|
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Comparing the Effectiveness of Behavioral & Traditional Treatment Approaches |
Saturday, May 27, 2006 |
2:30 PM–3:50 PM |
Regency V |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Christine Reeve (Mailman Segal Institute) |
CE Instructor: Jeannie A. Golden, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Behavioral and traditional approaches to treating children with autism are very different in terms of philosophies, goals, curriculums, and specific teaching methods. Each of the presenters will provide a brief overview of these differences and discuss a study that they are implementing together in order to compare the effectiveness of the two approaches. The participants in this study are children ages 2-5 years that have a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The children were videotaped in a standard situation with the same teacher and typically developing peer. Once the children had been video taped in the three situations, trained observers used the Autism Behavioral Observation System (ABOS) to measure the percentage of intervals in which specific target behaviors occurred. Inter-observer reliability and validity were measured for the ABOS. As the children were being video taped, their parents were interviewed in order to obtain detailed diagnostic information, as well as to determine which type of treatment approach had been chosen by the parents. Nine months later, parents will be interviewed again and the children will be videotaped in the same standard situations. Comparisons will be made between the children who are matched according to age, gender and initial level of autism to ascertain their progress in various areas of development. The researchers also investigated family characteristics that effected parents selection of a behavioral vs. traditional approaches to treatment of their children with autism. Finally, there are examples of using ABA approaches for children with ASD within the public school regular classes. |
|
The Development of a Tool for Measuring Videotaped Interactions of Children with Autism & a Typically-Developing Peer. |
KIM FLOYD (East Carolina University), Jeannie A. Golden (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: Measures of children with autism do not often include observation of their interaction with peers, although this is one of the more difficult problems exhibited by children with autism. The presenters will describe a tool that has been developed to videotape children with autism in a standard situation with the same teacher and typically developing peer. The children are video taped in the three situations: teacher child interaction, teacher led child and peer interaction, and child and peer free play. |
|
The Autism Behavioral Observation System: Is It A Valid & Reliable Measure Of Autism? |
JEANNIE A. GOLDEN (East Carolina University), Amy Diachenko (East Carolina University), Alicja Lipinski (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: The participants in this study were children ages 2-5 years that have a diagnosis of Autism or PDD-NOS using Gillian Autism Rating Scale (GARS). The study took place at a childcare center in Greenville, North Carolina. The children were videotaped in a standard situation with the same teacher and typically developing peer. Once the children had been video taped in the three situations (teacher child interaction, teacher led child and peer interaction, child and peer free play), trained observers used the Autism Behavioral Observation System to measure the percentage of intervals in which specific target behaviors occurred. As the children were being video taped, their parents filled out the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) to determine the degree of autism of the children. Degree of autism as determined by the GARS and SCQ was compared to the frequency of specific target behaviors to determine the concurrent validity of the Autism Behavioral Observation System as a measure of autism. Inter-observer reliability of the behavioral observation system was also measured and found it to range from 78 to 100%. |
|
The Role of Family Demographics in the Choice of Treatments for Autism: Does Where You Live Make a Difference? |
EMILY COGDELL (East Carolina University), Jeannie A. Golden (East Carolina University) |
Abstract: This study looked at the family demographics of families with children with autism in two states, Florida and North Carolina, to determine which characteristics predicted whether the family chose an ABA program or special education program. The families were contacted through local agencies and asked to fill out a survey based on family characteristics at the time of diagnosis. Demographic information requested included income level, education level of parents, number of children in family, internet access, and race. It was hypothesized that two characteristics which will predict that a family chooses ABA over traditional special education programs in North Carolina are high income and high level of education, whereas in Florida these factors would be irrelevant. |
|
Using Embedded Instruction to Support Students with Autism and Developmental Disabilities in General Education Classrooms. |
JESSE W. JOHNSON (Northern Illinois University) |
Abstract: Embedded instruction is a set of instructional strategies that capitalize on opportunities to teach critical skills to students with moderate and severe disabilities in the context of naturally occurring routines (Brown, Evans, Weed, & Owen, 1987; Ford et al, 1989). This presentation summarizes the results of eight studies focused on examining the utility of embedded instruction in supporting students with Autism Spectrum Disorders and students with moderate and severe disabilities in general education settings. The results of all eight studies showed that 1) embedded instruction can be implemented successfully by general educator and paraprofessionals, and 2) embedded instruction procedures are effective in teaching targeted skills to students with moderate and severe disabilities in general education class rooms. There are important implications of these studies for providing |
|
|