension passages, and 5 out of 6 students showed improvement in the number correct on AIMSWEB Maze. |
|
Teaching Leisure Skills With an iPod touch Activity Schedule |
KELLY CARLILE (Caldwell College), Sharon A. Reeve (Caldwell College), Ruth M. DeBar (Caldwell College), Kenneth F. Reeve (Caldwell College) |
Abstract: Traditionally, activity schedules are presented to learners in book form. However, this format may be cumbersome and socially stigmatizing to a child with autism. Conversely, presenting an activity schedule on an iPod touch may provide a more socially acceptable format, in that it would be more discrete and allow for easy portability, especially if supports, such as prompts, and an adult's presence, are eventually removed. The present study investigated the use of an iPod touch to teach students to follow an activity schedule composed of leisure activities to 4 children with autism. Manual prompts, time delay and reinforcement procedures were also used. To further promote independence, experimenter proximity to the participants was faded until she was no longer present. A multiple-probe-across-participants design was used. Prior to intervention, none of the participants followed the schedule and they rarely engaged in on-task behavior. Following intervention, all participants learned to independently follow a 47-step leisure activity schedule presented on the iPod touch and increased their on-task behavior. In addition, these skills generalized to novel settings and novel schedules, and maintained over time. The implications of incorporating technology to increase independence in children with autism is discussed. |
|
|
|
|
Measuring Behavior Using Scaling: A Behavioral Developmental Approach |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
4C-1 (Convention Center) |
Area: DEV/EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
Chair: Patrice Marie Miller (Harvard Medical School) |
CE Instructor: Michael Lamport Commons, Ph.D. |
Abstract: In psychophysics and perception, sensitivity to differences in magnitude comes in two forms, discrimination and scaling. Animal behavioral methods show how animals scale various stimulus properties. Since there are procedures that work well with animals for obtaining scales, scaling cannot be mentalistic. Scales are important because they are useful in predicting behavior. Quantitative analysis of behavior is largely built around how animals respond relative to the rate of reinforcement, a stimulus property of reinforcement. The rate of responding is a way of scaling the perceived value of various reinforcement contingencies. Here, task difficulty may be viewed as another stimulus or contingency dimension. How difficult a discrimination is, has most often been found by varying the closeness of stimuli along some dimension. These are all flat forms of difficulty, meaning that, these are direct properties of the stimulus or the response. Here we are going to consider the order of hierarchical complexity of the task requirements, a property of the overall contingency, which is a different form of difficulty. We are also going to look separately at the dimension of the time between the reinforcer and the response. Finally, a model is presented that integrates the two. The models discussed here will be shown to have a number of applications. |
Keyword(s): Discounting Value, Hierarchical Complexity, Predicting Action, Scaling |
|
Measuring the A Priori Difficulty of a Task Contingency Using Order of Hierarchical Complexity |
ANDREW M. RICHARDSON (Dare Association, Inc.) |
Abstract: The Model of Hierarchical Complexity is a quantitative behavioral-developmental theory that suggests an objective way of determining the a priori difficulty of a tasks contingencies. The model explains why stage-like performances are observed. The model proposes that stages result from the hierarchical structure of tasks. A task is defined as hierarchically more complex when it organizes, in a non-arbitrary fashion, two or more less complex tasks. Using this model, sixteen orders of hierarchical complexity have been generated. In this study, the model is used to generate stimuli in the form of either problems or stories. The stimuli within a domain consist of an ordered series of tasks, from order 1, reflexes and conditioned reflexes, up to order 12, the discrimination of efficient market. Tasks were generated in several domains, including reinforcement contingencies (economic), mathematical, scientific, moral, political, and social domains. 280 people were recruited through online groups. A Rasch analysis of the responses showed that, within each domain, items were well scaled on a single dimension reflecting the predicted difficulty of the item. Participants performances were shown to conform to the predictions of the model, with very high amounts of variance accounted for (from .73% and up). |
|
Systematic Dimensional Behavioral Approach to Diagnoses |
EVA YUJIA LI (Mount Holyoke College) |
Abstract: Traditionally, stimuli have a few physical dimensions. These include color, brightness, shape, and they sometimes represent objects. Functionally, these may be conditioned respondently, or operantly discriminated. Some models of discrimination have also considered the detectability of various stimulus properties, including density, numerosity, and time between. A dimension is the time between the reinforcer and the response. One method for scaling value is to titrate preference for a standard relative to a delayed reinforcer. The other method is to determine the discriminability of reinforcers as a function of how far they occur before choice. For eight pigeons, the detectability of how much reinforcement had been previously delivered as a function of time between a reinforcer and a choice was found. In applied behavior analysis, there has been an emphasis on discrimination of various kinds of stimuli and responses showing whether or not such relations exist. Here, we are going to look at a property of stimuli that is embodied in task demands called the order of hierarchical complexity. Secondly we are going to look at perceived value as a function of the type of reinforcer, its delay, its change in delay, and theoretically, the change in the change of delay. |
|
An Integrative Account of Stage and Value as Determinants of Action |
MICHAEL LAMPORT COMMONS (Harvard Medical School) |
Abstract: Accounts of stage and moral action have not integrated behavioral, developmental and quantitative paradigms. This presentation integrates the three by using a mathematical model of value obtained from developmental action and from stage, as in the Model of Hierarchical Complexity. The result is a behavioral-developmental account of stage and action, rather than a mentalistic one. Both value and stage are necessary for determining actions. Each consists of a matrix. The Value matrix has a number of vectors. For humans, there are 6 Holland Code variables in the value vector. The second vector is discounting-difference ratio between change in the overall value vector and change in time. The third vector is the change in differences in value over time, or risk. The second matrix is Stage, which measures performance in meeting difficulties produced by the order of hierarchical complexity of particular tasks, as discussed in the earlier talks. A mathematical account of the value and the stage matrices and their interaction terms are used to predict moral behavior. |
|
Herrnstein's Behavioral Scaling Notions of Trait and Attitudes |
NICHOLAS HEWLETT KEEN COMMONS-MILLER (Tufts University) |
Abstract: Attitudes and traits are often considered to be outside of behavior analysis because they are considered to be mentalistic. They are obtained by presenting a stimulus question, whose properties are unknown and then recording responses. What might be mentalistic are interpretations given to the results obtained from such procedures. Herrnstein considered attitudes as simply response tendencies to such stimulus sentences. Usually, the scales that derive from such responses are obtained by using factor analysis and scaling programs. Behavior analysts prefer psychophysicistical scales in being able to describe the stimulus properties without resorting to the response properties alone. But Herrnstein thought that the degree to which these stimulus questions grouped together and could be scaled as to degree of endorsement by participants was more psychophysical. Traits on the other hand were such properties obtained over longer periods of time. If response strength is acceptable in behavior analysis, then degree of endorsement should also be acceptable. So, using things like Rasch scales to determine the difficulty of items, or bias in favor or not in favor, is an intermediate step between being able to figure out the difficulty of an item a priori or the value of a reinforcement contingency a priori. |
|
|
|
|
A Critical Examination of Graphical Presentation Practices in Behavior Analysis |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
204 (TCC) |
Area: PRA; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Kerri L. Milyko (Precision Teaching Learning Center) |
Discussant: Douglas E. Kostewicz (University of Pittsburgh) |
CE Instructor: Richard M. Kubina Jr., Ph.D. |
Abstract: Behavior analysts analyze and interpret data as well as construct, communicate, and defend claims of knowledge with data graphics. While behavior analysts do use other inscription devices, such as tables, visual analysis of data serves as the linchpin of the science of behavior. From Skinner to contemporary behavior analysts, researchers and practitioners mostly rely on time series data graphics such as the line graph. With so much analytical and communicative power invested in line graphs behavior analysts must consider how to construct and use different types of line graphs that effect their verbal behavior. This symposium examines different aspects of presenting time series data and suggests behavior analysis pay greater attention to for the most critical practices behavior analysts engage in. |
|
An Initial Survey of Fractional Graph and Table Area
in Behavioral Journals |
DOUGLAS E. KOSTEWICZ (University of Pittsburgh), Richard M. Kubina Jr. (The Pennsylvania State University) |
Abstract: This study examined the fractional graph area (FGA), the proportion of page space used to display statistical graphics, in 11 behavioral journals and places behavior analysis on a continuum with other natural, mathematical, and social science disciplines. The composite FGA of all 11 journals puts behavior analysis within the range of the social sciences, whereas the composite FGA of the most established and preeminent behavioral journals positions behavior analysis within the range of the natural sciences. In addition, fractional table area (FTA), the proportion of page space used to display tables, generally is higher in behavioral journals with lower degrees of FGA, a result that replicates previous research. |
|
A Critical Review of Time-Series Graphics in Behavior Analytic Journals |
DOUGLAS E. KOSTEWICZ (University of Pittsburgh), Richard M. Kubina Jr. (The Pennsylvania State University) |
Abstract: One may argue that the genesis and continued practice of all forms of behavior analysis (e.g., applied, basic, philosophical) rest upon the foundation of the careful examination of data graphics, mainly time series graphics. Time series graphics derive their name from their construction; a time series scale on the horizontal axis expresses a unit of time and some type of quantitative scale on the vertical axis shows time progressing from left to right. A quick survey of important books on behavioral research show that prominent experimental designs use time series graphics, mainly the simple line chart (e.g., Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007; Hersen & Barlow, 1976; Kazdin, 2011; Kennedy, 2005; Kratochwill, 1978; Kratochwill & Levin, 1992; Poling & Fuqua, 1986; Sidman, 1960). However, the guidelines for constructing line charts appear in very few publications. Furthermore, the field of behavior analysis does not have agreed-upon standards for line chart construction. As a result of number of systematic errors occur in published line charts. This presentation shares the results of survey examining 11 prominent behavioral journals and their graphical practices in regards to line chart usage. |
|
Arithmetic and Semilogarithmic or Ratio Line Charts: A Comparison of Visual Displays |
RICHARD M. KUBINA JR. (The Pennsylvania State University) |
Abstract: Line graphs or charts have two forms, arithmetically and semilogarithmically scaled. Behavior analysts make scant use of semilogarithmic charts and use, almost exclusively, arithmetically scaled charts. As a scientific discipline Behavior Analysis would benefit from an informed explication of each data graphic. Other sources do exist which describe different types of graphics, including line charts, and explain how behavior analysts can use them (e.g., Cooper, Heron & Heward, 2007; Parsonson & Baer, 1978). Comparing and contrasting the structure, hallmark characteristics and limitations of arithmetically and semilogarithmically scaled line charts, however, has yet to occur. Therefore, the present paper asks the following questions. What design attributes guide the construction of arithmetically and semilogarithmically scaled line chart? What purpose does the arithmetically and semilogarithmically scaled line chart serve? How do the technical features and purposes of line charts serve a science of behavior and the behavior analysts who use them? The research questions will not only provide a detailed comparison of the purposes of arithmetic and semilogarithmic line charts but will also offer advantages or disadvantages for behavior analysts conducting visual analysis with time series data. |
|
|
|
|
Improving the Efficiency and Efficacy of Staff and Parent Training of Assessment and Treatment Procedures With Children Diagnosed With Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
612 (Convention Center) |
Area: TBA/DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Michael E. Kelley (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
CE Instructor: Michael E. Kelley, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The application of the basic principles of behavior analysis has been remarkably valuable in guiding researchers and practitioners to develop effective assessments and treatments. One area that warrants further development is the systematic improvement of efficiency and efficacy of those procedures. In the current series of studies, we show how typical assessment or training procedures may be systematically replicated and extended in several important ways. First, Higgins et al. show how individuals may be trained to conduct preference assessments using web-based technology. The trainees include individuals who do not otherwise have training available in vivo. Next, Kunnavatana et al. report on teaching teachers to conduct efficient, trial-based functional analyses, which may relieve teachers of the burden of finding trained professionals to conduct the assessments. Third, Kowcheck et al. show data suggesting the necessary components of a staff-training package. Finally, Vladescu et al. demonstrate the utility of video modeling for conducting procedurally correct discrete-trial training. In combination, these studies extend the literature on how to improve the efficiency and efficacy of training and have the potential to expand practitioners skills in the assessment and treatment of problem behavior and skill deficits. |
Keyword(s): Improving training, Training |
|
Evaluating Web-based Technologies to Teach Staff to Conduct a Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment |
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Wayne W. Fisher (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Kevin C. Luczynski (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Regina A. Carroll (Munroe-Meyer Institute University of Nebraska Medical Center), Oliver C. Mudford (University of Auckland) |
Abstract: The ubiquity of personal computers and the development of secure Internet technologies have led to the increased use of Web-based training in fields such as medicine and education (Ritterband & Tate, 2009). Roscoe and Fisher (2008) demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of a training package that included delayed feedback on performance and immediate feedback during scripted role-play sessions to teach direct-care staff how to implement two common preference assessments with children diagnosed with intellectual disabilities. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating whether delivering these same teaching procedures, as well as an information-based multimedia presentation, via Web-based technologies produces similar results on staff members' implementation of a multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment.Thirteen component skills were targeted, and the effects of the teaching package on skill acquisition were evaluated using a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design across participants. Robust and immediate improvements in the component skills were observed across participants and their performance maintained during a 1-month follow-up observation. In addition, the Web-based delivery of the teaching components was reported as highly acceptable. The benefits of Web-based technologies and other Web-based applications will be discussed. |
|
Training Educators to Conduct Trial-Based Functional Analyses |
SORAYA SHANUN KUNNAVATANA (Utah State University), Sarah E. Bloom (Utah State University), Andrew Samaha (Utah State University), Elizabeth Dayton (Utah State University) |
Abstract: Functional analyses are commonly used to identify the maintaining variables of problem behaviors and direct treatment. Although research has demonstrated the utility of the standard functional analysis, they are not always feasible in educational settings. The trial-based functional analysis was developed as an alternative when resources do not permit a standard functional analysis. The current study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified pyramidal training procedure in which special education programming coordinators were trained to conduct trial-based functional analyses and then subsequently trained primary and secondary grade level teachers. Results showed that teachers implemented the trial-based functional analysis with good integrity after training and during in situ probes; however, modest improvements were observed in accuracy of calculating and graphing data, and analyzing graphs to identify a function. |
|
A Component Analysis of a Staff Training Package |
KEEGAN C. KOWCHECK (West Virginia University), Aimee Giles (West Virginia University), Claire C. St. Peter (West Virginia University) |
Abstract: Instructional time for children with autism may be maximized by training classroom staff to implement discrete-trial training (DTT) programs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a component analysis of an existing training package. The training package had previously been shown to be effective in teaching paraprofessionals to implement DTT programs. The training package consisted of video modeling and didactic instruction, and performance feedback. Twelve special education teachers were divided into 2 groups, and taught to implement DTT during an optional professional development session over the summer. A multiple-baseline-across-participants design was used. Using a performance checklist, data were collected on the accuracy with which the teachers implemented DTT programs in trainer-trainee dyads. For 11 of 12 participants, mastery criteria were met following at least one session of performance feedback. On average, correct implementation of DTT procedures increased by 20.53% following the video phase, and by 30.5% following one feedback session. |
|
The Effects of Video Modeling on Accurate Implementation of Discrete Trial Instruction |
JASON C. VLADESCU (Caldwell College), Regina A. Carroll (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Amber R. Paden (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Tiffany Kodak (University of Oregon) |
Abstract: Discrete trial instruction (DTI) is a common and effective approach to teaching children with autism and related disorders. Thus, it is important to identify effective procedures to train staff to implement DTI accurately. One training alternative, video modeling (VM) involves showing a video that exhibits behaviors a viewer should imitate and demonstrate in an appropriate context. The present study evaluated VM to train three new staff members in an early intervention (EI) clinic to implement DTI. We evaluated implementation accuracy using a multiple-baseline across participants design. All participants reached the mastery criterion for accurate implementation of DTI with a confederate following the introduction of VM, and performance remained high while implementing novel teaching protocols. Following training with VM, participants used DTI to teach a child in an EI clinic. The results showed that the participants accurate implementation of DTI remained high, and both children acquired the targeted skills. Additionally, we conducted a post-hoc analysis that showed that the number of individual DTI components implemented at or above the mastery criterion increased following VM and maintained during child training. Together, these findings provide additional support that VM may be an effective method to train staff members to implement DTI. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Advancements in Evaluating Teaching Procedures for Increasing Verbal Behavior |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
1:00 PM–2:20 PM |
101 (TCC) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Amy S. Polick (Florida State University at Panama City) |
CE Instructor: Amy S. Polick, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Because language underlies most learning in the typical child and is a core deficit in children with autism, developing language skills is often a major goal of behavioral treatment (Sundberg & Michael, 2001). Additionally, research has shown that traditional operant behavioral procedures have been effective in enhancing language performance with children (Eikeseth, 2009). One behavioral approach to teaching language pays particular attention to targeting verbal operants for intervention, which upon acquisition, provide a foundation for building more advanced verbal behavior (Sundberg & Michael). The purpose of the symposium is to discuss recent advancements in evaluating teaching procedures for increasing verbal behavior of children with and without autism spectrum disorders. The first paper compared the effects of presenting the discriminative stimulus once versus re-presenting it when using least-to-most prompting to teach intraverbal behavior. The second study compared successive and simultaneous tact training on the emergence of listener skills. The third paper compared the efficiency of play-based learning and discrete-trial instruction on the acquisition of receptive discriminations. Finally, the fourth paper evaluated the effects of programmed treatment integrity errors on the acquisition of tacts and auditory-visual conditional discriminations during discrete trial instruction. |
Keyword(s): Autism, Discrete-trial Instruction, Treatment Evaluations, Verbal Behavior |
|
An Investigation of the Presentation of the Discriminative Stimulus When Using Least-to-Most Prompting to Teach Intraverbal Behavior |
TIFFANY HUMPHREYS (Florida State University at Panama City), Amy S. Polick (Florida State University at Panama City), Laura Reisdorf (Florida State University at Panama City), Alison Parker Ivancic (Florida State University at Panama City), Jackie Thaxton (Florida State University at Panama City) |
Abstract: A common procedure used in skill acquisition with individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) is least-to-most prompting (MacDuff, Krantz, & McClannahan, 2001). While a common recommendation is to re-present the discriminative stimulus (SD) when providing prompts (Cooper, Herron, & Heward, 2007; Lovass, 2003), few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of this recommendation in teaching language to children with ASDs. Westand Billingsley (2005) evaluated the traditional (SD was repeated) vs. revised (SD given once) least-to-most prompting and found that both methods were successful in teaching a chained response. The purpose of the present study was to further assess the effects of re-presenting the SD when using least-to-most prompting to teach intraverbal behaviors to children with autism. Results showed no reliable and consistent benefit of re-presenting the SD. Out of 6 comparisons that produced acquisition, 33% produced faster learning with the SD repeat condition, 33% faster with the SD once condition, and 33% showed no difference between the two conditions. Follow-up data also showed no difference in strength of maintenance across conditions. The presentation will further discuss these data and the implications for implementing language intervention strategies with children diagnosed with ASDs. |
|
The Effects of Successive and Simultaneous Tact Training on Listener Behavior |
Daniela M. Ribeiro (Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos), KATHRYN LEE (California State University, Sacramento), Caio F. Miguel (California State University, Sacramento), Danielle LaFrance (B.E.S.T. Consulting, Inc.) |
Abstract: Besides being of theoretical interest, research on functional independence among speaker and listener behaviors could aid in the development of efficient procedures to teach verbal behavior to children with and without language delay. The current study compared two procedures to teach tacts, namely successive and simultaneous training using a multiple treatment design. During the successive tact training,1 set of 3 stimuli was taught with1 picture presented in each trial. During the simultaneous tact training, another set was trained with all3 pictures presented in each trial. Four typically developing children were exposed to both teaching conditions and sets were counterbalanced across participants. After training, listener relations' tests were conducted. Results show that the4 participants reached criterion in4 to8 sessions with each set. Corresponding listener relations emerged for both sets. In summary, there was no difference between the2 procedures in terms of trials to criterion, and emergence of untrained listener relations. Future studies should replicate the procedures with children with language delays to determine if differences during tact training and listener testing are observed |
|
A Comparison of Structured versus Play-Based Interventions to Teach Receptive Discriminations to Children With Autism |
KANEEN B. GEIGER (Auburn University), James E. Carr (Behavior Analyst Certification Board), Linda A. LeBlanc (Auburn University), Nicole M. Hanney (Auburn University), Amy S. Polick (Florida State University at Panama City), Megan Rae Heinicke (Auburn University) |
Abstract: Research has shown that discrete trial teaching (DTT), has been effective in teaching language to children with autism. Discrete trial teaching uses a highly structured, fast-paced, format with skills that are selected by the teacher are taught in a one-to-one situation at a desk or table. Play-based instruction (PBI) embeds DTT procedures in the context of a game, such that language skills are targeted in a more naturalistic, play-type environment. However, all of the other characteristics of DTT (e.g., fast-paced, targets selected by the teacher) are still in place during PBI. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of DTT to PBI. Additionally, measures were collected on affect to determine if PBI was perceived as "more fun" than DTT by the participants. Finally, a concurrent-chains evaluation of preference was used to determine which teaching procedure was more preferred. Two 4-year-old boys with autism, participated in this study. Receptive discriminations were taught in either DTT or PBI. Results showed that for both boys, PBI and DTT were equally effective. For one boy, the2 procedures produced similar affect and were equally preferred. For the other boy, PBI produced more positive affect and was more preferred. |
|
An Evaluation of Programmed Treatment Integrity Errors During Discrete Trial Instruction |
REGINA A. CARROLL (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Tiffany Kodak (University of Oregon), Wayne W. Fisher (University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: In the present study, we evaluated the effects of programmed treatment integrity errors on skill acquisition, for children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), during discrete trial instruction (DTI). In Study 1, we observed5 children with ASD during academic instructions in the school to identify teaching practices that may influence skill acquisition. The results of Study 1 showed that teachers working with children with ASD do not consistently implement all components of academic instruction with a high degree of integrity. In Study 2, we simultaneously manipulated the3 most common integrity errors observed in Study 1 during DTI. Specifically, we compared skill acquisition during a high-integrity condition and a low-integrity condition, with3 programmed integrity errors, for5 children with an ASD. All participants in Study 2 showed either delayed acquisition or did not acquire target stimuli when DTI was implemented with low integrity. In Study 3, we evaluated the extent to which one or more specific integrity errors influenced skill acquisition for2 participants from Study 2. We will describe important areas of feature research related to teaching children with an ASD in an academic setting. |
|
|
|
|
Spousonomics: Using Economics to Master Love, Marriage, and Dirty Dishes |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
4C-2 (Convention Center) |
Area: CBM; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Basic |
CE Instructor: Thomas J. Waltz, Ph.D. |
Chair: Thomas J. Waltz (Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research) |
JENNY ANDERSON (The New York Times), Paula Szuchman (The Wall Street Journal) |
Jenny Anderson is a New York Times reporter who spent years covering Wall Street and won a Gerald Loeb Award for her coverage of Merrill Lynch. She currently writes about education and lives with her husband and two daughters in Manhattan. |
Abstract: Every marriage is its own little economy, a business of two with a finite number of resources that need to be allocated efficiently. In their book, Spousonomics, authors Paula Szuchman and Jenny Anderson apply bedrock economic principles to some of the most common conflicts in domestic life. Some examples include: Division of Labor (Or, Why You Should Do the Dishes): Exposing the fallacy of the 50/50 marriage split. Some people are better at, say, making school lunches, while others panic at the sight of a vacuum cleaner. Here’s a tip: Do what you’re “relatively” good at and “trade” the rest. Incentives (Or, Getting Your Spouse to Do What You Want): How getting your spouse to finally pay the bills on time is simply a matter of finding the right incentive. Trade-offs (Or, The Art of Getting Over It): The simple beauty of the cost-benefit analysis. Let’s break down that four-day trip to Cabo with your friends. Costs: A grumpy wife, $700 airfare, kids that miss you. Benefits: a savage tan, enough Don Julio to inflict permanent damage, uninterrupted sleep. Verdict? Supply and Demand (Or, How to Have More Sex): Talking your sex life to death, waiting until the kids are asleep and you’re both catatonic, not admitting that lingerie turns you on—all bad habits that raise costs and lower demand. The key to keeping your sex life hot is keeping it affordable. |
Target Audience: The lecture will target a general audience and will specifically focus on translating concepts from behavior economics to areas of concern for everyday living and clinical practice. Specifically, clinicians will become familiar with the relevance of behavior economic concepts to interpersonal and family relationships. This introduction will provide an empirically based conceptual framework for clinicians to expand their practice. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to:
- Recognize the relevance of behavior economic concepts to interpersonal and family relationships.
|
Keyword(s): behavioral economics, clinical, family, marriage |
|
|
|
|
"Please Take a Bite!" What Behavior Analysis Has to Offer the Field of Childhood Feeding Problems |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
303/304 (TCC) |
Area: DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Keith E. Williams, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jennifer M. Asmus (University of Wisconsin-Madison) |
KEITH E. WILLIAMS (Penn State Hershey Medical Center) |
Keith Williams received his Ph.D. in Applied Developmental Psychology from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He has been the Director of the Feeding Program at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center since 1997, where he supervises multidisciplinary clinics and a day treatment program. Prior to this, he worked with the Kennedy Krieger Institute's Feeding Program. He has over 40 publications in the area of childhood feeding problems including the book, Treating eating problems in children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental disabilities with Richard Foxx. An Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Penn State College of Medicine, he also teaches in Penn State Harrisburg's graduate program in Applied Behavior Analysis. Dr. Williams provides training in the area of feeding throughout Pennsylvania, nationally, and abroad. |
Abstract: Up to 25% of the pediatric population experiences a feeding problem at some point across the span of childhood and this percentage has been found to be even higher among children with special needs and/or chronic health problems. While behavior analysts have been working with children with feeding problems for decades, the number of behavior analysts who work in this area of practice is still limited. There are two main goals of this talk. The first is to review the role behavior analysts have played in the treatment of childhood feeding problems and discuss need for behavior analysts to expand their presence in this area of clinical need. The second is to advocate for the spread of our methodology and interventions to the other disciplines toserve children with feeding problems. While there may now be over 5,000 certified behavior analysts, there over 100,000 occupational therapists and 120,000 speech pathologists in the United States. Providing behavior analytic tools to our colleagues in other allied health disciplines will allow for a larger number of children with feeding problems to receive effective treatment. |
|
|
|
|
Some Determinants of Behavioral Variability During Learning |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
6BC (Convention Center) |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
Instruction Level: Basic |
CE Instructor: Aaron P. Blaisdell, Ph.D. |
Chair: Matthew C. Bell (Santa Clara University) |
AARON P. BLAISDELL (University of California, Los Angeles) |
After receiving his BA and MA in Biological Anthropology (at SUNY Stony Brook and Kent State University, respectively), Dr. Blaisdell realized that animal cognition was even more interesting than studying dead humans. So he trekked on over to SUNY Binghamton for his Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology with Dr. Ralph Miller, where he studied learning, memory, and temporal cognition in the rat. This was followed by a brief stint as an NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow with Dr. Robert Cook, an expert on Avian Visual Cognition at Tufts University, where he learned how pigeons perceive and think about the world. Since 2001, Dr. Blaisdell has emigrated to the climatological and cultural paradise of sunny LA as Associate Professor in Learning & Behavior and Behavioral Neuroscience in the UCLA Psychology Department. He presides over a comparative cognition lab, studying cognitive processes in rats, pigeons, hermit crabs, and humans. Aaron is currently president of the International Society for Comparative Psychology and the Ancestral Health Society. His interest in Ancestral Health reunites his fascination with anthropology with his interest in comparative approaches to evolution and health. His lab website is http://pigeonrat.psych.ucla.edu. |
Abstract: Behavior typically becomes more variable in the face of a drop in the value of a motivating outcome, such as food. Dr. Blaisdell will review converging lines of evidence for this relationship from studies in his lab. He will describe the negative relationship between found between the signaled probability of food and variability in behavior. This relationship is quite general: Observed in both temporal and spatial behavioral dimensions, in both rats and pigeons, and in both the operant chamber and in open-field settings. Behavioral variability is also greater under conditions involving smaller or delayed food rewards compared to larger or immediate rewards. Dr. Blaisdell will describe some manipulations of the response-outcome contingency that reveal interesting relationships between Pavlovian and instrumental processes. These data support a general conclusion that signaled outcome value is an important determinant of behavioral variability in a wide variety of conditioned behaviors. |
Target Audience: basic researchers |
Learning Objectives: #none# |
Keyword(s): behavioral variability |
|
|
|
|
Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in the Human Brain |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
6E (Convention Center) |
Area: TBA; Domain: Basic Research |
Instruction Level: Advanced |
CE Instructor: Jessica Singer-Dudek, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jessica Singer-Dudek (Teachers College, Columbia University) |
MAURICIO DELGADO (Rutgers University) |
Mauricio Delgado is an assistant professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. He is the director of the Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab and the associate director of the Rutgers University Brain Imaging Center. Dr. Delgado completed his graduate studies at the University of Pittsburgh under the direction of Dr. Julie Fiez in 2002. His research included one of the first studies to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural correlates of reward processing in humans. Dr. Delgado then moved to New York University for a postdoctoral fellowship with Dr. Elizabeth Phelps, where he continued studying human reward processing but also extended his research to understand aversive influences on brain and behavior. His research program at Rutgers University currently investigates how the human brain learns from rewards and punishments, how it uses this information to guide behavior during both simple decisions (e.g., learning actions which lead to desired outcomes) and complex social interactions (e.g., learning to trust another person), and how it controls or regulates our emotions to avoid maladaptive decision-making. Dr. Delgado was the recipient of the 2009 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers and his research is funded by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Science Foundation. |
Abstract: Our understanding of the neural structures involved in processing reward-related information has its foundations on a rich animal literature and classical theories of learning. More recently, advances in methodological approaches, particularly neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have allowed for the extension of these investigations to the human brain and helped delineate a basic reward circuit in humans. Central to this circuit is the role of cortico-striatum loops connecting regions involved in cognitive control (prefrontal cortex) and motivational processes (striatum). In this talk, we will discuss how the human brain learns about rewards and creates reward representations, via conditioned reinforcers, that can influence behavior. Additionally, we will highlight how cognitive strategies can effectively control neural responses to reward elicited by conditioned reinforcers (e.g., cue paired with a drug reinforcer), and its potential application of helping attenuate maladaptive decision-making (e.g., drug seeking behaviors). |
Target Audience: Practitioners and researchers who are interested in mechanisms controlling behavior; those interested in brain and behavior relations |
Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to:
- Recognize what fMRI findings have to offer the science of ABA.
- Idenitfy how the human brain learns about rewards and creates reward representations, via conditioned reinforcers, and how that can influence behavior
|
|
|
|
|
The Road Less Traveled: Case Histories in the Extension of Behavioral Interventions to New Domains |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–3:20 PM |
4C-3 (Convention Center) |
Area: CBM/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Anthony DeFulio (Johns Hopkins University) |
Discussant: Ron Van Houten (Western Michigan University) |
CE Instructor: Anthony DeFulio, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Behavior analysis has broad applicability, but the lions share of our collective effort targets a relatively narrow range of social problems. The purpose of this symposium is to highlight efforts to expand the scope of behavior analytic interventions by addressing social problems that are outside the mainstream of modern behavior analysis. This symposium features three areas of inquiry that behavior analysts have been quietly tackling for decades, and it has become clear that behavior analytic interventions have the potential for massive impact in each of these domains. Attendees will receive updates on drug abuse intervention, behavioral gerontology, and the treatment of sexual offending as examples of research and practice outside the mainstream of behavior analysis. Each of these domains has benefited from the solid scientific foundation provided by mainstream applied behavior analysis. Importantly, the work in each of these unique contexts may provide useful lessons of general interest to all applied researchers and practitioners in behavior analysis. In addition, the presentations will feature brief descriptions of the opportunities for future research and service delivery in the featured domains. The ensuing discussion will include additional examples of novel applications and extensions of behavior analytic interventions. |
Keyword(s): Behavioral gerontology, Behavioral intervention, Drug Addiction, Sex Offenders |
|
Building and Disseminating a Long-Term Intervention for Drug Addiction and Poverty. |
ANTHONY DEFULIO (Johns Hopkins University) |
Abstract: Contingency management for drug abuse is an application of operant principles and procedures that has been developing in the context of medical science for over30 years. Early work in this area proceeded much like any other area of behavior analytic inquiry. But for the last several decades, much of the work of researchers in this field has been dedicated to demonstrating the effectiveness of the behavioral approach using research strategies that are more valued and better understood in the medical community. This practice has brought worldwide attention to contingency management interventions for drug abuse, and placed behavior analysts in a position to take part in an even broader movement to produce positive behavior change by the careful deployment of money as a reinforcer. The therapeutic workplace is an employment-based contingency management intervention for drug addiction born of operant research that dovetails with the current pay-for-performance movement. Details of intervention, evidence for its effectiveness, and ongoing attempts to disseminate it will be discussed. |
|
Using Behavior Analysis to Improve the Lives of Older Adults |
LINDA A. LEBLANC (Auburn University) |
Abstract: The increase in the number and proportion of adults over the age of 60 in the United States has been referred to as the “graying of America.” In particular, recent decades have seen a substantial increase in the number of individuals who live into their 80s and 90s. With increased age comes increased risk of health and cognitive concerns that can result in decreases in quality of life and functional independence. Behavior analysts are in a position to improve the lives of older adults by using our principles and procedures to create environments that foster independence and active engagement, prevent unnecessary disability, and minimize problem behaviors that impact social relationships. In addition, behavior analysts who understand the functional determinants of important health behaviors can individualize supports for older adults to maintain health and wellness. Recent research will be presented to illustrate contributions of behavior analysis in designing aspects of nursing home care, using functional assessment to understand factors that contribute to dehydration, and management of problem behaviors that arise during the progression of dementia. Potential future research ideas will be discussed as well as strategies for entering into the field of aging from other areas of applied behavior analysis. |
|
A Behavior Analytic Approach to the Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offending |
JORGE RAFAEL REYES (Westfield State University), Timothy R. Vollmer (University of Florida) |
Abstract: The problem of sexual offending has obvious social importance and carries traumatic consequences for children and their families. Behavioral assessment and treatment techniques were once at the forefront of approaches for sexual offending. However, early behavioral research in the field of sex offender assessment and treatment was narrowly focused. This led to the rise of the view within and outside the field that behavior analytic principles and procedures are incapable of adequately addressing the problem. In addition, many features of sexual offending present a substantial challenge to traditional behavioral methodology. Recent research (e.g., Reyes et al., 2006; Reyes, et al., 2011) designed to address these challenges has demonstrated that a behavior analytic approach to sexual offending is not only feasible, it may offer new assessment and treatment directions not previously possible. The purpose of the current presentation will be to discuss how traditional behavioral methodology has been adapted to address the problem of sexual offending, and to highlight some ways in which the field of behavior analysis benefits when its constituents address problems not typically considered to be amenable to a behavioral approach. |
|
|
|
|
Exploring the Frontiers of Behavior Analysis and Technology |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–3:20 PM |
618/619 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/TPC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Janet S. Twyman, Ph.D. |
Chair: April Heimlich Stretz (DYMO| Mimio Interactive Teaching Technologies) |
T. V. JOE LAYNG (DYMO|Mimio Interactive Teaching Technologies) |
JANET S. TWYMAN (University of Massachusetts E.K. Shriver Center) |
KAREN L. MAHON (Disrupt Learning) |
ZACHARY LAYNG (DYMO| Mimio Interactive Teaching Technologies) |
Abstract: We live in a mobile, digital age. Exciting new technologies (e.g., software development, social networking, smart phones, interactive whiteboards, tablet computers, remote controllers) are used in education, medicine, organizational behavior, self-management, personal improvement, and numerous other domains, but rarely with the benefit of a thoroughgoing behavior analytic model. The panelists have successful history of using behavioral contingencies to build and support products, and will offer perspectives on the current and future interaction between behavioral technology (based on a thoroughgoing contingency analysis and rooted in solid instructional design) and emerging hardware and software technologies made possible through advances in computer science, robotics, engineering, neurology, and many other fields. Opportunities and options for advancing both behavioral science and the applications of new technologies will be discussed. |
Keyword(s): emerging technology, instructional design, interactive devices, interlocking contingencies |
|
|
|
|
Conceptual and Clinical Issues Related to the Study and Treatment of Anxiety |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–3:20 PM |
202 (TCC) |
Area: PRA/TPC; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Discussant: Patrick C. Friman (Father Flanagan's Girls and Boys Town) |
CE Instructor: Louis P. Hagopian, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Avoidance and escape behavior associated with apparent or tacted anxiety represents one of the most common reasons children are referred to treatment. Although early behavioral research on fear conditioning led to the development of highly effective behavioral interventions, behavior analysts rarely use this term. The current symposium will begin by reviewing a conceptual framework for defining anxiety as functional response class occasioned by stimuli that signal intense punishment. Next, specific behavioral assessment and treatment strategies will be discussed, including the potential use of measures of physiological responding and affect in addition to traditional behavioral measures. The next presenter will discuss the prevalence of anxiety in children with autism and differences relative to typically developing children. Concordance of differing assessment procedures will be discussed with regard to the problems and complexity of assessment of emotional and private events with individuals with limited language skills. The discussant, who has previously advocated for the study of anxiety by behavior analysts, will comment on these conceptual and clinical issues. |
|
Anxiety: A Functional Response Class Occasioned by Stimuli that Signal Intense Punishment |
LOUIS P. HAGOPIAN (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Heather K. Jennett (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: Other than a few exceptions (e.g., Friman, Hayes, & Wilson, 1998), the field of behavior analysis has generally avoided the use of the term “anxiety.” Perhaps this is related to the common use of the term as an explanatory hypothetical construct, or its use to describe private events, which are inherently difficult to precisely define and measure. However, early conceptualizations of fear conditioning from the animal learning relied solely on the analysis of observable behavior. Although some may consider a behavioral account of anxiety as incomplete, behavioral treatments for anxiety derived from this body of research have been shown to be highly effective and are universally accepted as representing best practices. This talk will discuss a behavioral conceptualization of anxiety, defining it as a functional response class occasioned by stimuli that signal intense punishment. As noted by Friman et al., for verbal humans, derived relational processes can also play a role in broadening the range of stimuli that can occasion the anxiety response. Adopting this framework has the potential to provide behavior analysts a means to objectively study, understand, and talk about this phenomenon; and thus enabling behavior analysts to better communicate with other disciplines, and access reimbursement for services for this ubiquitous problem. |
|
The Contribution of Physiological Measurement to the Assessment of Anxiety in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities |
HEATHER K. JENNETT (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Louis P. Hagopian (Kennedy Krieger Institute) |
Abstract: In the anxiety literature, anxiety has been defined as a multi-component response (Davis & Ollendick, 2005; Lang, 1968), which includes behavioral, cognitive, affective, and physiological responding. For individuals with intellectual disabilities and communication deficits, assessment of cognitive responding or private events is not always possible and may not be reliable. In contrast, the assessment of behavioral, affective, and physiological responding is possible through direct observation. It is proposed that a combination of these three observable components may indicate that an anxiety response is present in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Use of physiological measurement, along with observation of behavioral and affective changes, will be discussed with implications for behavior analysts. Future research for validating this proposed model will also be discussed. |
|
Anxiety, Fear, and Phobias in Young Children with Autism: Prevalence, Assessment, and Intervention |
RAYMOND G. ROMANCZYK (State University of New York at Binghamton), Laura B. Turner (Binghamton University) |
Abstract: Recent research has indicated much higher prevalence of anxiety/fear for children with autism compared to typically developing children. The presentation will briefly review the prevalence, differences with typically developing children, and implications for social and emotional development in children with autism. The relationship between anxiety, fear, and phobias will be discussed in the context of atypical development and conceptualization of assessment and intervention practices. Specifically, concordance of differing assessment procedures will be discussed with regard to the problems and complexity of assessment of emotional and private events with individuals with limited language skills. Finally, examples of specific outcome data will be presented with discussion of cost-benefit analysis and the challenges of providing services to this substantial sub-group of children with autism. |
|
|
|
|
Re-conceptualizing Our Philosophical Core: One Behavior Science or Many? |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:00 PM–3:20 PM |
605 (Convention Center) |
Area: TPC; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Shea Fisher (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) |
Discussant: Sam Leigland (Gonzaga University) |
CE Instructor: Thomas G. Szabo, M.A. |
Abstract: Much has been written during the last half of the twentieth century concerning the philosophical foundations of behavior science. Some maintain that contemporary behaviorism is best conceived as a mechanistic scientific enterprise. Others argue that our science is rooted in the pragmatic approaches of Pierce, Dewey, and James. Still others suggest that different strains in behavior science have different philosophical cores and that this is not a bad thing provided we are careful to articulate our assumptions to avoid unnecessary and counterproductive wrangling. In this symposium, we will reconsider the categorical constructs designed by Steven C. Pepper (1942) that organize contemporary philosophies into 4 relatively adequate world hypotheses. Presenters will advance 3 distinct approaches, each of which aims to resolve philosophical misunderstandings that currently divide our field. |
Keyword(s): contextualism, interbehaviorism, mechanism, radical behaviorism |
|
Contextualism and Mechanism: A Philosophical Review |
SHEA FISHER (University of Louisiana at Lafayette), Emily Kennison Sandoz (University of Louisiana at Lafayette), Matthieu Villatte (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) |
Abstract: Contextualism and mechanism have both been posited as philosophical foundations underlying behavior analysis. The distinctions between these positions have gained considerable attention over the last couple of decades, with both sides claiming their view as the proper foundation for research in the field. This paper will review the various aspects of each perspective and how these competing visions have resulted in distinct programs of research. The discussion will conclude with a nuanced pathway through the conceptual thicket, resolving contradiction between the 2 views and providing a space for coexistence and possible synergy. |
|
Revisiting the Distinction between Functional and Descriptive Contextualism |
JONATHAN J. TARBOX (Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Inc.), Joshua K. Pritchard (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: A distinction has been proposed between 2 types of contextualism: functional and descriptive. This distinction is generally made on the basis that the 2 forms of contextualism exist side-by-side. We will argue that the primary distinction between the 2 forms of contextualism is that scholars of functional contextualism believe in cause-and-effect relations (erroneously referred to as functional relations) between events in nature, whereas scholars of descriptive contextualism do not. Further, we will argue that interbehaviorism, the prototypical example of descriptive contextualism, is a more basic philosophical system within which investigational systems, such as functional contextualism, operate. For this reason, it is not valid to criticize descriptive contextualism as not being useful for experimentation-that is not its purpose nor is it the purpose of any philosophy of science. Descriptive contextualism, and interbehaviorism in particular, provides the basic foundation upon which investigational constructs, such as the notion that changes in behavior are caused by contact with environmental events, can be contrived and used to aid in basic and applied research. In this light, functional contextualism is probably not properly called a philosophical system. It is a set of constructs created to aid in experimental investigation. |
|
Philosophy Across the Battle Lines: Contextualism and Fieldism |
THOMAS G. SZABO (University of Nevada, Reno), Linda J. Parrott Hayes (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: It has been nearly 2 decades since the terms descriptive and functional contextualism were coined as extensions of Pepper's (1942) contextualist world hypothesis to denote interbehaviorism and radical behaviorism, respectively. Although these terms may have once been useful, philosophy of science is not a static discipline, and recent discourse has led to a reevaluation of the positioning of interbehaviorism as the philosophical system most characteristic of the descriptive contextualist construct. We suggest that the intellectual forbears of interbehaviorism are not the same as those of radical behaviorism, nor are its foundational assumptions about scientific enterprise, and therefore interbehaviorism cannot adequately be characterized as a contextualist philosophy. Further, we posit that Pepper's model of 4 world hypotheses can be extended to include a fifth approach, Fieldism, of which interbehaviorism is the prototypical philosophical system. In this talk, we will discuss the unique dispersive, synthetic, and integrative qualities of field philosophies as well as the difference between field and contextualist research agendas. It is our view that understanding our points of intersect and departure will help us to communicate more effectively and build bridges within the field of behavior science where currently there are barricades. |
|
|
|
|
Thanatology and Applied Behavior Analysis: Ethical and Clinical Preparation for the Inevitable |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:20 PM |
204 (TCC) |
Area: PRA/CSE; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Theodore A. Hoch, Ed.D. |
Chair: Theodore A. Hoch (George Mason University) |
REBECCA MORSE (George Mason University) |
STEPHEN LEDOUX (State University of New York at Canton) |
JOSE A. MARTINEZ-DIAZ (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: Behavior analysts often work with medically fragile people, and these people sometimes die. Even seemingly healthy clients and students sometimes die. Family members of clients and students die, colleagues die, and each of us will die., Unique ethical and practical challenges are presented by the death of one's student or client, or of the family member with whom one has been working in the service of a client; or when one's colleague or colleague's loved one is terminally ill or dies; and certainly when a behavior analyst dies. This panel discussion will introduce some of these scenarios and issues, and will guide discussion such that participants will gain greater clarity as to ethical and practical actions to take with regard to death and the practice of applied behavior analysis. |
Keyword(s): death, ethics, practice, thanatology |
|
|
|
|
Increasing Early Vocalizations of Nonverbal Children Diagnosed With Autism |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
305 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Anna I. Petursdottir (Texas Christian University) |
Discussant: Tracie L. Lindblad (Four Points Intervention Strategies, Inc.) |
CE Instructor: Anna I. Petursdottir, Ph.D. |
Abstract: In early behavioral intervention for young children diagnosed with autism, attempts are typically made to establish vocal communication before considering alternative or augmentative communication systems. However, efforts to establish functional vocal speech may be complicated by the absence of various prerequisites; for example, in the case of children who do not have an echoic repertoire and perhaps display a low frequency and limited variability of vocalizations. In this symposium, we will present2 empirical studies that evaluated procedures for expanding the phonemic repertoires of nonverbal children diagnosed with autism. In addition, a novel procedure for inducing early echoic responding will be introduced and illustrated with data and video recordings. |
Keyword(s): echoic behavior, lag schedules, stimulus-stimulus pairing, vocalizations |
|
A Comparison of Discrimination Training and Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing for Increasing Vocalizations of Children with Autism |
TRACY L. LEPPER (Texas Christian University), Anna I. Petursdottir (Texas Christian University) |
Abstract: This study sought to compare the effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure (SSP) and an operant discrimination training (ODT) procedure on target vocalizations of 3 preschool aged boys with autism, as well as to identify individual preference for each procedure. During SSP, auditory stimuli were presented in a manner that reliably predicted the delivery of a preferred stimulus. During ODT, auditory stimuli were presented in a manner that signaled the availability of reinforcement for engaging in an arbitrarily selected response. A control condition was also included that involved presenting auditory stimuli explicitly unpaired with the delivery of the preferred item. The procedure preference evaluation involved selecting color cards that were used as discrimination aids during the experimental procedures from a multiple stimulus array. Each selection led to 4 trials of the procedure associated with the color selected. Preliminary results indicate that both procedures were effective for increasing the target vocalizations in 3 out of 4 completed cases, and that for the only participant to complete the procedure to date, the preference evaluation suggested that ODT was preferred. |
|
Effects of Variability Contingencies on the Phonemic Repertoire of Young Children with Autism |
ALLISON SERRA TETREAULT (Kennedy Krieger Institute), Steven Thompson (West Virginia University) |
Abstract: Young children with autism sometimes do not use words to communicate, but do engage in vocal stereotypy. If vocal stereotypy is characterized by the use of a small set of phonemes (i.e., basic sound units), shaping words can be difficult. Several interventions, including stimulus-stimulus pairing and echoic training, have been evaluated to address this problem but with limited success. The current study investigates the effects of reinforcement for variability on the phonemic repertoires of young children with autism who engage in limited vocalizations. Five participants were exposed to lag reinforcement for producing varied vocalizations. Increases in number of phonemes occurred as the restrictiveness of the reinforcement schedule (i.e., the lag value) was manipulated. This expansion of the repertoire occurred even when the overall percentage of novel vocalizations per session did not increase. Smaller increases in repertoire size were noted for participants with larger baseline repertoires. The clinical utility of this procedure will be addressed. |
|
Inducing Echoic Responses in Non-verbal Children: Echoic Extension, Another Strategy that May Work |
GLADYS WILLIAMS (CIEL, Spain), Manuela Fernandez Vuelta (CIEL, Argentina), Belen Gomez Verdugo (CIEL, Mexico), Jose Julio Carnerero (Centro Al-Mudaris) |
Abstract: The foundation to emit vocal verbal operants is the presence of echoic repertoire. Without this ability one cannot acquire vocal verbal behavior. Some children with language delays may need to be taught this ability in a very specific manner and many of them learn it with procedures that have already been proven effective (e.g., behavioral momentum, automatic reinforcement). However, there are children who do not acquire the skill, even with these procedures. It is the purpose of this paper to present a new procedure, Echoic Extension, a procedure that has worked with some children who otherwise have not acquired echoic repertoire. We will analyze the components that may make it effective. We will also discuss how to develop the skill into true verbal operants and show data and video-tapes. |
|
|
|
|
The Science of Making and Maintaining Friendships: Teaching Children With Autism Needed Component Skills |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
LL02 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Anna Matchneva (I Step Ahead Services, Inc.) |
Discussant: Grace Iarocci (Simon Fraser University) |
CE Instructor: Anna Matchneva, M.Ed. |
Abstract: Children diagnosed with High Functioning Autism or Aspergers Syndrome present with social skills deficits that include: difficulty shifting their attention to a social stimulus, inadequate eye contact, difficulty understanding emotions of others, problems with the initiation of social interactions in play and conversation, difficulty interpreting social cues, difficulty making inferences, poor problem solving skills, struggles to take anothers perspective, and lack of empathy skills. Long term outcomes for individuals with High Functioning Autism and Aspergers Syndrome who continue to struggle socially indicate they struggle to develop and maintain friendships, rarely marry, and there is increased prevelance of psychiatric disorders. Therefore, early intervention is called for to teach these pragmatic language skills. We evaluated the effects of Natural Environment Teaching, Precision Teaching, and Role Playing on Social initiations, social inferencing, identifying and solving problems in social situations, and teamwork skills. Data collection involved daily data collection for all skills taught. Data-based decisions were made weekly, and teaching strategies were modified as needed. Curriculum Based Measurement was designed and implemented to measure effects of intervention, and maintenance and generalization probes took place with untrained tasks. |
Keyword(s): Social Skills |
|
Tell Me About Your Friend: Teaching Peer's Interests and Social Initiations in an Inclusive Preschool Setting |
ANNA MATCHNEVA (I Step Ahead Services, Inc.), Jolenta P. Urbaniak- Pazura (I Step Ahead Services, Inc.) |
Abstract: Many children with autism fail to establish and maintain meaningful friendships with their peers. Identifying a common interest, initiating social interaction, responding to initiations of other peers, making compliments, and taking perspective of others are just some of the component skills for developing relationships with peers and are among many that children with autism struggle with. Talking about their friends is something that typical peers do readily and frequently but can be a challenging task for a child with autism. This study evaluated a program for teaching children to identify interests or other peers and to initiate social interaction based on their interests. The intervention was implemented with 3 preschool age children diagnosed with autism and their typically developing peers in context of an inclusive early education classroom. Creative activities and naturalistic behavior strategies were used to facilitate teaching opportunities. Data was collected during each teaching session and generalization probes took place in novel social contexts. |
|
Programming for Pragmatics: Teaching a Boy With Autism to Understand Emotions, Make Inferences, and Problem Solve in Social Situations |
ALEXIA STACK (Alexia Stack Behavioural Consulting), Magdalena A. Markiewicz (Alexia Stack Behavioural Consulting) |
Abstract: Children diagnosed with high functioning autism or asperger's syndrome often present with social skills deficits that include: difficulty shifting their attention to a social stimulus, inadequate eye contact, difficulty understanding emotions of others, difficulty interpreting social cues, difficulty making inferences, poor problem solving skills, and struggles to take another's perspective. These are commonly referred to as pragmatic language skills. Within the field of applied behaviour analysis, we have limited curricula that sufficiently program for these language skills. However, speech and language pathology offers our field some reliable assessment measures, and programming tools for pragmatic language skills. In this study, we used the "Social Language Test: Elementary" as an assessment tool for a boy diagnosed with high functioning autism as a norm-referenced measure of pragmatic language. With the baseline measurement, we completed component analysis, and developed an individualized curriculum to teach him how to: understand emotions and respond appropriately to peer's emotions, make inferences in social situations; and how to identify problem situations and generate socially appropriate solutions. Precision teaching, Natural Environment Teaching and Incidental Teaching were used to teach component skills. Curriculum-based measurement was used to measure generalization across settings and stimuli. |
|
Teamwork: Teaching Children With ASD to Complete Team Projects in Social Group Setting |
MARECEL CLETO (I Step Ahead Services, Inc.), Anna Matchneva (I Step Ahead Services, Inc.) |
Abstract: Teaching social skills to students with autism has received increased attention but little research focused on teaching students to work together as a team. Completing team projects is a common practice in elementary and secondary classrooms and therefore teaching teamwork skills is critical for successful inclusion. Teamwork is the ability to work together with others as a member of a group. Accepting assigned role, engaging in assigned task, accepting ideas of others, negotiating, and problem solving are just some of the key component skills necessary for effective team work that many students with high functioning autism and Aspergers syndrome struggle with. This study evaluated an effect of prompting, reinforcement, peer and adult feedback on teaching teamwork to school age children diagnosed with autism. Intervention was implemented in the context of a social group taking place once a week after school. Teaching activities were carefully designed to facilitate opportunities to respond. Data was collected during each teaching session and percentage of component skills demonstrated was calculated. Maintenance and generalization probes were conducted at one month follow up with untrained task. |
|
|
|
|
Applied Behavior Analytic Interventions in School Settings for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
302 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Gregory Lyons (University of Wisconsin-Madison) |
Discussant: Mandy J. Rispoli (Texas A&M University) |
CE Instructor: Gregory Lyons, M.A. |
Abstract: There is a growing body of intervention research to address the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorders, but the effectiveness of these interventions when implemented in natural settings (e.g., classrooms) by natural change agents (e.g., teaching staff) is less clear. In this symposium we present three comprehensive meta-analyses of the intervention research literature that advance our knowledge of the effectiveness of school-based intervention for children with autism. In the first paper, Greg Lyons will present the results of a meta-analysis of 91 single-case research design studies assessing the effects of school-based interventions aimed at addressing challenging behaviors. In the second paper, Jenna Lequia reviews 18 single-case research design studies assessing the variables contributing to the effectiveness of activity schedules to decrease challenging behavior. Sarah Kuriakose presents the results of a meta-analytic review (n = 15 studies) of intervention conducted during school recess. All papers analyze non-overlap of all-pairs scores to determine the effectiveness of interventions. Finally, the results of these three studies will be analyzed and discussed by Dr. Mandy Rispoli of Texas A&M University, a scholar whose research focuses on applied behavior analytic interventions for children with autism in natural settings. |
Keyword(s): Activity Schedules, Challenging Behavior, Recess Interventions, School Interventions |
|
A Meta-Analysis of Classroom-Based Interventions to Address Challenging Behaviors in Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
GREGORY LYONS (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Wendy A. Machalicek (University of Oregon), Jenna LeQuia (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Sunyoung Kim (University of Wisconsin-Madison) |
Abstract: Within school settings, challenging behavior can negatively affect students with autism and their teachers, resulting in impeded learning and socialization, and teacher burnout. To assess the effects of interventions aimed at addressing these challenging behaviors, this paper employed a systematic meta-analysis of the research intervention literature. Reviewed studies employed single-case designs to assess challenging behavior interventions for students with autism, ages 3-21, in classroom settings. Systematic searches were conducted, resulting in the inclusion of 91 studies. Studies were coded in terms of design, participant, assessment, intervention, and contextual variables. Effectiveness of interventions was determined by, a) calculating non-overlap of all-pairs (NAP), b) rating the final-phase treatment levels, and c) calculating percent clinical change. Preliminary results indicate positive effects across intervention categories, with function-based, replacement skill packages resulting in the largest mean effect size. Additionally, research conducted in general education settings employs antecedent manipulations more frequently than research conducted in special education settings. Implications toward understanding the translation of evidence-based practices to natural settings are discussed. |
|
Effects of Activity Schedules on Challenging Behavior Exhibited in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review |
JENNA LEQUIA (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Wendy A. Machalicek (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Mandy J. Rispoli (Texas A&M University) |
Abstract: School recess is an opportunity to include students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) with their typically developing peers and is a setting in which instruction can occur. However, the educational opportunities for children with ASD within recess are often overlooked and recess time is being reduced or eliminated in the United States. This review involved a systematic search and analysis of 15 studies that utilized recess to implement academic, social, or behavioral interventions for students with ASD. Each identified study that met pre-determined inclusion criteria was analyzed and summarized in terms of: (a) participant characteristics, (b) intervention procedures, (c) dependent variables, and (d) intervention outcomes. This review has three main aims: a) to evaluate and synthesize the evidence-base, b) to inform and guide teachers interested in utilizing recess time for educational purposes, and c) to stimulate and guide future research in this important area. Results demonstrate that recess time can indeed be used to teach target behaviors to students with ASD. |
|
Use of School Recess Time in the Education and Treatment of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review |
SARAH KURIAKOSE (University of California, Santa Barbara), Russell Lang (Texas State University-San Marcos), Gregory Lyons (University of Wisconsin-Madison), E. Amanda Boutot (Texas State University) |
Abstract: School recess is an opportunity to include students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) with their typically developing peers and is a setting in which instruction can occur. However, the educational opportunities for children with ASD within recess are often overlooked and recess time is being reduced or eliminated in the United States. This review involved a systematic search and analysis of 15 studies that utilized recess to implement academic, social, or behavioral interventions for students with ASD. Each identified study that met pre-determined inclusion criteria was analyzed and summarized in terms of: (a) participant characteristics, (b) intervention procedures, (c) dependent variables, and (d) intervention outcomes. This review has three main aims: a) to evaluate and synthesize the evidence-base, b) to inform and guide teachers interested in utilizing recess time for educational purposes, and c) to stimulate and guide future research in this important area. Results demonstrate that recess time can indeed be used to teach target behaviors to students with ASD. |
|
|
|
|
Teaching Adolescents and Adults Multi-Component Skills Using Video Modeling and Video Prompting |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
LL04 (TCC) |
Area: DDA/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Helen I. Cannella-Malone (The Ohio State University) |
CE Instructor: Helen I. Cannella-Malone, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The use of video modeling and video prompting has been demonstrated to be an effective method for teaching new skills to people with autism and other developmental disabilities. This symposium will present four applied studies that used video in innovative ways to teach adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities multi-step tasks. The studies used continuous video modeling—in which the video looped while the participant completed task—or taught students to self-prompt in which they prompted themselves through the steps of the tasks. All four studies were successful in using video to teach new skills, and the results from these studies provide new insights into how best to use video modeling and video prompting. The practical utility of using video in instruction will be discussed along with implications for practice and recommendations for future research. |
Keyword(s): developmental disabilities, video modeling, Video prompting |
|
Video Self-Prompting and Mobile Technology to Increase Daily Living and Vocational Independence for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
Sally Bereznak (The University of Georgia), KEVIN AYRES (University of Georgia), Linda Mechling (University of North Carolina, Wilmington), Jennifer Alexander (The University of Georgia) |
Abstract: This study examines a video self-prompting strategy to teach 3 high school students daily living and vocational skills. Three students with autism were recruited for the study. Two of the students were able to learn to self-prompt with video on an iPhone while a third student required teacher assistance. Students then used these prompting procedures to learn new skills. The effects of the prompting systems were evaluated in the context of a multiple probe across behaviors, replicated across students. Results indicate that participants increased performance across all behaviors by increasing the percent of steps performed independently. This study introduces a novel approach to using instructional video, in that 2 of the students were able to learn how to self-prompt with the iPhone and ultimately teach themselves the target skills. |
|
The Effects of Video Self-Prompting on the Acquisition of Vocational Skills for Deaf Students With Moderate Intellectual Disabilities |
HELEN IRENE MALONE (The Ohio State University), Joe Wheaton (The Ohio State University), Pei-Fang Wu (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: This study taught three adolescents with developmental disabilities who were also deaf to use an iPod Touch application (inPromptu) to teach themselves new skills. Using multiple probe across participants designs, the students were first taught to clean lockers using traditional video prompting. Using that skill, they were then taught to use the iPod Touch app independently (i.e., self-prompt). Finally, their ability to self-prompt was tested with a new skill (making booklets). All three students learned to clean lockers with video prompting, as well as learn to make booklets using the iPod Touch independently. This study provides a clear methodology for teaching students to self-prompt. |
|
The Effects of Video Prompting and Activity Schedules on The Acquisition of Independent Living Skills of Students Who Are Deaf and Have Developmental Disabilities |
PEI-FANG WU (The Ohio State University), Helen I. Cannella-Malone (The Ohio State University), Joe Wheaton (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: The current study investigated whether four Deaf students with developmental disabilities could learn a chain of independent living skills and follow activity schedules using a combination of the two iPod Touch applications (apps): inPromptu and First Then Visual Schedule. Using a multiple probe across participants design, the study examined the effects of the intervention on skill acquisition and generalization to untrained independent living skills and novel sequences of activity schedules after the students mastered the use of the two iPod apps. All participants successfully acquired a variety of independent living skills using video prompting. Three of the four participants were able to follow varied and novel activity schedules after they were trained to follow the fixed order activity schedule. Multiple exemplars were needed for one participant to master varied and novel activity schedules. In addition, all participants successfully followed activity schedules in an untrained setting (e.g., school dorm). This study extended the current literature on video prompting and activity schedules by incorporating both approaches and testing their generalization effects. As such, the study provided new practices that may increase functional independence for Deaf students with developmental disabilities. |
|
Continuous Video Modeling to Prompt Completion of Multicomponent Tasks by Adults With Moderate Intellectual Disabilities |
LINDA MECHLING (University of North Carolina, Wilmington), Kevin Ayres (University of Georgia), Kimberly Purrazzella (University of North Carolina, Wilmington), Kaitlin Purrazzella (University of North Carolina, Wilmington) |
Abstract: This investigation examined the ability of four adults with moderate intellectual disabilities to complete multi-component tasks using continuous video modeling. Continuous video modeling, which is a newly researched application of video modeling, presents video in a looping format which automatically repeats playing of the video while the individual completes a task. Four adult males, ages 29 to 35 years, with a diagnosis of Down syndrome and a moderate intellectual disability, were participants in the study. A multiple probe design across three sets of multi-component tasks (folding multiple sizes of towels; sorting an assortment of recycling materials; preparing a buffet table with multiple serving stations) and replicated with four adults was used to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous video modeling. Overall results suggest that this newly explored method for presenting video models was an effective presentation mode for three of the four participants. |
|
|
|
|
Improving College Instruction: Experimental Evaluations of Three Teaching Procedures |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
613/614 (Convention Center) |
Area: TBA/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Neal Miller (The Ohio State University) |
Discussant: Traci M. Cihon (University of North Texas) |
CE Instructor: Neal Miller, M.Ed. |
Abstract: When teaching college students, professors use a variety of strategies, ranging from traditional lectures to hands-on experiences and demonstrations. Although much has been written about the general need for evidence-based practice in education, relatively little has been published regarding instruction on the college level. In order to determine how to best structure college courses, it may be useful to conduct experimental evaluations of common teaching methods. Three technologies that are often used in college settings, but have not been sufficiently studied are (1) the use of flashcards to teach concepts, (2) the use of vocabulary banks to teach a foreign language, and (3) the use of online study games for quiz preparation. In this symposium, we will present evidence on each of these educational practices, and discuss the implications of these findings for college teaching. Specific recommendations will be made regarding ways to improve the efficiency of each procedure, and how they can be combined with traditional teaching methods. |
Keyword(s): college teaching, flashcards, online games, vocabulary |
|
The Effects of a Study Activity on the Academic Performance of College Students |
JESSICA GAMBA (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology), Tracy L. Kettering (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology), Lorraine M. Bologna (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology), Susan K. Malmquist (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology) |
Abstract: This study assessed the effects of a behaviorally based study game on weekly quiz scores in a graduate level class. An alternating treatment design counterbalanced across two participating sections of the course was utilized in order to control for potential time- or curriculum-based effects. Specifically, the game was available each week to one of the two sections of the participating course. Students were required to use the game when it was available for a total of at least 30 min in the week prior to taking the quiz associated with the unit of study. Average quiz scores were higher for students who had interacted with the game compared to when the game was not available. |
|
Teaching Behavioral Concepts to College Students: A Comparison of Flashcards Containing Examples Versus Definitions |
Neal Miller (The Ohio State University), JAMES NICHOLSON MEINDL (University of Memphis), Jonathan W. Ivy (Mercyhurst College), Joshua Garner (The Ohio State University), Nancy A. Neef (The Ohio State University) |
Abstract: Because college students often use flashcards as a tool for learning concepts, it may be useful to determine the most effective format. Fox and Ghezzi (2003) evaluated the effects of practicing with definitions versus examples. Although training with examples led to superior performance on a subsequent quiz, it was unclear whether examples were superior in general, or if the similarity between the formats of the quiz and flashcards produced this effect. A group of 19 college students enrolled in an introductory course on applied behavior analysis participated in this study. On the first day of classes, students were given a set of flashcards containing 10 key terms from the course. In each set of cards, 5 of the terms had definitions on the back, while the other 5 had examples. After practicing with the cards, students were tested on whether they could name the term when looking at the definition or example. Once they mastered this, the students were given a quiz in which they had to provide examples and definitions for all 10 terms. Students performed better on quiz items that were taught using examples, but were also more accurate on items that matched the format used in the flashcards (i.e. asked for a definition of a term they practiced with a definition). |
|
A Comparison of Vocabulary Banks and Scripts on Native English Speaking Undergraduate Students' Acquisition of Italian Verbal Repertoires |
BRITTANY L. DEAN (University of North Texas), Traci M. Cihon (University of North Texas), Christopher J. Stephens (St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley) |
Abstract: There is a paucity of behavior analytic research on second language acquisition, yet now more than ever there is a need for societies to become fluent in at least one additional language. The current study seeks to find efficient methods to teaching a foreign language by applying behavior analytic principles in a college classroom setting. The researchers compared two study methods and the effects on Italian language acquisition, retention, generalization, and conversational fluency. The first study method was vocabulary banks, which are frequently used but there is no empirical support for their utility. The second method was scripted conversations, based on observations from a cultural immersion program in which Italian and American students worked together to produce a play in both languages. Cihon and Stephens (2011) observed students using lines from the play to initiate conversations and overcome the language barrier. Preliminary results indicate that participants engaged in more Italian exchanges in vocabulary bank testing sessions than in script testing sessions; however participants emitted more Italian words during script testing sessions. This indicates that exchanges were more complex after studying scripts than after studying vocabulary banks. However, these patterns were different when we divided participants based on prior exposure to Italian language. Students who had no prior exposure to Italian engaged in more exchanges in script testing sessions and emitted more words during script testing sessions. Participants who had at least two classes in Italian prior to the study engaged in more exchanges and emitted more words during vocabulary bank testing sessions. This finding suggests further research is needed to determine efficient teaching methods and the role of prior experience in using these study methods. |
|
|
|
|
Using Animals to Modify Human Behaviour: Applied Behavior Analysis and Animal Facilitated Therapy |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
6E (Convention Center) |
Area: AAB/CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: E. Anne McBride, Ph.D. |
Chair: Lindsay Parenti (Pet Behavior Change, LLC) |
Presenting Authors: : E. ANNE MCBRIDE (University of Southampton) |
Abstract: The science of behaviour analysis is applied in a wide range of contexts by those working with individuals, families or at the organisational level. A related area is Clinical Animal Behaviour, where the focus is the animal's behaviour within a human context, and where both animal and human behaviour change is addressed. This latter field is the author's background. Recently, there has been a growing trend to use animals as intervention tools in human therapeutic programmes. The benefits of horse riding for those with physical disabilities, for example, are accepted, and considered to have clear scientific foundations. This is not the case where animals are used in psychological intervention programmes. Indeed, many consider such animal facilitated therapy to have little or no scientific validity and simply to provide a "feel-good" factor. This paper will consider; a. how behaviour analysis may explain much of what happens in animal facilitated therapy; b. how animals can be a specific tool in the behaviour analyst's therapeutic armoury; c. the potential for further roles of animals in human-health provision; and d. some issues to consider when planning therapeutic programmes involving animals. The talk will draw on examples of practice and critical consideration of evidence of outcome. |
|
E. ANNE MCBRIDE (University of Southampton) |
Dr. Anne McBride has a degree in Psychology and a Doctorate in animal behaviour. Anne has been a practising clinical animal behaviourist since 1987 and is a senior lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of Southampton. She is the Director of the Applied Animal Behaviour unit and is Director for the Masters in Human-Animal Interactions. She is a member of the Association of Pet Behaviour Counsellors and of the UK government advisory body The Companion Animal Welfare Council; she initiated the postgraduate Diploma / MSc in Companion Animal Behaviour Counselling which ran at the University of Southampton from 1994 � 2012, and lectured on applied behaviour analysis on that course, amongst other subjects. Her research interests cover both animal behaviour and the relationships people have with animals and how these are formed, both normal and abnormal relationships. She is particularly interested in how human interactions with animals affect animal and human welfare; be that how we talk to them, train them, feed them or allow them to behave. She has published on various aspects of human-animal interactions, and has written and lectured on this area both nationally and internationally. Her loves are cooking, walking, bonfires, friends and family and applying behaviour analysis to her dog and husband! |
Keyword(s): animal-assisted therapy |
|
|
|
|
Numerical Competence in the Grey Parrot |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
303/304 (TCC) |
Area: VBC; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Caio F. Miguel, Ph.D. |
Chair: Caio F. Miguel (California State University, Sacramento) |
IRENE PEPPERBERG (Harvard University) |
Dr. Pepperberg received her SB from MIT and M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard. She is currently a Research Associate and Lecturer in the Department of Psychology at Harvard and an Adjunct Associate Professor at Brandeis University's Psychology Department. She has been a visiting associate professor at MIT's Media Lab, later accepting a research scientist position there, leaving a tenured professorship at the University of Arizona. She has been a Fellow at the Radcliffe Institute of Advanced Study, won a John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship, was an alternate for the Cattell Award for Psychology, won the 2000 Selby Fellowship (Australian Academy of Sciences), won the 2005 Frank Beach Award for best paper in comparative psychology, was nominated for the 2000 Weizmann, L'Oreal, and Grawemeyer Awards, the 2001 Quest Award (Animal Behavior Society) and was renominated for the 2001 L'Oreal Award. She has also received fellowships from the Harry Frank Guggenheim and Whitehall Foundations, and numerous grants from NSF. Her book, The Alex Studies, describing over 20 years of peer-reviewed experiments on Grey parrots, received favorable mention from publications as diverse as the New York Times and Science. Her memoir, Alex & Me, is a New York Times bestseller. She has presented her findings nationally and internationally at universities and scientific congresses, often as a keynote or plenary speaker, and has published numerous journal articles, reviews, and book chapters. She is a fellow of the Animal Behavior Society, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychological Society, the American Ornithologists' Union, AAAS, the Eastern Psychological Association, and presently serves as consulting editor for three journals and as associate editor for The Journal of Comparative Psychology. |
Abstract: A Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) had previously been taught to use English count words ("one" through "sih" [six]) to label sets of one to six individual items (Pepperberg, 1994). He had also been taught to use the same count words to label the Arabic numerals 1 through 6. Without training, he inferred the relationship between the Arabic numerals and the sets of objects (Pepperberg, 2006b). In the present study, he was then trained to label vocally the Arabic numerals 7 and 8 ("sih-none," "eight," respectively) and to order these Arabic numerals with respect to the numeral 6. He subsequently inferred the ordinality of 7 and 8 with respect to the smaller numerals and he inferred use of the appropriate label for the cardinal values of seven and eight items. These data suggest that he constructed the cardinal meanings of "seven" ("sih-none") and "eight" from his knowledge of the cardinal meanings of one through six, together with the place of "seven" ("sih-none") and "eight" in the ordered count list. |
Keyword(s): animal cognition, animal language, Inferences, Numerical competence |
|
|
|
|
Establishing Conditioned Reinforcers and Inducing Verbal Behavior Developmental Cusps in Young Children With or at-Risk for Developmental Disabilities |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:00 PM–4:20 PM |
4C-1 (Convention Center) |
Area: DEV/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Jessica Singer-Dudek (Teachers College, Columbia University) |
CE Instructor: Jessica Singer-Dudek, Ph.D. |
Abstract: This symposium will present research related to the establishment of new conditioned reinforcers, through both classical and operant conditioning procedures, and will also present research related to how children come to learn new things, such as incidental language or perspective taking, as a function of acquiring new reinforcers. The first paper will outline how new reinforcers are acquired in a comparison of classical and operant conditioning procedures and will present results from a study where books were conditioned as reinforcers, leading to faster acquisition of reading behaviors. The second paper will present a study to condition praise as a reinforcer for a young child with autism, a necessary component of the acquisition of other developmental cusps, such as listener and speaker behaviors. The third paper will discuss how language is learned incidentally, via the joining of the speaker and the listener when Naming is acquired, and will present procedures to induce Naming by exclusion when it is missing. The fourth paper will discuss procedures for inducing level 2 of visual perspective taking and the implications for children who lack social listener reinforcement. |
Keyword(s): conditioned reinforcement, developmental cusps, perspective taking, verbal development |
|
The Effects of Inducing Conditioned Reinforcement for Observing Books on Rate of Acquisition of Novel Textual Responses and a Comparison of Operant and Classical Conditioning With Preschoolers |
R. Douglas Greer (Teachers College, Columbia University), SUSAN BUTTIGIEG (Teachers College, Columbia University), Jennifer Longano (Fred S. Keller School) |
Abstract: We tested the effects of conditioning books on the rate of acquisition of novel textual responses for 4 nursery school students at risk for developmental delays (3) or without developmental delays (1), aged 2 years, in two experiments. Two males and 2 females were selected for participation because they did not have book stimuli as a conditioned reinforcer for observing. The independent variables were the establishment of books as a reinforcer for observing responses and as a preferred activity in a free play area. The dependent variable was the rate of acquisition of novel textual responses. A matched-pairs with pre- and post-intervention probes with a nested multiple probe design was used; the participants were paired based on the number of learn units to criterion for a set of sight words. In Experiment I, Participants A and B acquired conditioned reinforcement for observing books as a function of mastering one set of words. Experiment II differed in that more sets of sight words were taught, and that the participants received the book conditioning intervention. Results indicated that the participants learned a novel set of sight words 2.20 to 7.25 times faster as a function of having books as a conditioned reinforcer. In another experiment we compared the effects of two conditioning procedures, operant conditioning versus classical conditioning, on the conditioning of peg boards as reinforcer. Toddlers, ranging in ages from 2-3 years old, in an early intervention school participated in the study. Participants were matched and paired. One child in each pair was exposed to an operant conditioning procedure, while the other matched pair received stimulus-stimulus pairings via a classical conditioning procedure. Preliminary findings show that for some participants the operant conditioning procedure was more effective for conditioning peg boards as a reinforcer, and for other participants the classical conditioning procedure was more effective. Future research will continue to compare the effects of the two conditioning procedures and also study potential prerequisite repertoires that affect the emergence of conditioned reinforcers for operant or for classical conditioning procedures. |
|
Contingent Pairing to Establish Praise as a Conditioned Reinforcer With Children With Autism |
AMANDA P. HORST (Simmons College), Judah B. Axe (Simmons College) |
Abstract: The limited influence of social stimuli as reinforcement for the behavior of children with autism is well documented. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as attention and praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors (e.g., tacts, intraverbals) maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to systematically replicate recent findings showing the praise can be conditioned as a reinforcer. The participant was 5 years old, diagnosed with autism, and nonverbal. A preliminary functional analysis demonstrated that button-pushing was consistently more frequent in a contingent tickle condition that in contingent praise and no consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and tickles was then administered in 2-min sessions and praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. Results indicate that button-pushing increased in the contingent praise condition following the pairing condition. Interobserver agreement of button-pushing was 99.4% across 50% of sessions in the study. One interpretation of the data suggests that the motivating operation linked to the unconditioned reinforcer must be in effect in the conditioned reinforcement condition. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely at the role of motivating operations in the process. |
|
Naming by Exclusion Training on the Emergence of Untaught Relations |
R. Douglas Greer (Teachers College, Columbia University), LIN DU (Teachers College, Columbia University), Noor Younus Syed (Teachers College, Columbia University) |
Abstract: We conducted a study to see whether children who had the Naming capability (incidental learning of language) also had the capability of Naming by exclusion. First, we tested whether children could respond as both speaker and a listener to an array of objects on a table top except one that was novel. We counterbalanced the order of the stimuli presented within session and across students. If the child was determined to have Naming by responding correctly to the last 10 trials consecutively we then probed the child on the untaught responses after 2 hours on listener responses (10 trials) and speaker responses (10 trials) without any consequences, to see whether he had Naming by exclusion. Criterion was set at 80% accuracy. If the child did not demonstrate Naming by exclusion, we used another set of stimuli with 4 known items and 1 unknown to teach to criterion (100% accuracy) before we probed for listener and speaker responses. Participant A did not have Naming by exclusion during the pre-probe and was taught one instructional session to criterion and he demonstrated mastery in the post-probe in both listener and speaker responses. Participant B had Naming by exclusion, as evidenced by the pre-probe, and she had 70% accuracy in the listener and speaker responses in the post probe. |
|
Inducing Skills of Level 2 of Visual Perspective Taking in Children With Autism |
LORENA GARCIA-ASENJO (Universidad de Oviedo), Luis Antonio Perez-Gonzalez (Universidad de Oviedo), Carlota Belloso-Diaz (Asociacion Aprendemos Asturias) |
Abstract: Level 2 of visual perspective taking (VPT) consists of responding differentially according to the visual perception of oneself and other person, when both people are seeing the same object from different perspectives. We have identified how to induce skills of Level 2 VPT, evaluated with verbal and selection responses in typically developing children. In this procedure we intermixed trials of the Level 2 VPT probe with verbal responses and selection responses of photos and objects. The goal of this study was to replicate the procedure of probes to induce these skills in children with autism. One participants results replicated the data obtained in typically developing children, but the other participant showed that the performance in the probe with selection responses of objects depends on the type of verbal stimuli of the instruction. These results replicated partially those obtained in typically developing children, and added the specificity of the stimuli employed in the case of children with autism to succeed on some probes. |
|
|
|
|
ABA and SLP: Promoting Collaboration |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
301 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mareile A. Koenig, Ph.D. |
Chair: Joanne Gerenser (Eden II Programs) |
MAREILE A. KOENIG (West Chester University) |
RAYMOND G. ROMANCZYK (State University of New York at Binghamton) |
TRACY VAIL (Let's Talk Speech and Language Services, Inc.) |
CORINNE M. MURPHY (West Chester University) |
Abstract: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and professionals in applied behavior analysis (ABA) frequently participate as members of support teams for children with autism. Collaboration between these professionals can enhance the teams work, since each professional brings valuable resources to the table. However, overlapping areas of expertise, different terms used for similar instructional elements, and variations in addressing the same problems may complicate the collaborative process unless each professional understands the others framework. Failure to effectively collaborate often results in professionals working in isolation or even worse, working in opposition. The purpose of this panel is to clarify similarities and differences between the developmental and behavioral models used by SLPs and ABA professionals, respectively. In addition, panel members will highlight strengths that SLP and ABA professionals each bring to an autism support team. Finally, the panel will conclude with recommendations for addressing issues that may be viewed differently by SLP and ABA professionals. |
Keyword(s): SLP ABA |
|
|
|
|
The Importance of Innovative Research in Behavior Analysis |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
606 (Convention Center) |
Area: EAB/TPC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Matthew P. Normand, Ph.D. |
Chair: Allison J. Morley (University of the Pacific) |
KENNETH SILVERMAN (Johns Hopkins University) |
MATTHEW P. NORMAND (University of the Pacific) |
RON VAN HOUTEN (Western Michigan University) |
TIMOTHY R. VOLLMER (University of Florida) |
Abstract: The principles of behavior analysis can be used in a wide variety of settings and with diverse populations. Furthermore, these principles can be used in the assessment and treatment of a multitude of behaviors, many of which are not commonly focused on in traditional research. The majority of behavior-analytic research generally focuses on the assessment and treatment of problem behaviors (e.g., self-injurious behavior, aggression, disruption) in special populations, such as individuals with developmental disabilities. However, some behavior-analytic researchers do address problems (e.g., substance abuse, physical activity, safety-related behaviors, sex offender-related behaviors) that lie outside of the mainstream behavior analysis research agenda. The panelists will discuss their personal accounts of conducting research outside of the behavior analysis "mainstream" and the importance of these lines of research to the field of behavior analysis. Additionally, panelists will discuss the problems faced when conducting such research, and provide advice to those looking to explore novel research areas in the field of behavior analysis. |
|
|
|
|
The Genius in All of Us: Building on Hart and Risley |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
618/619 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/DEV; Domain: Theory |
Chair: Susan M. Schneider (University of the Pacific) |
Discussant: Ronnie Detrich (Wing Institute) |
CE Instructor: Susan M. Schneider, Ph.D. |
Abstract: In their seminal longitudinal study Meaningful Differences (1995), Betty Hart and Todd Risley established that, across a range of demographic variables, infants and toddlers in enriched language environments were far more likely to develop excellent language skills. These important findings have been widely publicized, helping to contribute to what appears to be a trend toward more behavior-analytic methods in mainstream pre-K and K-12 education in the United States. In this symposium, reviews of3 mainstream trade books offer an integration of educational developments, nature-and-nurture advances, and expertise studies (such as Anders Ericsson's), and how they build on Hart and Risley's classic. Schneider covers Shenk's The Genius in All of Us, which makes the case for the extensive malleability of behavior that we behavior analysts have long known to exist. Watkins summarizes Tough's Whatever It Takes, a history of the early years of the Harlem Children's Zone projects, based explicitly on Hart and Risley. And Slocum brings us the adventures of much-honored inner-city fifth-grade teacher Rafe Esquith, author of There Are No Shortcuts, as he (unintentionally) discovers and incorporates behavior analysis methods into his teaching. Detrich will discuss how we can build further on these encouraging developments. |
Keyword(s): early enrichment, K-12 education, nature-nurture, teaching |
|
Shenk's The Genius in All of Us: Nature-Nurture and Behavioral Potential |
SUSAN M. SCHNEIDER (University of the Pacific) |
Abstract: David Shenk's bestseller, The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You've Been Told About Genetics, Talent, and IQ is Wrong, makes the case for the extensive malleability of behavior that behavior analysts have long known to exist. Citing Hart and Risley's Meaningful Differences early on, Shenk integrates research on: enriched early environments, nature-and-nurture relations, the modifiability of "intelligence," problems with interpretations of "heritability" and the twin studies, and Anders Ericsson's research on the development of expertise through practice (as opposed to innate "talent"). Shenk even includes a brief chapter on epigenetics. In short, the book is a primer on (a) why genetic determinism fails, and (b) the inspiring implication for education and parenting: We all have far more potential than we'd dreamed. While Shenk does not include behavior analysis principles explicitly, they are implicit throughout. |
|
Whatever It Takes: The Harlem Children's Zone and Geoffrey Canada's War on Poverty |
CATHY L. WATKINS (California State University, Stanislaus) |
Abstract: Whatever It Takes is the operating principle at the Harlem Children's Zone (HCZ). It is also the title of Paul Tough's book describing HCZ President and CEO Geoffrey Canada's comprehensive and controversial approach to education reform. According to Canada, "There's no reason that all of our children in this country are not able to learn at higher levels." Making that happen is the goal of Harlem Children's Zone, which provides a complex set of educational and social services and supports for children and their families. For example, based in part on the work of Hart and Risley, the HCZ includes programs such as Baby College and Three Year Journey, which teach parents about developing language skills, and Harlem Gems, a preschool program that emphasizes language. Dobbie and Fryer (2009) published an evaluation claiming that the HCZ "is enormously effective at increasing the achievement of the poorest minority children." Whitehurst and Croft (2010) offer an alternate analysis. Paul Tough states, "There aren't yet air tight data to prove that Canada's model works." However in 2010 the U.S. State Department of Education awarded 21 organizations planning grants of up to a half million dollars to create plans to reproduce the HCZ. |
|
Esquith's There Are No Shortcuts: How a Teacher of the Year Tests the Limits |
TIMOTHY A. SLOCUM (Utah State University) |
Abstract: Rafe Esquith, a 5th grade teacher at an inner city elementary school in Los Angeles, is one of the most widely recognized and honored classroom teachers in America. His books, including There Are No Shortcuts and Teach Like Your Hair's on Fire, are best sellers and articulate a distinct approach to improving education. Esquith offers no easy answers; the titles of his books epitomize his main themes—the educational mission must be engaged with unrelenting urgency and total dedication. He extends his teaching day to more than 11 hours and his school year with summer school and multiweek field trips. He constructs his own curriculum in academic subjects as well as social skills and character. Esquith's vision of education overlaps behavioral approaches in their shared focus on academic achievement and social behavior outcomes, increasing academic engaged time, the importance of building skills, and the great power of supportive environments for behavior change. Esquith also departs from behavioral approaches in important ways: For him, the critical variables in education are more in the character, intelligence, and dedication of teachers. |
|
|
|
|
Evidence Based Practice in Educationand Training |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
616/617 (Convention Center) |
Area: EDC/TBA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Mark T. Harvey (Florida Institute of Technology) |
CE Instructor: Mark T. Harvey, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Educational policy in the United States advocates for empirically validated teaching procedures to be utilized in the classroom. As educational systems continue to be levied with added responsibilities and diminishing resources, it becomes imperative to identify Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) that are efficacious and easily implemented in educational systems. Additionally, empirically based teaching is not frequently observed when considering University level instruction. This symposium presents recent research on evidence-based practice in both primary and University level teaching with a focus on functional changes in both teacher and child behavior. Data-based presentations will outline the critical features of EBP in educational settings, summarize methods for effectively training teachers on EBP, identify critical features for implementation of EBP, and evaluate the effects on student behavior. |
Keyword(s): BST, Timeout |
|
Using Behavioral Skills Training to Prepare Parents of Children With Autism to Teach Manding |
Ada C. Harvey (Florida Institute of Technology), Patrick E. McGreevy (Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D., P.A.), TARA LOUGHREY (Florida Institute of Technology), Leny D. Velasquez Velasquez (Munroe Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Natalie L. Homa (Florida Institute of Technology), Anthony T. Fischetti (Florida Institute of Technology), Lina Majdalany (Florida Institute of Technology), Stephanie A. Sinn (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: We examined the effectiveness of a Behavioral Skills Training (BST) package to instruct 3 parents to teach manding skills to young children with autism. Sessions included 5 bi-weekly modules with instructions, video modeling and role plays. Following completion of each training module, we observed parents implementing procedures in family homes or at a university-affiliated autism treatment center. Data were collected on the accuracy of implementing training steps for parents and the frequency of manding responses in children. We provided feedback and modeling of correct procedures following training. A changing-criterion design was used to evaluate the effects of the training. Results showed the training was effective for all parents, and findings were maintained during 1- and 2-month probes. We observed variable increases in manding responses for the children. Findings are discussed in terms of future applications of a BST model for enhancing parent skills to teach verbal behavior. |
|
An Evaluation of Behavioral Skills Training With the Addition of a Fluency Component |
Ashley Breeden (University of South Florida), Timothy M. Weil (University of South Florida), EMILY BRAFF (University of South Florida) |
Abstract: Behavior Skills Training (BST) typically consists of an initial informational component presented to the learners either vocally, through a handout, presentation, or both. Results from the active student responding literature indicates these methods as the least effective means of conveying important information to learners. This study sought to utilize an alternative instructional component, fluency training, and to evaluate if any effects are observed on implementation of the behavior chain of Discrete Trial Training (DTT). Teachers had previous training and experience on implementing DTT prior to this studyhowever, all teachers implemented strategies with low integrity. Teachers were trained to fluent levels on verbally stating the component steps of DTT and were then observed during probe sessions to evaluate percentage of steps implemented correctly. The probes indicate an initial improvement, but decreases over time that are consistent with results on other passive in-service trainings. Teachers then took part in a single session of Modeling, Role-Play, and Feedback. Results suggest that while fluency training had an impact on participants verbal performance on discrete trial information, and affected overt performance during subsequent probes, the effects were small and transient. Performance improved only after training on the components of BST and additional training had been completed in-situ. |
|
Increasing Academic Performance Using Behavioral Momentum |
MARK T. HARVEY (Florida Institute of Technology), Shantel Pugliese (Florida Institute of Technology), Leny D. Velasquez Velasquez (Munroe Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: This project assessed the use of behavioral momentum on the latency and accuracy of math problems. Behavioral momentum involved the sequencing of high probability tasks (e.g., two single digit math problems) before a student was presented with a low probability behavior (e.g., triple digit math problem). Assessment modules (3 to 5 sessions each) were used to assess baseline measures: (1) ten 3+3 digit math problems, and (2) twenty 1+1 digit math problems. Following assessment, students were given a 30 problem math test with 3 + 3 digit math problems embedded with a sequence of 1 + 1 digit math problems. Latency to each keystroke, duration of problem completion, and accuracy of each problem was monitored and analyzed. The use of behavioral momentum resulted in a decrease in latency in the completion of triple-digit addition problems with a concurrent increase in accuracy of triple-digit addition problems. |
|
Optimizing Online Instruction With Time-Out Contingencies |
ERICK M. DUBUQUE (University of Nevada, Reno), Linda J. Parrott Hayes (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: Online learning has become a pervasive mode of instruction within higher education over the last decade. This change in instructional format represents a significant shift from traditional classroom interactions resulting in learning opportunities for students and instructors that are difficult to replicate in traditional classrooms (e.g., individualized instruction, immediate feedback for all students, etc.). In addition to these advantages, online learning also presents instructors with new challenges. One of these challenges is preventing access to competing activities that vie for student attention during an online lesson. To address this issue, we investigated the impact of an interactive time-out condition during online instruction. We hypothesize that instituting an interactive time-out condition should help prevent students from escaping an aversive online lesson by requiring them to spend more time in the instructional context when they respond in ways that indicate they are not attending to the material being presented. In other words, this intervention should help an instructor establish the rule that students will be able to escape from aversive instruction more quickly when they attend to instructional material as opposed to when they do not. |
|
|
|
|
ABAI Practice Board: Practitioner Resources for Identifying Evidence Based Practices in Autism Treatment |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
3:30 PM–4:50 PM |
204 (TCC) |
Area: PRA/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Robert K. Ross, Ed.D. |
Chair: Michael F. Dorsey (Endicott College) |
ROBERT K. ROSS (BEACON Services) |
EILEEN GAMBRILL (University of California, Berkeley) |
MARY JANE WEISS (Endicott College) |
JOHN M. GUERCIO (AWS) |
Abstract: The number of individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has increased dramatically over the past two decades, and the need to provide treatment to these individuals has given rise to wide range of treatment options available to consumers. Unfortunately for consumers, many of the popular ASD treatments lack a solid empirical basis of support. A number of states and organizations have attempted to provide guidance with respect to the evidence base of autism treatments (New York, Maine, NRC, NAC, CDC, etc.). The guidelines developed by these organizations while helpful, are not meant to be practice recommendations for behavior analysts. The ABAI Practice Board is beginning a process designed to evaluate interventions in autism for their consistency with behavior analytic practices as well as their evidence basis. It is hoped that this process will lead to clarity of what constitutes practices that fall within and without the applied and ethical practice of behavior analysis. The panel will outline this proposed process and discuss some of the challenges inherent in this endeavor. The panel will engage in a dialog with the audience to help shape this process. Those interested in participation in the process are highly encouraged to attend. |
|
|
|
|
International Service Delivery in Autism: Increasing Effectiveness |
Saturday, May 26, 2012 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
302 (TCC) |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Patricia I. Wright, Ph.D. |
Chair: Patricia I. Wright (Easter Seals) |
MOLLY OLA PINNEY (Global Autism Project) |
EMILY ALEXANDRA WINEBRENNER (Global Autism Project) |
SUSAN AINSLEIGH (Dar Al Hekma College) |
Abstract: The high prevalence rate of autism and need for service delivery is reported from many developing countries (Grinker 2007; Wong & Hui, 2007). Effective treatment methodologies are primarily published in English and autism professionals are trained predominately in North America. There are many North American professionals traveling to developing countries to promote effective interventions and influence the field of autism service delivery. Application of evidence-based practices within diverse cultures, language/translation barriers and maintenance of skills and behaviors with itinerant models of consultation are just a few of the considerations that professionals must consider when working in cultures outside of their own. The panelists for this presentation have been providing itinerant consultation in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East for several years. The panelists will share lessons learned and protocols for increasing effectiveness when providing itinerant consultation in developing countries. Practical considerations of international work will be described. The audience will be invited to engage in discourse to promote increased access to quality intervention for those living with autism, regardless of geography. |
Keyword(s): autism, international |
|
|